Recount shows PPP-233,336 to Coalition 217,920 – but Lowenfield report gives Coalition lead of 68,383

By Shikema Dey, Kemol King and Mikaila Prince, Jun 14, 2020 News 0  , Source - Kaieteur News Online - https://www.kaieteurnewsonline...ition-lead-of-68383/

Chief Elections Officer (CEO) Keith Lowenfield yesterday in his report to the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM), claimed that 55% of the 2,339 ballot boxes used in the March 2 elections were so affected by instances of irregularities, voter impersonation and unreconciled documents, that the total results for each district could not be ascertained to be derived from a fair and impartial election.

Chief Elections Officer, Keith Lowenfield

If these boxes were extracted from the process, as suggested by Lowenfield, the remaining boxes would account for a total of a little over 183,000 votes with the lion’s share going to APNU+AFC (125,010), the bulk of the remained going to the PPP (56,627) and the remainder to the smaller parties.

The revised tabulation produced by Lowenfield reverses the outcome of the recount, giving the coalition a lead exceeding 68,000 votes, despite the fact that the total numerical results of the recount placed the PPP/C squarely in the lead, 233,336 to the Coalition 217,920.

These details were included in the report Lowenfield was required to submit, on the results of the recount, to the Commission, pursuant to the gazetted order for the National Recount. Yesterday, the 13th, was the stipulated deadline for Lowenfield to submit the report to GECOM, as gazetted in the order for the recount. It states in Paragraph 12 that, “The matrices for the recount of the ten (10) Electoral Districts shall then be tabulated by the Chief Elections Officer (CEO) and shall be submitted in a report, together with a summary of the observation reports for each District, to the Commission on or before the 13th day of June, 2020.”

While the order did not require Lowenfield to pronounce on the validity of any party’s allegations or on the credibility of the elections, he did.

Graph showing the Chief Elections Officer’s revision of the recount results to place the Coalition in the lead

Unsubstantiated Claims
During the 35 day recount, the coalition accumulated thousands of claims of electoral fraud against the PPP/C. Many of these claims failed to stand up to scrutiny and were eventually found out to be false. Lowenfield stated in his report that GECOM found the coalition’s claims to be “of substance”.

Kaieteur News had investigated a list of 172 names sent by the Immigration Department to GECOM, along with a letter claiming that those persons were not in the jurisdiction on election day. Twenty-six of those persons have since come forward refuting the placement of their names on that list, and revealing the information to be inaccurate. When this was raised with Commissioner Vincent Alexander, he said that the information would be treated as accurate until those persons formally wrote to GECOM, providing proof that they were in Guyana on election day. It is unclear whether any of those persons have done so.

The coalition also made claims of dead voters and published one death certificate in the state newspaper of Chitnandani Ramdass, a Region Two woman who died on June 5, 2015, who they alleged to have been ticked off as having voted at the March 2020 polls. An official copy of the Maria’s Hall Nursery School OLE, provided by the PPP/C, showed that the woman’s name was not ticked off as having voted. The APNU+AFC also claimed to have in their possession ‘countless’ death certificates, but to date, the party has not published any.

A summary of Lowenfield’s tabulation
In his report Lowenfield stated that, “anomalies and/or irregularities are breaches or polling procedures outlined in the Representation of the People Act (ROPA), Cap. 1:03, and the official manual for Presiding Officers and other Polling Day Officials (Revised 2019).” The CEO tabulated 168 instances of anomalies across the ten districts, affecting seven percent of all ballot boxes.

In his report Lowenfield stated, “Voter impersonation refers to instances where votes were cast in the names of deceased persons or in names of electors who were not themselves personally present to cast their ballots on 2nd March 2020.”

The CEO tabulated 947 instances of voter impersonation affecting 41% of all ballot boxes. He posited that there were 141 additional ballot boxes which were affected by both instances of irregularities and voter impersonation. This accounted for six percent of all ballot boxes. Lowenfield also stated that GECOM could not reconcile all statutory documents in 27 ballot boxes, all coming from Region Four. This affected one percent of all ballot boxes.

In totality, instances of irregularities, voter impersonation and unreconciled documents affected, according to the CEO, 1,283 or 55% of all ballot boxes.

The national recount showed that the PPP/C won with 233,336 votes over the APNU+AFC’s 217,920 votes. This represents a margin of victory of 15,416 votes. However, Lowefield produced a revision of the results, extracting the ballot boxes affected by irregularities, voter impersonation and unreconciled documents. His revision placed the coalition in the lead with 125,010 votes. That represents a 68,383-vote lead over the PPP/C’s 56,627 votes in Lowenfield’s revised figures.

In doing so, Lowenfield suggested removing 269,619 valid votes, most of which would be taken from the PPP/C. While his revision would take 176,709 votes from the PPP/C, it would only take 92,910 from the coalition.

Breakdown of Lowenfield’s report by region
In Region One, the Official List had 18,592 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 99 boxes showed that 12,111 and 12,060 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

Lowenfield stated that 93 irregularities and/or instances of voter impersonation were recorded, and spread across 33 ballot boxes, affecting 35 percent of all votes cast in the general election. He stated that 20 percent were impacted by irregularities, 13 percent by voter impersonation and two percent by both.

With respect to allegations of voter impersonation, Lowenfield stated that one party, referring to the Coalition, alleged that there were 10 instances of deceased persons who appear to have voted and 19 instances where electors who are alleged to be out of the jurisdiction have voted.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region One do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total would be 2,506 votes for APNU+AFC, 5,298 votes for PPP/C, 93 votes for LJP, 17 votes for PRP, and three voters for URP.

Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results decreased the PPP/C’s margin of victory in Region one, from 4,093 votes to 2,792 votes.

In Region Two, the Official List had 37,979 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 135 boxes showed that 26,621 and 26,491 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

Lowenfield stated that 338 irregularities and/or instances of voter impersonation were recorded, and spread across 86 ballot boxes, affecting 75 percent of all votes cast in the general election. He stated that three percent were impacted by irregularities, 55 percent by voter impersonation and 17 percent by both.

With respect to allegations of voter impersonation, Lowenfield stated that one party, referring to the Coalition, alleged that there were 12 instances of deceased persons who appear to have voted and 19 instances where electors who are alleged to be out of the jurisdiction have voted.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Two do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total would be 35 votes for ANUG, 2,787 votes for APNU+AFC, 48 votes for CG, 62 votes for LJP, 3,737 votes for PPP/C, 22 votes for PRP, three votes for TCI, and 14 votes for URP.

Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results decreased the PPP/C’s margin of victory in Region Two, from 11,445 votes to 950 votes.

In Region Three, the Official List had 100,758 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 355 boxes showed that 72,592 and 72,457votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

Lowenfield stated that 1,041 irregularities and/or instances of voter impersonation were recorded, and spread across 212 ballot boxes, affecting 68 percent of all votes cast in the general election. He stated that four percent were impacted by irregularities, 61 percent by voter impersonation and four percent by both.

With respect to allegations of voter impersonation, Lowenfield stated that one party, referring to the Coalition, alleged that there were six instances of deceased persons who appear to have voted and 971 instances where electors who are alleged to be out of the jurisdiction have voted.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Three do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total would be 85 votes for ANUG, 10,503 votes for APNU+AFC, 80 votes for CG, 12,556 votes for PPP/C, 39 votes for PRP, 18 votes for TCI, 12 votes for TNM, and 13 votes for URP.

Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results decreased the PPP/C’s margin of victory in Region Three, from 24,043 votes to 2,053 votes.

In Region Four, the Official List had 285,617 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 879 boxes showed that 202,077 and 201,575 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

Lowenfield stated that irregularities, instances of voter impersonation and/or unreconciled ballot boxes were recorded, and spread across 466 ballot boxes, affecting 55 percent of all votes cast in the general election. He stated that seven point two percent were impacted by irregularities, 39.2 percent by voter impersonation, three point four percent by both, and five point seven percent by unreconciled ballot boxes.

With respect to allegations of voter impersonation, Lowenfield stated that one party, referring to the Coalition, alleged that there were 16 instances of deceased persons who appear to have voted and 1,690 instances where electors who are alleged to be out of the jurisdiction have voted.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Four do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total would be 632 votes for ANUG, 71,479 for APNU+AFC, 458 votes for CG, 306 votes for LJP, 16,696 votes for PPP/C, 162 votes for PRP, 202 votes for TCI, 66 votes for TNM, and 37 votes for URP.

Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results increases the Coalition’s margin of victory in Region Four, from 36,021 votes to 54,783 votes.

In Region Five, the Official List had 44,663 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 158 boxes showed that 33,120 and 33,004 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

Lowenfield stated that 406 irregularities and/or instances of voter impersonation were recorded, and spread across 69 ballot boxes, affecting 51 percent of all votes cast in the general election. He stated that 5 percent were impacted by irregularities, 42 percent by voter impersonation and three percent by both.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Five do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total will be 16,383 votes cast with a distribution of 51 votes for ANUG, 8,864 votes for APNU+AFC, 39 votes for CG, 7,378 votes for PPP/C, 26 votes for PRP, 12 votes for TCI, six votes for TNM, and 7 votes for URP.

Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results decreased the PPP/C’s margin of victory in Region Five, from 3,824 votes to 1,486.
In Region Six, the Official List had 99,123 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 378 boxes showed that 64,567 and 64,434 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

Lowenfield stated that 1128 irregularities and/or instances of voter impersonation were recorded, and spread across 274 ballot boxes, affecting 77 percent of all votes cast in the general election. He stated that 20 percent were impacted by irregularities, 74 percent by voter impersonation and three percent by both.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Six do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total would be 14,615 votes cast with a distribution of 46 votes for ANUG; 9,437 votes for the APNU+AFC; 47 votes for CG; 5,021 votes for the PPP/C; 33 for PRP; 17 votes for TCI; three for TNM, and 11 votes for URP.

Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results decreased the PPP/C’s margin of victory in Region Six, from 23,047 votes to 4,416.

In Region Seven, the Official List had 14,887 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 82 boxes showed that 9,592 and 9,529 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

Lowenfield stated that 540 irregularities and/or instances of voter impersonation were recorded, and spread across 46 ballot boxes, affecting 71 percent of all votes cast in the general election. He stated that two percent were impacted by irregularities, 29 percent by voter impersonation and three percent by both.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Seven do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total would be 13,805 votes cast with a distribution of 19 votes cast for ANUG; 1,501 votes for the APNU+AFC; 27 votes for CG; 1,094 of votes for the PPP/C; 185of votes for LJP; and three votes for URP.

While the PPP/C did not win District Eight in the recount, the CEO’s revised figures placed it in the lead with a margin of victory of 1,501 votes.

In Region Eight, the Official List had 7,431 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 55 boxes showed that 4,665 and 4,644 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

These, he said spread across 23 ballot boxes, affecting a total of 54% of votes; 24% of votes were affected by anomalies, 11% by voter impersonation and 18% of votes affected by both anomalies and voter impersonation.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Eight do not meet the stands of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total would be 2,158 votes cast “with a distribution of 820 votes for APNU+AFC, 306 votes for LJP, 1,028 votes for PPP/C, and 4 votes for TNM.
While the PPP/C did not win District Eight in the recount, the CEO’s revised figures placed it in the lead with a margin of victory of 208 votes.

In Region Nine, the Official List had 17,771 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 73 boxes showed that 12,261 and 12,228 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

These, he said spread across 52 ballot boxes, affecting a total of 80% of votes; 17% of votes were affected by anomalies, 14% by voter impersonation and 49% of votes affected by both anomalies and voter impersonation.

Additionally, Lowenfield noted another procedural error, two rejected ballots for want of official mark or “unstamped ballots.”

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Nine do not meet the standards of fair and credible elections. However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total will be 2,432 votes cast with a distribution of 677 votes for APNU+AFC, 44 votes for LJP, 1,707 votes for PPP/C, and 4 votes for URP.
Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results decreased the PPP/C’s margin of victory in Region Nine, from 2,183 votes to 1,030 votes.

In Region Ten, the Official List had 33,808 eligible electors. Lowenfield’s report states that the recount of the 125 boxes showed that 22,747 and 22,733 votes were tabulated for the general and regional elections, respectively.

These, he said spread across 22 ballot boxes, affecting a total of 17% of votes; 5% of votes were affected by anomalies, 11% by voter impersonation and 1% of votes affected by both anomalies and voter impersonation.

The CEO’s summation of these instances led him to conclude that the results for Region Nine do not meet the standards of fair and credible elections.

However, he also asserted that, if the ballot boxes affected by irregularities and/or voter impersonation are “extracted” from the process, the total will be 18,874 votes cast with a distribution of 142 votes for ANUG, 16,436 votes for APNU+AFC, 86 votes for CG, 2,112 votes for PPP/C, 30 votes for PRP, 31 votes for TCI, 14 votes for TNM, and 23 votes for URP.

Lowenfield’s revision of the recount results increased the Coalition’s margin of victory in Region Ten, from 16,007 votes to 14,320 votes. The Commission is now expected to deliberate on the report and declare a result by June 16, this Tuesday.

Lowenfield is probably unaware of the focus of his task and ventured deep into what if this, that and the other exist, then probably the result should be this way..

Awaiting the announcement before or on June 16, 2020.

“Lowenfield has no authority to give opinion on credibility of elections” – Jagdeo

Jun 14, 2020 News 0  , Kaieteur News Online - https://www.kaieteurnewsonline...of-elections-jagdeo/

The Opposition People’s Progressive Party (PPP) yesterday said that Chief Elections Officer (CEO) of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) Keith Lowenfield had “no authority” to note his personal opinions in the report on the National Recount.

GECOM’s CEO Keith Lowenfield

Yesterday, around noon, Lowenfield submitted Matrices for the recount of the 10 Electoral Districts and a Summary of the Observation Reports for each district to the GECOM Chair, Ret’d Justice Claudette Singh, along with required attachments, pursuant to the gazetted order made by GECOM, under which the national recount of ballots, were done.

In its statement, the PPP highlighted the relevant portions of the May 29 addendum to the initial gazetted order which said “The matrices for the recount of the ten (10) Electoral Districts shall then be tabulated by the Chief Election Officer and be submitted in a report, together with a summary of the observation reports for each District, to the Commission on or before 13th day of June 2020.”

“It is clear from the above that Lowenfield has no power or authority or any mandate to offer a view, opinion or judgement of any type, either in the Observation Report or the Matrices to be tabulated,” the PPP said, adding that Lowenfield’s singular duty “was to summarize the various Observation Reports and to aggregate the totals in the Matrices.”

Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo

In his summary of each District, Lowenfield stated that “The summation of anomalies and instances of voter impersonation identified in District Nine clearly does not appear to satisfy the criteria of impartiality, fairness, and compliance with provisions of the Constitution and the ROPA Cap 1:03.

Consequently, on the basis of the votes counted and the information furnished from the recount, it cannot be ascertained that the results for District Ten, Upper Demerara/Berbice, meet the standard of fair and credible elections.”

This, according to the Opposition was “clear and blatant violation of the Gazetted order.”

“In a clear and blatant violation of the Order, Lowenfield arrogated unto himself the role of an investigator, judge and executioner and made conclusive findings, in respect of the wild, reckless and baseless allegations made by APNU+AFC and rendered a judgment on them, concluding that they were established, without doing any investigations, hearing no one affected and applying principles only known to himself.”

The party accused Lowenfield of acting “ultra vires”, “, in excess of and without authority, in violation of natural justice, in abrogation of the separation of powers doctrine, unlawfully, unconstitutionally and the pronouncements that he has made are certainly null, void and of no effect.”

The PPP said that “his pronouncements and tabulations bear a striking resemblance to the contentions and calculations of the APNU+AFC have not gone unnoticed. He would make an excellent witness for the APNU+AFC at the trial of an Election Petition.”

Additionally, the party said that Lowenfield has committed “Misfeasance” as the CEO of an election process under his purview.

“In so doing, he has also thrown under the bus thousands of Guyanese, who have worked diligently in the electoral machinery, all because he wants to satisfy the agenda of his political masters at Congress Place,” the PPP noted.

The CEO, the Opposition said, has also rendered the entire Commission complicit in and culpable of spending approximately $8B of taxpayers’ dollars in holding elections that were not credible.

“This is the same Lowenfield, who had prepared a Report on Mingo’s fraudulent declarations and was ready to submit it to the Commission.”

The PPP called on the seven-member Commission of GECOM to “ignore” every aspect of the CEO’s report, “other than the General Elections Recount Totals and the Regional Elections Recount Totals.”

The Official Gazette ( Extraordinary ) of Guyana

Georgetown, Monday 4th May 2020

Pertinent sections relating to the role of the Chief Election Officer ...

11. The signed matrix produced in accordance with the aforementioned in paragraph 9 shall then be transmitted to the Chief Election Officer and copied given to the representatives of political parties that contested the elections, the CARICOM Scrutinizing Team and the Chairman and Commissioners and available to the public.

12. The matrices for the recount of the ten ( 10 ) Electoral Districts shall then be tabulated by the Chief Election Officer and shall be submitted in a report, together with a summary of the observation reports for each District, to the Commission.

Source -- https://www.gecom.org.gy/asset...Recount_5May2020.pdf

Miss Claudette should get a coin and paint one side red (PPP) and the other side green (Coalition). Toss it. 

@Mitwah posted:

Miss Claudette should get a coin and paint one side red (PPP) and the other side green (Coalition). Toss it. 

I had a boss who had a special coin made with head on both sides. He always used it in coin tosses, always won, and we always wondered how he did. One day I went in his desk and found the coin. 

The CEO thinks that the coolieman can't count or stupid. 

These are “Magicians”’not Mathematicians.

@Former Member posted:

De mathematician seh HAP-New win

Jun 14, 2020 Dem Boys Seh, Features / Columnists 0

https://www.kaieteurnewsonline...ian-seh-hap-new-win/

Dem Boys Seh

Dem boys now see Soulja Bai in de true light. Dem boys did feel dat he was being misled and confused over de elections.

Dem did believe dat dem scamps around he did lie to he about de count. But now dem believe dat Soulja Bai know de truth all along.

Dem boys expect he fuh stand up and tek he licks like a man. He should accept, bless and move on… and tek L’il Joe with he. Dem two are like peas in a pod.

Dem boys hearing how de Coalition talking one thing but dem doing another. Dem dun start fuh clear out dem things. One big one at N-CEE- N done pack he bags. Some of dem Ministers busy packing. Some of dem moving with box in car trunk; others moving with Canter trucks.

Dem boys thought was only dem family pictures dem had to move. But it look like some of dem had half of dem house in dem office. Some of dem might need truck and dragline soon.

But dem gat some people who desperate. Dem consult Nigel de Mathematician and he tell dem dat de Coalition win. He seh how de Coalition get 217,920 votes and de PPPC get 233, 336. Nigel de Mathematician seh technically de HAP-New votes mo dan de PPP.

He seh dat 2+1+7+9+2+0= 21;

And 2+3+3+3+3+6 = 20.

And since 21 is greater than 20, it means that de HAP-New win de elections

Talk half and don’t breathe out until de declaration.

That's Guyanese math for you.   

@Ramakant-P posted:

That's Guyanese math for you.   

What kind of Math is it when a country with a population of 740000 has a voters list of 660000? Tell me nah?

@Totaram posted:

What kind of Math is it when a country with a population of 740000 has a voters list of 660000? Tell me nah?

If all 10 yrs old registered in 2012 Census ,attained the age of 18 yrs on March 2 ,2020 ,no one died ,no one migrated , the voters list would be 605,421 .

It would be impossible mathematically to be proven true.

@Former Member posted:

I had a boss who had a special coin made with head on both sides. He always used it in coin tosses, always won, and we always wondered how he did. One day I went in his desk and found the coin. 

What happened when someone else called heads?  Just curious.

@Totaram posted:

What happened when someone else called heads?  Just curious.

Don't bet, cause you kok duk. 

@Totaram posted:

What happened when someone else called heads?  Just curious.

He was the head of the Dept. and everyone was scared of him. He always called heads.