Why not start from 2002. The slyness of the Granger types makes me ponder are we gonna replace the PPP with similar snake in the grass?
Why not start from 2002. The slyness of the Granger types makes me ponder are we gonna replace the PPP with similar snake in the grass?
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Why not ask him personally? Maybe he was misquoted about the date. As is most often the case than not the reporting of comments by anyone other than the PPP regime is always subject to false information.
I heard from a good source the date mysteriously changed after Granger submitted 2000 to 2010. What Granger has to do is say publicly he wants the investigation to start from 2000. In the same way elements in the PPP don't want us to know what happened to Minister Sawh and family, rest assured elements within the PNC don't want to focus on the jailbreak.
I heard from a good source the date mysteriously changed after Granger submitted 2000 to 2010. What Granger has to do is say publicly he wants the investigation to start from 2000. In the same way elements in the PPP don't want us to know what happened to Minister Sawh and family, rest assured elements within the PNC don't want to focus on the jailbreak.
WERE YOU ALWAYS THAT SHAMELESS OR SOMEONE DID SOMETHING TO TYOU THAT CAUSE YOU TO BE PERMANENTLY SHAMELESS/. SOME PEOPLE WILL SELL THEIR SOULS AND ALL FOR WHAT, TO LOOK GOOD IN THE EYES OF A FEW, TO BE ABLE TO CHEAT AND THIEF OR IS IT A OBSESSION FOR POWER????
I heard from a good source the date mysteriously changed after Granger submitted 2000 to 2010. What Granger has to do is say publicly he wants the investigation to start from 2000. In the same way elements in the PPP don't want us to know what happened to Minister Sawh and family, rest assured elements within the PNC don't want to focus on the jailbreak.
WERE YOU ALWAYS THAT SHAMELESS OR SOMEONE DID SOMETHING TO TYOU THAT CAUSE YOU TO BE PERMANENTLY SHAMELESS/. SOME PEOPLE WILL SELL THEIR SOULS AND ALL FOR WHAT, TO LOOK GOOD IN THE EYES OF A FEW, TO BE ABLE TO CHEAT AND THIEF OR IS IT A OBSESSION FOR POWER????
I am an academic so I don't need to beg for favors to look good in the face of some. I don't need to leech on others for some drinks and poke cuttahs like you. Have no reason to thief like you do as I am quite comfortable with the little I have. Always spend less than you earn and there is no need to rape the poor people's assets like you do.
WERE YOU ALWAYS THAT SHAMELESS OR SOMEONE DID SOMETHING TO TYOU THAT CAUSE YOU TO BE PERMANENTLY SHAMELESS/. SOME PEOPLE WILL SELL THEIR SOULS AND ALL FOR WHAT, TO LOOK GOOD IN THE EYES OF A FEW, TO BE ABLE TO CHEAT AND THIEF OR IS IT A OBSESSION FOR POWER????
Not everybody wants to sell their batty like you.
I agree with you.
Why not start from 2002. The slyness of the Granger types makes me ponder are we gonna replace the PPP with similar snake in the grass?
If Granger can ask, so can others. He is right to ask for this period because it is fresh on our minds hence current. If there was a necessity to ask for previous to that then the PPP should. All of us on this board as far as I can remember asked the PPP at the time to investigate the period beginning December 98 to the rise of the drug killings in 2002. On this board and officially the PPP denied we ever had a problem in '98