Skip to main content

Gov’t to introduce river taxi service for Berbicians

September 4, 2015 12:28 pm Category: latest news A+ / A-

By Fareeza Haniff

River taxi[www.inewsguyana.com] – The APNU+AFC government has decided to introduce a River Taxi Service for residents on the West and East Bank of Berbice, which is in direct response to the refusal of officials from the Berbice Bridge Company to reduce the tolls of the Berbice River Bridge.

Government had announced a reduced toll structure which was slated to take effect on September 01, but the officials from the Company refused to implement it on the grounds that millions of dollars will be lost to investors and government did not consult with them.

The administration is providing a monthly subsidy to the Company to compensate for the loss, but this too was refused, resulting in a stalemate between the two sides.

Minister of State, Joseph Harmon told a post Cabinet media briefing on Friday, September 04, 2015 that the proposal for the river taxi was made by Minister of Public Infrastructure, David Patterson and it was approved by Cabinet following “extensive” discussion.

The service will cater specifically to students and the elderly population.

“Cabinet approved the establishment of a river taxi service, primarily to allow for the students and the elderly who are affected in large measure by the refusal of the Berbice Bridge Company Inc to accept the government’s proposal for a lowering of the toll,” Harmon told the news conference.

Minister of State, Joseph Harmon.

Minister of State, Joseph Harmon.

He further noted that Cabinet has mandated Minister of Finance, Winston Jordan to continue discussions with officials from the Company to ensure the reduction of the toll.

“We are of the firm belief that very soon the Bridge Company, who indicated that they had referred the matter to the shareholders of the Company, that they will see the light and agree to have the toll reduced,” the Minister of State said.

He explained that government will provide the infrastructure and the regulatory framework for the implementation of the service; there will also be a pilot project and depending on the outcome, government will authorize the use of a large number of the vessels.

He made it clear that the administration will not be providing the vessels Government will not provide the vessels and a committee, comprising of representatives from the Ministries of Education, Social Cohesion, Public Security and Public Infrastructure will travel to Berbice this weekend to put in place the necessary arrangements for the passengers.

“Our focus will be ensuring the school children and the elderly get an opportunity to cross…at a reduced cost. It is our business in government to ensure that the general public…who cannot afford higher fares, that they are given this subsidy by the State,” Harmon said.

It is not yet clear how soon this service will be implemented.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Nehru:

Those IDIOTS dont know what they want.  CLUELESS FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

What do you think they should have done Nehru ? 

They had talks and even though the government was going to subside the reduced toll, the bridge want to increase the toll  by 55%.

Tola
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Those IDIOTS dont know what they want.  CLUELESS FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

What do you think they should have done Nehru ? 

They had talks and even though the government was going to subside the reduced toll, the bridge want to increase the toll  by 55%.

The Bridge people are great at what they do. They know they will never get an increase. Now, to your question, The Bridge is of VITAL IMPORTANCE to the Guyana Economy and to the People, especially Berbicans so it is in the BEST interest to ALL to sit down and come up with a solution that will be FAIR and just.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Those IDIOTS dont know what they want.  CLUELESS FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

What do you think they should have done Nehru ? 

They had talks and even though the government was going to subside the reduced toll, the bridge want to increase the toll  by 55%.

The Bridge people are great at what they do. They know they will never get an increase. Now, to your question, The Bridge is of VITAL IMPORTANCE to the Guyana Economy and to the People, especially Berbicans so it is in the BEST interest to ALL to sit down and come up with a solution that will be FAIR and just.

In that case the bridge should be nationalised and the current private shareholders arrested for trying to rob the country blind with their minority investment.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Mr.T:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Those IDIOTS dont know what they want.  CLUELESS FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

What do you think they should have done Nehru ? 

They had talks and even though the government was going to subside the reduced toll, the bridge want to increase the toll  by 55%.

The Bridge people are great at what they do. They know they will never get an increase. Now, to your question, The Bridge is of VITAL IMPORTANCE to the Guyana Economy and to the People, especially Berbicans so it is in the BEST interest to ALL to sit down and come up with a solution that will be FAIR and just.

In that case the bridge should be nationalised and the current private shareholders arrested for trying to rob the country blind with their minority investment.

Great Idea, MrT for President!

Nehru
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Tola
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Rivah taxi? dah like de previous ferry service(Torani)? Oh rass dem bubicians ah guh suffah again. Gaad help abie.

FM
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Rivah taxi? dah like de previous ferry service(Torani)? Oh rass dem bubicians ah guh suffah again. Gaad help abie.

REminds me of wooden Computa, Fireside and Jug Lamp.  TK seh vote PNC fuh Donkey Cart Economy.!!!!

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Not when the Guyanese taxpayer is paying for it.

Tola
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Not when the Guyanese taxpayer is paying for it.

Who said anything about Taxpayer.

Nehru
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Rivah taxi? dah like de previous ferry service(Torani)? Oh rass dem bubicians ah guh suffah again. Gaad help abie.

Skelly, many people I know would rather wait for the ferry/taxi, than pay 55% more to cross on the bridge.

Due to the bridge/taxi cost now, may decide to have medical treatment  in Berbice, instead of going to GT. A school fren  made this decision.  

Tola
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Not when the Guyanese taxpayer is paying for it.

Who said anything about Taxpayer.

We are talking about presidents using the same service as ordinary citizens.

Tola
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Those IDIOTS dont know what they want.  CLUELESS FOOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!

What do you think they should have done Nehru ? 

They had talks and even though the government was going to subside the reduced toll, the bridge want to increase the toll  by 55%.

The Bridge people are great at what they do. They know they will never get an increase. Now, to your question, The Bridge is of VITAL IMPORTANCE to the Guyana Economy and to the People, especially Berbicans so it is in the BEST interest to ALL to sit down and come up with a solution that will be FAIR and just.

The Govt was going to subsidize the difference...seems like a nobrainer, except to you I guess

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:

Can fault the Govt for trying to help poor people...

So when the Water Taxis charge an arm and a leg wha yuh gun do???

you think just like the do nothing PPP who only wanted to fill thier friends and family pockets

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:

Can fault the Govt for trying to help poor people...

So when the Water Taxis charge an arm and a leg wha yuh gun do???

Once it's less that the bridge, all is well

FM
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:

Can fault the Govt for trying to help poor people...

So when the Water Taxis charge an arm and a leg wha yuh gun do???

Once it's less that the bridge, all is well

I think this is a first that someone promoting Water Taxis in favor of a Bridge.  Maybe the world is changing or logic has been redefined.

Nehru
Everything will take time to see how the general public will adjust to the river taxis. Not all commuters cares much about the bridge fare, but I believe most people may welcome cheaper crossing. We will be right here to debate the result.
FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Everything will take time to see how the general public will adjust to the river taxis. Not all commuters cares much about the bridge fare, but I believe most people may welcome cheaper crossing. We will be right here to debate the result.

kEY FACTOR:  safety!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  aL yUH rASS THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nehru
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Rivah taxi? dah like de previous ferry service(Torani)? Oh rass dem bubicians ah guh suffah again. Gaad help abie.

Skelly, many people I know would rather wait for the ferry/taxi, than pay 55% more to cross on the bridge.

Due to the bridge/taxi cost now, may decide to have medical treatment  in Berbice, instead of going to GT. A school fren  made this decision.  

Tola bai, The Torani ferry was a nightmare. We had to wait between 4 to 6 hours to cross from Rosignol to New Amsterdam. Maskita bin ah tear rass.

Just imagine travelling so long from USA to GT and had to wait for hours just to see people paying bribes to get ahead of you. You stood there helpless. If you spoke up, you were threatened with arrest. If the river taxi is coming back, it'll be like old times...Guyana gaan fuh channa.

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Everything will take time to see how the general public will adjust to the river taxis. Not all commuters cares much about the bridge fare, but I believe most people may welcome cheaper crossing. We will be right here to debate the result.

kEY FACTOR:  safety!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  aL yUH rASS THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Will private speed boats be employed?

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Everything will take time to see how the general public will adjust to the river taxis. Not all commuters cares much about the bridge fare, but I believe most people may welcome cheaper crossing. We will be right here to debate the result.

kEY FACTOR:  safety!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  aL yUH rASS THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I always you that you criticize fuh criticize sake

FM
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Tola:
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The river taxi can be an alternative crossing, but it wouldn't kill the bridge. Is Granger going to use the river taxi too? :-)

Good question,no belly wuk private jet to Florida.

Why not?? If people can afford Private Jet they should be allowed to do so.

Rivah taxi? dah like de previous ferry service(Torani)? Oh rass dem bubicians ah guh suffah again. Gaad help abie.

Skelly, many people I know would rather wait for the ferry/taxi, than pay 55% more to cross on the bridge.

Due to the bridge/taxi cost now, may decide to have medical treatment  in Berbice, instead of going to GT. A school fren  made this decision.  

Tola bai, The Torani ferry was a nightmare. We had to wait between 4 to 6 hours to cross from Rosignol to New Amsterdam. Maskita bin ah tear rass.

Just imagine travelling so long from USA to GT and had to wait for hours just to see people paying bribes to get ahead of you. You stood there helpless. If you spoke up, you were threatened with arrest. If the river taxi is coming back, it'll be like old times...Guyana gaan fuh channa.

There's always the bridge...nothing like competition...why yuh think there is Staten Island ferries and many other ferry services

FM

Demerara River have a speed boat service from

Vreed-en-Hoop to GT,been operating since the

70's,it is quicker to reach GT than use the Bridge

and also far cheaper.

 

If the government is introducing this kind of

service in the Berbice River what is the big

deal,some of you guys thinks this is all new,

further there are speed boat service to Leguan

,Supernaan, Bartica,etc..etc.

Django
Last edited by Django
Bro, Berbice river is much wider. Safety must be considered when school children and elderly will travel the most. I am not a fan of the coalition government, but I am not hoping that every implementation must be a failure. I am not heartless.
FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Bro, Berbice river is much wider. Safety must be considered when school children and elderly will travel the most. I am not a fan of the coalition government, but I am not hoping that every implementation must be a failure. I am not heartless.

Cobra..  i am sure adequate vessels will be used and

safety indeed is top priority.

Django
Last edited by Django
Originally Posted by Django:
 

Cobra..  i am sure adequate vessels will be used and

safety indeed is top priority.

Safety does not exist in the Guyanese' psyche.

 

This move by the government is akin to a loser mentality one. There are at least three better moves they could have made.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Django:
 

Cobra..  i am sure adequate vessels will be used and

safety indeed is top priority.

Safety does not exist in the Guyanese' psyche.

 

This move by the government is akin to a loser mentality one. There are at least three better moves they could have made.

Kaz..what are the moves???

Django
Originally Posted by Cobra:
1. Paddle with you private canoe.
2. Swim
3. Walk on water like Jesus.
:-)

Me like #3 bes and since me talk to Him most days, me gun tek dat option.

But jus to be sure me gun put on a life jacket, because me faith might get weak in de middle ah de riva. Me na Petah u know.    

Tola
Originally Posted by Django:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Django:
 

Cobra..  i am sure adequate vessels will be used and

safety indeed is top priority.

Safety does not exist in the Guyanese' psyche.

 

This move by the government is akin to a loser mentality one. There are at least three better moves they could have made.

Kaz..what are the moves???

Don't hold your breath.

Tola
Last edited by Tola
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Bro, Berbice river is much wider. Safety must be considered when school children and elderly will travel the most. I am not a fan of the coalition government, but I am not hoping that every implementation must be a failure. I am not heartless.

dem bin ah travel pan pantoon and wan lil laanch fun dankey years.

 

Pointblank
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Bro, Berbice river is much wider. Safety must be considered when school children and elderly will travel the most. I am not a fan of the coalition government, but I am not hoping that every implementation must be a failure. I am not heartless.

Like de cobra neva slither by de mighty essiquibo riva . dat riva mo wide dan de berbice riva and more dangerous yet fuh dankey yeard dem have speed boat now riva taxi.

\

Pointblank

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×