These revelations put this case in jeopardy. It also proves that the democrats have weaponized government institutions and some jury selection process.

The Federalist is a Republican mouthpiece.

Sean, were you ever on a Jury? The Jury Foreman do not/cannot tell other Jurors what to think, how to vote, you know that, right??

Why the ***.k are you posting troll tracks on the forum? If you had a brains you would write some original opinion on the matter so we could know where you stand. No one care to read the griping of conservative dregs. Keep it where it is, link it if it is reference material to some idea you have but do not copy and paste is here as if we are eager to read that s.hit

Sean posted:

These revelations put this case in jeopardy. It also proves that the democrats have weaponized government institutions and some jury selection process.

These "revelations" astound dunces like you. Every juror who ever sat on a case are as any human that ever lived flawed in some way. That is being weaponized is the awful contagion that has begun to consume trumpeters that because some one has had problems or indiscretions in their life they are corrupt. Investigate these troll and see what saints they are.

The judge will sentence that creepy dude to t he max on the 9th. His only hope is a pardon.

Listen you bullshitter. I made more original discussion at GNI than you ever made here. I am posting facts which hit you and other Hillary leftovers in the gut like a bullet. You are constantly whining like a wimp.

Please read the Foreman juror who lied that she knew nothing about the case prior to being selected. Those posts are there for the public to see. 

Stop your constant whining. 

D2 posted:

Sean posted:

These revelations put this case in jeopardy. It also proves that the democrats have weaponized government institutions and some jury selection process.

These "revelations" astound dunces like you. Every juror who ever sat on a case are as any human that ever lived flawed in some way. That is being weaponized is the awful contagion that has begun to consume trumpeters that because some one has had problems or indiscretions in their life they are corrupt. Investigate these troll and see what saints they are.

The judge will sentence that creepy dude to t he max on the 9th. His only hope is a pardon.

More BS form you.. 

Lying to a Judge during the selection process is a criminal offence and will jeopardize this case.

This case in now in jeopardy after this Juror Foreman Facebook posts. It undermines the entire Jury selection process including this case.

This is what she posted prior to being selected and swore that she knew nothing about this case.

The Fake News Media failed to report this. 

What apparently biased lead juror in Stone trial said during jury selection

Roger Stone (Image: Washington Examiner video screen grab)

• Share
• Tweet
• Flip

 

 

By Chuck Ross

• A former Democratic congressional candidate revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson on the jury that convicted Roger Stone.
• Tomeka Hart said during the jury selection process that she did not “pay that close attention” to developments in the Russia investigation. She also said that Stone’s links to President Donald Trump would “absolutely not” affect her views at trial. 
• But Hart’s social media posts show that she was closely tuned in to the Russia probe and that she considered Trump and his supporters to be racist. 

When Tomeka Hart was interviewed during the jury selection process as part of the Roger Stone trial, the former Democratic congressional candidate said she was generally aware of developments in the Russia investigation, but that she didn’t “pay that close attention” to the probe.

She also insisted that Stone’s affiliation with President Donald Trump would “absolutely not” color her views of the longtime Trump confidante, according to a copy of a court transcript obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

But Hart’s social media record, which emerged Wednesday after she came forward as the foreperson on Stone’s jury, paints a different picture.

Trending: The Jessie Liu clue: A D.C. cover-up that IS Spygate

Hart’s Twitter account shows that she tweeted frequently about developments in the special counsel’s investigation, typically stories that were negative for Trump. She was also intensely critical of Trump and his followers. (RELATED: Lead Juror In Roger Stone Case Ran For Congress As A Democrat In 2012)

 

In one Aug. 19, 2017 post, Hart referred to Trump as the “#KlanPresident,” an apparent reference to the Ku Klux Klan.

In another, Hart asserted that all Trump supporters are racist.

“Then stop being racists. Co-signing and defending a racist and his racist rhetoric makes you racist. Point blank,” she wrote on Aug. 2, 2019.

Months later, Hart would find herself leading a jury weighing a case against one Trump’s staunchest defenders: Stone. The GOP operative, who has known Trump for four decades, is widely credited with coaxing him to run for president.

Hart outed herself as the lead Stone juror in a Facebook post Wednesday expressing support for four prosecutors who withdrew from the case after the Justice Department revised a proposal that Stone serve up to nine years in prison. The new proposal still calls for “substantial” prison time for the 67-year-old Stone, but said that it should be “far less” than the 87-108 month recommendation.

 

The Hart-led jury, which deliberated for seven hours, convicted Stone on Nov. 15, 2019 on all seven counts he faced.

Hart was interviewed on Nov. 5, 2019 along with a group of other potential jurors. Hart is not identified by name in the transcript (she is referred to as Juror Number 1261), but the description matches her resume. Hart ran for Congress and also served as the foreperson on a grand jury in Tennessee for two years.

“You’ve also indicated a fair amount of paying attention to news and social media including about political things?” Judge Amy Berman Jackson asked Hart.

“Yes,” she replied.

“And when we asked what you read or heard about the defendant, you do understand that he was involved in Mr. Trump’s campaign in some way?” Jackson asked.

 

“Yes,” she said.

“Is there anything about that that affects your ability to judge him fairly and impartially sitting here right now in this courtroom?” Jackson queried.

“Absolutely not,” Hart answered.

“What is it that you have read or heard about him?” asked Jackson.

“So nothing that I can recall specifically,” Hart replied. “I do watch sometimes paying attention but sometimes in the background CNN.”

“So I recall just hearing about him being part of the campaign and some belief or reporting around interaction with the Russian probe and interaction with him and people in the country, but I don’t have a whole lot of details. I don’t pay that close attention or watch C-SPAN,” she continued.

“Can you kind of wipe the slate clean and learn what you need to learn in this case from the evidence presented in the courtroom and no other source?” Jackson asked, to which Hart responded, “Yes.”

But Hart’s Twitter account suggests that she closely followed the Russia probe and other investigations involving Trump associates.

On Nov. 5, 2017 she tweeted a story about leaked documents purporting to show that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had secret ties to associates of Russian President Vladimir Putin. On March 3, 2017, she circulated a New Yorker story entitled, “Trump, Putin and the New Cold War.” On March 24, 2019, Hart wrote that Republicans were “ignoring the numerous indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions of people in 45’s inner-circle” that stemmed from former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

Hart did not comment directly about Stone, whose case stemmed from Mueller’s investigation. But she did retweet a Jan. 30, 2019 post by CNN contributor Bakari Sellers that downplayed conservative criticism of the circumstances of Stone’s arrest.

Conservatives widely condemned the Jan. 25, 2019 FBI raid on Stone’s home in Florida. Sellers dismissed those complaints by listing black Americans who have been killed by police or died while in police custody.

Hart did not respond to emails seeking comment.

It is unclear why Stone’s lawyers did not strike Hart from the jury pool given her political leanings.

The court transcript shows that Stone attorney Robert Buschel pressed Hart about whether she had any future political aspirations.

“I don’t know, not federal,” said Hart, who served on the Memphis, Tennessee, school board before running for Congress.

Judge Jackson interjected during the line of questioning to ask Hart whether Trump or Stone’s political affiliations would change how she weighed evidence at trial.

“Is there anything about his affiliation with the Trump campaign and the Republican party in general that gives you any reason to pause or hesitate or think that you couldn’t fairly evaluate the evidence against him?” Jackson asked.

Hart answered: “No.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

https://libertyunyielding.com/...ring-jury-selection/

Facts about this case which the Fake News Media don't want you to see or hear :

• Tomeka Hart revealed on Wednesday that she was foreperson on Stone jury 
• Hart unsuccessfully ran for Congress in Tennessee as a Democrat in 2012 
• She is also a former Memphis City Schools Board President 
• Her social media shows a long history of anti-Trump comments
• She called Trump supporters racists and tweeted about Stone case before trial 

• The foreperson on Roger Stone’s jury ran for Congress as a Democrat in 2012, it was revealed Wednesday. 
• Tomeka Hart revealed her role on the jury in a Facebook post defending four prosecutors who quit the Stone case in protest over a revision to the Trump confidante’s recommended prison sentence. 
• Hart’s social media activity shows she closely followed the special counsel’s Russia investigation, and frequently posted negative stories about President Donald Trump.

Nehru posted:

Sean, were you ever on a Jury? The Jury Foreman do not/cannot tell other Jurors what to think, how to vote, you know that, right??

I was called to serve. You have to declare whether you know any information about the case and whether you have any biases.

Her Facebook posts revealed that the know a lot about the case and even commented on the case. She also had a lot of biases:

Sean posted:

Facts about this case which the Fake News Media don't want you to see or hear :

• Tomeka Hart revealed on Wednesday that she was foreperson on Stone jury 
• Hart unsuccessfully ran for Congress in Tennessee as a Democrat in 2012 
• She is also a former Memphis City Schools Board President 
• Her social media shows a long history of anti-Trump comments
• She called Trump supporters racists and tweeted about Stone case before trial 

• The foreperson on Roger Stone’s jury ran for Congress as a Democrat in 2012, it was revealed Wednesday. 
• Tomeka Hart revealed her role on the jury in a Facebook post defending four prosecutors who quit the Stone case in protest over a revision to the Trump confidante’s recommended prison sentence. 
• Hart’s social media activity shows she closely followed the special counsel’s Russia investigation, and frequently posted negative stories about President Donald Trump.

Those are not facts that pertain to the case. The fact the lady is a democrat as an accusation is as flawed as if one says republicans are all liars. You do not have the capacity to reason so are beguiled by the spurious distractions from the fact the man was convicted for lying to congress and for interfering with prosecution. Where does any of the above repudiate those objective facts? Either he did it or he did not.

Jurors have real lives but they also always seem to deliver up reasonable outcomes. Trumpeters selling the idea that only trump lovers can be honest is as idiotic as you truing to sell us this lady cannot be an honest adjudicator of legal facts because she had ambitions as a congress person or was keenly tuned to the nations civic and political live. All of us are not useless drones like you.

Sean posted:

Listen you bullshitter. I made more original discussion at GNI than you ever made here. I am posting facts which hit you and other Hillary leftovers in the gut like a bullet. You are constantly whining like a wimp.

Please read the Foreman juror who lied that she knew nothing about the case prior to being selected. Those posts are there for the public to see. 

Stop your constant whining. 

Posting links and cut and paste of stories is not originality. Ever see me posting stories without a comment?. Ask your fellow posters to compare you to me and you will have your answer. Note I have had bare knuckle fights fight with all of them at some time or. You are a stone cold dunce and the only originality you have is an aptitude of self aggrandizement. But there you are selling a load of bunk/

More BS. No among of BS from you can fact that she lied during the selection process and as such is subject to a criminal investigation and puts this case in jeopardy.

You have not made one single valuable contribution to society and show up here with your nonsense and BS which keeps piling up.

Sean posted:

More BS. No among of BS from you can fact that she lied during the selection process and as such is subject to a criminal investigation and puts this case in jeopardy.

You have not made one single valuable contribution to society and show up here with your nonsense and BS which keeps piling up.

The man did what he did. Nothing is in dispute. 

I raised three kids, live a great life, helped raised my brother's kids and that is all the contribution I need. Now go imagine you have a house by a lake.

“This is a crisis of credibility,” Sasha Samberg-Champion, a former federal appellate attorney now with Relman Colfax, told the Guardian. “Nobody knows whether decisions are being made based on the facts and the law, or whether they are based on a political whim.”

I can give you dozens of similar attestations from similarly placed individuals. The fact remains the he is convicted by a jury of his peers and will have to pay the piper or wait a year until trump can pardon him without political cost.

D2 posted:

Sean posted:

More BS. No among of BS from you can fact that she lied during the selection process and as such is subject to a criminal investigation and puts this case in jeopardy.

You have not made one single valuable contribution to society and show up here with your nonsense and BS which keeps piling up.

The man did what he did. Nothing is in dispute. 

I raised three kids, live a great life, helped raised my brother's kids and that is all the contribution I need. Now go imagine you have a house by a lake.

Look at you, hey hey.

Everyone has a duty to raise their children. I have two, one is in law school and the other just started university. 

I guess you brother is a deadbeat too, can't afford to raise children.

You have made ZERO contribution to society and yet show up here with your usual BS. I will invite a few members to my residence this summer while you huddle on that park bench dreaming of becoming someone and making a valuable constitution to society.

That's the problem with people like you on the left, always dreaming of owning a home and creating wealth while not making an effort in realizing those dreams. BS does not count as a valuable contribution to society, yet you keep peddling it.

Sean posted:

D2 posted:

Sean posted:

More BS. No among of BS from you can fact that she lied during the selection process and as such is subject to a criminal investigation and puts this case in jeopardy.

You have not made one single valuable contribution to society and show up here with your nonsense and BS which keeps piling up.

The man did what he did. Nothing is in dispute. 

I raised three kids, live a great life, helped raised my brother's kids and that is all the contribution I need. Now go imagine you have a house by a lake.

Look at you, hey hey.

Everyone has a duty to raise their children. I have two, one is in law school and the other just started university. 

I guess you brother is a deadbeat too, can't afford to raise children.

You have made ZERO contribution to society and yet show up here with your usual BS. I will invite a few members to my residence this summer while you huddle on that park bench dreaming of becoming someone and making a valuable constitution to society.

That's the problem with people like you on the left, always dreaming of owning a home and creating wealth while not making an effort in realizing those dreams. BS does not count as a valuable contribution to society, yet you keep peddling it.

 

So kudos to you! Two of mine are ivy league grads and one from Vtech who is a formula 1 mechanic. Yes one  has an obligation to raise their kids but it is the center of social responsibility. 

I presume you have invented some gene therapy with your high school diploma so you have left an institutional legacy to society!

Invite whom you want to your residence that you see that as the core of your life is enough to determine you are an *******. 

Money does not make a man. His ability to participate in the cultural life of his community across the spectrum of life does. And I assure you I am not on the bread line however much your wild imagination would want to make it so. Further, I was born into a wealthy family so that trench water think has not left any damage to my psyche so I have to measure my life by what I have.

Money talks and BS walks.

Keep peddling BS.

Sean posted:

Money talks and BS walks.

Keep peddling BS.

When you get it tell me....you are too stupid to know what is real money.

Bai, sitting on a park bench with cap in hand won’t get you anything except BS. 
hey hey hey 

Sean posted:

Bai, sitting on a park bench with cap in hand won’t get you anything except BS. 
hey hey hey 

I know....not having any intellectual content between your ears leaves lots of space for imagining....inclusive of the delusion of being king midas

Piwari has eroded your brain to the extent that medical experts are baffled at the emptiness in your head. The only solution available is diapers for your mouth and drilling between your ears. That may only be a interim solution. 

Sean posted:

Piwari has eroded your brain to the extent that medical experts are baffled at the emptiness in your head. The only solution available is diapers for your mouth and drilling between your ears. That may only be a interim solution. 

Stop visiting these conspiracy sites and you will ketch some sense. Let the piwari stuff go. Piwari is associated with the Amerindians. Whenever you invoke piwari, you reference Amerindians. Leave the people alone. I don't see all Amerindians, unlike blacks, causing riots in Guyana. Please, stop the piwari stuff.

Sean posted:

Piwari has eroded your brain to the extent that medical experts are baffled at the emptiness in your head. The only solution available is diapers for your mouth and drilling between your ears. That may only be a interim solution. 

The above is an apt example why beyond doubt most here thinks you are a flake. You do not know a damn thing about me but because I am Amerindian i am supposed to be addicted to piwari.

To the contrary, Piwari is a beer with less than 5 percent alcohol content and one has to take a few barrels of it to get drunk. Now bushrum, a morbid distillate prevalent in your area and a scourge among the illiterates like you could be something one, if they are so inclined, to reasonably attribute as a habit of yours.

But that would be a feeble excuse. Noting alcoholic or hallucinatory mediates your thinking. You are plainly stupid....born that way