Do we have constitutional scholars who are solely responsible for the interpretation of the constitution of Guyana when there are doubt? In recent months, the speaker of the house needed legal consultation in reference to his ruling on Minister Rohee, an elected Minister from tabling bills and speaking in the house of parliament. The speaker was dissatisfied with the (CJ), Ian Chang's ruling that Minister Rohee can speak and function as any other Minister in Parliament. Where does the buck stop? I find that the speaker shoots first and ask question later or he simply don't have any respect for the constitution. Guyana is facing a constitutional crisis.