Skip to main content

Posted on October 22, 2016 by Ralph Ramkarran

http://conversationtree.gy/go-...president/#more-1423

The President’s address to the National Assembly was disappointing. The expectation was that he would use the occasion to announce the Government’s legislative agenda wrapped around policy initiatives for the next parliamentary year. There was a modicum of this. But on the whole it was a political speech, long on political partisanship and short on the solutions to the grave problems facing the nation, which was more appropriate to a political platform. Whoever caused the serious problems facing the Guyanese people, relating to the economy, crime, to name a few, the Government now has ownership of them. The Guyanese people are looking to the Government to solve them, not excuses as to why they cannot be solved. They are frustrated at the increasing hardship and impatience is rising.

There is no evidence that the Government has attached any importance to itself investing in Guyana’s economy or encouraging others to do so. The Government announced at the end of August that ‘almost nine months into the year, less that 50 percent of the 2016 National Budget has thus far been spent.’ No serious explanation was given for this ‘unfavourable’ and ‘embarrassing’ situation. Since it does not appear to have happened before, the question arises as to whether the trained and competent staff under the past administration that had responsibility are still in place or have been removed or hounded out or have left of their own accord. These are stories that are being heard all the time, with some evidence.

While Government investment is slowing down, the last Government left projects on the table about which little is now being heard, or have been abandoned, or postponed. The biggest was Amaila. In opposing Amaila when in opposition, the President promised two or three smaller hydro projects. After fifteen months we have not heard a word about them. The Specialty Hospital has been unceremoniously abandoned. India was also to assist is establishing a technology facility. There were many other projects being talked about. All may not have been feasible. All may not have received funding. There were great suspicions about the last two PPP/C Government’s track records as a result of Skeldon and allegations of corruption, but at least they understood the necessity for a continuous flow of investment into Guyana’s economy and President Jagdeo worked hard to ensure that projects were continually developed and funding sought or them. Over tremendous objection the country can now boast of a Berbice Bridge and a Marriott Hotel.

These issues have become more urgent because low commodity prices, serious problems in the sugar industry and reducing production in several sectors are creating severe problems. The Bank of Guyana reported some weeks ago that every sector of the economy has shown a decline except mining. The construction industry has slowed dramatically because houses are no longer being built. Negative factors, such as a return to the era of nationalization of personal property for the building of government offices will not help.

Some may conclude that the President stayed away from economic matters in order not to steal the Minister of Finance’s thunder when the latter presents his budget shortly. But such a conclusion would not be justified having regard to the President’s criticisms of the past Government’s management of the economy. This is par for the course, but we are now fifteen months away from the change in Government and the way in which this Government is spending money suggests that the coffers are overflowing. Take only two – the increase in ministerial salaries and the D’Urban Park development. Empty government coffers is not a legislative matter. It is political red meat.

The President threw another hunk of red meat to his political supporters by offering coroners’ inquests for the 400 persons allegedly killed during the PPP’s terms of offices. This is an issue that has frequently engaged the attention of many persons and organizations, which have accused the past PPP governments of atrocities ranging from genocide to murder to collusion in the killings, with efforts to make linkages with drug smuggling, Roger Khan and PPP/C Governments. At least a start could have been made on this in the fifteen months since the Government was elected. Laws already exist for this to happen and past PPP/C governments would no doubt be anxious to have them commence to ascertain whether there is any evidence of their culpability, which they deny. But instead of starting the process, the President used the opportunity of his address to the National Assembly to do some politicking.

It is commendable that the President has commenced the process of addressing the National Assembly at the beginning of every session. It should trigger advanced planning for a legislative agenda, the initiation of which the Parliamentary Management Committee had encouraged in times past, without much success. But the temptation must be resisted to use the occasion to score political points. There are numerous opportunities to do so. And in fact a legislative agenda itself is an opportunity to make political statements by the quality of the legislative plans advanced by the Government. For this the President can go high and still achieve a political objective.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Looks like the koolaid have had a peculiar effect on Django. Apparently he didn't read the article as he heaps praises on Granger in the title while Ramkarran was disappointed. 

FM
Drugb posted:

Looks like the koolaid have had a peculiar effect on Django. Apparently he didn't read the article as he heaps praises on Granger in the title while Ramkarran was disappointed. 

Bhai  you are funny the title is original and from the author.

You r@ss got comprehension issues or wha ???

Django

If the bar is low, not too much work to do.

"The President threw another hunk of red meat to his political supporters by offering coroners’ inquests for the 400 persons allegedly killed during the PPP’s terms of offices. This is an issue that has frequently engaged the attention of many persons and organizations, which have accused the past PPP governments of atrocities ranging from genocide to murder to collusion in the killings, with efforts to make linkages with drug smuggling, Roger Khan and PPP/C Governments. "
Maybe the inquests will show almost all people from Linden, Plaisance, Wismar and Buxton were the killers.

FM

Ramkurran is playing the rank game. His god Jranger will reward him with gold that he can add to the silver brick in his mouth. Then he will shut his mouth. It is all about the rank.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad

New govt. continues PPP’s trend…Money taken from lottery fund without approval


By Abena Rockcliffe-Campbell

Last year, when the APNU+AFC government announced that it will be transferring the monies of the lottery fund into the Consolidated Fund; former Auditor General Anand Goolsarran dubbed this, “a victory for public accountability.”
But, this “victory” appears to be short lived.
Auditor General, Deodat Sharma, in his most recent report, revealed that the APNU+AFC’s dealing with the Accounts of the Guyana Lotteries Commission is not much different from the PPP/C’s.    According to Sharma, the APNU+AFC has done better than the PPP in that it has placed some of the money within the lottery fund into the Consolidated Fund.
But the government continues to use the remaining monies in the lottery fund without Parliamentary approval.
The Government of Guyana and Canadian Bank Note Ltd (CBN) entered into an agreement establishing a Government Lottery which was organized and conducted under the provisions of the Government Lotteries Act, Chapter 80:07 of the Laws of Guyana.
Under this agreement, CBN is to pay Licence fees equivalent to 24 percent of its gross revenue. The Guyana Lotteries Commission, established in August 1996 by a Cabinet Decision, manages the Licence fees receivable and ensures that amounts expended are within the National Sector and in accordance with the guidelines for access to the lottery funding.
Sharma said that over the years, the Lotteries Commission received proceeds from the National Lottery which were used to make payments approved by Cabinet.  “These proceeds were retained in a separate bank account and no amounts were paid over to the Consolidated Fund.”

Auditor General, Deodat Sharma

Auditor General,
Deodat Sharma

Minister of Finance, Winston Jordan

Minister of Finance, Winston Jordan

Sharma said that in 2015, under the new Government, the Ministry of Finance transferred $1.069B from the lotteries fund to the Consolidated Fund.
Nonetheless, Sharma said that while the Ministry of Finance has been budgeting for Lottery Receipts, expenditure continues to be met without parliamentary approval.
The Auditor General stressed that expenditure from the proceeds of the National Lottery should be accounted for by having a supplementary estimate passed in the National Assembly and recorded in the Public Accounts.
Sharma reported that “aside from the amount of $1.069 billion which was transferred to the Consolidated Fund, significant sums which include prior year balances of $369.294M and the proceeds of $421.754M received for 2015 still remain in the bank account and were used to meet expenditure.”
The Auditor General said that according to the bank statements for 2015, amounts totaling $305.826M were expended.
However, Sharma said that the cash book and payment vouchers for 2015 to verify the details of the amounts spent were not presented for audit and the Deputy Accountant General explained that these were with the Forensic Auditor and had not been returned up to the time of the audit. “Notwithstanding, the Ministry provided a listing of the amounts expended according to activities and these were verified with the bank statement.”
Monies were used to cover expenses for Carifesta, Mashramani, Amerindian Heritage, Rehabilitation of Durban Park and Emancipation.  Kaieteur News contacted Minister of Finance, Winston Jordan who said that he will not be responding to the findings of the Auditor General in this regard.  The Minister refused to offer an explanation and said that all questions will be answered at the level of the Public Accounts Committee.
The Lotteries Commission is subject to separate financial reporting and auditing. Sharma has noted that the last set of audited accounts was for the year 2013.  He said that at the time of his report, the audit for the year ended 31December 2014 is being finalized.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×