Skip to main content

http://www.guyana-times.com/?p=18458

September 14,2016

Govt terminates Investment Agreement with BaiShanLin.

…company now to repay $1.5B in tax waivers

The Guyana Government has terminated the Investment Agreement with controversial Chinese logging company BaiShanLin Forest Development Inc, and the entity is now being asked to repay the fiscal concessions it had been granted for the importation of machinery, equipment and vehicles to the tune of $1.5 billion.

Commissioner General [ag) Ingrid Griffith

Commissioner General (ag) Ingrid Griffith

Guyana Times has seen a copy of the Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA) letter, which was inked by Commissioner General (ag) Ingrid Griffith and called on the company to make good on its payment within two weeks or face having its machinery, equipment and motor vehicles seized.

This publication has since been informed that it was the failure of BaiShanLin to make its payments, which saw members of the law enforcement and investigative division of GRA descending on the entity’s Coomacka Linden operations Sunday last.

According to the GRA missive addressed to Managing Director of BaiShanLin, Chu Hongbo, the Government’s premier revenue collection agency had launched an investigation to determine if the terms and conditions under which the tax exemptions were granted had been complied with.

BSL breach

BaiShanLin Managing Director Chu Hongbo

BaiShanLin Managing Director Chu Hongbo

According to the Revenue Authority, BaiShanLin failed to undertake the activities of the project specified in the Investment Agreement with regard to the setting up of a modernised wood processing facility in Linden.

The tax collection body also found that BaiShanLin had also failed to create and sustain employment for 150 persons over three years.

“It should be noted that they also failed to employ citizens of Guyana with first preference being given to residents in the region where the project is located,” the GRA added.

It found too that the company also failed to procure and provide all the investment and other financing required by the undertaking, in the estimated sum of US$150 million over a three-year period from the time of signing of the Investment Agreement.

The GRA also investigated to ascertain if the activities of the project were undertaken in accordance with the business proposals that the Chinese logging company had issued to the Guyana Office for Investment (GO-Invest) prior to the Investment Agreement.

The GRA found that the company had breached the terms and conditions, under which tax exemptions were granted as outlined in the Investment Agreement.

 According to the Revenue Authority, BaiShanLin failed to undertake the activities of the project specified in the Investment Agreement with regard to the setting up of a modernised wood processing facility in Linden.

Value added, not log exports

In its letter to BaiShanLin outlining the course of action to be taken, the GRA pointed out to the company that during an interview, the company’s accountant informed GRA investigators that the design of the wood processing facility was now being finalised in China and the company was in the process of seeking alternative sources of financing to continue with the project, which would now include value-added processing.

In the letter, Griffith reminded BaiShanLin’s Managing Director, “As you are aware, the concessions were granted on the basis that activities of your company would be value-added processing and not the cutting, felling and exporting of logs.”

Repay $1.5B

It was subsequently determined that BaiShanLin breached its covenant with Government in its Investment Agreement “for which the penalty is termination of the Agreement”.

As such, “the residual Customs duty and taxes are now due and payable on machinery, equipment and motor vehicles” in the amount of just over $1.5 billion ($1,584,047,052).

The company was also warned that failing to make good on its payments within the two-week timeframe would result in “the Law Enforcement and Investigation Division taking the necessary actions to seize the machinery, equipment and motor vehicles” in accordance with the Customs Act.

Ranks of the GRA’s enforcement division seized several pieces of equipment belonging to the embattled Chinese logging company when they descended on its operations on Sunday.

The move by GRA’s enforcement decision came just days after the Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC) terminated several local Joint Venture Agreements the company had in addition to revoking its State Forest Exploratory Permit.

Joint ventures

Based on documentation seen by this publication, on September 1, 2016, the GFC wrote to the five companies with whom BaiShanLin had entered into joint ventures, informing them that the arrangement had been terminated, since the Commission had not been informed ahead of time of a transfer of shares.

Each of the companies was told to remove any equipment it had on the more than 400,000 hectares of forest within 90 days.

The matter has since engaged the attention of the Chinese Embassy in Georgetown, since it was approached for assistance by BaiShanLin.

According to letters issued to Haimorakabra Logging Co Inc, Kwebanna Wood Products Inc, Sherwood Forests Inc, Wood Association Industries Company and Puruni Woods, they had violated provisions in the Forestry Act when they failed to inform the Commission of a transfer of shares, hence the decision to terminate the arrangement.

GFC owed

In making the announcement of repossession, the Commission said, “The decision came after the company failed to deliver on agreed actions to introduce investors to the Commission and having been given time to prove that it had an acceptable plan to clear an approximately GY$80 million debt.”

BaiShanLin was incorporated locally in September 2006 under the Guyana Companies Act 1991 with the main objective of timber harvesting and establishing downstream wood processing operations in Linden.

To date, however, the company has failed to fulfil many of its commitments to the Government of Guyana, reneging on the obligations it made, which were accepted in good faith, according to the GFC.

 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This PNC Govt are indeed DUNCES.  Guyana now glad to be channa. What these IDIOTS think other Investors will think of Guyana???

There are so many other ways to deal with such a matter but when fat square pegs are being forced into a hole, it will always be a disaster. The Chinese Govt and others will not take this sitting down.

Nehru
Nehru posted:

This PNC Govt are indeed DUNCES.  Guyana now glad to be channa. What these IDIOTS think other Investors will think of Guyana???

There are so many other ways to deal with such a matter but when fat square pegs are being forced into a hole, it will always be a disaster. The Chinese Govt and others will not take this sitting down.

Expected from a layman,agreement was breached and termination takes effect,they were given enough time to put their house in order,that Company as an investor was raking in the dough and had no interest in providing any benefits to the Guyanese people.

Django

GRA sought $1.5B from Baishanlin for breach of tax exemptions terms.

September 14,2016

http://www.stabroeknews.com/20...ax-exemptions-terms/

The Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA) wrote Chinese logging company Baishanlin in February this year seeking $1.58b for breach of the terms under which tax exemptions were granted.

According to the letter seen by Stabroek News, the GRA said that Baishanlin did not undertake the aspects of the project specified in the investment agreement signed with the Government of Guyana i.e. upgrading and building a modern wood processing facility at Conception, Linden.

It was also argued by the GRA that Baishanlin failed to create and sustain employment for 150 persons over three years and that the company failed to procure and provide all of the investment and other financing needed for the undertaking in the sum of US$130m over a three-year period from the date of the signing of the investment agreement.

The GRA letter by then acting Commissioner-General Ingrid Griffith to Chu Hongbo, Managing Director of Baishanlin said that the company’s accountant, Nigel Persaud had told GRA investigators that the design of the wood processing facility was now being finalized in China and the company was in the process of seeking alternative sources of financing to continue the project which would now include value adding processing. Griffith’s reply to this was that the ”…concessions were granted on the basis that activities of your company would be value added processing and not the cutting, felling and exporting of logs”.

As a result, Griffith’s letter advised that Baishanlin was in breach of Covenant 5 (1) b (i) of the investment agreement with the government for which the penalty is termination of the agreement. The GRA therefore said that the residual customs duty and taxes were now due and payable on the machinery, equipment and motor vehicles to the tune of $1.58b in accordance with Section 36 of the Customs Act, Chapter 82:01.

Fourteen days was fixed as the period for payment to be made failing which Griffith warned that the Law Enforcement and Investigation Division of the GRA would take the necessary action to seize the items.

It was after this letter, that Minister of State, Joseph Harmon made a controversial intervention with the GRA to stay the seizure of the Baishanlin items. After an uproar over his intervention, the GRA proceeded in April this year to begin seizing Baishanlin’s assets including several luxury vehicles from its Providence compound. This exercise continued over the weekend.

Meanwhile,  Baishanlin is claiming that the GRA has not explained how it came up with the $1.58b figure.

“We already invested US$100M here and GRA charge that we break investor agreement and they [want] us [to] pay back the duty for the machines. For us, we don’t understand their judgment of $1.58B to pay back this duty,” Baishanlin Chief Executive Officer Chu Hongbo told Stabroek News yesterday.

“Our investment agreement signed with the Guyana government is valid for three years from the year 2015. GRA states we break the agreement. We have no idea how they confirm that we break the agreement. I don’t know how they calculated… All of the foreign investors here in Guyana enjoy duty free priority for their project or investment in Guyana. We did not have a different mould for our investment, it was the same,” he added.

According to an audit conducted by former Auditor General Anand Goolsarran, during 2012 to 2015, the PPP/C government granted Baishanlin concessions amounting to $1.8 billion despite its failure to fulfill obligations under its investment agreements.

Goolsarran had recommended that the Government of Guyana consider terminating the investment agreements with the company and recover the value of the fiscal concessions granted to it.

Meanwhile, the company is also seeking an inventory of the items seized by the GRA during operations at its Providence and Coomacka locations last Friday and Sunday, respectively. Among the items removed were vehicles, machinery and equipment as well as items acquired separately.

Company officials have also alleged that the personal effects of staff were stolen during the operation.

They also allege that their workers were shoved by a GRA officer and had their right to freedom of movement taken away when they were placed in a line and told not to move. They claimed the GRA officer was armed with a gun.

“About 25 men with big guns, about five trucks and their own machine, they came and said they are the GRA. My worker, he got scared and ran to call me, saying that he thinks we are being robbed but the men… shouting is GRA and he wants me to call the police to find out if it is true,” an employee, Eddie Wang, had told Stabroek News on Monday.

“They took away his phone and up to today have not given it back. They went into his room and pulled out a shotgun he has, without asking for the licence and started saying he has illegal firearm and ammunition. But that is not it. While he was outside they stole  his laptop, some other things and imagine two packs of Pall Mall cigarettes and his cage with two parrots, then doubting that no one took anything,” he added.

Some of the articles were returned when one of the Baishanlin staffers got a peek of an item in the vehicle of a subcontracted GRA unit and insisted on it being searched.

Wang said that as he was trying to get an explanation from a GRA official he knows about the procedures, since he was shoved along with other staff by a GRA employee and told to shut up and stay put at an area identified.

“Imagine they said they are lawful and they do these things to us and you must hear how they shouted at us,” Wang noted.

Formal complaint

Baishanlin has made a formal report to China’s Ambassador to Guyana Zhang Limin on allegations of theft by GRA personnel during the raid, the alleged shoving of the workers and the alleged threats made to workers.

The local tax agency remains mum on the operations.

“The Commissioner-General says, ‘No Comment,’” the secretary to GRA’s Head Godfrey Statia told Stabroek News yesterday when contacted.

Chairman of the agency Rawle Lucas had earlier told this newspaper to contact Statia for a comment.

GRA has also not explained to the company what are its procedures for seizures neither has it given the company an inventory of the items it removed.

The legal counsel for Baishanlin says a meeting with relevant authorities of the GRA to discuss the raid and the way forward has been proposed.

Chu has appealed to government and the people of Guyana to show patience and give the Chinese logging company at least three years to deliver on its commitments to value-added output and job creation.

“We need three more years. Say, up to 2019. We would appreciate if the Guyanese people and government show patience with us. They will see the returns on their investment,” he told this newspaper on Monday.

“Our financing in China depends on the investment conditions here in Guyana and if they feel that they cannot be guaranteed those conditions, then we cannot move forward…the way the GRA acted yesterday, by just seizing our machinery and even personal property of staff and even the car of a friend who was visiting, that is not a good sign for our investors,” he added.

 

Django
Drugb posted:

It appears that the PNC operatives are circumventing the courts on this matter. This does not bode will for future investors.

Listen druggie.  Even your fellow PPP frauds agree that tossing out these Chinese thieves is the thing to do.

Get with it.

FM

DrugB wants to continue to shore up the Chinese even though they have done nothing to live up to their side of the trade agreement in the ,ast 10 years. Like he hasn't yet figured out that BSL is broke. When you can't pay your mortgage the bank takes your house back. Nothing different here.

Mr.T

GRA has NO RIGHt to sieze Property until they take the Company to Court. You just cant come to a conclusion on your own. Where is the friggin Rule Of Law??  How did the Fat Pig came up with the amount??? I can go on and on but GNI SHIT HEADS will not comprehend.

Nehru
The Guyana Government has terminated the Investment Agreement with controversial Chinese logging company BaiShanLin Forest Development Inc, and the entity is now being asked to repay the fiscal concessions it had been granted for the importation of machinery, equipment and vehicles to the tune of $1.5 billion.

 

http://www.guyana-times.com/?p=18458, September 14,2016,

Govt terminates Investment Agreement with BaiShanLin., …company now to repay $1.5B in tax waivers

While the government can legally terminate the Investment Agreement, it is highly unlikely that it can then request the financial concessions granted to BaiShanLin.

The process must be resolved in a Court of law, unless the Agreement has explicit clauses specifically stating BaiShanLin must return the payment on the termination of the Agreement by the government.

Of note ... Terminating an Investment Agreement can also be resolved in a Court of Law.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Nehru posted:

GRA has NO RIGHt to sieze Property until they take the Company to Court. You just cant come to a conclusion on your own. Where is the friggin Rule Of Law??  How did the Fat Pig came up with the amount??? I can go on and on but GNI SHIT HEADS will not comprehend.

As a result, Griffith’s letter advised that Baishanlin was in breach of Covenant 5 (1) b (i) of the investment agreement with the government for which the penalty is termination of the agreement. The GRA therefore said that the residual customs duty and taxes were now due and payable on the machinery, equipment and motor vehicles to the tune of $1.58b in accordance with Section 36 of the Customs Act, Chapter 82:01.


What is said here??

You seem to be defending this company,why because this deal was done under the funny fellas.

The only shit head on this site is you,all you are doing is stinking up the place.

Django
Last edited by Django
Nehru posted:
Mr.T posted:

Breach of contract doesn't need a court order to sort things out.

Really???  Yuh bin ah school August Month I can tell.

The details of the contract that gives that GRA legal permission to act has been published on GNI many times over. Obviously you are making donkey noises in absence of brains to digest what the contract means. Surely you can't THAT uneducated?

Mr.T
Mr.T posted:
Nehru posted:
Mr.T posted:

Breach of contract doesn't need a court order to sort things out.

Really???  Yuh bin ah school August Month I can tell.

The details of the contract that gives that GRA legal permission to act has been published on GNI many times over. Obviously you are making donkey noises in absence of brains to digest what the contract means. Surely you can't THAT uneducated?

These are lies. However on the other hand, if indeed the govt was taking illegal actions then BSL can always secure an injunction. 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×