Public Works Ministry completes demolition of ‘illegal’ structures erected by BM Soat at Success

Yuji, you are now a part of the Lying Scumbag Society of GNI.

If you vex, you vex

Quite a few people in Guyana has no respect for law and order.

It sounds like the PPP gave the land to the father, but then somebody in the PPP regime did not get their bank balance greased and decided to take revenge.

Typical PPP runnings!!

I don't understand how a court order was granted,since they had transport for the land. Seems like a lawsuit for damages is brewing.

It was a court order, due process was followed.  You guy are a bunch of crabs.  Chiefsta prefers slitting throats and shooting women as law and order.

The GoG under the PNC demolished many properties in the 1st phase of the four-lane highway.  These were not illegal but eminent domain rules were applied.

Typical Chief runnings, endless non-stop shyte from the mouth.

young man said that when the Works Ministry won the judgement in the High Court, Government moved on Tuesday to demolish the fence; but after the family had been served with the court order, he presented the family’s transport to the court to prove that what the Government was claiming as its reserve was in fact property that had been transported to his father.
As to the family’s subsequent moves, the man said they will continue to fight the issue in the court, since they have transport for the land that the government is claiming as its reserve.

Why do you use your mouth like a kaka hole?. No wonder, you got that shitty batty smile.

Mmmm, could you refute my statement in a "somewhat intelligent" manner, or is this the "loser" response.

Do you read your shyte before you post? Why do you continue to use your mouth like a kaka hole?

This is what I posted, could you please refute:

Soat also produced a court order which prohibited the government from demolishing their property. Their court order was obtained the very day that the demolition started but it was not honored.

Not according to this statement from the "young man" below.  They did not receive a "stay" from the court but presented a transport document.  The court must have look at all relevant documentation and issued the order.  They may file documents but unless the court issues a stay, the gov't is free to act on the court order.  They may file an appeal and if the court concludes the Govt acted in appropriately, they will need to terminate and reimburse for the property destroyed.

The young man said that when the Works Ministry won the judgement in the High Court, Government moved on Tuesday to demolish the fence; but after the family had been served with the court order, he presented the family’s transport to the court to prove that what the Government was claiming as its reserve was in fact property that had been transported to his father.

http://www.kaieteurnewsonline....-bm-soat-properties/

Attorney-at-Law, Khemraj Ramjattan, who secured the order restricting the Ministry from destroying the property was on hand and sought to no avail to have the police or the ministry officials to respect that Order.
But he had not served it in keeping with the procedure. The writ should have been served on the Chief Works Officer who was not on hand for the service.
Among the police ranks that were on hand was the commander for the division Assistant Commissioner, Christopher Griffith, who was presented with the Court Order.
Shortly after a bit of deliberation, the Mohameds were told that the Ministry’s Court Order stands and that the workers must be allowed to proceed to destroy the property at which point in time the demolition of that building began.
Ramjattan told media operatives he did not understand how the Ministry officials could be allowed by the Police to proceed, saying that the Commander was in possession of the Conservatory Order secured by him for BM Soat.
According to Ramjattan, he secured the legal document about 13:30 hrs which would have been shortly after the Ministry officials would have begun destroying the fence.
This publication understands that the reason the officials were allowed to destroy the buildings was the fact that the Order had to be served to the Chief Works Officer.
He was nowhere to be seen and instead another Ministry official was supervising the workers.

Once again, they need to file an appeal and if the order is overturned, the Govt needs to terminate and mitigate.  Coming from the High Court, I have to assume, this case made it through the lower courts and the High Court was final.  Anyway, if there is further legal process, then they will need to file.

quote:

This publication understands that the reason the officials were allowed to destroy the buildings was the fact that the Order had to be served to the Chief Works Officer.
He was nowhere to be seen and instead another Ministry official was supervising the workers.

In that case the demolition is illegal. If the Chief Works officer is not present, who authorized another ministerial official to oversee the demolition? And why was the chief works officer not present even though he was supposed to?

It all sounds like a big PPP scam to misappropriate land.

Nah, the Chief Works" not being served and the "Chief Works" not present at the demolition are two different things.  I'm sure it will be sorted out in the coming days.

Who gives a flying **** what the PNC is accused of doing half a century ago? You have no evidence to support your claim in the first instance. But more importantly is the act that less than 10% of Guyanese were born 50 years ago to be able to know what the PNC is alleged to have done or not done. We are now in 2013 with a PPP regime that has been in power for 20 years. Using the excuse that decades ago someone else or another party did this or that is shyte excuse. The real issue is how people are being treated now, not 50 years ago. And even then, let us not forget that the PNC is a branch of the PPP. Even to this day the PNC members are being paid their salary by the PPP.

ahmmmm, baseman . . . u must feel like a total ass now, eh? 

What the PNC did was fully legal then and now.  What the PPP is doing today is fully legal then and now.  The Govt just have to follow due process and ensure fair and adequate compensation for legally owned property.  The Govt needs to expand the highway and eminent domain rules apply.  I think this is true in almost every nation.

In this instance, was the property legally owned or not, then it's a matter of compensation which could be sorted out afterwards anyway. No need to block the highway expansion.

All the other tripe you write is just that...tripe.

nice misdirection try ignar . . . but this has nothing to do with eminent domain

you're very 'disciplined' with your lies and half-truths . . . just like the PPP gangsters

Don't you wish.  You know the Govt is correct.

how about all compensation workout before

Nah, then you delay the inevitable and the project.  If the court decides the property was legally owned, then compensation is in order, if not then the matter is closed.  The fact that the Govt could invoke eminent domain rules either way, then go ahead and work out the ownership dispute and value in due course.  Coming from the High Court seems to me the Govt was on very strong grounds.

exposed dankey, u should know by now that empty sloganeering and deploying red herring doan work on me

address the foolishness u posted antiman!

As I said, you know the Govt is correct but you shame it don't go your way.  There is little that work you and your sound-byte posts.

with the government losing votes every day its bad politics trying to be a bully and everybody know Bm soat is a big business man in guyana with a lot of influence   the ppp will lose some more votes now what the ppp should have done is sit with the man and work out a deal this government need to know you can negotiate  

u lie and filibuster with the guile of 14 year old retard

c'mon . . . tell us all about the gov't moving to demolish here under "eminent domain," and the absence of a 'staying' court order

doan forget to prance around as before with the certainty of the invincibly stupid and snarl of the 'powerful' wannabe PPP smartman

One thing that is correct is, you are an ass.