Desperate PNC people want to crucify that upstanding lady.

Granger doesn't know that because he doesn't know the law.

@Ramakant-P posted:

Granger doesn't know that because he doesn't know the law.

What do you know about the law?  You are clueless about everything except chupidness.

@Former Member posted:

Desperate PNC people want to crucify that upstanding lady.

Do fo do na obeah.  When the PPP decided to involve the courts in the elections dispute they must have known that the other side could play the same game.  Well here we are--it appears as if the GECOM Chair will now have to defend privately laid criminal charges, just like Mr. Lowenfield.  

The courts are there to resolve disputes even if the case seems baseless to the general public. Both the PNC are PPP are reserved to file any cases at their disposal. However, this case adds to the legal circus of election 2020.

The PPP sought an injunction to prevent GECOM from making any declarations based on Mingo's fraudulent form 24. Mingo's attempt was so blatant that it would have been political and legal malpractice had they not gone to the High Court to stop him, Lowenfield and GECOM from comitting treason.

That is vastly different from all the silly court filings by the Coalition starting with their very first filing using Ulita Moore who is an APNU elections candidate to ask the court to stop a recount that her presidental candidate Granger called CARICOM and asked them to oversee. The Coalition doesn't even argue law or fact. They are forced to hang tightly to conspiracy theories and when they feel that not getting any traction, they resolve to veiled threats of violence.

@Former Member posted:

The courts are there to resolve disputes even if the case seems baseless to the general public. Both the PNC are PPP are reserved to file any cases at their disposal. However, this case adds to the legal circus of election 2020.

Fair enough

@Former Member posted:

The PPP sought an injunction to prevent GECOM from making any declarations based on Mingo's fraudulent form 24. Mingo's attempt was so blatant that it would have been political and legal malpractice had they not gone to the High Court to stop him, Lowenfield and GECOM from comitting treason.

That is vastly different from all the silly court filings by the Coalition starting with their very first filing using Ulita Moore who is an APNU elections candidate to ask the court to stop a recount that her presidental candidate Granger called CARICOM and asked them to oversee. The Coalition doesn't even argue law or fact. They are forced to hang tightly to conspiracy theories and when they feel that not getting any traction, they resolve to veiled threats of violence.

Well like I said before "do fo do na obeah".  

@Totaram posted:

Do fo do na obeah.  When the PPP decided to involve the courts in the elections dispute they must have known that the other side could play the same game.  Well here we are--it appears as if the GECOM Chair will now have to defend privately laid criminal charges, just like Mr. Lowenfield.  

The case against Lowenfield is justified. The case against Claudette Singh is unjust. PPP/C is not playing any "game".

Granger and Harmon want power-sharing talks with PPP/C at the same time they're working 24/7 to deny a PPP/C victory? No way.

@Former Member posted:

The case against Lowenfield is justified. The case against Claudette Singh is unjust. PPP/C is not playing any "game".

Granger and Harmon want power-sharing talks with PPP/C at the same time they're working 24/7 to deny a PPP/C victory? No way.

Believe what you want but the games are in full swing.  Lawyers are usually creative people who could find some aspect of the law to make or bolster a case so  these court matters could go on ad infinitum.  

@Former Member posted:

Granger and Harmon want power-sharing talks with PPP/C at the same time they're working 24/7 to deny a PPP/C victory? No way.

Power sharing talks/discussions are irrelevant to the specific issue for the election results.

Those matters are best suited for formation of groups prior to officially going forward as units for an election.

@Totaram posted:

Believe what you want but the games are in full swing.  Lawyers are usually creative people who could find some aspect of the law to make or bolster a case so  these court matters could go on ad infinitum.  

I get you. Ramjattan's "technicality". Doesn't mean they are morally just. That's why even Coalition supporters who have a sense of decency will not trust Congress Place in future.

@Totaram posted:

What do you know about the law?  You are clueless about everything except chupidness.

That is for you to find out.   You are unintelligent. You are not human because you are a Jackass and so is your ancestors.

@Ramakant-P posted:

That is for you to find out.   You are unintelligent. You are not human because you are a Jackass and so is your ancestors.

Chupidee Kakakant braying all round Brampton.

@Totaram posted:

Chupidee Kakakant braying all round Brampton.

You should get out of this forum.  You are a dunce and unintelligent. You have nothing intelligent to say.    so stop embarrassing yourself and go home to your family if you have one still.