So why doesnt he just go to Sweden to clear his name by showing that the accusations came from an enraged female?

Because one of those 2 females was actually a CIA..besides, the condom was indeed broken so therefore he is guilty of rape under Swedish law.

Galloway causes collateral damage over Assange allegations

• guardian.co.uk,Wednesday 22 August 2012 20.59 BST

George Galloway's attempts at clarification of his offensive video pronouncements on rape are both muddled and inept. He says "nonconsensual sex is rape". If a man has sex with a sleeping woman, he cannot have her consent. So on Galloway's own definition, that must be a rape. This is still more so when her consent to the original sex was allegedly subject to his using a condom, which this time he was not using. It would be interesting to know at which point, on Galloway's weird view of the law, the man's right of "insertion" during "the sex game" runs out.

Galloway then asserts that "Julian Assange – let's be clear – has always denied the allegations. And this has all the hallmarks of a setup. I don't believe, from what we know, that the director of public prosecutions would sanction a prosecution in Britain. What occurred is not rape as most people understand it. And it's important to note that the two women involved did not initially claim it."

The fact that Assange denies the allegations does not mean that the allegations themselves, if proven, do not constitute a rape. It just means that he denies that he did what would otherwise constitute a rape. The fact that the women's account has changed does not mean that the present allegations do not constitute a rape. It just means that the present allegations are contradicted by earlier allegations, which may or may not be reason to doubt the veracity of the present allegations.

Galloway's view of the DPP's view is as irrelevant as it is ill-informed. Most people would certainly believe that a man having unprotected sex with a sleeping woman when she has previously insisted upon the use of a condom is a rape, but their view is equally irrelevant. The frequent assertions that what happened would not constitute rape in the UK are simply wrong, but they are still being trotted out.

Julian Assange may be innocent. I don't know. He may be being set up. I don't know that either. But these are matters for the Swedish legal process. He hasn't even been charged yet. What I do know is that a man protesting his innocence is not a complete defence to a crime. Still less is it a reason to assert that even if the allegations are proved, a crime never took place.

The lesson here is that If you sleep with a hooker you better pay for every shot and stick to the contract. You see? Your wife or girlfriend would never complain if you make love to them when you wake up in the morning and they are still sleepy unless of course they wanted to dump you...

what you do they call it when you have sex without a condom

Femenists call it rape and so the law they created.

By the way, femenists believe that semen is the most disgusting and repulsive substance in the universe.

i think it was NEHRU THAT WAS THE MOST DISGUSTING,by the way femenists hate every thing

"The alleged sexual offences are not considered crimes in Latin America, or in 95% of the world," President Correa of Ecuador said.

Dem Swedish women dem think they got a bag a gold between dem legs nuh.

Slapping a woman on the behind is under the legal definition of rape in the US.

How about a lil pinch on the bamsy?

u will be jacked up for a sexual impropriety and if convicted will be at minimum be punished with your name on a sexual offender list and would have screwed your life up completely since you will no longer be able to travel anywhere. You will even have to report in every time you move. These are very serious offenses and not a matter to be taken lightly.

After which he will be extradited to the US for execution. It will happen because Sweden in a client state and cannot guarantee Assange that he will not be extradited.

Sweden is under no obligation to protect him. He can always go home and ask for his home country protection. But he is an enemy of the majority of states on the planed so only have a few places of refuge. But getting to those places is not guarantee. 

Dam! Alright, no bamsy pinch then,

The Sweds need to realise that their definitions of rape are not only ridiculous but insane? What sort of society are they trying to create? Do they want to turn everyone into a gay?

AGAIN: THE SWEDISH DEFINITION OF RAPE IS RIDICULOUS... this is the type of law that you create to hit people you don't like!