alena06 posted:Bibi Haniffa posted:skeldon_man posted:ksazma posted:Stormborn posted:ksazma posted:Stormborn posted:This creates a bunch of shallow dunces who study to the test and have no inkling what it means to know t he subject matter
I don't know if you can make this assessment Stormy. Unless you have direct information of the people who actually took those subjects.
I can say that because it addresses perspectives in the philosophy of education across time. It is the argument from the founding of the University grounded on the trivium to the quadrivium to the modern era or liberal arts. One prepares the student to think rather than to cram source data and regurgitate it.
Fair enough. However, is there any evidence that these particular students crammed source data and then regurgitate it?
If these students are preparing for 20+ subjects of CXC, when are they going to have time to be children? Why are parents so stupid to push their children. What do they have to prove?
Is GCE tougher than CXC? How come we never heard someone passed 15 subjects GCE with all As?
Yes, GCE is tougher than CXC. I taught CXC before migrating to North America to attend university. The CXC curriculum is shallow and wide. Many of the courses have a component that include term grades as part of the overall grade and the actual exam is watered down. In English, what was one subject in GCE is two subjects in CXC.
The class teacher has a say in the overall grade. I used to have to grade my students papers and send it in to the Ministry of Education. The format and curriculum of the exam has evolved over the years so I am not sure how it's done now.
Bibi, you must have taught some of the brightest and best leaders in GY Btw, my eldest is starting college this year at NYU!!
Congrats to your daughter Alena. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree!