Skip to main content

Clairmont Mingo (at left) and Keith Lowenfield

          Clairmont Mingo (at left) and Keith Lowenfield

August 9, 2020

Source

President Irfaan Ali has announced a planned review of the recently-concluded elections process and to hold anyone who tried to undermine it to account.

“A review of events related to the electoral process over the last five months will begin shortly in order to determine, forensically, exactly what transpired, and to hold accountable any persons who sought to pervert and corrupt the system,” Ali told those gathered at his inauguration yesterday at the National Cultural Centre.

One week ago, five months after the polls and after a series of legal battles, Ali was declared the winner of the presidential elections and subsequently sworn in as the country’s ninth executive president.

The announcement came after Chief Election Officer Keith Lowenfield submitted the results of the March 2nd general elections using the numbers of a national recount, which was necessitated by attempts to manipulate the count for Region Four in favour of the former APNU+AFC coalition.

Region Four Returning Officer Clairmont Mingo was accused on March 5th of presenting fictitious figures on a spreadsheet and five major observer groups had found his tabulation not to be credible, including the CARICOM observer mission. On May 6th, GECOM executed a recount exercise that showed that the PPP/C had won the majority of votes. However, the credibility of the results determined by the recount have been challenged by the APNU+AFC, which has claimed that alleged irregularities that were uncovered compromised the polls. Lowenfield is currently facing private criminal charges which are alleging fraud and misconduct in his handling of the elections results.

Ali charged yesterday that “vigorous attempts” were made over the past five months to destroy the democratic credentials of people and to deny the will of the electorate.

“All of us are painfully aware of the trauma and anguish that our people endured over the past five months,” he said.

According to Ali, everyone has an obligation to ensure that history does not repeat itself. “All of us have an obligation to the nation and to ourselves to ensure that never again should any generation of our people be subjected to such unlawful behaviour,” he added.

In an effort to ensure this is not done, Ali further stated that his government will pursue the necessary reforms so as to strengthen the democracy and make the electoral process more transparent. “In our manifesto we pledged to pursue inclusionary constitutional governance. I intend to see that pledge is implemented.  To do so will require certain constitutional reforms which we will be formulated in consultation with the people”, Ali said.

“…..We will enhance parliamentary democracy, support an independent and efficient judiciary and ensure that the rule of law and the constitutional rights of every Guyanese are respected by all,” he added.

Last week, the Central Corentyne Chamber of Commerce called for a Commission of Inquiry to be conducted into the elections, with its president, Mohammed Raffik contending that the contentious five-month delay in the finalisation of the results saw setbacks to the country’s race relations.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Criminal probe into GECOM’s 2020 election operations also on the cards- Nandlall

FILE PICTURE: PPP General Secretary, Bharrat Jagdeo and his delegation meeting with the seven-member Guyana Elections Commission, and Chief Elections Officer Keith Lowenfield and Deputy Chief Elections Officer Roxanne Myers.

August 8 ,2020

Source

Attorney General Anil Nandlall on Saturday did not rule out a criminal probe into the administrative operations of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) concerning the 2020 general elections, but said other options might include a commission of inquiry or a forensic audit.

He said a “deep probing police investigation” is among the options being considered to move ahead “very shortly” because the country had been subjected to five months of intense political crisis. “This is a matter of national concern. The people of Guyana suffered greatly. The State of Guyana was affected and it is the duty of an elected government to probe into this national tragedy so that the issue can be made public so that the people of Guyana can understand what transpired and more importantly to prepare against a repeat of this horrific tragedy,” he said.

President Dr. Irfaan Ali earlier in the day announced that government would conduct a forensic review to determine exactly what transpired, and to hold accountable any persons who sought to pervert and corrupt the system.

Private Prosecutor, Attorney-at-Law, Glenn Hanoman has already told the Court that three private criminal charges of misconduct in public office, fraud and conspiracy to commit a felony against the Chief Elections Officer, Keith Lowenfield would eventually be taken over by the Director of Public Prosecutions and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The DPP has not withdrawn those charges against Mr. Lowenfield who is on GYD$450,000 bail but has scrapped those  against the GECOM Chairman, Retired Justice Claudette Singh.

With the opposition A Partnership for National Unity+Alliance For Change (APNU+AFC) already preparing to file an elections petition concerning alleged electoral fraud, irregularities and anomalies that rendered the March 2,  2020 polls unreflective of the will of Guyanese, Mr. Nandlall said that would be one of the factors that would decide the type of probe to be conducted.

“There are certain eventualities I have to await. If they do not materialise then it will cause me to move in a particular direction. If it does, a different option will have to be explored,” he said.

The Attorney General said no decisions of the seven-member commission would be enquired into by a Commission of Inquiry but into the electoral process. “We are going to deal with officers outside of the Commission,” he said.

Leader of the People’s National Congress Reform, Mr. David Granger on Friday restated that the election results were the product of electoral malpractices that would be challenged in a High Court election petition.

This would not be the first probe into an elections  that a PPP administration would be conducting. The first was into the disturbances of the 1992 elections by a one-man commission of now late Senior Counsel B.O. Adams.

Django
@Django posted:

This is interference by the newly elected President.

GECOM is responsible to look into the affairs and mismanagement of the institution.

You are dead wrong. GECOM is not a law onto itself. A probe is warranted and consequences well justified.

Baseman
@Baseman posted:

You are dead wrong. GECOM is not a law onto itself. A probe is warranted and consequences well justified.

Not the President makes the call ,GECOM is an independent institution [ well in true form it's partially]  and can do an in house investigation. They know what happened .This isn't the kabaka days ,the same complained about are coming to pass,it's not only a week.

Django
Last edited by Django
@Prashad posted:

Anyone who tries to rig an election should be jailed and heavily fined.

Rigging didn't stop in 1992 ,all the elections reports states irregularities ,recommendations was given for GECOM to be more independent ,every government just let it slide.

Django
Last edited by Django

The new Sheriff will ensure that all those involved in what took place from March to August will be brought to justice. I didn't expect the PNC filing any petition but they don't have to because this inquiry will uncover everything. More bad news for the PNC.

FM
@Django posted:

Rigging didn't stop in 1992 ,all the elections reports states irregularities ,recommendations was given for GECOM to be more independent ,every government just let it slide.

Not anymore. This new government said it is a results driven government so no more letting things slide.

FM

GECOM is independent in its conduction of the elections but if any laws are broken then the courts can hold those law breakers responsible. The Conduit between the Court and the person(s) breaking those laws is the police which is part of the government.

FM
@Former Member posted:

GECOM is independent in its conduction of the elections but if any laws are broken then the courts can hold those law breakers responsible.

The Conduit between the Court and the person(s) breaking those laws is the police which is part of the government.

When Laws are broken the Police [another institution which is free from political influence ] are called to carry out an investigation ,if found culpable the courts [another independent institution free from political interference ] decides.

Django
Last edited by Django
@Django posted:

When Laws are broken the Police [another institution which is free from political influence ] are called to carry out an investigation ,if found culpable the courts [another independent institution free from political interference ] decides.

That is what will happen bai. The President expects the police to look into it. Remember not so long ago Granger used to talk about the powers of the President? Well this President has powers too.

FM
@Django posted:

When Laws are broken the Police [another institution which is free from political influence ] are called to carry out an investigation ,if found culpable the courts [another independent institution free from political interference ] decides.

Wow...Google has its limitations!

Baseman
@Former Member posted:

That is what will happen bai. The President expects the police to look into it.

Remember not so long ago Granger used to talk about the powers of the President?

Well this President has powers too.

Where Granger spoke about Presidential Powers ?

Django

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×