Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Substandard work, among other problems on Hope Canal Project; Minister should initiate independent mid-term review

 

Posted By Stabroek staff On December 4, 2012 @ 5:07 am In Letters | No Comments


Dear Editor,
A few days ago we made a site visit to the Hope Canal Project to assess construction progress. What we observed with respect to project activities, quality control and the contractors’ abilities to organize and execute the work to complete their contracts on time was not very encouraging.

 

Work done on the Weir discharge structure across the sea defence indicates that only about 15% of contract work has been completed to date, and based on the contractor’s performance thus far it is unlikely that the structure will be completed and become functional before 2014. Excuses given such as the late delivery of materials, equipment failure and transportation difficulties all within his ambit are not severe contingencies to relieve the contractor of his contractual obligations to complete the Weir within the specified time-frame.

 

The timber piles driven show that many of them are out of plumb, drifting by as much as 3 ft. The northern row of driven perimeter steel sheet piling shows that some of them have listed eastwards by as much as 15 degrees, indicating that they have been driven with inadequate guide support and their toes have probably slipped out of the interlocking grooves. The driven out-of-plumb timber piles may have been broken at the splices and therefore their bearing capacity compromised.

 

The engineer responsible for observing materials and completed work to evaluate their compliance with the plans, specifications and design should have recognized these problems and instructed the contractor to take remedial measures to correct the sub-standard work. The slippages (delays in construction progress) should have been reported to NDIA (the owner) at an earlier stage and a plan proposed by the contractor, agreed to and monitored to get the project back on track. The Minister of Agriculture/NDIA engineers during their recent visit to the site must have seen that the piles were being driven out of alignment, but apparently they took no action to remedy the situation, continue to allow things to slide while the contractor goes about his daily routine executing sub-standard work.

 

The design and supervision of construction of this structure raises many troubling questions. Design of the foundation requires some 520 timber piles 120 ft long. Of necessity the piles have to be spliced and the splicing of timber piles in general is never recommended because of the difficulty to keep the piles plumb and prevent cracking and splitting during driving. The design should have been reviewed by an independent consultant to check whether the structure was not over-designed, particularly the requirement for what appears to be an excessive number of piles to support the structure. Prior to construction, test piles should have been driven and loaded to determine the length and number of piles required to adequately support the structure.

 

Experience of previously designed and built structures under similar soil conditions such as the 7-door Weir across the Abary River shows that timber piles were not necessary to support the structure since the soil at that elevation could safely support the imposed loads. There are other features of the Weir design such as the elimination of gabion baskets upstream which would have made the structure more efficient and cost effective without compromising safety.

 

The canal is about 50% completed and not 83% as claimed. About 30% of the canal remains to be dug and re-dug to final bed grade. Some 80% of its embankments have to be raised to design elevation, compacted, trimmed, shaped and strengthened with geo-textile fabric. In some sections selected borrow fill may have to be used to replace unsuitable material.

 

Construction of the embankments between the Crown and Conservancy Dams is in a state of flux as the consultants/NDIA contemplate how the geo-textile fabric stored outside the Hope Estate Office should be installed to achieve the design objectives. It is worth noting that during our visit the pegasse built eastern embankment of the canal about 1 km north of the Head Regulator site was on fire, burning uncontrollably, and will probably compromise the geo-textile fabric if installed.

 

A major problem developing in the unfinished canal is weeds, which have taken over about 40% of the canal’s waterway and it is estimated that within six months if no action is taken the entire waterway will be covered with weeds. Their presence will severely restrict flow and negate the objective of discharging floodwater efficiently from the conservancy. Cost for their removal and continual maintenance will be an expensive exercise which NDIA is still to estimate and budget for.

The bushes growing profusely on the embankments will also have to be controlled by regular maintenance. Further to keep the Weir functioning at peak performance after it is completed will require excavation of the foreshore and continually maintaining the channel to keep it clear. This will be another additional costly work now awaiting consideration and execution.

 

Work on the Head Regulator is about 20% completed and piling is expected to be finished early in the new year. It is unlikely that this structure will be completed and be functional before the end of 2013.

The road bridge appears to be progressing slowly with an untidy work site, improper storage of material/equipment and signs of a disorganized work plan. Some of the pre-stress units being installed on the bridge show changes from the original design, and therefore certified test reports should be available to confirm their strength requirements. Those units on site awaiting installation should be properly stored to prevent excessive exposure to the elements which may very well compromise their strength requirements.

 

There can be no doubt that Dr Ramsammy, Minister of Agriculture, has been grossly misled that come June 2013 the Hope Canal Project will be completed and become functional.

 

To confirm our observations and to allay the public’s apprehension, he should initiate an independent mid-term review of the Hope Canal Project to assess progress with respect to the implementation of project activities focusing on the project implementation plan, its progress in achieving project outcomes, expenditures and the disbursement schedule. The review will show how skewed the NDIA/consulting engineers were regarding the timely completion of project works and their indifference to costs and the auxiliary works required to make the system functional.


Yours faithfully,


Malcolm Alli
Charles Sohan

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Dear Editor,

 

To confirm our observations and to allay the public’s apprehension, he should initiate an independent mid-term review of the Hope Canal Project to assess progress with respect to the implementation of project activities focusing on the project implementation plan, its progress in achieving project outcomes, expenditures and the disbursement schedule.


Yours faithfully,


Malcolm Alli
Charles Sohan

Observations and not authentic confirmation of the issues.

FM

Doctors usually observe the facts and symptoms to make diagnosis. Observations of all type are crucial to scientific research and discovery. I think we owe these two experienced and fine Guyanese engineers a great debt for their educated and informed observation. I hope the government does the right things and save the taxpayers from waste and another poorly executed project like the Skeldon sugar factory and the Parika wharf, to name a few.   

FM

Engineers say Hope Canal works substandard, call for review

 

Posted By Stabroek staff On December 5, 2012 @ 5:30 am In Local | No Comments

-contractors challenge findings


Prominent engineers Malcolm Alli and Charles Sohan have sounded alarm bells over substandard work on the Hope Canal Project and have urged an independent review but the contractors are dismissing their concerns, saying their assessment of the situation is misleading.

 

“What we observed with respect to project activities, quality control and the contractors’ abilities to organize and execute the work to complete their contracts on time was not very encouraging,” Alli and Sohan wrote in a letter published in yesterday’s edition of the Stabroek News and which was based on a recent site visit to assess construction progress.

 

As a result of their findings, they urged Minister of Agriculture Dr Leslie Ramsammy to order an independent mid-term review of the project to assess progress with respect to the implementation of project activities focusing on the project implementation plan, its progress in achieving project outcomes, expenditures and the disbursement schedule. “The review will show how skewed the [National Drainage and Irrigation Authority]/consulting engineers were regarding the timely completion of project works and their indifference to costs and the auxiliary works required to make the system functional,” they said. “There can be no doubt that Dr Ramsammy… has been grossly misled that come June 2013 the Hope Canal project will be completed and become functional.”

 

The site of the bridge works

 

The Hope Canal has four aspects: over 10km of channel from the East Demerara Water Conservancy, a bridge across the public road, a conservancy head regulation with three gates, and an outfall at the canal’s Atlantic exit, which will comprise eight gates. The canal’s excavation is being done by NDIA, with BK International, DIPCON Engineering and Courtney Benn Contracting Services constructing the other three components.

 

Among the findings of Alli and Sohan was that work done on the Weir discharge structure across the sea defence indicates that only about 15% of contract work has been completed to date. They said that based on the contractor’s performance so far, it is unlikely that the structure will be completed and become functional before 2014. “Excuses given such as the late delivery of materials, equipment failure and transportation difficulties all within his ambit are not severe contingencies to relieve the contractor of his contractual obligations to complete the Weir within the specified time-frame,” they said.

 

Drifting piles

The site for the eight-door weir discharge structure

 

Alli and Sohan also point out that the timber piles driven show that many of them are “out of plumb,” saying that they are drifting by as much as three feet. “The northern row of driven perimeter steel sheet piling shows that some of them have listed eastwards by as much as 15 degrees, indicating that they have been driven with inadequate guide support and their toes have probably slipped out of the interlocking grooves,” they note, while adding that the driven out-of-plumb timber piles may have been broken at the splices and therefore their bearing capacity compromised.

 

They said that the engineer responsible for observing materials and completed work to evaluate their compliance with the plans, specifications and design should have recognized these problems and instructed the contractor to take remedial measures to correct the sub-standard work. “The Minister of Agriculture/NDIA engineers during their recent visit to the site must have seen that the piles were being driven out of alignment, but apparently they took no action to remedy the situation, continue to allow things to slide while the contractor goes about his daily routine executing sub-standard work,” they added.

 

The weed-filled canal

 

Efforts made by Stabroek News to contact the NDIA for a comment yesterday were unsuccessful, however, on-site engineers, who asked not to be named, challenged Alli and Sohan’s findings. One engineer stated that the piles were slanted due to earth movement. The man explained that two trenches once occupied the area where works are being carried out and that when works started the entire area was filled up to facilitate construction. He also said that tree bark and water pockets still remain beneath the earth making it quite unstable.

 

In addition to this impediment, the engineer stated that some of the timber piles could not be pile-driven the full 120ft into the earth due to resistance provided by what is known as “cemented sand.” Instead, he added, some of the piles could only be driven to depths of 110ft, 112ft, 113ft and 115ft. Another engineer stated that the soil surrounding the slanted piles still has to be excavated so that they can be cut to complete the foundation. He added that once cut, the slanting portions will be removed, eliminating the problem.


The on-site engineers also said that of the piles to be driven, more than 90% of them have already been driven, leaving just over 100 to be taken care of.

 

Weeds


Alli and Sohan  also listed “weeds, which have taken over about 40% of the canal’s waterway” as “a major problem developing in the unfinished canal.” They estimated that within six months, if no action is taken, the entire waterway will be covered with weeds. “Their presence will severely restrict flow and negate the objective of discharging floodwater efficiently from the conservancy. Cost for their removal and continual maintenance will be an expensive exercise which NDIA is still to estimate and budget for,” they said, while pointing out that the bushes growing profusely on the embankments will also have to be controlled by regular maintenance.

Upon visiting the site, Stabroek News was able to confirm that the waterways were indeed clogged to a significant extent by weeds and that both banks of the canal were overtaken with heavy vegetation. The western bank, in particular, was rich with thick vegetative growth, including trees over 10ft in height.

 

Another concern raised by Alli and Sohan is the design and supervision of construction of the structure, which they noted requires some 520 timber piles 120 ft long based on the design of the foundation. “Of necessity the piles have to be spliced and the splicing of timber piles in general is never recommended because of the difficulty to keep the piles plumb and prevent cracking and splitting during driving,” they said. Further, they argue that the design should have been reviewed by an independent consultant to check whether the structure was not over-designed, and particularly the requirement for what appears to be “an excessive number of piles to support the structure.” Prior to construction, they added, test piles should have been driven and loaded to determine the length and number of piles required to adequately support the structure. They also noted that from experience of previously designed and built structures under similar soil conditions, such as the 7-door Weir across the Abary River, “timber piles were not necessary to support the structure since the soil at that elevation could safely support the imposed loads.”

 

The drifting piles at the Hope Canal (Arian Browne photo)

 

The canal is about 50% completed and not 83% as claimed, Alli and Sohan added. They found that about 30% of the canal remains to be dug and re-dug to final bed grade and about 80% of its embankments have to be raised to design elevation, compacted, trimmed, shaped and strengthened with geo-textile fabric. Added to that, they said construction of the embankments between the Crown and Conservancy Dams is in a state of flux as the consultants and the NDIA contemplate how the geo-textile fabric stored outside the Hope Estate Office should be installed to achieve the design objectives. “It is worth noting that during our visit the pegasse built eastern embankment of the canal about 1 km north of the Head Regulator site was on fire, burning uncontrollably, and will probably compromise the geo-textile fabric if installed,” they added.

 

Alli and Sohan also said work on the head regulator is about 20% completed and piling is expected to be finished early in the new year. It is unlikely that this structure will be completed and be functional before the end of 2013, they, however, found.

 

The road bridge, they added, appears to be progressing slowly, “with an untidy work site, improper storage of material/equipment and signs of a disorganized work plan.” They also said some of the pre-stress units being installed on the bridge show changes from the original design, and therefore certified test reports should be available to confirm their strength requirements.


The Hope Canal is a US$15Million relief channel at the East Demerara Water Conservancy aimed at resolving the flooding usually experienced in the Mahaica, Mahaicony and Abary areas annually during the rainy seasons.

The canal is supposed to function as an alternative to utilizing the Lama Stop Off and Maduni Sluice, whose use also led to excessive flooding in those areas.

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

You need that sort of shallow excuse to think you say something...goat!

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

You need that sort of shallow excuse to think you say something...goat!

So the problem is the inspectors as the article indicate, but yet you fail to acknowledge that they are AFC/PNC supporters. In fact most of the engineers inspecting the projects in Guyana are AFC/Pnc supporters who undermine the country's efforts to develop. You see the PPP needs to weed out the rats who are sabotaging the nation, however they would be called racists so they have to keep on these incompetent fools. 

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

You need that sort of shallow excuse to think you say something...goat!

So the problem is the inspectors as the article indicate, but yet you fail to acknowledge that they are AFC/PNC supporters. In fact most of the engineers inspecting the projects in Guyana are AFC/Pnc supporters who undermine the country's efforts to develop. You see the PPP needs to weed out the rats who are sabotaging the nation, however they would be called racists so they have to keep on these incompetent fools. 

Dumb Jackass, I don't think you realize how vacuous are your statements above. Is that your best excuse? You might do better if you get a note from your mother.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

You need that sort of shallow excuse to think you say something...goat!

So the problem is the inspectors as the article indicate, but yet you fail to acknowledge that they are AFC/PNC supporters. In fact most of the engineers inspecting the projects in Guyana are AFC/Pnc supporters who undermine the country's efforts to develop. You see the PPP needs to weed out the rats who are sabotaging the nation, however they would be called racists so they have to keep on these incompetent fools. 

Dumb Jackass, I don't think you realize how vacuous are your statements above. Is that your best excuse? You might do better if you get a note from your mother.

As long as I continue to get a rabid reaction from you, I know my job is well done. In fact you now know how it feels to be blamed for every thing that goes wrong in Guyana regardless of the root cause.  ahahahahhahahahahahaha

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Observations can be made by any one.

 

Authentic conclusions are of essence.

That makes no sense.

You might have proper perspectives when you can grasp the fundamentals.

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

You need that sort of shallow excuse to think you say something...goat!

So the problem is the inspectors as the article indicate, but yet you fail to acknowledge that they are AFC/PNC supporters. In fact most of the engineers inspecting the projects in Guyana are AFC/Pnc supporters who undermine the country's efforts to develop. You see the PPP needs to weed out the rats who are sabotaging the nation, however they would be called racists so they have to keep on these incompetent fools. 

Dumb Jackass, I don't think you realize how vacuous are your statements above. Is that your best excuse? You might do better if you get a note from your mother.

As long as I continue to get a rabid reaction from you, I know my job is well done. In fact you now know how it feels to be blamed for every thing that goes wrong in Guyana regardless of the root cause.  ahahahahhahahahahahaha

At the end of the day you are still a dumb jackass. I see you are now braying in Bminor.


Where is the note?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

Malcolm Alli and Charles Sohan made simple personal observations,  They are not official inspectors for the project(s). Hence, the general observations are simply their personal views and do not reflect an authentic report.

 

When an official engineering firm is commissioned to assess a project, they prepare and submit their official reports directly to the company.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

Malcolm Alli and Charles Sohan made simple personal observations,  They are not official inspectors for the project(s). Hence, the general observations are simply their personal views and do not reflect an authentic report.

 

When an official engineering firm is commissioned to assess a project, they prepare and submit their official reports directly to the company.

Unlike u, these guys are professionals in the field, and are making informed assessments and offering opinion that go way beyond "simple personal observations"

 

No one is claiming that they produced a commissioned report . . . go tilt your lance elsewhere

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The problem is that the inspectors are AFc/PNC supporters who take bribes to look the other way. 

Malcolm Alli and Charles Sohan made simple personal observations,  They are not official inspectors for the project(s). Hence, the general observations are simply their personal views and do not reflect an authentic report.

 

When an official engineering firm is commissioned to assess a project, they prepare and submit their official reports directly to the company.

Malcom and Charles are professionals and much more qualified than you to make such asseements. You are not qualified enough nor do you have the experiences  to match or critique their work.

Mitwah

What is wrong wrong with Malcom's and Charles request for Dr. Ramsammy, who was grossly misled on the completetion date  to pause and  as in their words:    To confirm our observations and to allay the public’s apprehension, he should initiate an independent mid-term review of the Hope Canal Project to assess progress with respect to the implementation of project activities focusing on the project implementation plan, its progress in achieving project outcomes, expenditures and the disbursement schedule. The review will show how skewed the NDIA/consulting engineers were regarding the timely completion of project works and their indifference to costs and the auxiliary works required to make the system functional. ?

 

 

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Observations can be made by any one.

 

Authentic conclusions are of essence.

That makes no sense.

You might have proper perspectives when you can grasp the fundamentals.

Oh my! This is no deep and teeming with magisterial wisdom, I though we are dealing with a cyber Plato or Aristotle.  

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Observations can be made by any one.

 

Authentic conclusions are of essence.

That makes no sense.

You might have proper perspectives when you can grasp the fundamentals.

Oh my! This is no deep and teeming with magisterial wisdom, I though we are dealing with a cyber Plato or Aristotle.  

You have finally demonstrated the epitome of your expressions and mannerism.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Observations can be made by any one.

 

Authentic conclusions are of essence.

That makes no sense.

You might have proper perspectives when you can grasp the fundamentals.

Oh my! This is no deep and teeming with magisterial wisdom, I though we are dealing with a cyber Plato or Aristotle.  

You have finally demonstrated the epitome of your expressions and mannerism.

 

Woooow! I am stunned by such a magnificent single sentence.  

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Observations can be made by any one.

 

Authentic conclusions are of essence.

That makes no sense.

You might have proper perspectives when you can grasp the fundamentals.

Oh my! This is no deep and teeming with magisterial wisdom, I though we are dealing with a cyber Plato or Aristotle.  

You have finally demonstrated the epitome of your expressions and mannerism.

Woooow! I am stunned by such a magnificent single sentence.  

It is your choice to continue with your ramblings or present succinct and pertinent information.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Observations can be made by any one.

 

Authentic conclusions are of essence.

That makes no sense.

You might have proper perspectives when you can grasp the fundamentals.

Oh my! This is no deep and teeming with magisterial wisdom, I though we are dealing with a cyber Plato or Aristotle.  

You have finally demonstrated the epitome of your expressions and mannerism.

Woooow! I am stunned by such a magnificent single sentence.  

It is your choice to continue with your ramblings or present succinct and pertinent information.

"For a Covetous Man to inveigh against Prodigality... is for the Pot to call the Kettle black."

Mitwah

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×