Skip to main content

The pedestrian overpass above the Diamond Public Road

The pedestrian overpass above the Diamond Public Road

January 30 ,2021

Source

Minister of Public Works Juan Edghill has asked Auditor General Deodat Sharma to conduct a forensic audit into the construction of the overhead pedestrian crossings along the East Bank of Demerara which were built under the former APNU+AFC administration.

In a letter to Sharma released yesterday, Edghill cited the need for the forensic audit to be conducted since according to him the Government did not get “value for money” for the installation and operation of the elevators.

Although the elevators were part of the project, he said they are still incomplete after more than two years.

The project was funded by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).

Contracts were awarded to two companies for the construction of five overhead walkways.

S.Jagmohan Hardware Supplies and Construction Services was  awarded a total of US$728,973 to construct crossings at Providence and Diamond while a contract of $1,034,326 was awarded to B&J Civil Works to build crossings at three locations namely: Eccles, Houston and Peters Hall.

These contracts were executed on April 27, 2017.  Later, with approval from the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board (NPTAB) and the IDB, the contracts were amended and the period for completion extended to September 30, 2018.

Former Minister of Public Infrastructure David Patterson, in May 2017 had announced government’s plan to construct the crossings, which were expected to significantly reduce accidents, save on time for those travelling from Diamond and enable a free flow of traffic.

In addition, Edghill noted that under the former Ministry five complete solar voltaic systems were procured and installed at the five crossings.

Farfan and Mendes Limited were given the contract which was effective from July 8, 2018 to supply, install and maintain the solar voltaic systems for a ten-year period at a cost of US$502,213.

In his letter to Sharma, Edghill attached a series of documents which detail his claims and carry dates between the period of December, 2018 and December, 2019.

“The contracting agency accepted the projects (construction of the overhead walkways) as substantively completed and took over the works in accordance with Clause 56.1 of the conditions of the contracts,” Edghill said.

He added that as it relates to the supply, installation and maintenance of the solar voltaic systems, the contracting agency accepted the project as substantially completed.

Maintenance

In the letter, Edghill further explained that in November, 2017, it was announced that the crossings and the elevators would be maintained and managed by the Demerara Harbour Bridge Corporation (DHBC).

As a result, he said the infrastructure was handed over to former General Manager of the DHBC Rawlston Adams. This allowed Adams to access the electrical rooms and the interconnection of the CCTV systems at each of the overpasses.

Additionally, the Peters Hall overpass was provided with electricity from the DHBC, according to Edghill and the DHBC and eGovernment agency, the National Data Management Authority (NDMA) installed equipment at the overpasses.

A few months after, Edghill noted that an agreement was signed by the DHBC with the then Public Infrastructure Ministry to manage and maintain the overpasses which included its cleaning on the condition that revenue would be recovered for these costs from advertising.

According to Edghill, the elevators arrived here in February, 2018 and installation commenced in June, 2018.

Several months after, they were commissioned with the period for maintenance beginning from November 1, 2018 for a period of one year.

Following this, Edghill said personnel received training on how to operate and maintain the elevators.

Edghill added that for close to a year after commissioning, the elevators were inoperable and remained closed.

During this period, there were incidents of vandalism and in all instances repairs were carried out by the Ministry. Edghill said that the DHBC failed to provide any footage of these incidents.

Technical difficulties

In August, 2019, the overpass at Peters Hall was commissioned and it was open for use by the public.

Edghill said in his letter that subsequently a number of technical difficulties emerged including door lock not opening or closing, elevator malfunctioning while persons were inside among others.

As a result, Edghill said that RBP Lifts, the company which installed the elevators and the local representative who was responsible for quarterly maintenance were summoned on numerous occasions.

The local representative was unable to rectify some of the issues.

During September, 2019, an incident occurred where persons were stuck in the elevator. The Ministry learnt of this via social media.

Edghill said the issue was looked into and repairs were done. As such, the elevators were back in operation.

“No further communication was received from DHBC as the said agency’s personnel had been trained and had been introduced to the local elevator representative, and there was no indication that the elevators were not performing or working as per manufacturer’s specifications. There was also no notice from DHBC that the elevators were as a consequence closed,” Edghill noted in his letter.

He added that the DHBC had reported that after the issue was rectified, it recurred.

“The elevators would work excellently for about 20 minutes then start exhibiting the same problems of not locking, or opening, errors indicating control board faults, screen displays malfunctioning,” Edghill said.

He said on several occasions efforts were made by the local representative to fix the issue but they were fruitless.

As a consequence, in February, last year, he said the elevators at Peters Hall stopped working since the issues were not rectified and it was unsafe for persons to use them.

Presently, Edghill said the elevators have various defects.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@Django posted:



This how bridge is built ,23 years patch work was done on the wooden bridge.

This was done under Patterson tenure ,probe fella Edgill should take note.

The Jagabaat give us a few bridges - Mahaica,Mahaicony, Berbice, does that make him less of a thief or crook? Patterson got caught thieving, you should ask how much kickback he skimmed off that project. Like the Jagabaat no fancy bridge under his tenure can change what they are - crooked thieves....

sachin_05
Last edited by sachin_05
@sachin_05 posted:

The Jagabaat give us a few bridges - mahaica, mahaicony Berbice, does not make him less of a thief or crook?

Patterson got caught thieving, you should ask how much kickback he skimmed off that project.

Like the Jagabaat no fancy bridge under his tenure can change what they are - crooked thieves....

Gifts are thieving ? bear in mind not condoning wrong doings ,the guilty should pay the penalty.

Edgill on smear campaign that's what the PPP good at doing. By the way did you read the auditor report on billion dollars of gifts ?

Django
Last edited by Django
@Django posted:

The visionless Edgill asking the apologist Sharma to probe ,this fella may turnout to be a failure as Minister of Public Infrastructure .

Isn't Edgill, your buddy?  He is trying hard to be noticed. He has done a good job so far trying to improve the infrastructure.

R
@Ramakant-P posted:

Isn't Edgill, your buddy?   He is trying hard to be noticed.

He has done a good job so far trying to improve the infrastructure.

Buddy ?? who want to a friend of the big mouth crook. If them use whitewash you will say good job.

Django
Last edited by Django
@Django posted:

Gifts are thieving ? bear in mind not condoning wrong doings ,the guilty should pay the penalty.

Edgill on smear campaign that's what the PPP good at doing. By the way did you read the auditor report on billion dollars of gifts ?

What about auditorgeneral report on Patterson? Or contractors money deposited in hispersonal account? That is the problem y’all PNC and PPP shills and apologists  your ministers are saints the other side are call thieves for doing the exact same thiefing...

sachin_05
@sachin_05 posted:

What about auditor general report on Patterson? Or contractors money deposited in his personal account?

That is the problem y’all PNC and PPP shills and apologists  your ministers are saints the other side are call thieves for doing the exact same thiefing...

Seems to buy hook line and sinker from Guyana Times. Got to be big laugh for one to believe you there are neutrality .

Django

Patterson, Adams charged for $163M fraud at DHB

Alliance for Change (AFC) General Secretary and former Public Infrastructure Minister, David Patterson and former General Manager of the Demerara Harbour Bridge Corporation (DHBC), Rawlston Adams were on Monday released on $200,000 bail each on a charge which alleged they conspired to defraud the company of $162,635,015.

AFC General Secretary and former Public Infrastructure
Minister David Patterson (in red shirt)
joined the protest action after his court appearance

The men, who were initially supposed to be arraigned before Chief Magistrate Ann McLennan, were instead brought before Senior Magistrate Leron Daly after the Chief Magistrate recused herself from hearing the matter since she informed the court that she is known to Patterson and Adams and does not want any bias to be perceived.
The men were not required to plead to the indictable charge which stated that between November 18, 2016, and February 1, 2018, at Georgetown, they conspired together with each other and with other persons unknown to defraud the DHBC asphalt plant of $162,635,015 – funds for a project about a feasibility study and design for a new bridge which was not a function of that corporation and so monies from the asphalt plant account could not be used.
Patterson, who serves as Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, was represented by Attorneys-at-Law Nigel Hughes, Ronald Burch-Smith, and Khemraj Ramjattan, while Adams was represented by Attorney-at-Law Glen Hanoman.
Special Organised Crime Unit (SOCU) Prosecutor, Attorney-at-Law Leslyn Noble asked for the men to be released on substantial bail and for them to lodge their passports.

Former General Manager of the DHBC, Rawlston Adams at the
Georgetown Magistrates’ Courts

However, this was strongly opposed by defence counsel who informed the court that their clients are not flight risks. In doing so, the lawyers provided the court with a brief incite of their clients’ professional careers. Moreover, they informed that during the investigation stage, their clients were released on self-bail by SOCU, and were reporting to the agency when required.
Magistrate Daly granted the men bail and did not impose the condition of having them lodge their passports. They will make their next court appearance on February 15, 2021, for the commencement of the trial.

Protest
Meanwhile, as Patterson and Adams were being arraigned on the charges, several persons led by Opposition Leader Joseph Harmon picketed outside of the courthouse. Armed with their placards, chants of “Patto deliver, [Juan] Edghill [Public Works Minister] is a failure,” “Roundabout, Patto” and “PPP stop thieving taxpayers’ money through COVID relief”, emerged from the crowd.
Speaking with the media, Harmon said that Patterson was being charged for a matter that has already been dealt with by Retired Judge Claudette Singh when she was the Police Force’s legal advisor.
“This action by the PPP regime is basically a vindictive action and it is meant to create some problem with the leadership of the APNU/AFC…This Government is using the Guyana Police Force; they have weaponised the Guyana Police Force to take action against citizens when there is no real cause of action.”
According to Harmon, “This action is dead and there is absolutely no reason why the Police should be bringing this action at this point in time against David Patterson. Patterson is a thorn in the sight of the PPP, he is disturbing them in the Public Accounts Committee…”

Sole-sourced
Last week Friday, Patterson and Adams were questioned by the SOCU. Patterson was once cleared in 2019 by investigators from SOCU when it comes to the sole-sourced contract to Dutch company LievenseCSO for the design and feasibility study of the new Demerara River bridge.
But both the Public Procurement Commission (PPC) and the Auditor General had red-flagged Patterson for requesting from the then Cabinet that the feasibility contract be sole-sourced instead of being processed through the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board (NPTAB).
The PPC had found that after the bidding process was annulled because of non-responsive bidders, NPTAB had approved for the project to be re-tendered. Back in November of last year, Public Works Minister Juan Edghill had disclosed that the Guyana Police Force was actively probing the award of the 2016 $145 million contract to LievenseCSO.
The Minister had said the investigation follows a formal complaint to law enforcement. The then Opposition PPP/C had requested that the Public Procurement Commission (PPC) investigate the award of the contract. The party had sought to hold the David Granger Administration accountable for sole-sourcing the contractor, rather than following the procurement laws.
When the PPP/C completed its investigation and handed its report over on August 7, 2018, it noted that several companies had bid for the project to do the feasibility study and design for the new Demerara River bridge and 12 companies had been shortlisted.
The report had added that only two of the 12 companies had made proposals. As such, the bidding process was annulled. It further noted that on November 12, 2016, the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board (NPTAB) approved the move for the project to be re-tendered.
However, the project was not re-tendered; instead, LievenseCSO was engaged by the Public Infrastructure Ministry to do the work. Page seven of the report noted that the bid from LievenseCSO was “unsolicited”, but Patterson took the company’s proposal to Cabinet for approval, and Cabinet granted its approval for the company to be engaged.
The report, on page seven, also stated that monies to be spent on the project were taken from the asphalt plant accounts. Reports indicate that in 2017, $215.3 million was used from the fund, while in 2018 a further $74 million was withdrawn.
The original sum approved by Cabinet for the contract was $161.5 million. It is understood that the contract price for the handpicked LievenseCSO was actually $148 million.

K
Last edited by Django
@kp posted:

Where there is Smoke, there is fire. A case was built against them.

By the corrupt crew .

The Police already done an investigation no wrong doing was found by their Legal Advisor.

Django
Last edited by Django

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×