Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Europe’s Shared Responsibility for Migrants

 

The European Commission’s proposal last week of a system of quotas to distribute migrants among the European Union’s 28 member states is a welcome step toward a permanent, more equitable process for dealing with the waves of migrants seeking safety and opportunity in Europe.

 

E.U. regulations now stipulate that it is the responsibility of the country where migrants arrive to accommodate them and process asylum requests. That has left Italy and Greece overwhelmed by the recent tide of migration from Africa.

 

The commission‘s proposal would provide emergency relief to Italy and Greece by relocating 40,000 Syrian and Eritrean asylum seekers (economic migrants would be repatriated) who arrived there after April 15 to other European nations over the next two years, while working on a permanent plan. That is very little to ask of the countries that are not doing their share. Yet, several countries that are run by right-wing governments, or are facing rising anti-immigrant sentiment, are having none of even this modest proposal.

 

Hungary, Poland, Latvia and the Czech Republic have all protested any use of mandated quotas. Voluntary quotas, as these countries know, are meaningless. Britain and Ireland have the option under E.U. treaties of “opting in” — hardly likely in the case of Britain, given the anti-immigration stance of Prime Minister David Cameron’s government and Mr. Cameron’s pledge to hold a referendum on whether Britain should leave the European Union.

 

The new proposal has strong backing from Germany, which took in 203,000 asylum seekers in 2014, the most of any European country. Germany’s support is appropriate, given its relatively robust economy. But even Germany has expressed concern, together with France, that the plan should take into consideration how many asylum seekers countries have already taken in. This is a reasonable demand. Five of the E.U.’s 28 members — Germany, France, Sweden, Italy and Hungary — now account for three-fourths of all asylum applications.

 

When the European Council meets on June 25 and 26, it must be sure it has rounded up enough support to approve a credible version of the new proposal that establishes binding rules for fairly sharing the influx of refugees. It will be a challenge for the European Commission to get members to deal collectively with the migration crisis. But countries that refuse to accept the idea of sharing the burden that has been falling so heavily on Italy and Greece are only showing their contempt for the very idea of the union of Europe.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Europe cannot sustain this. North Africans have traditionally not integrate and Europe cannot create bantustans. They need to create an headland in Africa in the area of Allepo, hold it, clear it and resettle North Africans in the area

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Europe cannot sustain this. North Africans have traditionally not integrate and Europe cannot create bantustans. They need to create an headland in Africa in the area of Allepo, hold it, clear it and resettle North Africans in the area

The asylums seekers aren't mainly North African though.  Most are sub Saharan Africans or people fleeing the Middle East.

 

I suspect that the issue with the North Africans in Europe is more complex than you make it out to be.  Prior to 9/11 did any one in the USA have an issue with the Arab populations.  In fact many who most assumed to be "white" were in fact of Arab origin, Nadler being an example.

 

Europe has its own problems as it is quite xenophobic and refuses to accept that its involvement in many of these nations in the colonial era triggered a migration to the "mother country".

 

Europe refused to embrace these people, and consider even their grand children to be "foreign".  They refuse to accept that diversity is usually a good thing, and stigmatize different cultural practices that immigrants bring.

 

Why do the USA and Canada, and now even the UK, have fewer problems in integrating their immigrants than do nations like France, Italy, Germany, and Spain?

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by baseman:

They rass created the mess of Libya.  I pity the poor people running and getting killed, but Europe created the mess, let them deal with it.

People are migrating THROUGH Libya, because there is no government to stop them.  Libya isn't creating a refugee crisis for Europe as these are mainly Syrians, Iraqis, and sub Saharan Africans.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×