Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Guyana says Venezuelan claim is threat to its survival

Friday, July 24, 2015 | 3:20 PM, Source

 

WASHINGTON, United States (AFP) – Guyana's territorial dispute with Venezuela represents a threat to its very survival, President David Granger warned Friday at a meeting in Washington.

 

After a recent offshore oil find, a border dispute between the two countries has escalated, with Venezuela laying claim to a huge swathe of Guyana's territory.

 

"Guyana at the moment is facing a challenge to its survival by a larger state," Granger told guests at the William Perry Center of Hemispheric Defense Studies.

 

Caracas has laid claim to waters off the Essequibo region that would include the oil find. The region straddles the two countries and Venezuela disputes the settlement of the border drawn through the 215,000 square kilometer (83,000 square mile) region.

 

Granger warned the conflict could spill over to the rest of the region if not dealt with quickly.

 

"The present threat, if not resolved promptly, if not resolved permanently, if not resolved peacefully could lead to deterioration of the security situation in the entire Caribbean and on the northern tier of the south American continent," he said.

 

"This is too much to bear for a country with fewer than a million people."

 

Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro has blamed America, including oil company Exxon Mobil, for provoking the conflict.

 

He recalled his ambassador earlier this month. Guyana has asked for the United Nations to help resolve the border dispute.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

HE Granger is correct and has his challenges.  If he is to stand any chance, he would mend fences with the PPP and include the 49% in the national dialogue.  Venezuela does pose an existential threat to Guyana.  He also need to seek a way to accommodate Venezuela after all, it was his party under the great LFSB agreed in 1966 to give Venezuela say in the resources of the territory.  He has to deal with that.  The US will NOT ride to the rescue, neither, it seems, will Brazil.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:

HE Granger is correct and has his challenges.  If he is to stand any chance, he would mend fences with the PPP and include the 49% in the national dialogue.  Venezuela does pose an existential threat to Guyana.  He also need to seek a way to accommodate Venezuela after all, it was his party under the great LFSB agreed in 1966 to give Venezuela say in the resources of the territory.  He has to deal with that.  The US will NOT ride to the rescue, neither, it seems, will Brazil.

neither LFSB nor his party agreed to any such thing in 1966

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

HE Granger is correct and has his challenges.  If he is to stand any chance, he would mend fences with the PPP and include the 49% in the national dialogue.  Venezuela does pose an existential threat to Guyana.  He also need to seek a way to accommodate Venezuela after all, it was his party under the great LFSB agreed in 1966 to give Venezuela say in the resources of the territory.  He has to deal with that.  The US will NOT ride to the rescue, neither, it seems, will Brazil.

neither LFSB nor his party agreed to any such thing in 1966

Well, another Redux "interpretation" of fact and history.

 

Really, it does not matter.  Did you see in that photo in Brazil, Brazil president put Maduro next to her and Granger furthest out like "Pluto".  Not good, not good at all.  Granger has enormous challenges and I'm sure, the PNC hardliners will be treated worse.  I pity his position.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

HE Granger is correct and has his challenges.  If he is to stand any chance, he would mend fences with the PPP and include the 49% in the national dialogue.  Venezuela does pose an existential threat to Guyana.  He also need to seek a way to accommodate Venezuela after all, it was his party under the great LFSB agreed in 1966 to give Venezuela say in the resources of the territory.  He has to deal with that.  The US will NOT ride to the rescue, neither, it seems, will Brazil.

neither LFSB nor his party agreed to any such thing in 1966

Well, another Redux "interpretation" of fact and history.

 

Really, it does not matter.  Did you see in that photo in Brazil, Brazil president put Maduro next to her and Granger furthest out like "Pluto".  Not good, not good at all.  Granger has enormous challenges and I'm sure, the PNC hardliners will be treated worse.  I pity his position.

nothing to "interpret" . . . u get ketch again

 

lol

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×