Skip to main content

Source

Guyana’s Ambassador to Kuwait today explained the circumstances of a charge against him in 2002 by the US Securities and Exchange Commission and which has raised questions here about his suitability for a diplomatic posting.

A statement from the AFC follows:

Ambassador Dr. Shamir A. Ally vehemently denies culpability in the charges brought by the SEC to the company he was employed with.

Guyana’s Ambassador to Kuwait, Dr. Shamir Ally was employed by Acrodyne, a Public MANUFACTURING Company, for a SHORT PERIOD, from February 2, 1999 to May 9, 1999 as the Cost Accounting Manager. On May 10, 1999 he was promoted to Controller and he served in this position for fifteen (15) months up to July 10, 2000.
The company’s President, A. Robert Mancuso had asked Ally to help turn around the company as they were preparing to manufacture Digital Television Transmitters for Television Stations, converting from analogue to digital systems.
Dr. Ally was terminated in July 2000 when the Technical Director Ostroff became the new President. The company was at the time in the midst of a power struggle, falling revenue/income & a depleting labour force.
Two (2) years later in May 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the United States agency for maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets in-country, served notice on Acrodyne Pty. Ltd. and its former principals of its intention to take CIVIL ACTION.
The charge read that the SEC was accusing former President A. Robert Mancuso and former Chief Financial Officer Ronald R. Lanchoney, along with Controller Shamir Ally, of disseminating false financial information in press releases and Commission filings in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Dr. Ally was first employed at Acrodyne in 1999.
The procedures he worked with he had inherited, and he operated under the close supervision of the CFO.
Dr. Ally was charged jointly with Mancuso and Lanchoney. Instead of proceeding with a long and costly trial, the three professionals were strongly advised by that company’s Attorney-at-Law, Mr. Steven Thomas, to make a deal with the SEC to pay fines WITHOUT ADMISSION OF GUILT.
Dr. Ally’s VEHEMENT denials of any culpability were first contained in correspondences to the Staff Attorney of the SEC’s Central Regional Office, Ms. Dawn Leporati Leget, on May 29, 2002. His position today, fourteen (14) years after the incident, remains unchanged. He insists that the company’s annual reports to the SEC were accurate financial results, gleaned from information available from the company’s accounting systems.
Acrodyne used to prepare quarterly reports based on some actual, and some estimated figures. But at year-end they did ANNUAL STOCKTAKING for END OF YEAR reports which were all audited and forwarded to the SEC. The Quarterly Reports to the SEC were not AUDITED. That was Standard Operating Procedure at Acrodyne. There were also no highly computerized systems to offer closer evaluations from one year to the next.
In all of his correspondences to the SEC and Acrodyne since 2002, Dr. Ally has said that he “most VEHEMENTLY DISAGREES WITH THE SEC’s CHARGES”, and that he had agreed topay the US$10,000 penalty UNDER PROTEST! The CFO also paid a US$10,000 penalty and the company’s President US$50,000.
Dr. Ally also accused the SEC of making him a scapegoat since the Accounting procedures he had worked with he had inherited from his predecessors, and he has consistently iterated that he worked under the close supervision of Mr. Lanchoney, the CFO.
He said that his July 2000 termination ruled out his ability to access the accounting recordswhich would have enabled him to substantially rebut the SEC’s 2002 charge.
INACCURATE PUBLIC INFORMATION
Contrary to information carried recently in several sections of the local media claiming that the SEC’s 2002 charges took away his voting rights in the USA, Dr. Ally has proven that theSEC’s final judgment (the US$10,000 penalty) never prohibited him from serving as an Officer or Director of any public company (as it did his erstwhile colleagues), NEITHERDID IT RESCIND HIS VOTING RIGHTS.
Since 2002, Dr. Shamir Ally has continued to function unimpeded at very high levels in and out of the United States, voting at ALL National elections, City and Town elections.
At Indian Trail, North Carolina, Dr. Shamir Ally was SWORN IN to serve on six (6) Town Boards and Committees from 2014 to December 2015.
More recently, in February 2015, the North Carolina Secretary of State appointed Dr. Shamir Ally as a NOTARY PUBLIC.
We must reiterate that contrary to recent media reports, Dr. Shamir Ally was charged and required to pay a penalty by the SEC. He was not convicted of a crime.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Demerara_Guy posted:

The issue is what the Guyana government intends to do on this matter.

It is immaterial what Shamir A. Ally and the AFC say on the matter.

They're issuing this statement to shut up the public and no one must say anything bad about the con man. We must address him now as 'Your Excellency'.  

FM

Poor attempt at damage control.  The cyat is already out of the bag.  But now the magic question remains - Why is the Guyana government protecting this man?  And at what cost?  Who is to benefit from this?  And why??

Bibi Haniffa

"The charge read that the SEC was accusing former President A. Robert Mancuso and former Chief Financial Officer Ronald R. Lanchoney, along with Controller Shamir Ally, of disseminating false financial information in press releases and Commission filings in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Dr. Ally was first employed at Acrodyne in 1999.
The procedures he worked with he had inherited, and he operated under the close supervision of the CFO."

Lesson learnt - when you inherit a process, you don't take it for granted,  especially when you are signing off on press releases and commission filings.  The SEC will not take any excuses.

alena06
alena06 posted:

"The charge read that the SEC was accusing former President A. Robert Mancuso and former Chief Financial Officer Ronald R. Lanchoney, along with Controller Shamir Ally, of disseminating false financial information in press releases and Commission filings in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Dr. Ally was first employed at Acrodyne in 1999.
The procedures he worked with he had inherited, and he operated under the close supervision of the CFO."

Lesson learnt - when you inherit a process, you don't take it for granted,  especially when you are signing off on press releases and commission filings.  The SEC will not take any excuses.

If nothing else, he was lazy for not instituting his own procedures for accessing and evaluating financial information. CFOs generally allow Controllers very wide scope in operational procedures. Plus he was not a mere employee. He was a principal as defined by the SEC. To suggest that his work was compromised because there were no highly computerized system is no more than a lame excuse. People were providing reliable and legal information since the days of manual journals. Lastly, I didn't know that being a Notary Public was a bragging right.  

FM
alena06 posted:

"The charge read that the SEC was accusing former President A. Robert Mancuso and former Chief Financial Officer Ronald R. Lanchoney, along with Controller Shamir Ally, of disseminating false financial information in press releases and Commission filings in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Dr. Ally was first employed at Acrodyne in 1999.
The procedures he worked with he had inherited, and he operated under the close supervision of the CFO."

Lesson learnt - when you inherit a process, you don't take it for granted,  especially when you are signing off on press releases and commission filings.  The SEC will not take any excuses.

That's BS.  Now, if it had occurred just as he joined with prior statements he had signed, I agree.  As a signatory to the Financials, you are responsible and you are to ensure the validity and accuracy of the numbers.  Surely the SEC did not buy it or he would not be charged and fined.  You sign off on a document, you are responsibility, don't blame the past or someone else.  In the least, this was gross negligence.

FM
ksazma posted:
alena06 posted:

"The charge read that the SEC was accusing former President A. Robert Mancuso and former Chief Financial Officer Ronald R. Lanchoney, along with Controller Shamir Ally, of disseminating false financial information in press releases and Commission filings in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Dr. Ally was first employed at Acrodyne in 1999.
The procedures he worked with he had inherited, and he operated under the close supervision of the CFO."

Lesson learnt - when you inherit a process, you don't take it for granted,  especially when you are signing off on press releases and commission filings.  The SEC will not take any excuses.

If nothing else, he was lazy for not instituting his own procedures for accessing and evaluating financial information. CFOs generally allow Controllers very wide scope in operational procedures. Plus he was not a mere employee. He was a principal as defined by the SEC. To suggest that his work was compromised because there were no highly computerized system is no more than a lame excuse. People were providing reliable and legal information since the days of manual journals. Lastly, I didn't know that being a Notary Public was a bragging right.  

I guess prior to computerization, all those financial disclosures were false.

However, I guess the inept, hapless, corrupt and crooked PNC will accept this.

Notary Public!!  You too funny bai!!

FM
ba$eman posted:
alena06 posted:

"The charge read that the SEC was accusing former President A. Robert Mancuso and former Chief Financial Officer Ronald R. Lanchoney, along with Controller Shamir Ally, of disseminating false financial information in press releases and Commission filings in 1998, 1999 and 2000. Dr. Ally was first employed at Acrodyne in 1999.
The procedures he worked with he had inherited, and he operated under the close supervision of the CFO."

Lesson learnt - when you inherit a process, you don't take it for granted,  especially when you are signing off on press releases and commission filings.  The SEC will not take any excuses.

That's BS.  Now, if it had occurred just as he joined with prior statements he had signed, I agree.  As a signatory to the Financials, you are responsible and you are to ensure the validity and accuracy of the numbers.  Surely the SEC did not buy it or he would not be charged and fined.  You sign off on a document, you are responsibility, don't blame the past or someone else.  In the least, this was gross negligence.

Correct Ba$eman.

FM

I suppose the SEC was wrong to charge Ally? Did he or did he not pay the 10,000 US fine?


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 18025 / March 10, 2003

 

ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
RELEASE NO. 1736 / March 10, 2003

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. A. ROBERT MANCUSO, RONALD R. LANCHONEY, AND SHAMIR A. ALLY, Case No. 03-1220 (E.D. Pa.)

 

On March 4, 2003, United States District Court Judge Michael M. Baylson entered final judgments against A. Robert Mancuso, Ronald R. Lanchoney, and Shamir A. Ally, enjoining them from future violations of the antifraud and recordkeeping provisions set forth in Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1 thereunder, and from future aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The final judgment against Mancuso also enjoined him from future violations of Rule 13b2-2 under the Exchange Act. In addition, the final judgments prohibited Mancuso and Lanchoney from acting as an officer or director of a public company, and imposed civil penalties of $50,000 against Mancuso, $10,000 against Lanchoney, and $10,000 against Ally. The defendants consented to the entry of the orders without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations in the action.

 

The Commission's complaint alleged that the defendants were involved in the dissemination of false financial information by Acrodyne Communications, Inc. ("Acrodyne") in press releases and Commission filings in 1998, 1999 and 2000. The Commission alleged that Mancuso (Acrodyne's former CEO and president), Lanchoney (Acrodyne's former CFO), and Ally (Acrodyne's former controller) were aware of numerous and significant problems with Acrodyne's accounting controls, but failed to assure that Acrodyne's financial transactions were accurately recorded. The Commission claimed that, as a result of the actions of Mancuso, Lanchoney and Ally, Acrodyne engaged in inaccurate and improper cost accounting and revenue recognition. The Commission also alleged that, starting in the second quarter of 1999 and continuing through the first quarter of 2000, Ally directed that unsupported journal entries be made to the cost of sales and inventory accounts to bring Acrodyne's financial statements in line with the gross margin percentage he had estimated for period. The Commission claimed that Mancuso approved these fraudulent adjustments for the first quarter of 2000. Finally, the Commission claimed that Mancuso recklessly provided false information to Acrodyne's auditors relating to Acrodyne's guarantee of a customer's debt. In a related matter, on March 6, 2003, the Commission ordered Acrodyne to cease-and-desist from future violations of the antifraud, periodic reporting, and books and records provisions of the Exchange Act.

 

 

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18025.htm
FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×