@Sheik101 posted:

How u know? yuh meet she?

For all we know we might have another reincarnated Salipenta or one of those triple banned members reincarnated.

@Sheik101 posted:

How u know? yuh meet she?

@Former Member posted:

I asked the same question.

Not bothering with y'all .

@Sheik101 posted:

How u know? yuh meet she?

Be careful here Sean. You might get slapped and thrown in the pen for inciting racists feelings.

@Former Member posted:

For all we know we might have another reincarnated Salipenta or one of those triple banned members reincarnated.

The member is newbie ,avoid the speculation .

@ Skelly.

Me na seh nothing. Sheik seh sun. Me clean as whistle.

@Former Member posted:

For all we know we might have another reincarnated Salipenta or one of those triple banned members reincarnated.

I don't know, but from what I can tell, she's no lawyer. It's actually a criminal offence pretending to be a lawyer.

Maybe, she's DJ's legal advisor ? 

@Former Member posted:

I don't know, but from what I can tell, she's no lawyer. It's actually a criminal offence pretending to be a lawyer.

Maybe, she's DJ's legal advisor ? 

Bai, dis ah me last me gun seh. Fram day 1 me had me had doubts an me still tink so.Me nah mek no kankrete statement hey.

@Former Member posted:

I don't know, but from what I can tell, she's no lawyer. It's actually a criminal offence pretending to be a lawyer.

Maybe, she's DJ's legal advisor ? 

Avoid the insinuations ,i do think you are capable .

What insinuations ? Let her provide proof that she's a lawyer otherwise it's safe to assume that she's a lying.

Ok bai. Peace and out until later.

@Former Member posted:

What insinuations ? Let her provide proof that she's a lawyer otherwise it's safe to assume that she's a lying.

Anyone ever ask you to provide any information about yourself on the forum ?

Stick to the topic.

Sean had to provide proof of his computer room

Just to tickle your fancy...

The next theory ,the voice is Artificial Intelligence Generated.

Wow, Rochelle, this is a first, very original and brilliant. You have a lovely voice.     I think these Indo chaps are now smitten with you.    Now they'll want you to slap your law degree here.  

Rochelle forgot to mention the foo foo. Good job. 

@Django posted:

The next theory ,the voice is Artificial Intelligence Generated.

Bai, don't get carried away. I sitting down at Long Branch beach here in Jersey cracking up. I could get my Girlfren to make a recording like dat.

@Rochelle posted:

Just to tickle your fancy...

 

Rochelle, you have a calming voice similar to our BLM chairperson, Ivy from Ghana.  Yesterday she chaired an international zoom meeting, with flying colours.

Claudette Singh cannot withdraw from an appeal she never made.

@Former Member posted:

I don't know, but from what I can tell, she's no lawyer.

It's actually a criminal offence pretending to be a lawyer.

Not necessarily so, Sean ...

-- One can indeed claim to be an attorney. However the said person must not; in any way, shape or form; impersonate a specific person who is a lawyer and also the said person does not practice law.

@Django posted:

The next theory ,the voice is Artificial Intelligence Generated.

Perhaps I need to do a GNI Live as well? 

This forum is....amazing. 

Ladies and Gents, 

I am a female, I am a lawyer, and I am sticking to that story. I am not, nor do I need to impersonate something or someone that I am not. 

Now back to our scheduled program.

@Tola posted:

Rochelle, you have a calming voice similar to our BLM chairperson, Ivy from Ghana.  Yesterday she chaired an international zoom meeting, with flying colours.

Thank you so much for your compliment! I hope the meeting was beneficial to all who attended.  

@Rochelle posted:

Ladies and Gents, 

I am a female, I am a lawyer, and I am sticking to that story. I am not, nor do I need to impersonate something or someone that I am not. 

Now back to our scheduled program.

So who is attending to your law practice when you are telling lies all day here on GNI?

@Ramakant-P posted:

Claudette Singh cannot withdraw from an appeal she never made.

She was enjoined to the initial matter in the COA. Remember there was an opportunity for several parties to join the case after APNU petitioned to the COA.

And also recall where she stood on the matter - arguing that APNUAFC had no valid grounds to make an appeal.

I assume PPP/C was hoping her submissions would help buttress their argument, but instead, they cannot rely on her. It is her right to not appear or make submissions. Like I stated, this is a blow to PPP/C. Such actions evidence that she does not wish to challenge the COA's decision, thereby leading the way for a declaration on valid votes only. 

@Bibi Haniffa posted:

So who is attending to your law practice when you are telling lies all day here on GNI?

Well Bibi, I have the privilege of actually working from home. I have two separate laptops set up for GNI banter and work. I am as responsive to my work emails as I am GNI.

Thanks for checking in.   

@Rochelle posted:

   

Perhaps I need to do a GNI Live as well? 

This forum is....amazing. 

Good idea .

@Rochelle posted:

She was enjoined to the initial matter in the COA. Remember there was an opportunity for several parties to join the case after APNU petitioned to the COA.

And also recall where she stood on the matter - arguing that APNUAFC had no valid grounds to make an appeal.

I assume PPP/C was hoping her submissions would help buttress their argument, but instead, they cannot rely on her. It is her right to not appear or make submissions.

Like I stated, this is a blow to PPP/C.

Such actions evidence that she does not wish to challenge the COA's decision, thereby leading the way for a declaration on valid votes only. 

It is not a blow to the PPP/C, any other ones nor groups.

Issues are being assembled and the specific matter will be discussed by the Caribbean Court of Justice - CCJ - starting on Wednesday, July 01, 2020.

It will be seen what develops at that time.

@Former Member posted:

Wow, Rochelle, this is a first, very original and brilliant. You have a lovely voice.     I think these Indo chaps are now smitten with you.    Now they'll want you to slap your law degree here.  

Wow! The only person getting smitten here is u bai. 😃 😃  u gone. Hook, line and sinker. 😃 😃.

@Rochelle posted:

   

Perhaps I need to do a GNI Live as well? 

This forum is....amazing. 

Go ahead. Do it. 😃 😃.

Let it be known that an APNU/AFC agenda is being peddled here. When someone doesn't speak on the broader aspect of the election episodes, it speaks volume of that person's character. We don't have a forum attorney. Each time the news breaks in favor of APNU, it's an occasion for green celebration. Guyana is not green or red, it every color that makes up our country. To whom it may be, no one from either side doesn't impress me when this election is about their selfish fulfillment. I have been following the narrative on both sides on a daily basis. Let's give the CCJ a chance to do its job on July 01.

@Former Member posted:

Let it be known that an APNU/AFC agenda is being peddled here.

This is a public forum for members to engage in discussions or simply to read the posts.

It is doubtful that this is a forum for PNCR/APNU/AFC, PPP/C or any other political group's agenda.

Individuals do have their personal perspectives on the political issues.

@Former Member posted:

This is a public forum for members to engage in discussions or simply to read the posts.

It is doubtful that this is a forum for PNCR/APNU/AFC, PPP/C or any other political group's agenda.

Individuals do have their personal perspectives on the political issues.

To whom it may be, no one from either side doesn't impress me when this election is about their selfish fulfillment.

How long have you been waiting to jump on my throat? 

The APNU/AFC agenda is based on the topic heading, but it continues on to the highlighted portion. 

You of all people should know that I don't favor any party, but I push for justice and fairness.

@Former Member posted:

To whom it may be, no one from either side doesn't impress me when this election is about their selfish fulfillment.

How long have you been waiting to jump on my throat? 

The APNU/AFC agenda is based on the topic heading, but it continues on to the highlighted portion. 

You of all people should know that I don't favor any party, but I push for justice and fairness.

 

This is all assumptions:

2. Justice Singh understands President Granger will be sworn in as President for a second term and no longer wishes to support the applicant's case. This can only mean she agrees with Lowenfield's report.

3. This was all a chess move. Make your enemies think they have won until the very last moment when they are trapped in their own web of lies.

Mr. moderator, you should refrain from engaging in posting pro-PPP topics on the site if you want to be neutral. 

@Former Member posted:

To whom it may be, no one from either side doesn't impress me when this election is about their selfish fulfillment.

How long have you been waiting to jump on my throat? 

The APNU/AFC agenda is based on the topic heading, but it continues on to the highlighted portion. 

You of all people should know that I don't favor any party, but I push for justice and fairness.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, as Petal continues uninterruptible with her/his burps with absolutely nothing of substance to a discussion topic. 

@Former Member posted:

Blah, blah, blah, blah, as Petal continues uninterruptible with her/his burps with absolutely nothing of substance to a discussion topic. 

Note: I reported your silly response to the Admin. Trust me, if he doesn't take me seriously, I will make him. 

@Rochelle posted:

Ladies and Gents, 

I am a female, I am a lawyer, and I am sticking to that story. I am not, nor do I need to impersonate something or someone that I am not. 

Now back to our scheduled program.

What r u insinuating? you're sticking to that story.