Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
Top China analyst: Beijing has been duping the US since Mao
 

China launched a secret 100-year modernization program that deceived successive U.S. administrations into unknowingly promoting Beijing’s strategy of replacing the U.S.-led world order with a Chinese communist-dominated economic and political system, according to a new book by a longtime Pentagon China specialist.

For more than four decades, Chinese leaders lulled presidents, cabinet secretaries, and other government analysts and policymakers into falsely assessing China as a benign power deserving of U.S. support, says Michael Pillsbury, the Mandarin-speaking analyst who has worked on China policy and intelligence issues for every U.S. administration since Richard Nixon

 

The secret strategy, based on ancient Chinese statecraft, produced a large-scale transfer of cash, technology, and expertise that bolstered military and Communist Party “superhawks” in China who are now taking steps to catch up to and ultimately surpass the United States, Pillsbury concludes in a book published this week.

The Chinese strategic deception program was launched by Mao Zedong in 1955 and put forth the widespread misbelief that China is a poor, backward, inward-looking country. “And therefore the United States has to help them, and give away things to them, to make sure they stay friendly,” Pillsbury said in an interview. “This is totally wrong.”

The Chinese strategy also is aimed at gaining global economic dominance, he says, noting that China’s military buildup is but one part. The combined economic, political, and military power is seeking to produce China as a new global “hegemon” that will export its anti-democratic political system and predatory economic practices around the world.



Replies sorted oldest to newest

Look Terrorist Indian,

 

The fact that you got ONE conspiracy theory right does not change much. We probably would have believed this earlier if you didn't display this Muslim fetish of seeing conspiracies everywhere.

FM

Dotishness! The fools laughed at me.

Luckily I started learning Mandarin and Kung Fu!

i hope the dolts realize now the amount of chinese spies imbedded in the population. 

 

When last you went into Flushing without a guidebook and translator?

傻瓜將學習  Hahaha!

FM

Pillsbury's conclusion could have credence and validity had the development took place a few years ago.

 

While inconceivable, it is also improbable that such an issue would be in existence since around the 1950's.

 

The focused issues relate to countries taking a much more prominent position in the world, interacting much more with each other and the declining influence of countries such as Britain, US_of_A, France, etc.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

 

While inconceivable, it is also improbable that such an issue would be in existence since around the 1950's.

 

 

Let us wax philosophical for a moment Sahib.

 

Did you really mean to say "inconceivable"? I believe it can so be conceived as the author of the article indeed conceived of it in alleging that the Chinese both conceived and implemented it.

 

But can something truly be both inconceivable and improbable? Would something inconceivable not be more appropriately impossible? Also, how would we be aware of that which we cannot conceive of? We wouldn't know that it's inconceivable because we did not yet conceive of it. And once we have conceived of it, does it not then become incapable of being rendered "inconceivable"?

 

Over to you.

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

Dotishness! The fools laughed at me.

Luckily I started learning Mandarin and Kung Fu!

i hope the dolts realize now the amount of chinese spies imbedded in the population. 

 

When last you went into Flushing without a guidebook and translator?

傻瓜將學習  Hahaha!

I would more learn Galician than mandarin. At least I can pick that up in a few months and would have a kinship with those folks. I have no desire to visit china and at this point I know mandarin would be a waste of time. I am also convinced that the path of human future is not going to be led by china. We tried slavery already.

 

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

 

While inconceivable, it is also improbable that such an issue would be in existence since around the 1950's.

 

 

Let us wax philosophical for a moment Sahib.

 

Did you really mean to say "inconceivable"? I believe it can so be conceived as the author of the article indeed conceived of it in alleging that the Chinese both conceived and implemented it.

 

But can something truly be both inconceivable and improbable? Would something inconceivable not be more appropriately impossible? Also, how would we be aware of that which we cannot conceive of? We wouldn't know that it's inconceivable because we did not yet conceive of it. And once we have conceived of it, does it not then become incapable of being rendered "inconceivable"?

 

Over to you.

Your exclusive choice use phrases to wax whatever you want with yourself.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by TI:

Dotishness! The fools laughed at me.

Luckily I started learning Mandarin and Kung Fu!

i hope the dolts realize now the amount of chinese spies imbedded in the population. 

 

When last you went into Flushing without a guidebook and translator?

傻瓜將學習  Hahaha!

I would more learn Galician than mandarin. At least I can pick that up in a few months and would have a kinship with those folks. I have no desire to visit china and at this point I know mandarin would be a waste of time. I am also convinced that the path of human future is not going to be led by china. We tried slavery already.

 

It's merely a matter of time. I'm quite astonished the British at least, did not pick up on Chinese strategy. Chinese nationals (some naturalized in the west) hold massive amounts of real estate and investments, but patriotic to mother China.  Chinese implemented a few so called Capitalist zones in certain cities that actually duped the west into thinking they were changing ideology.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

 

While inconceivable, it is also improbable that such an issue would be in existence since around the 1950's.

 

 

Let us wax philosophical for a moment Sahib.

 

Did you really mean to say "inconceivable"? I believe it can so be conceived as the author of the article indeed conceived of it in alleging that the Chinese both conceived and implemented it.

 

But can something truly be both inconceivable and improbable? Would something inconceivable not be more appropriately impossible? Also, how would we be aware of that which we cannot conceive of? We wouldn't know that it's inconceivable because we did not yet conceive of it. And once we have conceived of it, does it not then become incapable of being rendered "inconceivable"?

 

Over to you.

Your exclusive choice use phrases to wax whatever you want with yourself.

wax tarasss HAHAHA

cain

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×