Skip to main content

Guyanese want a new type of politics, principled politicians

Dear Editor,

Guyanese are dissatisfied with the way democracy is working. They want a new way of doing politics. In addition to regular, free, fair and transparent elections and freedom of expression, Guyanese want inclusive governance so that citizens, the press and the diaspora can participate in reviewing and implementing national policies, programmes and plans.

In the 2011, 2015 and 2020 elections, many Guyanese changed the way they traditionally voted. It is estimated that at least 35,000 ‘swing’ voters (equivalent to 5 seats in the National Assembly) cast their ballots, not for party or ethnicity, but for politicians who they believe would practice power with good character.

This is significant because, in the new National Assembly, the difference is 1 seat and 1.38% of total votes between the PPP/C and the combined opposition of APNU+AFC and the small and new parties. Although most Indo-Guyanese voted for the PPP/C and most Afro-Guyanese voted for the APNU+AFC, these parties could not have won, respectively, 33 parliamentary seats and 31 parliamentary seats, without significant support from voters in the Mixed and Indigenous communities who are now 31% of the population.

In future elections, more voters will cast their ballots, not on the basis of party loyalty or ethnicity, but on the following concerns. Will politicians manage properly the new oil-producing economy? Will politicians ensure that Guyana will not be infected with the oil ‘Dutch Disease’ in the financial, political, economic and social spheres? Will politicians smartly use the oil revenue to support a diversity of non-oil economic sectors to increase incomes for all ethnic communities in all the regions of Guyana? Will they implement policies to overcome the “pre-existing conditions” of unfair ethnic and class competition, corruption, poverty, crimes and public insecurity? Will politicians end the culture of impunity where elected politicians and public officials who carry out illegal and corrupt activities escape punishment such as sanctions, fines and dismissal?

Most politicians in the National Assembly are from the middle class. They are academics, doctors, lawyers, managers, engineers and teachers. They have social status, post-secondary education, high skills, good incomes and pensions, and access to economic resources.

Without question, Guyana needs these full-time professional politicians from the middle class to use their authority, influence, skills, experience and power to successfully address the challenges of an oil-producing economy, a maturing democracy, climate change and pandemics.

But we need balance by including more politicians who are workers and farmers because, unfortunately, there are many examples from oil-producing countries where most middle class politicians acted like “a class for themselves”. They did not implement policies to overcome the social and economic inequalities that are a burden on the overwhelming majority of the population who are working people, the unemployed, the under-employed, the dispossessed, the marginalized, the poor and the hungry.

Now, more than ever, Guyanese do not want opportunist politicians who abuse power.

Opportunist politicians come from all political parties, ethnicities, classes, genders, ideologies, ages, sizes, shapes and colours. While they appear to listen to people and talk about democratic reforms, about fighting poverty and corruption, and about defending human rights, in reality, their actions expose their true character. They exclude or control how civil society organizations could participate in finding solutions to the nation’s problems.

They are preoccupied with using power to serve their own self-interests and on facilitating unfair advantages for their families through nepotism, and for their friends and associates through cronyism.

They participate in and accommodate grand and petty corruption and quietly justify the paying of bribes supposedly to avoid bureaucratic delays. With impunity, they break or go around the rules. They discourage and obstruct investigations into how some politicians and officials have acquired wealth. They usually ally with foreign and diaspora ‘carpetbagger (dishonest)’ investors who want to take advantage of Guyana.

Most times, opportunist politicians get away with illegal behaviour because some of their party supporters and some members of their ethnic community make excuses for them and do not call them out to be accountable for their wrongdoings.

Principled politicians, on the other hand, practice power for the benefit of the people. Although many have experienced social mobility into the middle class, they never forget where they come from. They are admired because they are honest, caring, fair-minded, humble, authentic, courageous and forward-looking. When they see something is wrong, they do not look away but they do something to stop or change it. They practice accountability and transparency and ensure that all laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens.

They are preoccupied with addressing the needs, hopes and the interests of the overwhelming majority of the nation who are workers, farmers, the poor, the unemployed and the dispossessed. They work to create a diversified, sustainable and inclusive economy to provide more jobs especially for women and youth, to enhance public safety, to minimize corruption, to strengthen public institutions, to significantly reduce poverty and income inequality in all ethnic communities, to improve public services and to establish world-class education and healthcare systems.

Principled politicians work to implement Article 13 of the Constitution which mandates that all citizens’ organizations must be involved in the management and decision-making of the State. They support the creation of a level-playing-field for all ethnic communities to equally access government patronage, state land, tax incentives, public contracts, local services, public service jobs, fair wages, professional jobs, business and educational opportunities, financing, markets, and drainage and irrigation services.

Principled politicians also focus on improving Guyana’s Human Develop-ment Index (HDI) to end the inequalities in women’s health and inequalities in the empowerment of women and youth. Their priorities are [a] decreasing the very high mortality rate for women who give birth and preventing violence against women and girls; [b] eradicating the high income gap between females and males, [c] increasing the participation of women in the labour force, in senior and middle management positions and in elected positions at the national, regional and local levels; [d] improving access to the internet across schools and communities; [e] increasing the participation of male youth in secondary schools; [f] lowering high unemployment among youth; and [g] lowering the high suicide rate.

Principled politicians work to end the strained and confrontational relations between the PPP/C and the APNU+AFC. They believe in making the Guyana dream a reality when, all the sons and daughters of our ethnic communities and the diaspora, will sit equally, in sisterhood and brotherhood at the decision-making table, and use their wisdom and their good characters to chart the economic, social, political and constitutional future of the nation.

Yours faithfully,

Geoffrey Da Silva

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This is wishful thinking.

The press and the diaspora can participate in reviewing and implementing national policies, programs, and plans.

Here is a Genious at work:

Indo-Guyanese voted for the PPP/C and most Afro-Guyanese voted for the APNU+AFC, these parties could not have won, respectively, 33 parliamentary seats and 31 parliamentary seats, without significant support from voters in the Mixed and Indigenous communities who are now 31% of the population.

Godfrey Da Silva should know that Jagdeo came from the farming community and also he is a middle-class person.

So Da Siva, what else is new?

R
@seignet posted:

Granger really screwed it all up. Whatever took place in his head? He knew the alternative was going to be Jagdeo and yet he faltered. Even when he could have seized the country.

He could have refused the recount ,let the issue settled by an Election Petition .He wanted to know what happened hence the Re-count which tell the tales of Electoral Rigging by the same people who are the accuser.The land of strange power grabbing people .

Django
Last edited by Django
@seignet posted:

Granger really screwed it all up. Whatever took place in his head? He knew the alternative was going to be Jagdeo and yet he faltered. Even when he could have seized the country.

I thought Granger was you boy.

R
@Django posted:

He could have refused the recount ,let the issue settled by an Election Petition .He wanted to know what happened hence the Re-count which tell the tales of Electoral Rigging by the same people who are the accuser.The land of strange power grabbing people .

How shameful, isn't it?

R
@cain posted:

That is the difference with PPP supporters, their supporters stand with them even when they are wrong and they say nothing. That is Apan Jatt nuh so?

It worked both ways.  The blacks stood with the PNC and they were wrong all the time.  Don't start to throw blame.  Two wrongs don't make a right.

R
@Ramakant-P posted:

It worked both ways.  The blacks stood with the PNC and they were wrong all the time.  Don't start to throw blame.  Two wrongs don't make a right.

Nonsense! Your post to Siggy says it all doesn't it?

cain

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×