As the APNU/AFC alliance continues to perpetuate its myth of depression in Linden owing to the $5 and $6 per KW consumers there are now being asked to pay, we wonder if such thoughts of poverty etc eluded them during their 2011 election campaign fundraising drives. Didn't those 'impoverished' Lindeners contribute significantly to the US$6M campaign fund target set by the APNU in 2011?
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Former Member
How much of the campaign money which Balwant Persaud claimed Gerhard was unable to give a proper account for was contributed by Lindeners?
Former Member
Originally Posted by albert:
As the APNU/AFC alliance continues to perpetuate its myth of depression in Linden owing to the $5 and $6 per KW consumers there are now being asked to pay, we wonder if such thoughts of poverty etc eluded them during their 2011 election campaign fundraising drives. Didn't those 'impoverished' Lindeners contribute significantly to the US$6M campaign fund target set by the APNU in 2011?
Poor people can support movements against their oppression in any way the can even if it means subsidizing those of their community to speak on their behalf at a national level.
They are not fortunate as the PPP to have funding sources among influence peddlers in RH like the Talking horse. They do not have state assets to promise in quid pro quo deals to mall and hotel builders, local contractors or the Chinese business men among others.
If you care about elections financing make sure there are open disclosure elections funding laws. Of course you will never broach that because the corrupt quid pro quo influence peddling would be off.
You better lay off your trolling for muck because you are covered in it. The PPP is a corrupt regime and knee deep in it so it is with real danger to themselves they would try to tarnish the reputations of others. They will just be making foot soldiers with determination to run them into the ground.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by albert:
As the APNU/AFC alliance continues to perpetuate its myth of depression in Linden owing to the $5 and $6 per KW consumers there are now being asked to pay, we wonder if such thoughts of poverty etc eluded them during their 2011 election campaign fundraising drives. Didn't those 'impoverished' Lindeners contribute significantly to the US$6M campaign fund target set by the APNU in 2011?
Poor people can support movements against their oppression in any way the can even if it means subsidizing those of their community to speak on their behalf at a national level.
They are not fortunate as the PPP to have funding sources among influence peddlers in RH like the Talking horse. They do not have state assets to promise in quid pro quo deals to mall and hotel builders, local contractors or the Chinese business men among others.
If you care about elections financing make sure there are open disclosure elections funding laws. Of course you will never broach that because the corrupt quid pro quo influence peddling would be off.
You better lay off your trolling for muck because you are covered in it. The PPP is a corrupt regime and knee deep in it so it is with real danger to themselves they would try to tarnish the reputations of others. They will just be making foot soldiers with determination to run them into the ground.
So you typed all that just to say what exactly? 
Former Member
Originally Posted by albert:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by albert:
As the APNU/AFC alliance continues to perpetuate its myth of depression in Linden owing to the $5 and $6 per KW consumers there are now being asked to pay, we wonder if such thoughts of poverty etc eluded them during their 2011 election campaign fundraising drives. Didn't those 'impoverished' Lindeners contribute significantly to the US$6M campaign fund target set by the APNU in 2011?
Poor people can support movements against their oppression in any way the can even if it means subsidizing those of their community to speak on their behalf at a national level.
They are not fortunate as the PPP to have funding sources among influence peddlers in RH like the Talking horse. They do not have state assets to promise in quid pro quo deals to mall and hotel builders, local contractors or the Chinese business men among others.
If you care about elections financing make sure there are open disclosure elections funding laws. Of course you will never broach that because the corrupt quid pro quo influence peddling would be off.
You better lay off your trolling for muck because you are covered in it. The PPP is a corrupt regime and knee deep in it so it is with real danger to themselves they would try to tarnish the reputations of others. They will just be making foot soldiers with determination to run them into the ground.
So you typed all that just to say what exactly?
You are a bilge dispenser and cannot seek the higher ground when the PPP clearly has a quid pro quo with its elections funders and the largess extended to them for their " donations". Further, if elections financing is troublesome to you folks and you think your need to bring integrity into the system you had 20 years to say that.
And I write 10 words to your 100 here daily and all in response to your muck raking.
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
61 online (0 members
/
61 guests)