Skip to main content

Ulita Moore’s case proves attempt to frustrate electoral process – Carter Center

 

Control of Guyana’s newfound oil wealth is in the midst of the electoral impasse that faces the nation following “the mother of all elections”, according to US- based democracy watchdog The Carter Center.
The Center has since reiterated its commitment to observing the entire electoral process.
Guyana’s Full Court on Tuesday ruled to discharge the injunctions that were put in place by Justice Franklyn Holder following an application filed by APNU/AFC candidate Ulita Moore.
In a public missive issued on Wednesday, one day after the Full Court’s ruling, the Carter Center noted that while “every election is important,” this one was “deemed especially so because, five years ago, Exxon discovered massive amounts of oil off the coast of Guyana.”
The Center, in its missive, observed that the first barrels hit the market in January, saying, “Now, this small, poor nation is poised to become a very rich one, and the country’s two major political parties – which are divided largely along ethnic lines – desperately want to control the coming wealth.”
The democracy watchdog pointed out that the election came over a year after the passage of a no-confidence motion against President David Granger and his Administration in December 2018.
“The ruling party challenged the motion in the courts for months, but lost. The newfound oil revenue, many Guyanese believe, could keep the winner of the 2020 election in power for decades.”
Chair of The Carter Center Board of Trustees, Jason Carter, who led the Center’s Observer Team to Guyana, said that Guyana stands at a crossroads, stressing the importance of a credibly elected Government in the management of Guyana’s oil resources.
“Not only is it critical that this election is seen as credible, it’s also essential that it serves as a springboard to a future that is more inclusive and so that all the people of Guyana can share in this new wealth,” he said.
According to the Center, the governing A Partnership for National Unity, Alliance For Change (APNU/AFC) role in further frustrating the completion of a credible election process was further cemented when an injunction was filed by that party’s supporter Ulita Moore to halt a Caribbean Community (Caricom) supervised recount of votes.
The recount had been agreed upon by the leaders of the APNU/AFC and the People’s Progressive Party/Civic under a CARICOM Initiative.

Completing the mission
Director of the Carter Center’s Democracy Program, David Carroll, emphasised, “The stakes in this election are very high,” while pointing to the ethnic divide facing the country.
Former US President Jimmy Carter first led an election observation mission here in 1992.
As such, the Center said, of the long history in Guyana where it has been seen “as a trusted partner, it was important for us to observe this election.”
Noting that a month has elapsed since the voters took to the polls, the Center bemoaned the fact that a new President has not yet been sworn in.
The Center reminded that their team had to make the difficult decision to depart Guyana on March 20, before the completion of the electoral process, due to several factors, including “harassment of observers by ruling party supporters.”
The team had also expressed concerns in regard to international travel restrictions brought on by the COVID-19 virus. Nevertheless, the Center has affirmed its commitment to seeing the completion of the process, as was expressed by Associate Director of the Center’s Democracy Program, Brett Lacy.
He has also gone on record as saying, “We’re still committed to observing the entire electoral process…Nonpartisan observers have an important role to play. We report what we see and hear to the rest of the world. Whoever wins the election should want to ensure that their victory is seen as credible.”

Lack of credibility
In its recommitment to overseeing the completion of a credible election, the Center reminded of the unverified declaration made for Region Four, which is at the centre of the electoral impasse and has resulted in the March 2 election being regarded as flawed and lacking credibility.
Reflecting on the circumstances surrounding its conclusion — which has led to threats of international sanctions — the Center did reiterate, “Election day proceeded smoothly.”
The Center’s observers sent back mostly positive reports from all 10 of the country’s regions, but tallying went astray in Region Four when, after only half the results for the region had been tabulated in the presence of observers, the returning officer responsible for the tallying abruptly announced the rest of results, which indicated that the ruling party had come from behind to win the election.”
The Center, in addition to other international observer missions, subsequently denounced the declaration of unverified results, saying they lacked credibility, and called for a return to the verification process.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Carter Center was heavily involved in the changes in Venezuela. Carter himself declared that Chavez was very good for the Venezuelan ppl. We see how that ended.

Carter Center said Fujimoro of Peru was extremely good for Peru after a dictatorship. Fujimoro was worst than the guy he replaced.

Carter Center has never been well informed, they believe elections and ballot have the solution. Granger is testing them on that.

 

S

Carter should have kept an eye on the PPP after the 1992 fair and free elections. Their 23 years was not democratic to the PNC, that is why dey will not let the Carter Center screw them again. Hamilton Green remembers.

S

Bai, you hallucinating or what ? ALL elections under PPP were certified free and fair by USA, Carter Centre, Commonwealth etc. 
Bai, age is catching up wid you or you getting wrong sided. I noticed  that you have been making ass backwards statements lately. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×