Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Guyana should go solar

By , July 16, 2015, Source

 

Dear Editor,

 

Now that the new coalition government has made a decision not to continue the very expensive hydro project of the previous regime, an alternative should be looked at to generate energy to meet growing demand. The world is moving away from fossil energy although oil prices have been falling. Guyana itself is trying to capitalize on the exploration and development of traditional fossil energy. But the country cannot count on the oil find off the coast for domestic use because of the territorial threat from our neighbour.

 

At any rate, oil development (and refining) is some five years off and energy is needed urgently. Guyana has a shortfall in energy, and as the country grows and further develops, the demand for energy use will increase. It is noted that the cost of traditional energy has been going down, and at the same time concern about global warming from the use of fossil energy has been going up. With declining prices, people may stick to the habit of using traditional fossil energy (and burning wood and coal) that drives global warming. Green energy (solar and wind) must be considered and encouraged. The country needs to be educated to switch to an alternative green (solar and wind) energy that has been shown to be more cost effective than using traditional energy. In several countries, people generated surplus energy from solar at their homes that they sold to the national grid earning money. The same should be encouraged in Guyana with a subsidy for the installation of the equipment so that people become less dependent on the national grid.

 

Proposals (that I am aware of) for development of solar energy were made to the PPP government. It had its favourite contractors out of China in spite of proposals presented by others that may have been far more cost effective and that would have created jobs (in light manufacturing, assembling of equipment, servicing) for nationals. Local and/or Caribbean companies were not encouraged to develop and produce solar energy that would have assisted with unemployment issues throughout the region. The contracts largely went to the foreigners; the equipment came largely from China. Barbados manufactured solar equipment was not favoured. A Trinidad company that produces solar energy more cheaply than the Chinese was not even considered.   Other Caribbean servicing companies were not given preference even if more economical and less costly. China was the preferred choice for almost everything.

 

The new coalition government should encourage the development of solar energy giving preference to local or regional companies. And the country should be encouraged to move away from its dependence on traditional fossil energy. Subsidies should be given to homeowners to install solar equipment that would produce energy to power homes.

 

Many developing countries have been making the gradual shift from fossil energy towards green energy. A major portion of power generation in developed countries comes from green energy. The developed countries encourage and provide subsidies and tax breaks in the development of green energy. In the US and India, for examples, there are nationwide solar energy booms. The governments of New York State, New York City, Maharashtra, and New Delhi offer all kinds of incentives, including subsidies, to energy companies to develop green energy. Homeowners and businesses also get tax breaks. New York City is now at the centre of clean energy production; thousands of city homes are powered almost entirely by solar energy. Some schools and government buildings have gone solar.

 

As Guyana consumes more energy and as the country is funded by Europeans to protect the green forest and encouraged to go green, it only makes sense for the new government to encourage a green (solar) energy boom. The entire country should be encouraged to go green (solar and wind); subsidies should be given to home owners and businesses to go solar (that is better for homeowners than wind power that requires large amounts of land).

 

The new government should not behave like its predecessor and give preference to foreign favourites for reasons well known. Local and regional companies should be encouraged to set up operations in assembling as well as manufacturing equipment. The government should give a helping hand to local and regional companies for solar projects. Some progress (at extraordinarily high cost) has been made by the previous regime on solar and wind development. The coalition government must build on the progress to produce energy to add to the national grid to make the country less dependent on diesel generated power. This can make Guyana a shining example in the region encouraging the European countries to give us larger amounts of funds to protect our rainforest thereby reducing the effects of global warming.

 

Yours faithfully,
Vishnu Bisram

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Like shale oil, solar power is shaking up global energy

By , April 26, 2015, Source

 

SINGAPORE/TOKYO (Reuters) – One by one, Japan is turning off the lights at the giant oil-fired power plants that propelled it to the ranks of the world’s top industrialised nations. With nuclear power in the doldrums after the ***ushima disaster, it’s solar energy that is becoming the alternative.

 

Solar power is set to become profitable in Japan as early as this quarter, according to the Japan Renewable Energy Foundation (JREF), freeing it from the need for government subsidies and making it the last of the G7 economies where the technology has become economically viable.

 

Japan is now one of the world’s four largest markets for solar panels and a large number of power plants are coming onstream, including two giant arrays over water in Kato City and a $1.1 billion solar farm being built on a salt field in Okayama, both west of Osaka.

 

“Solar has come of age in Japan and from now on will be replacing imported uranium and fossil fuels,” said Tomas KÃĨberger, executive board chairman of JREF.

 

“In trying to protect their fossil fuel and nuclear (plants), Japan’s electric power companies can only delay developments here,” he said, referring to the 10 regional monopolies that have dominated electricity production since the 1950s.

 

Japan is retiring nearly 2.4 gigawatts of expensive and polluting oil-fired energy plants by March next year and switching to alternative fuels.

 

Japan’s 43 nuclear reactors have been closed in the wake of the 2011 meltdown at the ***ushima power plant after an earthquake and a tsunami – since then, renewable energy capacity has tripled to 25 gigawatts, with solar accounting for more than 80 percent of that.

 

Once Japan reaches cost-revenue parity in solar energy, it will mean the technology is commercially viable in all G7 countries and 14 of the G20 economies, according to data from governments, industry and consumer groups.

FM
Originally Posted by Observer:

I'm having solar panels installed on my roof.

Will be of interest what the PNC cum AFC government will do in this regard.

 

Hydroelectric power development was "killed" by the PNC while they were in the opposition.

 

With the development of a smelting plant in the US_of_A, as noted in a couple of past comments I made on related threads, hydropower developments by the Guyana government is inconceivable.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Observer:

I'm having solar panels installed on my roof.

Will be of interest what the PNC cum AFC government will do in this regard.

 

Hydroelectric power development was "killed" by the PNC while they were in the opposition.

 

With the development of a smelting plant in the US_of_A, as noted in a couple of past comments I made on related threads, hydropower developments by the Guyana government is inconceivable.

Kanta Engineer makes his stupid pronouncements once again. Unfortunately, they are always wrong and that's why you would never engage anyone who knows the subject material in a technical discussion. The opposition was against the Amaila Falls project and not hydroelectric power development in general. The PPP was trying to build Amaila Falls at a cost of close to a billion US dollars and only producing 165 MW. For that money, plants are going up all around the world producing 400MW and upwards. Hundreds of millions were going to end up in the pockets of PPP tiefmen and that is one of the reasons why the opposition voted against this project. There is a huge demand for power in Northern Brazil since they are away from the main grids in Brazil. The Brazilians made a proposal to the PPP government around 2009 to build a plant somewhere in the vicinity of 2500MW where Guyana would receive 300MW and the excess would be sold to Northern Brazil. The PPP turned it down since they would not be able to steal millions when the Brazilians are controlling the project. The Brazilian proposal is back on the table with the new government so to state that hydropower in now inconceivable in Guyana is just ludicrous. Sounds a bit like the sour grapes syndrome coming from a sore Loser.

Mars

Basically now and when apt, hydroelectric power developments will be done primarily by Brazil, perhaps under the BOOT concept- Build Own Operate and Transfer, with the time to transfer is between 50 to 100 years.

 

For Guyana to independently develop a hydroelectric power plant, the primary user will be the bauxite industry, for which an announcement was made recently that the power plant will now be built in the US_of_A and bauxite will be shipped to that location.

 

While individual are the greatest number of users, their consumption are extremely small when compared to industries and businesses which are the backbone and user of energy.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Basically now and when apt, hydroelectric power developments will be done primarily by Brazil, perhaps under the BOOT concept- Build Own Operate and Transfer, with the time to transfer is between 50 to 100 years.

 

For Guyana to independently develop a hydroelectric power plant, the primary user will be the bauxite industry, for which an announcement was made recently that the power plant will now be built in the US_of_A and bauxite will be shipped to that location.

 

While individual are the greatest number of users, their consumption are extremely small when compared to industries and businesses which are the backbone and user of energy.

Screw BOOT. That is a mechanism for others to own your resource with no imput except the come in under the pretext of having ability to build. Imagine, Motilal got the right to build a Hydro plant in Guyana!

 

We can put together the financing and the mechanisms to build and own the plant as a Guyanese asset. Note we did put in 90 percent of the funding for the Berbice bridge and by some miracle it is owned by some carpetbaggers  Indo feasting on the nation's teat all because a corrupt PPP made it so. Further it is an ugly bridge with a low shelf life and build in the wrong place.

 

We do not need to spend over a billion to make a 165 Megawatt plant. Even Windmills are more reasonable at that rate. We will get Hydro plants but not at the cost of selling our souls.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Basically now and when apt, hydroelectric power developments will be done primarily by Brazil, perhaps under the BOOT concept- Build Own Operate and Transfer, with the time to transfer is between 50 to 100 years.

 

For Guyana to independently develop a hydroelectric power plant, the primary user will be the bauxite industry, for which an announcement was made recently that the power plant will now be built in the US_of_A and bauxite will be shipped to that location.

 

While individual are the greatest number of users, their consumption are extremely small when compared to industries and businesses which are the backbone and user of energy.

Screw BOOT. That is a mechanism for others to own your resource with no imput except the come in under the pretext of having ability to build. Imagine, Motilal got the right to build a Hydro plant in Guyana!

 

We can put together the financing and the mechanisms to build and own the plant as a Guyanese asset. Note we did put in 90 percent of the funding for the Berbice bridge and by some miracle it is owned by some carpetbaggers  Indo feasting on the nation's teat all because a corrupt PPP made it so. Further it is an ugly bridge with a low shelf life and build in the wrong place.

 

We do not need to spend over a billion to make a 165 Megawatt plant. Even Windmills are more reasonable at that rate. We will get Hydro plants but not at the cost of selling our souls.

I did not know you paid any taxes in Guyana. Please don't use "WE" when you refer to Guyana. You have not been back to Guyana in at least 4 decades and you want to have a say in the affairs of the country?

The sakawinki parrot has become extinct.

FM
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Basically now and when apt, hydroelectric power developments will be done primarily by Brazil, perhaps under the BOOT concept- Build Own Operate and Transfer, with the time to transfer is between 50 to 100 years.

 

For Guyana to independently develop a hydroelectric power plant, the primary user will be the bauxite industry, for which an announcement was made recently that the power plant will now be built in the US_of_A and bauxite will be shipped to that location.

 

While individual are the greatest number of users, their consumption are extremely small when compared to industries and businesses which are the backbone and user of energy.

Screw BOOT. That is a mechanism for others to own your resource with no imput except the come in under the pretext of having ability to build. Imagine, Motilal got the right to build a Hydro plant in Guyana!

 

We can put together the financing and the mechanisms to build and own the plant as a Guyanese asset. Note we did put in 90 percent of the funding for the Berbice bridge and by some miracle it is owned by some carpetbaggers  Indo feasting on the nation's teat all because a corrupt PPP made it so. Further it is an ugly bridge with a low shelf life and build in the wrong place.

 

We do not need to spend over a billion to make a 165 Megawatt plant. Even Windmills are more reasonable at that rate. We will get Hydro plants but not at the cost of selling our souls.

I did not know you paid any taxes in Guyana. Please don't use "WE" when you refer to Guyana. You have not been back to Guyana in at least 4 decades and you want to have a say in the affairs of the country?

The sakawinki parrot has become extinct.

Dude keep your old, stale, racist, envious, mudtrench, communally shitting mentality. As I Said, in your sixtes and here you are pretending to know me. Well, that is what you backward coolies do. Pretend others are worse than you are so you get some modicum of satiation to your intractable poor self worth.  Take your pathetic backsides that side....

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Basically now and when apt, hydroelectric power developments will be done primarily by Brazil, perhaps under the BOOT concept- Build Own Operate and Transfer, with the time to transfer is between 50 to 100 years.

 

For Guyana to independently develop a hydroelectric power plant, the primary user will be the bauxite industry, for which an announcement was made recently that the power plant will now be built in the US_of_A and bauxite will be shipped to that location.

 

While individual are the greatest number of users, their consumption are extremely small when compared to industries and businesses which are the backbone and user of energy.

Screw BOOT. That is a mechanism for others to own your resource with no imput except the come in under the pretext of having ability to build. Imagine, Motilal got the right to build a Hydro plant in Guyana!

 

We can put together the financing and the mechanisms to build and own the plant as a Guyanese asset. Note we did put in 90 percent of the funding for the Berbice bridge and by some miracle it is owned by some carpetbaggers  Indo feasting on the nation's teat all because a corrupt PPP made it so. Further it is an ugly bridge with a low shelf life and build in the wrong place.

 

We do not need to spend over a billion to make a 165 Megawatt plant. Even Windmills are more reasonable at that rate. We will get Hydro plants but not at the cost of selling our souls.

 

1. BOOT concept- Build Own Operate and Transfer is applicable in numerous countries.

 

2. Indeed Guyana may get hydroelectric power plant(s), but they will be own by Brazil and other foreign companies to meet the projections and goals established earlier in the 20th century to connect and provide power to South, Central and North America.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×