Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Egypt's President Mohammed Morsi Out

As Military Presents Roadmap

Posted: 07/03/2013 3:11 pm



egypt morsi

 

The Egyptian military has announced the removal of Mohammed Morsi as president, presenting a roadmap for reconciliation in the country.

In a televised statement on Wednesday, Egyptian military chief Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that the plan calls for the temporary suspension of the constitution and the institution of a technocrat government. The chief justice of the constitutional court will lead the country in the interim.

Tahrir Square, where thousands of people had gathered during the day, erupted in celebrations as soon as the news was announced.

According to the Associated Press, an aide to Morsi said the Muslim Brotherhood leader has been moved to an undisclosed location.

 

CAIRO (AP) — The armed forces ousted Egypt's first democratically elected president Wednesday after just a year in power, installing a temporary civilian government, suspending the constitution and calling for new elections. Islamist President Mohammed Morsi denounced it as a "full coup" by the military.

After the televised announcement by the army chief, millions of anti-Morsi protesters in cities around the country erupted in delirious scenes of joy, with shouts of "God is great" and "Long live Egypt."

Fireworks burst over crowds dancing and waving flags in Cairo's Tahrir Square, epicenter of the 2011 uprising that ousted autocrat Hosni Mubarak. Now it was one of multiple centers of a stunning four-day anti-Morsi revolt that brought out the biggest anti-government rallies Egypt has seen, topping even those of 2011.

But the move potentially throws the country into further confrontation.

Moments after the army statement, a statement on the Egyptian president's office's Twitter account quoted Morsi as saying the military's measures "represent a full coup categorically rejected by all the free men of our nation."

Morsi has insisted his legitimacy as an elected president must not be violated or Egypt could be thrown in to violence. Some of his Islamist backers, tens of thousands of whom took to the streets in recent days, have vowed to fight to the end.

"Down with the rule of the military," some of them chanted after the army announcement, reviving a chant used by leftist revolutionaries during the nearly 17 months of direct military rule that followed Mubarak's removal.

The army has insisted it is not carrying out a coup, but acting on the will of the people to clear the way for a new leadership.

In his speech, army chief Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi said the chief justice of the Supreme Constitutional Court would step in as interim president until new elections are held. He would be sworn in judges of his court, el-Sissi said. A government of technocrats would be formed with "full powers" to run the country.

El-Sissi spoke while flanked by the country's top Muslim and Christian clerics as well as pro-reform leader Mohammed ElBaradei and two representatives of the youth opposition movement behind the wave of protests.

He promised "not to exclude anyone or any movement" from further steps. But he did not define the length of the transition period or when presidential elections would be held. He also did not mention any role for the military.

The constitution, drafted by Morsi's Islamist allies, was "temporarily suspended," and a panel of experts and representatives of all political movements will consider amendments. He did not say whether a referendum would be held to ratify the changes, as customary.

Seeking to avert a destabilizing backlash, he warned that the armed forces, police will deal "decisively" with violence.

After the 9:20 p.m., the Brotherhood's TV station went blank

Shortly before the 9: 20 p.m. announcement, the army deployed troops, commandos and armored vehicles in cities around the country. In Cairo, they stationed on bridges over the Nile River and at major intersections. They also surrounded rallies being held by Morsi's supporters — an apparent move to contain them.

Travel bans were imposed on Morsi and top figures from his Muslim Brotherhood including its chief Mohammed Badie and his powerful deputy Khairat el-Shater.

At least 39 people have been killed in clashes since Sunday, when the mass protests against Morsi began — hiking fears that greater violence could erupt when the final move was made against him. Street battles in the Nile Delta city of Kafr el-Sheikh on Wednesday left at least 200 people injured.

The army's move is the second time in Egypt's 2 ½ years of turmoil that it has forced out the country's leader. It pushed out Mubarak and took power itself. This time, however, its removal of an elected figure could be more explosive.

Elected with 51.7 percent of the vote in last year's presidential election, Morsi took office vowing to move beyond his roots in the Muslim Brotherhood.

But his presidency threw the country into deep polarization. Those who took to the streets this week say he lost his electoral legitimacy because he tried to give the Brotherhood and Islamist allies a monopoly on power, pushed through a constitution largely written by his allies and mismanaged the country's multiple crises.

"Now we want a president who would really be the president of all Egyptians and will work for the country," Said Shahin, a 19-year-old protester in Tahrir, said, falling to the ground to pray as soon as el-Sissi spoke.

Mahmoud Badr, spokesman for Tamarod, or Rebel — the youth movement behind the rallies — praised the crowds in the streets saying, they succeded in "putting your revolution back on track."

"Let's start a new page, a new page based on participation," he wrote on his Twitter account. "Our hand is extended to all

Morsi and his allies say the opposition never accepted their appeals for dialogue — seen by opponents as empty gestures — and that Mubarak loyalists throughout the government sabotaged their attempts to bring change.

The military had issued an ultimatum on Monday giving Morsi 48 hours to find some solution with its opponents. Any deal, however, was a near impossibility, making it inevitable the military would move.

Earlier in the day, el-Sissi met with ElBaradei, Egypt's top Muslim cleric — Al-Azhar Sheik Ahmed el-Tayeb — and Coptic Pope Tawadros II, as well as youth representatives and some members of the ultraconservative Salafi movements. The consultations apparently aimed to bring as wide a consensus as possible behind the army's moves.

But the Brotherhood boycotted the session, its political arm the Freedom and Justice Party said.

In a last-minute statement before the deadline, Morsi again rejected the military's intervention, saying abiding by his electoral legitimacy was the only way to prevent violence. He criticized the military for "taking only one side."

"One mistake that cannot be accepted, and I say this as president of all Egyptians, is to take sides," he said in the statement issued by his office. "Justice dictates that the voice of the masses from all squares should be heard," he said, repeating his offer to hold dialogue with his opponents.

"For the sake of Egypt and for historical accuracy, let's call what is happening by its real name: Military coup," Morsi's top foreign policy adviser Essam al-Haddad wrote on his Facebook page.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Pointblank:

 

sad day for Egypt

 

Actually, it's a good day.  The muslim brotherhood co-opted the youth revolution and to go Islamic.  They kept  low profile during the 1st revolution to let naive Obama throw Mubarak under the bus, then they moved in a take over.  You have to watch these Islamic crooks.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

 

sad day for Egypt

 

Actually, it's a good day.  The muslim brotherhood co-opted the youth revolution and to go Islamic.  They kept  low profile during the 1st revolution to let naive Obama throw Mubarak under the bus, then they moved in a take over.  You have to watch these Islamic crooks.

How is  rejecting the results of elections that were widely deemed to be free and fair and setting aside a country's basic law a good day.

Pointblank
Originally Posted by Pointblank:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

 

sad day for Egypt

 

Actually, it's a good day.  The muslim brotherhood co-opted the youth revolution and to go Islamic.  They kept  low profile during the 1st revolution to let naive Obama throw Mubarak under the bus, then they moved in a take over.  You have to watch these Islamic crooks.

How is  rejecting the results of elections that were widely deemed to be free and fair and setting aside a country's basic law a good day.

he is using it to institute an islamic state against the wishes of the people.  The military did the correct thing.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

sad day for Egypt

Actually, it's a good day.  The muslim brotherhood co-opted the youth revolution and to go Islamic.  They kept  low profile during the 1st revolution to let naive Obama throw Mubarak under the bus, then they moved in a take over.  You have to watch these Islamic crooks.

1. The Muslim Brotherhood won the elections in an open manner.

 

2. Regardless of the Muslim Brotherhood past/current views they are the legitimate ones elected to govern Egypt.

 

3. The Muslim Brotherhood received about 52% of the votes at the last elections.

 

It will be quite interesting to see the developments taking place and what will be the eventual outcome of the military take-over in Egypt.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

sad day for Egypt

Actually, it's a good day.  The muslim brotherhood co-opted the youth revolution and to go Islamic.  They kept  low profile during the 1st revolution to let naive Obama throw Mubarak under the bus, then they moved in a take over.  You have to watch these Islamic crooks.

1. The Muslim Brotherhood won the elections in an open manner.

 

2. Regardless of the Muslim Brotherhood past/current views they are the legitimate ones elected to govern Egypt.

 

3. The Muslim Brotherhood received about 52% of the votes at the last elections.

 

It will be quite interesting to see the developments taking place and what will be the eventual outcome of the military take-over in Egypt.

It's not as simple as that.  The progressive youth lead the protest against Mubarak.  The muslim brotherhood remained in the background and out of sight.  The youth wanted a new democratic secular state and what they saw was the Islamist hijacked and tried to take the nation down the backward medieval Islamic path.  These progressive voices will not be pushed aside and railroaded where they never wished to go.

 

I do support this coup and Obama should keep his mouth out, he is Mr "simpleton".  He should focus on fixing the mess he created here, fixing the economy or head back to community organizing.  Maybe Richmond Hill could use his skills.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

sad day for Egypt

Actually, it's a good day.  The muslim brotherhood co-opted the youth revolution and to go Islamic.  They kept  low profile during the 1st revolution to let naive Obama throw Mubarak under the bus, then they moved in a take over.  You have to watch these Islamic crooks.

1. The Muslim Brotherhood won the elections in an open manner.

 

2. Regardless of the Muslim Brotherhood past/current views they are the legitimate ones elected to govern Egypt.

 

3. The Muslim Brotherhood received about 52% of the votes at the last elections.

 

It will be quite interesting to see the developments taking place and what will be the eventual outcome of the military take-over in Egypt.

Well said DG, INTERESTING POINTS TO PONDER UPON.

Chief

The Muslim Brotherhood won the first elections in Egypt narrowly. Given the history and the context of deposing Mubarak and with the good behavior of the Egyptian military, it was Morsi's mandate to have an Administration that is inclusive and one of national reconciliation.

 

Morsi set about to do the opposite of that. He alienated millions of Egyptians, demonized other political interests, ignored Egypt's ethnic and political minority, and presided over a crumbling economy with shortages of electricity. The millions of protestors in Tahrir Square were doing what the Americans did on July 4, 1776 - delcaring their Independence -

Governments derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

 

Chief, Egypt's path to Islam is different from the Arabian peninsula and the rest of the Middle East. There are Salafis and other Muslim sects including the sunnis and not much of the Wahabi tradition. There are many Coptic Christians. Egypt is more North African than Middle-East in some respects. This is how you have to view Egypt.

 

The military has said it was the first to announce it was getting out of politics, and General Sisi declared it still is out of politics and will remain so. President Obama naturally expressed concern over the suspension of the Egyptian Constitution and the removal of Morsi, but stopped short of calling it a coup - given that the Congress would have to stop the annual $1.2 billion of aid to Egypt.

 

The enumerated points by D-G are not useful in analyzing what happened in Egypt. It is worth noting that top Muslim and Christian clerics as well as a politicians such as Mohamed ElBaradei, the Nobel Prize-winning diplomat and liberal icon, and Galal Morra, a prominent Islamist ultraconservative, or Salafi, all stood on stage and endorsed the takeover.

Kari
Originally Posted by warrior:

i wonder if the guyana army is reading and watching and when they will wake up 

The situation in Guyana has no parallels to Egypt.  Guyana is not going down any sectarian path, it is a democracy with issues of race, true.  The GoG is ruling by the constitution and, as currently demonstrated, is not free of the democratic process of limits and control by a parliamentary opposition.

 

The military have no justification to intervene, they did under the PNC and it was a disaster anyway.

FM
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

sad day for Egypt

Actually, it's a good day.  The muslim brotherhood co-opted the youth revolution and to go Islamic.  They kept  low profile during the 1st revolution to let naive Obama throw Mubarak under the bus, then they moved in a take over.  You have to watch these Islamic crooks.

1. The Muslim Brotherhood won the elections in an open manner.

 

2. Regardless of the Muslim Brotherhood past/current views they are the legitimate ones elected to govern Egypt.

 

So then, what's your issue with the PPP?

FM
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

So, let me get this, it is the Americans that engineered Morsi's demise and not his own grabbing for power?

 

Note, when the Egyptian get up and eat bread it is the American people via its government that caused that to happen.

 

America has nothing to gain there except that the state is stable. Egypt is the second largest recipient of US aid and it has been that way for decades.

 

Obama will have to come up with some strategy to sidestep the law to that states the US will suspend aid in lieu of a coup. Call him all the names you can but he too a lot of head maintaining aid to an Egypt headed by the brotherhood.

 

FM
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Pointblank:

So, let me get this, it is the Americans that engineered Morsi's demise and not his own grabbing for power?


 

I think its good he was ousted, but you can rest assure, the top brass in Egypt was in close consultation with US.  You see how Obama side-stepped the "coup" reference.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

Wy you asking suh hard questions?

 

You will send some into hiding

Pointblank
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

It was not incompetence. He used the democratic process to gain power. Once in office he started introducing islamic rule, suggested that Egyptians should go and fight in Syria for the rebels, appointed as governor the person who is accused of killing 12 tourists, etc.

If that is democracy that islamists are pushing then Morsi should be hanged in Tariq square.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

The Islamist fundamentalist don't care about corruption, they care about spreading their doctrine of medievalism to the rest of mankind.  The progressive forces and the military ensured this does not happen.

 

As the new head said, they will now get the glorious revolution that started back in 2011 back on track on its intended path, a secular republic based on democratic principles.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

U might dismiss this as Biblical rubbish. But in the Book of Daniel, it tells of the continuous turmoil in Egypt-it is one of the signs of the end times. If the scholars are correct, then we will see over the next year, a continous change of leadership. Strange happenings in that land will also confuse the world at large.

S

When is a military coup not a military coup? When it happens in Egypt, apparently

Those Western leaders who are telling us Egypt is still on the path to “democracy” have to remember that Morsi was indeed elected in a real, Western-approved election

 

 

 
 
   
 
 
 

For the first time in the history of the world, a coup is not a coup. The army take over, depose and imprison the democratically elected president, suspend the constitution, arrest the usual suspects, close down television stations and mass their armour in the streets of the capital.  But the word ‘coup’ does not – and cannot – cross the lips of the Blessed Barack Obama. Nor does the hopeless UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon dare to utter such an offensive word. It’s not as if Obama doesn’t know what’s going on. Snipers in Cairo killed 15 Egyptians this week from a rooftop of the very university in which Obama made his ‘reach-out’ speech to the Muslim world in 2009.

Is this reticence because millions of Egyptians demanded just such a coup – they didn’t call it that, of course – and thus became the first massed people in the world to demand a coup prior to the actual coup taking place? Is it because Obama fears that to acknowledge it’s a coup would force the US to impose sanctions on the most important Arab nation at peace with Israel? Or because the men who staged the coup might forever lose their 1.5 billion subvention from the US – rather than suffer a mere delay -- if they were told they’d actually carried out a coup.

Now for the kind of historical memory that Obama would enjoy. In that dodgy 2009 speech in Cairo – in which he managed to refer to Palestinian “dislocation” rather than “dispossession” – Obama made the following remarkable comment, which puts the events in Egypt today into a rather interesting perspective. There were some leaders, he said, “who advocate for democracy only when they are out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others…you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party. Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.”

Obama did not say this in the aftermath of the coup-that-wasn’t. He uttered these very words in Egypt itself just over four years ago. And it  pretty much sums up what Mohamed Morsi did wrong. He treated his Muslim Brotherhood mates as masters rather than servants of the people, showed no interest in protecting Egypt’s Christian minority, and then enraged the Egyptian army by attending a Brotherhood meeting at which Egyptians were asked to join the holy war in Syria to kill Shiites and overthrow Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

And there is one salient fact about the events of the last 48 hours in Egypt. No one is happier – no one more satisfied nor more conscious of the correctness of his own national struggle against ‘Islamists’ and ‘terrorists’ -- than Assad. The West has been wetting itself to destroy Assad – but does absolutely nothing when the Egyptian army destroys its democratically-elected president for lining up with Assad’s armed Islamist opponents. The army called Morsi’s supporters “terrorists and fools”. Isn’t that just what Bashar calls his enemies?  No wonder Assad told us yesterday that no one should use religion to gain power. Hollow laughter here -- offstage, of course.

But this doesn’t let Obama off the hook. Those Western leaders who are gently telling us that Egypt is still on the path to “democracy”, that this is an “interim” period – like the ‘interim’ Egyptian government concocted by the military – and that millions of Egyptians support the coup that isn’t a coup, have to remember that Morsi was indeed elected in a real, Western-approved election.  Sure, he won only 51 per cent -- or 52 per cent -- of the vote.

But did George W. Bush really win his first presidential election? Morsi certainly won a greater share of the popular vote than David Cameron. We can say that Morsi lost his mandate when he no longer honoured his majority vote by serving the majority of Egyptians. But does that mean that European armies must take over their countries whenever European prime ministers fall below 50 per cent in their public opinion polls? And by the way, are the Muslim Brotherhood to be allowed to participate in the next Egyptian presidential elections? Or will they be banned? And if they participate, what will happen if their candidate wins again?

Israel, however, must be pleased. It knows a coup when it sees one – and it’s now back playing its familiar role as the only ‘democracy’ in the Middle East, and with the kind of neighbours it understands: military rulers. And if Egypt’s wealthy military king-makers are getting a nifty $1.5 billion dollars a year from Washington – albeit postponed -- they are certainly not going to tamper with their country’s peace treaty with Israel, however unpopular it remains with the people for whom it supposedly staged the coup-that-wasn’t.  Stand by then for the first US delegation to visit the country which has suffered the coup-that-wasn’t. And you’ll know whether they believe there was a coup or not by the chaps they visit on their arrival in Cairo: the army, of course.

 

Pointblank
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

the people took him out. There were 25 million petitions solicited and presented to recall him. He surely did call down the wrath of his people if not god on his head!

 

By the way, removing a despot by force is always the last resort. In most cases it is the only resort.

FM

The judicial authorities replaced the attorney general , reinstating Abdel Meguid Mahmoud the prosecutor installed by Hosni Mubarak, the autocratic president ousted in Egypt’s 2011 revolution.

Pointblank

Mohamed ElBaradei, the Nobel Prize-winning diplomat and Egypt’s most prominent liberal, said Thursday that he had worked hard to convince Western powers of what he called the necessity of forcibly ousting President Mohamed Morsi, contending that Mr. Morsi had bungled the country’s transition to an inclusive democracy.

Pointblank

Listen people...Burnham won in 1964 (okay thru a coalition) and in 1968 (okay thru rigging). He then won more than two-thirds of the popular vote in 1973 and banned this and that; stomped on a free press, imprison and kill some opposition members; etc.

 

The GDF took their tanks from Ayangana to the Residence and asked Cheddie and Rodney to form a reconciliation govt until elections can be held in 1975. The Nixon administration did not call the removal of Burnham from office a coup.

 

Sounds familiar today? well, if not substitute Morsi for Burnham (not the rigging part but the other stuff) and the Egyptian military for the GDF. Now you get it?

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:

Listen people...Burnham won in 1964 (okay thru a coalition) and in 1968 (okay thru rigging). He then won more than two-thirds of the popular vote in 1973 and banned this and that; stomped on a free press, imprison and kill some opposition members; etc.

 

The GDF took their tanks from Ayangana to the Residence and asked Cheddie and Rodney to form a reconciliation govt until elections can be held in 1975. The Nixon administration did not call the removal of Burnham from office a coup.

 

Sounds familiar today? well, if not substitute Morsi for Burnham (not the rigging part but the other stuff) and the Egyptian military for the GDF. Now you get it?

??? I think for had too much henny yesterday!

FM
Originally Posted by Mr.T:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

It was not incompetence. He used the democratic process to gain power. Once in office he started introducing islamic rule, suggested that Egyptians should go and fight in Syria for the rebels, appointed as governor the person who is accused of killing 12 tourists, etc.

If that is democracy that islamists are pushing then Morsi should be hanged in Tariq square.

So what is the proper way to remove a corrupted leader from office? How would America remove a corrupted leader from office?

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

The Islamist fundamentalist don't care about corruption, they care about spreading their doctrine of medievalism to the rest of mankind.  The progressive forces and the military ensured this does not happen.

 

As the new head said, they will now get the glorious revolution that started back in 2011 back on track on its intended path, a secular republic based on democratic principles.

I am not concerned with what fundamentalist care about. I am concerned with how you think someone should be removed from the office they were democratically elected to. How would that take place in America for instance?

FM
Originally Posted by seignet:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

U might dismiss this as Biblical rubbish. But in the Book of Daniel, it tells of the continuous turmoil in Egypt-it is one of the signs of the end times. If the scholars are correct, then we will see over the next year, a continous change of leadership. Strange happenings in that land will also confuse the world at large.

No sane person care about your Biblical rubbish. We are talking now. Try living in the present for a change.

FM
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

the people took him out. There were 25 million petitions solicited and presented to recall him. He surely did call down the wrath of his people if not god on his head!

 

By the way, removing a despot by force is always the last resort. In most cases it is the only resort.

There were even more people wanting Obama removed back in 2010 because they believed that he was un-American among other things. Would you agree that the same approach should have been applied here?

FM
Originally Posted by Kari

The GDF took their tanks from Ayangana to the Residence and asked Cheddie and Rodney to form a reconciliation govt until elections can be held in 1975. The Nixon administration did not call the removal of Burnham from office a coup.

 

 

Did the above really happened 

FM
Originally Posted by Pointblank:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Simple question -

 

Was Morsi elected by the people of Egypt?

 

If so what is the proper way to have him removed if he is incompetent?

Wy you asking suh hard questions?

 

You will send some into hiding

It is a dangerous place to put oneself in when one feel the need to go along with the popular opinion rather than the right one. I don't care for Morsi any more than I care for any other Egyptian. My point is that decent people take decent positions. If we accept this approach for Egypt, we should at least be willing to state that it is acceptable to our situation. It is one thing to disagree with the popular vote but to remove the popular vote while proclaiming the grand value of democracy is highly hypocritical. And Baseman is in a league all his own.

FM
obviously you never read nor visited www.RichmondHillEDC.org or worse, you did not understand our issues
 
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Vish M:

is this still about Guyana and about Guyanese issues?


Is RHEDC about Guyana and Guyanese issues

Vish M
Originally Posted by Vish M:
obviously you never read nor visited www.RichmondHillEDC.org or worse, you did not understand our issues
 
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Vish M:

is this still about Guyana and about Guyanese issues?


Is RHEDC about Guyana and Guyanese issues

RHEDC stands for Richmond Hill Economic Development Council. If that is about Guyana and Guyanese issues, then you are involved in false advertising.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×