Skip to main content

Donations to the Clinton Foundation nose-dived last year amid Hillary Clinton’s presidential run, pay-to-play allegations, internal strife and a black mark from a charity watchdog.

Contributions fell by 37 percent to $108 million, down from $172 million in 2014, according to the group’s latest tax filings.

The cash plummeted as Hillary Clinton left the nonprofit in April 2015 after announcing her ill-fated candidacy. The foundation became a major issue in the race, with Donald Trump vowing to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate it.

 
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––

 Whether that effort will go forward is not clear. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), head of the House Oversight Committee, has indicated a probe into the foundation will continue.

Not only did contributions drop, but so did revenue the Clintons brought in from speeches. That income fell to $357,500 from $3.6 million in 2014.

By the time the foundation’s Clinton Global Initiative held its annual conference in September 2015, many donors had bailed, including Samsung and ExxonMobil.

Donna Shalala, the former Health and Human Services secretary who was brought in to run the charity last year, suffered a stroke after the CGI meeting.

The foundation had been rocked by internal divisions after daughter Chelsea Clinton took a more active role in the organization in 2013, when the group was renamed the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

Eric Braverman, a pal of Chelsea’s, was brought in to run the group, but he clashed with Bruce Lindsey, a senior adviser in the Clinton administration who had been CEO and became board chairman.

Braverman departed in January 2015 after 18 months, receiving a $330,000 payout, according to the tax filings. Shalala replaced him.

The Clinton Foundation refused to comment, but Shalala told The Chronicle of Philanthropy last month that the foundation had taken in money pledged in earlier years but those donations were recorded on earlier tax filings.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Let us look at this.

There might well have been "pay for play".  Contributions to the Foundation went to support activities which benefit poor people around the world.

Now let us see what will happen under Trump. His son in law will be an integral part of the Trump administration, but will still be involved in his family's company.  Trump's 3 kids will have full access to the Trump administration and will still be fully involved with the Trump Organization.

The Kushner and Trump companies will have full access to secret information, which can benefit the companies, and thus the owners.  And they will also enjoy the full clout of what ever the Trump presidency can ring to the table.

So expect a scandal not too far down the road because Donald Trump doesn't understand that being President of the USA is not the same as being owner of the Trump Organization.  In fact he thinks that he heads the United States of Trump, so can do as he wishes, and be answerable to no one.

Perish the day when others treat him, as president, with the same disrespect as he treated the current president, while in his role as president.

Trump is in a turf war with some 20 somethings, who made a polite request. I wonder what he will do when some one screams out loudly at an event that he attends "racist!"  The fact remains that Trump, even if not a bigot, has appointed white supremacists to his cabinet, and has actively courted the racial insecurities of the white working class.

He now refuses to entertain the fact that the way that he campaign has no unleashed a tsunami of bigotry directed towards non whites. People who see in Trump a fellow bigot, and so feel that expressing such views is perfectly normal behavior.

FM

The decline in donations was expected, after the runup year to an elections that she was expected to win. 

One has to look at what the foundation has done around the world when writing that contributions are down. By itself it sounds like someone who hates the clintons and wants to write negative, right Bibi the hater?

Kari

Kari, the Clinton’s foundation does what is was structured to do to help the needy children and families around the world. The dark side of it is for personal enrichment. You should know a thing or two about charitable organizations. They are not 100% honest with the use of public funding. Clinton’s foundation get caught many times for the Clinton’s personal benefits. This foundation is also tied into politics and favoritism to foreign states as top donors as we know it. 

FM

One can surmise that because of Hillary Clinton's then intentions for the presidential election, donations indeed would dropped off to completely avoid any ideas/notions of conflict of interest.

FM
caribny posted:

Well at least some of the Foundation funds go to poor people.

When Kushner and Ivanka get their daddy The Donald to help them out NONE of these gains will benefit poor people.

Yea, like 10%?

Now what does daddy's gift to his daughter have to do with anything!!  It's not donors' money!

FM
Demerara_Guy posted:

One can surmise that because of Hillary Clinton's then intentions for the presidential election, donations indeed would dropped off to completely avoid any ideas/notions of conflict of interest.

Nah D_G, the pay for players took a hike!!

I must admit, it's refreshing to see you go more than 10 words.

FM
ba$eman posted:
caribny posted:

Well at least some of the Foundation funds go to poor people.

When Kushner and Ivanka get their daddy The Donald to help them out NONE of these gains will benefit poor people.

Yea, like 10%?

Now what does daddy's gift to his daughter have to do with anything!!  It's not donors' money!

No its not donor's money.  Just the taxpayers'.

FM
caribny posted:
ba$eman posted:
caribny posted:

Well at least some of the Foundation funds go to poor people.

When Kushner and Ivanka get their daddy The Donald to help them out NONE of these gains will benefit poor people.

Yea, like 10%?

Now what does daddy's gift to his daughter have to do with anything!!  It's not donors' money!

No its not donor's money.  Just the taxpayers'.

What you proposing, your PNC Guyana model, extortion?

What is taxpayers' and what is not, that's for the IRS to determine, not some shot-gun agitator!

FM
Mitwah posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:

I am a lover, not a hater.

How would the groper Trump rate you?

Vulgarity is a disease for which there is no cure.  It's funny how you pick on the women on this site though.  Why don't you pick on guys like Carib or Gilbakka who will give you a bloody nose in two seconds flat?

Bibi Haniffa
Bibi Haniffa posted:
Mitwah posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:

I am a lover, not a hater.

How would the groper Trump rate you?

Vulgarity is a disease for which there is no cure.  It's funny how you pick on the women on this site though.  Why don't you pick on guys like Carib or Gilbakka who will give you a bloody nose in two seconds flat?

This must be some mental condition!

FM
ba$eman posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:
Mitwah posted:
Bibi Haniffa posted:

I am a lover, not a hater.

How would the groper Trump rate you?

Vulgarity is a disease for which there is no cure.  It's funny how you pick on the women on this site though.  Why don't you pick on guys like Carib or Gilbakka who will give you a bloody nose in two seconds flat?

This must be some mental condition!

Amral will slam the hammer on this very sick man Mitwah. It is just a matter of time.

Mitwah just could not wait to roll in the mud once again.

Mitwah has a very warped mentality. He will never get out of his gutter mentality.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×