Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
Digicel "appalled" that parliament pushes back telecoms law
Written by Demerara Waves Thursday, 22 September 2011 21:40


Digicel Guyana's CEO, Gregory Dean

Digicel Guyana Thursday said it was appalled at yet another aborted attempt at liberalisation in Guyana. This statement is made in light of failure of Parliament on Thursday to pass the necessary legislation which would have brought an end to more than twenty years of a monopoly on international calls in Guyana. Digicel noted that despite months of consultations and commitments, “the government pulled the legislation at the 11th hour.”

According to the telecommunications provider, “Parliament’s decision to allow the current monopoly to continue crushes Guyana’s hope for lower international calling rates within the near future.” “It also makes one wonder when the needs of the Guyanese public will take priority over the needs of ATN (Atlantic Tele Network) GT&T’s (Guyana Telephone and Telegraph's) parent company. Digicel is requesting that details of the late submission, the reason for the withdrawal of the promised legislation from Parliament today be made available to all stakeholders,” the company said in a statement.

Gregory Dean, CEO of Digicel Guyana was quoted in a company statement as commenting: “It saddens us to know the people of Guyana will continue to have a lack of choice and sky high prices on international calls as a result of the current international monopoly. This was Guyana’s opportunity to be propelled into a new era of modern, liberalised telecommunications sector where consumers are the real winners. Once again, all of the talk has come to nothing.”

After four years of operating in a monopoly environment, Digicel Guyana said it was looking forward to finally being able to compete without its hands tied behind its back. Digicel took credit for being able to transform the landscape of domestic telecommunications in Guyana and has expressed commitment to doing the same on the international level. Since Digicel’s entry into the market in 2007, the company said it has been instrumental in reducing local call rates by more than fifty percent. The barrier to entry resulting from high activation fees of $4,500 was removed and the cost of handsets was reduced significantly even though the quality has improved. The decision today will further impact Digicel’s ability to invest in accordance with its plans in Guyana.

“It has now been twenty years, nine months and four days since Guyana has been tied to the existing monopoly with no end in sight. This latest in the long line of failed attempts to end GT&T’s monopoly has come as a grave disappointment to Digicel,” Dean concluded.

Source

Replies sorted oldest to newest

UPDATED: Telecoms bill passage deferred until after election, Digicel appalled
Written by Kwesi Isles
Thursday, 22 September 2011 15:58

The government has deferred the passage of new telecommunications legislation in the National Assembly to the 10th Parliament which will be formed after the 2011 regional and general elections which are constitutionally due by December 28. The bill had been widely expected to be passed at Thursday’s sitting, the last of the 9th Parliament, but government MP Clement Rohee in the absence of Prime Minister Samuel Hinds who has responsibility for the sector, asked for the deferment.

The Telecommunications Bill and the Public Utilities Commission (Amendment) Bill had been sent to Special Select Committees and the reports from the bodies were to be adopted and the bills read for a third time and passed. Asked about the deferment afterward Acting Chief Whip for the government side Gail Teixeira said it was as a result of noteworthy late submissions. “At the very last moment significant comments were made in relation to the bill, there are two bills, the telecoms and the PUC, and they were significant enough to require further time for consideration,” Teixeira stated briefly.

She declined to say from whom the contributions were received while noting that they did not originate from the government who had brought the bill to the House. When contacted GT&T CEO Yog Mahadeo said he had no comment at this time on the deferment but did indicate that the late submission did not come from his company since they had made their submissions during the time allocated for that earlier this year.

Meanwhile, GT&T's competitor, Digicel, in a release following Thursday's sitting stated that it was "appalled at yet another aborted attempt at liberalisation." According to the company "parliament’s decision to allow the current monopoly to continue crushes Guyana’s hope for lower international calling rates within the near future. It also makes one wonder when the needs of the Guyanese public will take priority over the needs of ATN, GT&T’s parent company." Digicel also called for the details of the late submission to be made available to all stakeholders. “It saddens us to know the people of Guyana will continue to have a lack of choice and sky high prices on international calls as a result of the current international monopoly. This was Guyana’s opportunity to be propelled into a new era of modern, liberalised telecommunications sector where consumers are the real winners. Once again, all of the talk has come to nothing,” Digicel' CEO Gregory Dean is reported as saying. “It has now been twenty years, nine months and four days since Guyana has been tied to the existing monopoly with no end in sight. This latest in the long line of failed attempts to end GT&T’s monopoly has come as a grave disappointment to Digicel,” Dean concluded.

Teixeira told reporters Thursday that she was sure the legislation would be listed as an “important” item for the 10th Parliament since it had a bearing on many of the government's programmes. All international traffic is currently routed through GT&T under the company’s 20-year exclusive licence for international services which is up for renewal but the government had long signalled that there were going to be changes in the telecoms sector to end that scenario. The telecoms bill paves the way for the creation of a Telecommunications Agency into which the National Frequency Management Unit will be incorporated. The Agency will function under the supervision of the minister as the technical regulator of the telecoms sector.

Under this bill and with several amendments to the Public Utilities Commission Act, the Commission will be the economic regulator in a newly liberalised sector with pricing being determined by the market instead of the body as currently obtains. The bill also addresses the issue of market dominance which the Commission will have the power to rule on while taking into considerations matters such as technology and market trends, market share and pricing.

Source
FM
Gov’t shelves laws for open telecoms sector - Digicel urges full disclosure
By STABROEK STAFF | LOCAL | FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2011

The government yesterday failed to deliver on its promise to liberalise the telecommunications sector during the life of the Ninth Parliament, with the deferral of two bills it said was critical to the process. The decision against proceeding with the Telecom-munications Bill 2011 and the Public Utilities Commission (Amendment) Bill 2011, which had been expected to be passed yesterday after they emerged from select committee reviews, prompted a call by telecommunications provider Digicel for a full disclosure of the reasons.

PPP/C Chief Whip Gail Teixeira, when contacted, told Stabroek News that “at the last moment some significant comments were made,” which led to the government deciding to allow more time for consideration. She declined to disclose the source of the “comments” or their nature. She, however, said they were significant enough to warrant more discussions. As a result, she added, the bills would have to roll over to the 10th Parliament.


Gail Teixeira

Teixeira said that despite its failure to pass the bills relating to the telecommunications sector, the government was able to pass significant pieces of legislation, including the Access to Information law, in addition to allowing other select committees to complete their business. “We were able to complete 90 percent of our work,” she noted. With the deferral of the final readings of the bills and the dissolution of the Parliament yesterday, the legislation will have to be re-tabled for consideration in the next Parliament, which could be established by the end of December.


Gregory Dean

Digicel yesterday called on the government to disclose the reasons for the withdrawal of the promised legislation to all stakeholders, while saying it was “appalled” at the latest aborted at liberalising the telecoms sector. “It saddens us to know the people of Guyana will continue to have a lack of choice and sky high prices on international calls as a result of the current international monopoly,” Digicel Chief Executive Officer Gregory Dean said in a statement. “This was Guyana’s opportunity to be propelled into a new era of modern, liberalised telecommunications sector where consumers are the real winners. Once again, all of the talk has come to nothing,” Dean lamented.


Yog Mahadeo

Digicel said that the decision to allow GT&T’s current monopoly to continue “crushes Guyana’s hope for lower international calling rates within the near future.” “It has now been twenty years, nine months and four days since Guyana has been tied to the existing monopoly with no end in sight. This latest in the long line of failed attempts to end GT&T’s monopoly has come as a grave disappointment to Digicel,” Dean stated. Prime Minister Samuel Hinds had previously said that when the bills were passed and implemented, they would lead to GT&T’s monopoly on international calls being immediately broken. “We believe that as both GT&T and Digicel have thrived with an open competitive mobile cellular system, all the participants in an open international connectivity system will also be able to thrive,” Hinds said. GT&T and its supporters, Hinds also said, feel that they should not be looking to open the international services from the commencement date. He, however, opined that the failure to open the international connection was probably one of the bigger constraints on the telecommunications sector and on economic flow and activity.

When contacted last evening, Chief Executive Officer of GT&T Yog Mahadeo declined to comment, saying that he would have to find out why the government decided not to pass the two bills. Mahadeo, however, has been critical of the government’s approach in introducing the legislation, saying that the deliberations with the stakeholders in the telecommunications sector had been unsatisfactory and incomplete. He told Stabroek News last month that while GT&T had made it clear all along that it was ready to play its part in a liberalised telecommunications environment, it had been anticipating fair and amicable negotiations towards the eventuality of an end to its monopoly. However, he said that two significant proposals for the development of the telecommunications sector were given short shrift by the administration.

Mahadeo explained that in November 2007, GT&T had presented a plan to the government that would have allowed for the Guyana-Suriname submarine cable, launched last year, to go through Brazil within two years of its commissioning here. The plan, which, according to Mahadeo, was never acknowledged by government, was presented prior to the administration’s announcement that it was undertaking a separate project to develop a cable link with Brazil. According to Mahadeo the government also gave the cold shoulder to a 2010 GT&T plan for the creation of a country-wide broadband wireless service. In December last year the government announced its own plan for a countrywide WIMAX service. Mahadeo said he was unaware of the reason why GT&T’s offers were ignored.

President Bharrat Jagdeo has publicly expressed impatience with the pace of the GT&T’s telecommunications infrastructure growth, while advocating a liberalised sector. However, Mahadeo pointed out that by failing to respond to GT&T’s request for frequency allocation to drive its broadband build-out last year, the government itself had to take responsibility for the pace at which it is proceeding. “The fact that the e-magine build-out across the country is where it is at this time has to do with the company not being given the frequency allocation which it requested,” Mahadeo added.

Source
FM
I am very suspicious of Mahadeo and his intentions.He is mainly talking about internet access, which is 99% entertainment. It ain't going to provide work for the Guyanese internet users.
Mr.T

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×