Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Sharing some fruits, Abidha?

Yes, I am sharing what our government is all about despite the ongoing budget wrangling. You get more than you bargain for under the PPP. The famous coconut tree symbolized the nature of a valuable tree of choices.

PPP/C will continue to govern for a very long time.

FM
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Rev Al:

 

 

You certainly get more than you bargained for with the PPP. 

You even get katahar...NOT the one the joint opposition intended to give the poor sugar workers to HOLD.....the one that you cook and eat.  

Got one on Liberty yesterday, green and hard. I get mad cause I did not get ant Katahar at the Pooja Saturday, only Aloo and Pumpkin.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Rev Al:

 

 

You certainly get more than you bargained for with the PPP. 

You even get katahar...NOT the one the joint opposition intended to give the poor sugar workers to HOLD.....the one that you cook and eat.  

Got one on Liberty yesterday, green and hard. I get mad cause I did not get ant Katahar at the Pooja Saturday, only Aloo and Pumpkin.

If this was Burnham time you would have to settle for YAM instead of aloo. Consider yourself lucky.  I cook a bad aloo curry with channa yesterday. My neighbors asked if I was cooking goat meat. 

FM
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Rev Al:

 

 

You certainly get more than you bargained for with the PPP. 

You even get katahar...NOT the one the joint opposition intended to give the poor sugar workers to HOLD.....the one that you cook and eat.  

Got one on Liberty yesterday, green and hard. I get mad cause I did not get ant Katahar at the Pooja Saturday, only Aloo and Pumpkin.

If this was Burnham time you would have to settle for YAM instead of aloo. Consider yourself lucky.  I cook a bad aloo curry with channa yesterday. My neighbors asked if I was cooking goat meat. 

Bhai, I had to eat Breadfruit Curry at wedding House during the DARK DAYS. Now  MOses want to return to those Days.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:

You are very right. This is as fake as they are in their details of abundance!

It matters NOT if the tree is fake in your eyes. It signifies that you get more than you bargained for. It symbolises the PPP vision like a tree with different variety of fruits. That is so sweet! Isn't it, Stormy?

FM
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Stinger:
What a load of bullshit, jus like de PeePeePee vision

You sees it as bullsihit, I see it as something the country and its people can rely on. What better example are there to offer? 

You believe that the country can rely on the government reaping bananas from a coconut tree. No wonder you morons are easily fooled by the PPP scams.

Mars
Originally Posted by God:
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Stinger:
What a load of bullshit, jus like de PeePeePee vision

You sees it as bullsihit, I see it as something the country and its people can rely on. What better example are there to offer? 

You believe that the country can rely on the government reaping bananas from a coconut tree. No wonder you morons are easily fooled by the PPP scams.

FYI, I would rather be fooled by the PPP than to be fooled by any vinegar party. Did I answer your question? 

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
 

stormborn: You are very right. This is as fake as they are in their details of abundance!


Stormy:

 

Check this out:

 

We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

You said you saw FAKE stormy---that means you are a FAKE.

 

Remember--we see things the way we are.

 

ha ha ha ha ha

 

 

* Abidha looked at that image and concluded--"you get more than you bargain for."

 

* Stormborn looked at the image and concluded "FAKE"

 

 

Now folks, who is real and who is fake---Abidha or Stormborn ?

 

 

Remember folks, we see things the way we are.

 

Rev

 

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by God:
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Stinger:
What a load of bullshit, jus like de PeePeePee vision

You sees it as bullsihit, I see it as something the country and its people can rely on. What better example are there to offer? 

You believe that the country can rely on the government reaping bananas from a coconut tree. No wonder you morons are easily fooled by the PPP scams.

FYI, I would rather be fooled by the PPP than to be fooled by any vinegar party. Did I answer your question? 

I didn't ask a question. I undoubtedly stated that you're a moron. There is no question about it if you believe that this is something the Guyanese people can rely on.

Mars
Originally Posted by Stinger:
PPP blind followers believe in nancy story, a banana bearing coconut tree Wut a buncha morons

If morons vision a tree with variety of fruits then I would rather be a moron. I wouldn't let anyone to blur my vision. Everything you see as fake may one day turn into reality. We think positive! We're optimistic! We will press on what we believed in.

FM
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by ABIDHA:

You are very right. This is as fake as they are in their details of abundance!

It matters NOT if the tree is fake in your eyes. It signifies that you get more than you bargained for. It symbolises the PPP vision like a tree with different variety of fruits. That is so sweet! Isn't it, Stormy?

 How can something that is pure wishful thinking project a reality "more than ones wishing"? You are a nutcase. This is fantasy, the projection of a lie and illustrates a lie ie the PPP are more than they are. One does not need to fantasize that the PPP are more abundant in their thieving than they are. The reality is already constrictive of ones breathing.

FM
Originally Posted by Rev Al:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
 

 

stormborn: You are very right. This is as fake as they are in their details of abundance!


Stormy:

 

Check this out:

 

We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

You said you saw FAKE stormy---that means you are a FAKE.

 

Remember--we see things the way we are.

 

ha ha ha ha ha

 

 

* Abidha looked at that image and concluded--"you get more than you bargain for."

 

* Stormborn looked at the image and concluded "FAKE"

 

 

Now folks, who is real and who is fake---Abidha or Stormborn ?

 

 

Remember folks, we see things the way we are.

 

Rev

 

 

 

 You make no sense. To say you know that we see things the way they are is contrary to any of the great philosophical discourses across time.

 

Let me remind you; Plato say we see shadows of the real, Bishop Barkeley the mind of god; Hume, merely our sense of cause on effect ie our experience and it is not trustworthy; Kant the structure of the mind, ie  the structure forces a filtering so the thing in itself ie the a priori is outside apprehension; Hinduism, illusions etc etc.

 

Now go and read before you regurgitate nonsense.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Rev Al:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
 

 

stormborn: You are very right. This is as fake as they are in their details of abundance!


Stormy:

 

Check this out:

 

We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

You said you saw FAKE stormy---that means you are a FAKE.

 

Remember--we see things the way we are.

 

ha ha ha ha ha

 

 

* Abidha looked at that image and concluded--"you get more than you bargain for."

 

* Stormborn looked at the image and concluded "FAKE"

 

 

Now folks, who is real and who is fake---Abidha or Stormborn ?

 

 

Remember folks, we see things the way we are.

 

Rev

 

 

 

Stormborn:  You make no sense. To say you know that we see things the way they are is contrary to any of the great philosophical discourses across time.

 

Let me remind you; Plato say we see shadows of the real, Bishop Barkeley the mind of god; Hume, merely our sense of cause on effect ie our experience and it is not trustworthy; Kant the structure of the mind, ie  the structure forces a filtering so the thing in itself ie the a priori is outside apprehension; Hinduism, illusions etc etc.

 

Now go and read before you regurgitate nonsense.


Storm:

 

You can quote all the great thinkers in the world----but this is a factual truth:

 

We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are.

 

 By the way storm---do some work on your reading comprehension---you clearly misconstrued the above statement.

 

Anyway, you mentioned Plato and his comment that "we see shadows of the real.."

 

ASK PLATO IF WE CAN SEE OUR SHADOWS IN THE DARK ?hahaha

 

Rev

FM
Originally Posted by Rev Al:

Storm:

 

You can quote all the great thinkers in the world----but this is a factual truth:

 

We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are.

 

 By the way storm---do some work on your reading comprehension---you clearly misconstrued the above statement.

 

Anyway, you mentioned Plato and his comment that "we see shadows of the real.."

 

ASK PLATO IF WE CAN SEE OUR SHADOWS IN THE DARK ?hahaha

 

Rev

 First dummy, there is nothing such as a "factual truth". Truths are representations of facts in some language and are a logical construct not some existential reality. Secondly, that you know  the answer to the ontological question and can irrefutably state what it is would be the first time in the history of the world that we have philosophical "progress" ie definitive answer to a fundamental question.

 

The problem here is basic; you are  a poorly read fool.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
==================
 

The problem here is basic; you are  a poorly read fool.

 

ha ha ha ha 

 

Storm:

 

Because the Rev is your superior, he will not permit himself to be fazed by your  name calling and cheap shots.

 

Now stormy, you might fancy yourself to be widely read, but I'll call you out---your comprehension skill is pi$s poor.

 

Let's go back to the statement I made:

 

"We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are."

 

 

THIS WAS YOUR REPLY:

 

...To say you know that we see things the way they are...

 

==============

 

Storm--you clearly did not understand my statement.

 

The Rev never said "we see things the way they are."

 

 

You clearly misconstrued the statement I made.

 

Read it again---SLOWLY!

 

And try your best to understand it:

 

"We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are."

 

Did you read the last part storm ?

 

Lemme help you:

 

"we see things the way we are"

 

 

CONCLUSION:

 

You might be widely read stormy--but you have a problem comprehending what you read.hahahaha

 

Rev

 

FM
Originally Posted by Rev Al:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
==================
 

The problem here is basic; you are  a poorly read fool.

 

ha ha ha ha 

 

Storm:

 

Because the Rev is your superior, he will not permit himself to be fazed by your  name calling and cheap shots.

 

Now stormy, you might fancy yourself to be widely read, but I'll call you out---your comprehension skill is pi$s poor.

 

Let's go back to the statement I made:

 

"We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are."

 

 

THIS WAS YOUR REPLY:

 

...To say you know that we see things the way they are...

 

==============

 

Storm--you clearly did not understand my statement.

 

The Rev never said "we see things the way they are."

 

 

You clearly misconstrued the statement I made.

 

Read it again---SLOWLY!

 

And try your best to understand it:

 

"We don't see things the way they are--we see things the way we are."

 

Did you read the last part storm ?

 

Lemme help you:

 

"we see things the way we are"

 

 

CONCLUSION:

 

You might be widely read stormy--but you have a problem comprehending what you read.hahahaha

 

Rev

 

 Let me clarify since you are so smart. The first statement you made is "You said you saw FAKE stormy---that means you are a FAKE. Since the second clause is your emphasis then why not take the same logical conclusion by extension with your second statement ie we see things the way they are. Now, you can pretend the first part is somehow so profound in your universe that we cannot grasp it but the logical path is the only one we have in this universe. Now let us know the nature of "factual truth" and why you came up with that peculiar construct. Maybe that is culled from some portion of the fantastic where you are "superior"!!!

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×