Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
Home > TOP STORY > Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers
Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers

Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers

 

RESIDENT members of the diplomatic corps in Guyana, as well as in other Caribbean Community (CARICOM) member states, must adhere to diplomatic proprieties.This was the consensus of the CARICOM’s Community Council of Ministers, which held its 35th meeting at the CARICOM Secretariat, Georgetown, Guyana on Friday.
The Council also stressed the need for members of the diplomatic corps to ensure that there is non- interference in the domestic affairs of member states.

Andrew Ayre

Andrew Ayre

These sentiments follow several tense incidents between with members of Guyana’s own diplomatic corps and the current administration.

FEATS OF FOLLY

The most recent such occurrence saw British High Commissioner, Mr. Andrew Ayre, commenting on Guyana’s political status quo at a news conference where he made statements that drew the ire of the Government.
Ayre’s comments were largely premised on the November 10 prorogation of Parliament and the fact that it has continued to date.
The British High Commissioner is of the opinion that Guyana is in “clear breach” of Guyana’s Constitution and the Commonwealth Charter – the latter violation being grounds for possible sanctions against Guyana.
Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr. Roger Luncheon was the most recent critic of Ayre.
During a post-Cabinet media briefing on Thursday, he said there seems to be something about Western foreign envoys who are about to depart this country that encourages them to comment on Government’s affairs or as he described it as “feats of folly.”
Referring to the soon to depart UK High Commissioner, the Cabinet Secretary noted that the official who has served for three years, took the opportunity to be “unusually remembered” by government, further describing him as “terribly dishonourable” for attempting to depict President Ramotar’s actions as a constitutional crime.
He added that the High Commissioner also attempted to portray the prorogation action as one worthy of Commonwealth sanctions, and one that could result in the withdrawal of developmental aid.
It was further noted by Dr Luncheon that the UK High Commissioner, “sinisterly and conspiratorially” revealed the European Union’s and the UK’s handiwork in the recent EU dishonouring of its agreement with the Guyana Government on budgetary support.
“His attempts to damage Guyana’s credibility and its economic prospects are considered by cabinet to be unpardonable,” the HPS stressed.
It was pointed out by the Cabinet Secretary, that since such concerns are usually shared bi-laterally, the High Commissioner’s actions needed to be condemned as they are, “unacceptable in the realm of international diplomacy as any concerns of the UK Government can and ought to be continued to be shared conventionally.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

CARICOM made their decision based on ONE PPP minister presentation.

Are other presentations not important to CARICOM, to make an unbiased decision ? 

Since when is the PPP telling the truth ?

Tola
Originally Posted by yuji22:
“His attempts to damage Guyana’s credibility and its economic prospects are considered by cabinet to be unpardonable,” the HPS stressed.

It was pointed out by the Cabinet Secretary, that since such concerns are usually shared bi-laterally, the High Commissioner’s actions needed to be condemned as they are, “unacceptable in the realm of international diplomacy as any concerns of the UK Government can and ought to be continued to be shared conventionally.”
 
Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers, January 17, 2015
 

His reported statements and actions are unacceptable as a Diplomatic representative of his country.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
“His attempts to damage Guyana’s credibility and its economic prospects are considered by cabinet to be unpardonable,” the HPS stressed.

It was pointed out by the Cabinet Secretary, that since such concerns are usually shared bi-laterally, the High Commissioner’s actions needed to be condemned as they are, “unacceptable in the realm of international diplomacy as any concerns of the UK Government can and ought to be continued to be shared conventionally.”
 
Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers, January 17, 2015
 

His reported statements and actions are unacceptable as a Diplomatic representative of his country.

 

Cricom puts the outgoing ambassador in his place. 

FM
Originally Posted by Tola:

CARICOM made their decision based on ONE PPP minister presentation.

Are other presentations not important to CARICOM, to make an unbiased decision ? 

Since when is the PPP telling the truth ?

Just a bunch of mendicants who will soon jump on the plane to beg the UK and the USA for cash.  Do you think that they don't already have a long list of requests from Joe Biden when he meets them in a few weeks?

 

If you beg people for money then you ought not get angry when they jump in your business.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Home > TOP STORY > Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers
Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers

Diplomats must adhere to principle of non-interference – CARICOM’s Council of Ministers

 

RESIDENT members of the diplomatic corps in Guyana, as well as in other Caribbean Community (CARICOM) member states, must adhere to diplomatic proprieties.This was the consensus of the CARICOM’s Community Council of Ministers, which held its 35th meeting at the CARICOM Secretariat, Georgetown, Guyana on Friday.
The Council also stressed the need for members of the diplomatic corps to ensure that there is non- interference in the domestic affairs of member states.

Andrew Ayre

Andrew Ayre

These sentiments follow several tense incidents between with members of Guyana’s own diplomatic corps and the current administration.

FEATS OF FOLLY

The most recent such occurrence saw British High Commissioner, Mr. Andrew Ayre, commenting on Guyana’s political status quo at a news conference where he made statements that drew the ire of the Government.
Ayre’s comments were largely premised on the November 10 prorogation of Parliament and the fact that it has continued to date.
The British High Commissioner is of the opinion that Guyana is in “clear breach” of Guyana’s Constitution and the Commonwealth Charter – the latter violation being grounds for possible sanctions against Guyana.
Head of the Presidential Secretariat, Dr. Roger Luncheon was the most recent critic of Ayre.
During a post-Cabinet media briefing on Thursday, he said there seems to be something about Western foreign envoys who are about to depart this country that encourages them to comment on Government’s affairs or as he described it as “feats of folly.”
Referring to the soon to depart UK High Commissioner, the Cabinet Secretary noted that the official who has served for three years, took the opportunity to be “unusually remembered” by government, further describing him as “terribly dishonourable” for attempting to depict President Ramotar’s actions as a constitutional crime.
He added that the High Commissioner also attempted to portray the prorogation action as one worthy of Commonwealth sanctions, and one that could result in the withdrawal of developmental aid.
It was further noted by Dr Luncheon that the UK High Commissioner, “sinisterly and conspiratorially” revealed the European Union’s and the UK’s handiwork in the recent EU dishonouring of its agreement with the Guyana Government on budgetary support.
“His attempts to damage Guyana’s credibility and its economic prospects are considered by cabinet to be unpardonable,” the HPS stressed.
It was pointed out by the Cabinet Secretary, that since such concerns are usually shared bi-laterally, the High Commissioner’s actions needed to be condemned as they are, “unacceptable in the realm of international diplomacy as any concerns of the UK Government can and ought to be continued to be shared conventionally.”

CARICOM must midn their own business.

FM

The British government is upset.  What Caricom say or not say is not going to make much of a difference.  

 

This is how it may play out if things continue on this path.

 

Britain would not want sanctions that can harm the Guyanese people right away so it may start by putting several personal sanctions (via the Commonwealth and the European Union) on key government officials. Then if this does not work then it will impose economic sanctions on the country. Like I said before these guys are now playing hard ball.  What Caricom says or not say would not make much of a difference because the British government knows that most people (the man and woman in the street) in most Caricom countries will support Britain.

 

 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×