National Assembly cannot reverse powers of any member – Chief Justice rules |
Written by |
Friday, 01 March 2013 22:30 |
Chief Justice(CJ) (ag) Ian Chang yesterday ruled that the National Assembly, not being Parliament, cannot, through any bill or motion be empowered to negate the powers of any member of the National Assembly. The CJ also ruled that whenever the court’s jurisdiction is invoked on any issue, the court’s decision is final and binding. Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs Anil Nandlall had filed a Motion in the High Court on behalf of the Government of Guyana, to nullify the No-Confidence Motion moved in the National Assembly on July 25, 2012 by Opposition Leader David Granger and passed by the House on July 30, 2012. The no-confidence Motion was brought against Minister of Home Affairs Clement Rohee after the death of three protestors in the mining town of Linden on July 18, 2012. The protest took place when residents objected to the hike in the electricity tariff in Region 10. The events took a turn for the worse during which period the trio was killed and others injured. Minister Rohee was accused of giving direct orders to the police officers on the ground to shoot at the protestors, and for not having proper oversight of national security in Guyana. Government had said it would not remove the minister from office, until the findings and report of a Commission of Inquiry empanelled to investigate the events of that day. That report was submitted to the Head of State on Thursday and its findings exonerate the minister. When the no-confidence Motion was presented by the Leader of the Opposition, David Granger, he had declared it to be the “Mother of all Motions.” AG Nandlall now observes that “the Court has now pronounced finally and definitively that that mother of all motions is unconstitutional, unlawful, and misconceived legally.” The final ruling of the CJ has endorsed his preliminary ruling. The major points in yesterday’s ruling were that Minister Rohee has a Constitutional right to speak, and that the National Assembly, not being the Parliament, cannot negate or deny him that Constitutional right to speak, which extends to the presentation of any motions or bills as is expressly guaranteed by the Constitution as a right to an elected member. Ruling that the motion filed by the Leader of the Opposition, was misconceived and unconstitutional, the CJ also stated that the convention which applies in England in relation to ministerial responsibility and resignation when a no-confidence motion is passed in a minister, has no place in Guyana’s political architecture. As such, he has ruled that the motion which was passed to repose that no-confidence motion in the minister and the consequent sanctions which followed, that is, the imposition of that prohibition which prevents the minister from speaking, is wholly wrong, unconstitutional and outside the power of the National Assembly. The CJ also outlined the distinction between the role of parliament to regulate its own procedure, and the role of the court in relation to parliament. AG Nandlall explained that, “The CJ stated clearly that while the parliament has a role to play in regulating its business and to determine matters arising from its business, this, however, does not oust the jurisdiction of the court to retain a supervisory jurisdiction of review of everything that transpires in parliament to ensure that parliament, the national assembly and the members of the national assembly do not exceed their constitutional powers, and do not trample on the constitutional rights of members and the national assembly. The court remains the only tribunal that is imbued with such a jurisdiction, and whenever the court’s jurisdiction is invoked, and the court makes a ruling on those matters, it is final and binding.” The AG expressed the fervent hope that, “once and for all, this will put this matter to rest and bring closure to those critics who are criticising me and the government for bringing these matters to the court.” He pointed to the fact that the CJ’s ruling a second time around, has confirmed that the court has an important role to play and, “it is the court to which we must come whenever the Constitution is being violated and that is the democratic and legal obligation that we have as a government. We will continue whenever we feel that the national assembly has exceeded its powers and has violated the Constitution to come back to the court for redress.” Meanwhile, A Partnership for National Unity Member of Parliament and legal representative Basil Williams, while conceding that the CJ’s final ruling has endorsed the preliminary decision, noted that some issues were clarified. “He (the CJ) has also crystallised the relationship between the power of the parliament and the court, and has reaffirmed that the court is the only and final authority to determine issues of law and issues emanating from the Constitution, not the Speaker. The Speaker cannot deal with matters of the Constitution or matters of law. Even if he deals with it, he is not the final decision maker in this respect, that jurisdiction resides with the court,” Williams declared. This statement made by Williams is a glaring contradiction of what his party holds fast to. APNU and its leaders have consistently declared that because they hold the parliamentary majority in conjunction with the Alliance For Change, they have the legal and constitutional authority to make decisions that must be followed and adhered to by government and the national assembly.
|
More Top Stories
- COI’s exoneration of Minister Rohee vindicates his integrity – President
- National Assembly cannot reverse powers of any member – Chief Justice rules
- Arrest in UG classroom... GDF deeply regrets ranks exceeded powers
- NAACIE holding out over expired Labour Agreement with GPL - CEO
- Hope Canal Project deadline now extended to August
- resident-ramotar-gets-linden-coi-report-justice-has-been-done-says-coi-chairman&catid=4:top-story&Itemid=8">President Ramotar gets Linden COI report - ‘Justice has been done’- says COI Chairman
- NAACIE rejects GPL ‘all inclusive’ 5 percent wage increase ….wages bill already more than company can afford, being met with Government subsidy –Brassington
- Acknowledging expected shortfall… Ramsammy outlines initiatives to increase sugar production
- Woman posing as Chronicle employee on fraud charge
- CGX to invest up to $1B in oil search over the next five years …Pacific Rubiales increases share stock in company, brings in US$40M
- My ruling was constitutionally correct – Speaker Trotman
- Medical storage facility at Diamond to be commissioned on March 8
- Guyana showcasing Caribbean Week of Agriculture this October
- resident-ramotar-to-receive-linden-coi-report-tomorrow&catid=4:top-story&Itemid=8">President Ramotar to receive Linden COI report tomorrow
- Speaker’s ruling rises above partisan politics– AG
- olitical-opposition-should-focus-on-issues-not-on-me-minister-rohee&catid=4:top-story&Itemid=8">Political opposition should focus on issues - not on me - Minister Rohee
- Many opportunities available for youth development
- Guyana’s economic performance hailed by CDB Vice- President -for sustained growth despite global recession
- Guyana inks US$40M loan, grant agreement with CDB – for transport and poverty alleviation projects
- At regional fisheries workshop… Ramsammy laments avoidable, high food import bills