Skip to main content

Guyana might get a little money now from oil but massive debt waits on the horizon – says Int’l Lawyer


International Lawyer, Melinda Janki.

Kaieteur News – Local politicians are constantly professing that Guyana will receive millions of dollars in revenue from the oil sector for years to come. While it is true that the country stands to get “a little money” now and in the near future, massive debt waits on the horizon says international lawyer and transparency advocate, Melinda Janki.
In an invited comment, Janki recalled that even now, the country owes ExxonMobil approximately US$900M in costs it claimed to have incurred offshore Guyana before it signed the highly criticized Stabroek Block deal in 2016. With ExxonMobil rushing to have five oil vessels in operation by 2026, development and operational costs will soar to billions of US dollars which Guyana will also have to pay, explained the lawyer. She said that this is just a small fraction of the debt that will be hanging around the nation’s neck in the future.
Also of concern to Janki is the deteriorating health of ExxonMobil, and how reliant it will be on Guyana to be its cash engine. In this regard, she reminded that last week, the oil giant said that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has forced it to make serious adjustments to its business plans. As part of its restructuring process, ExxonMobil said that it will be placing its advantaged assets in Guyana, high on its list of priorities.
But in order to keep the focus on Guyana, Janki said the company has had to write off US$17-20 billion worth of natural gas assets in other parts of the world. “Obviously, they wrote off the gas because it is worthless. It is a stranded fossil fuel asset. Nobody wants it,” expressed the lawyer.
Another critical development, she said, is the fact that Exxon is cutting 14,000 jobs or about 15 percent of its global work force while adding that the company has been forced to cut capital expenditure for 2020 to US$23 billion from $33 billion.
Taking the foregoing into account, Janki said it is clear to see that this company is in ill health while adding that it does not bode well for Guyana. The lawyer said, “…Guyana might get a little money now but in the long term it will have massive debt.”
Furthermore, when a company is doing as badly as Exxon is right now, Janki posited that a prudent government would take steps to protect its country. The lawyer said, “But this government seems more concerned with protecting Exxon…All you hear from the government is silly talk about development (of gas to shore projects and scaling up of oil projects in the Stabroek block). All you see is the government burdening the Guyanese people with more debt that has to be paid back long after the politicians have disappeared.”
Janki stressed that the company’s financial health needs to be of concern to all Guyanese as the nation could be left hanging from a dangerous precipice. She said it is imperative that one questions what would happen to Guyana if Exxon goes down in the middle of the grand gas to shore plans it is pushing. Janki said these are all pertinent questions and topics, which the nation’s leaders ought to be addressing now.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The country owes ExxonMobil approximately US$900M in costs it claimed to have incurred offshore Guyana before it signed the highly criticized Stabroek Block deal in 2016.

This is some shyte the PNC left us.

With ExxonMobil rushing to have five oil vessels in operation by 2026, development and operational costs will soar to billions of US dollars

She said that this is just a small fraction of the debt that will be hanging around the nation’s neck in the future.

R
@VishMahabir posted:

Damn pessimist...like Mitwah and Tola!

Get off your ass and visit Guyana to see how poorly most ordinary PPP voters live, after decades of voting for the PPP. The PPP track record stinks regarding assisting their own voters. Do you know why so many PPP projects fail, cause they demand too much kickbacks from contactors, who have to cut corners. Come to Guyana and we will show you new incomplete schools, accepted as completed by the MOE, that had to be finished by NGOs.   

How come the PPP elite live like hogs in a trough, but their voters have to place a bucket in a muddy drain to get water, due to low water pressure. Also, while there, ask the PPP voters to use their flooded outhouse. Grow up and learn how people are fooled into voting for the PPP, but their living condition have not changed much in decades.

Grow some balls and learn before talking, instead of hiding behind a keyboard.     

Tola
Last edited by Tola
@Ramakant-P posted:

The country owes ExxonMobil approximately US$900M in costs it claimed to have incurred offshore Guyana before it signed the highly criticized Stabroek Block deal in 2016.

This is some shyte the PNC left us.

With ExxonMobil rushing to have five oil vessels in operation by 2026, development and operational costs will soar to billions of US dollars

She said that this is just a small fraction of the debt that will be hanging around the nation’s neck in the future.

Just like Ramotar giving away the Kaieteur and Canje oil blocks to their friends.   

Tola
@Tola posted:

Just like Ramotar giving away the Kaieteur and Canje oil blocks to their friends.   

Do you really think so?  Where is the proof?  I didn't hear you say that it is the PNC that screwed up in 2016. Being hostile to the posters is not going to fix any problem.  If what your girlfriend, Janki is saying is true, then we are in deep, deep shyte.

R

I don't get much of what Ms. Janki is saying. I get the bit about the $900 million in development costs, but you also found least 9 billion barrels of oil that would bring revenue in for that money spent.

She lays out costs. But what about the revenue side? Exxon has made strategic moves to cut costs, write down assets and become a leaner organization in order to move forward. Why does she perceive this to be a "concern" for Guyana?????? Why is Exxon focusing more on Guyana a "concern"?

Maybe I'm missing something. In my view the biggest threat to Guyana in the oil industry is an oil spill, if it ever occurs. Yet strange enough, she never mentions that.

FM
@Former Member posted:

I don't get much of what Ms. Janki is saying. I get the bit about the $900 million in development costs, but you also found least 9 billion barrels of oil that would bring revenue in for that money spent.

She lays out costs. But what about the revenue side? Exxon has made strategic moves to cut costs, write down assets and become a leaner organization in order to move forward. Why does she perceive this to be a "concern" for Guyana?????? Why is Exxon focusing more on Guyana a "concern"?

Maybe I'm missing something. In my view the biggest threat to Guyana in the oil industry is an oil spill, if it ever occurs. Yet strange enough, she never mentions that.

You make some good points. She did mention a reference to an oil spill and an insurance policy which she said that Guyana will have to pick up the tab. Exxon is like any other company which spends more than they take in. If Exxon is in trouble, then Guyana is in trouble.  The time to throw blame is passed.

R
@Ramakant-P posted:

Do you really think so?  Where is the proof?  I didn't hear you say that it is the PNC that screwed up in 2016. Being hostile to the posters is not going to fix any problem.  If what your girlfriend, Janki is saying is true, then we are in deep, deep shyte.

You are dumber than your boyfriends Ramotar and Persaud for not knowing.

Tola
@Former Member posted:

I don't get much of what Ms. Janki is saying. I get the bit about the $900 million in development costs, but you also found least 9 billion barrels of oil that would bring revenue in for that money spent.

She lays out costs. But what about the revenue side? Exxon has made strategic moves to cut costs, write down assets and become a leaner organization in order to move forward. Why does she perceive this to be a "concern" for Guyana?????? Why is Exxon focusing more on Guyana a "concern"?

Maybe I'm missing something. In my view the biggest threat to Guyana in the oil industry is an oil spill, if it ever occurs. Yet strange enough, she never mentions that.

Often it is the reporting that is bad, especially on business matters.  It is likely that the reporter left out critical parts of Dr. Janki's comments. 

T
@Former Member posted:

I don't get much of what Ms. Janki is saying. I get the bit about the $900 million in development costs, but you also found least 9 billion barrels of oil that would bring revenue in for that money spent.

She lays out costs. But what about the revenue side? Exxon has made strategic moves to cut costs, write down assets and become a leaner organization in order to move forward. Why does she perceive this to be a "concern" for Guyana?????? Why is Exxon focusing more on Guyana a "concern"?

Maybe I'm missing something. In my view the biggest threat to Guyana in the oil industry is an oil spill, if it ever occurs. Yet strange enough, she never mentions that.

Traversing a Slippery Slope: Guyana’s Oil Opportunity

Check this thread ,document is attached.

Django

December 6 ,2020

Source

Dear Editor,

The word “Re-negotiation” as in “Re-negotiation of the Oil Contract” seems to be a loaded word. So, avoid using that dreaded word. Ask the oil company for a sit-down meeting and say simply, “Can we improve some of the terms of the Contract?

Editor, I have read a letter in yesterday’s SN by Darsh Khusial, director of OGGN in which he stated that (former) EPA head Vincent Adams had indeed gotten a major amendment to the Contract. Dr Adams had had talks with the Oil Company and got them to agree to provide “unlimited insurance liability” to cover damage from an oil spill. That is a huge improvement in Guyana’s favour.

Another sentence of that letter: “Dr Adams noted in the [KN radio] interview that Exxon will consider reasonable requests if asked”.

Editor, is it possible for your paper to ascertain whether the GoG has ever asked the oil company for improvements in the financial terms of the contract, namely, an increase in the 2% royalty and the 12.5% profit sharing?

Permit me to share this table making comparisons with the Suriname’s Oil Contract:

•   Note: Suriname’s Cost Recovery is set at 60% of revenues, leaving 40% for profit sharing. Guyana’s Cost Recovery is set at 75%, leaving a paltry 25% for profit sharing.

Dr Jan Mangal once said that the relationship between the host country and the Oil Company is like a good marriage. It seems to me that both Dr Adams and Dr Mangal are optimistic that “Exxon will consider reasonable requests if asked”.  Has the GoG asked?

Final point. I watched an interview of VP Jagdeo a few weeks ago with Kiana Wilburg on KN radio. Mr. Jagdeo explained in crystal clear terms how the absence of ring-fencing can be an invitation for the oil company to manipulate expenses between oil wells and/or oil fields to cheat Guyana out of a fair share of oil revenues. Would Mr. Jagdeo not agree to ask the oil company to review the contract’s ring-fencing provisions?

Yours faithfully,

Mike Persaud

Django

Django, I read the first page and meh head hutting. I ain't too smart fuh dem high falutin' documents bai. I stick to the lady's comments which make no sense. Totes said it might be bad reporting, and I hope so cuz she ain't mekkin' too much sense.

FM
@Django posted:

December 6 ,2020




Suh who negotiated these paltry rates for Guyana? You can't sign a contract and after all the work has started go back and say you don't like it!!!

The problem is in the negotiation. I bet these Government idiots (be they PPP or PNC) exalted themselves in their "brilliance" and "know it all" stupidness, neglecting to hire the right parties to oversee and advise in negotiations with Exxon.

Or, as is typical Guyanese stylee, someone got paid.

FM
@Former Member posted:

Django, I read the first page and meh head hutting.

I ain't too smart fuh dem high falutin' documents bai.

I stick to the lady's comments which make no sense. Totes said it might be bad reporting, and I hope so cuz she ain't mekkin' too much sense.

No problem ,you can still read it ,will get an idea how much money Guyana will get in the next 20 to 30 yrs.

Django
@Former Member posted:

Suh who negotiated these paltry rates for Guyana? You can't sign a contract and after all the work has started go back and say you don't like it!!!

The problem is in the negotiation. I bet these Government idiots (be they PPP or PNC) exalted themselves in their "brilliance" and "know it all" stupidness, neglecting to hire the right parties to oversee and advise in negotiations with Exxon.

Or, as is typical Guyanese stylee, someone got paid.

Minor changes made to 1999 agreement with ExxonMobil – Trotman

Django

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×