Part 2: Guyana was cheated by the British and Americans

Part 2 of 6

Part 3&4: Guyana was cheated by the British and Americans

Parts 3 and 4 of 

BETRAYAL BY THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY GOVERNMENT

http://www.guyana.org/features/guyana...

Cheddi Jagan had misplaced faith in British justice.

Jagan felt that Britain would do, in the end what was right. Jagan's bottom line was that Guyana should trust the British to be honest brokers for a peaceful solution.

Jagan at the time however was totally unaware that the US President John F Kennedy was applying extensive pressure on the British to rig an election victory for Forbes Burnham.

President Kennedy therefore flatly ignored detailed reports by the CIA emphasising that Dr Jagan was the right person to lead Guyana. The CIA's insistence that Forbes Burnham was a dangerous choice fell on President Kennedy's deaf ears.

Guyana was once again cheated by the British and American on May 11, 2015.

Part 5: Guyana was cheated by the British and Americans

Part 5 of 6

Part 6: Guyana was cheated by the British and Americans

Part 6 of 6

This is a sign of progress. The PPP idiots are reduced to talking to each other about ancient history. There is hope for Indian people.

Interesting stuff here.  Thanks for posting DG.

Do you find it odd that Guyanese spend most of their time arguing about shyte that happened decades ago so as to make their present day political choices?

WTF does 1964 have to do with 2015 besides history?

Are we gonna invade England to teach dem limeys a lesson for screwing us in 1966? America?

Guyanese choices today are based strictly on race.  I think it would be a very small number that vote for the PPP because of what the British and Kennedy did.  Some of the details presented in the clips were new to Dr. Fenton Ramsahoye (sp?) so the clips do bring new learning.

Apan Jhaat has returned in the form of discussions. Somehow, the conclusion arrived at is that it came with old Indian people and nutured and thriving after 177 years.

Those films are to reinforce to current conclusion that the British and Yanks rigged the elections again.

Historically, Guyana has not move one iota. Lots a shaking and huffing but we ain goan anywhere. Is like we all in rocking chairs, lot of shaking and huffing. But we ain moving. Simply bcz, we have too many that wont let the past ress.

I don't think Guyana is as relevant to the US and England as back in the 60s.  I think they are more concerned about stability now.  Why did they help Cheddi in 1992 if they had such great dislike for the PPP?

Comment related to the diehards who believe the Anglos did it again to the PPP

Yes.  I figured that after my reply.

That's why a simple 100-day plan is mystifying. It's only Day 29 since Granger was sworn-in as President but people want all the promises fulfilled already.

And some folks are still talking bout 28 years of PNC rigged elections.

[GILBAKKA'S NOTE TO SELF: As an amateur historian you sound like a hypocrite. ]

Historical events are important to understand current and future issues.

First, I don't think most of us give a hoot about dragging up the past.

Second, Why don't you guys who got a problem, send those articles to your reps in the US and if you so wish to the English embassy, tell em yall think they do dem people bad, go ahead.

How does this made all of you who live in these countries feel. Many of our problems originated in the policies of the U.S. and UK.?

America, Canada and England will have to pump billions into Guyana to make it work.  The Government will owe billions in debt.

Hey, you live in the belly of the beast. Feel great, eh!

I think that the U.S. did not think that the PPP would win the elections. They thought that the WPA and/or the PNC would be in power. No evidence to prove this yet.

This sort of maneuvering happens all over the world with the US being in the centre of it. They spend billions ,at the expense of the tax payers, to get the job done.

I think that Guyanese should demand an apology and compensation from the U.S. And British governments. Many of the problems we experience today resulted from the violence and discord they instigated in the early 1960s.

indeed! . . . you heading the bloody list