Skip to main content

July 27 2020

Source

Dear Editor,

The recent ruling of the Chief Justice in Misenga Jones versus the Guyana Elections Commission et al, despite the matter now being taken up at the Appeals Court, signals that legal maneuvering may finally be close to the end. 

As the legal processes start to wind down, GECOM will no longer be constrained by the endless and dizzying round of motions and appeals from deciding on the outcome of  the March 2, 2020 General and Regional Elections, and from making a declaration based upon the ruling of the courts. 

But what then? We are deluding ourselves and misleading people if we believe that the solution to our problem lies in running back and forth to the courts to find out who is ‘right’ and who is ‘wrong,’ who has rigged or who has rigged more. This is a political matter that will never be settled by legal debates. Meanwhile lines are being drawn in the sand and tensions have been heightened rather than resolved. Racial divisions are being actively stoked on social media, explicitly and through subtle stereotyping, and in ways that have made it impossible to listen to, hear and address the fears on all sides. Histories are selectively drawn upon so that only one side has ever been the aggressor or wrongdoer, only one side is ever the martyr and victim. Vicious personal attacks – often sexist, racist and homophobic – against those with whom one disagrees or thinks one disagrees, are now the order of the day. And depending on what ‘side’ one is on, yesterday’s demon is today’s heroine, and vice versa. Strange bedfellows are self-righteously being made, with no regard for principles and with scant regard for truth. This is where we are today.

No amount of res judicatas will compensate for the absence of fundamental electoral and constitutional reform in Guyana, and without which we will once again kick the bucket of racial distrust down the road until the next election. These reforms have been consistently resisted by both major parties over decades; it is telling that the one thing upon which they seem to agree is that whoever gets into power will ensure the status quo on this question remains undisturbed.

This most recent political crisis has arrived in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic that has put lives and livelihoods at risk. It has arrived at a time when Guyana has come to international attention as a result of oil discovery and production and our geostrategic location on Venezuela’s northeastern shoulder. In the face of new forms of corporate extractivism and exploitation of our resources, history has taught us that our internal divisions and our continuing inability to resolve them, can and will be effectively used against us.  

The declaration of a result and the swearing in of a new government is thus merely the start and not the end of the work to be done to heal this country and move forward on a genuine basis of inclusion and meaningful participation. The events of the last four months have underlined that regardless of a declaration, there is no winner under the existing system if by winner we mean the Guyanese people, across race, class, coast and hinterland, gender, party and all differences. Our experience across all previous administrations has also shown us this. There is no winner under the existing system when the consequence of stoking or not acknowledging and addressing racial fears continues to be that the majority of Guyanese continue to be shut out of access to economic and political power, whoever is in office. There is no winner under the existing system except for those who benefit from the ‘friends and family’ approach to sharing out the spoils of high positions. There is no winner under the existing system if we end up here again in five years, where a ballot is cast on the basis of fear of the other or for the less bad alternative. 

We cannot continue with a political system that diminishes the influence of the Guyanese people, concentrates power in the hands of a few, enables corruption and greed, and calls this democracy. This must end. While the division among ordinary people now seems like an unbridgeable chasm, we believe it can only be repaired by Guyanese acting together, across and beyond partisan politics to ensure that no single party can continue to hijack the hopes and aspirations of Guyanese people. Guyana is bigger than our narrow ideals, egos, and parties. She is bigger than one or two racial/ethnic minorities/majorities. She is certainly bigger than the people on the coast. Some have spoken consistently over the years, and certainly before this election, about the need for national unity as the only route to reconciliation and renewal (on March 9, 2020, political elders Moses Bhagwan and Eusi Kwayana issued such a statement, almost half a century after their first joint appeal for national unity and reconciliation). We repeat that call here. Immediately following a declaration, let us find common ground across our differences to demand a referendum on national unity, so that the Guyanese people ourselves can finally decide this question and offer the clearest mandate of all. This matter should not be left in the hands of political leaders, who have repeatedly failed to go forward on this issue that affects our very survival as a nation and as a people. Time and again these ‘leaders’ have been our undoing. It is time to say enough.

Yours faithfully,

Karen de Souza

Alissa Trotz

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Electoral and constitutional reform will not change the way how the Guyanese people do things.  The PPP and the PNC will still compete for power.  If you think that the demonstrations will stop then think again. First, there was the Black Power Movement, then, The BLM movement. What next? Do you think that the Police Force will do their jobs? Most of them do not know what their job descriptions are.

What is a referendum on National Unity? What is the real question?

R

No referendum for national unity under APNU+AFC rule will be supported by the political opposition.

Grangerites have made a mockery of national unity. APNU stands for A Partnership for NATIONAL UNITY. APNU was formed since 2011. The country is more disunited now than 9 years ago. Furthermore, the joint APNU+AFC Manifesto in 2015 made big promises to bring about national unity. The Coalition failed miserably to deliver. Again, the nation is more divided now than in 2015. Granger and his Harmonites have brought more disharmony to the nation during the past 5 years. 

National Unity is a meaningless Orwellian term for those people.

FM

I support national unity but first the PNC has to show real concrete evidence that they really care for the wellbeing of Guyana. In their 60+ years of existence they have done nothing other than destroy Guyana. They just don't seem to care for Guyana.

FM

National Unity Cannot be imposed on Guyanese. They will eventually figure it out and with smaller and truth worthy parties emerging, this will become a reality sooner than later.

AFC PNC had national unity as centre piece of their manifesto but the Racist Granger kicked the coolies from the AFC aside and imposed a racist Afrocentric led administration. That was his downfall. He chopped off the head of APNU by imposing an Afrocentric Ministry of Presidency rendering Moses and Ramjattan impotent and raping and destroying the AFC.

I am sick and tired of hearing the word National Unity. Guyanese will accomplish that reality sooner than later. It cannot be imposed. Their first job is to eradicate this wicked and racist PNC Afrocentic administration.

The stench of Granger's racist cabal is now unbearable and only a small group of shameless people are left supporting them. 

FM
@Former Member posted:

I support national unity but first the PNC has to show real concrete evidence that they really care for the wellbeing of Guyana. In their 60+ years of existence they have done nothing other than destroy Guyana. They just don't seem to care for Guyana.

The PNC was birthed in Burnham's unquenchable quest for power. The PNC was nurtured with the nectar of power. The PNC became stinking drunk with power. Like some drunkards who chant "Rum Till I Die", PNCites are chanting "Power Forever".

FM
@Totaram posted:

This is a silly little discussion.  Why?  What exactly is a referendum on national unity?  Are they suggesting that the Guyanese people be asked if they want national unity? 

I agree with you here. Not sure what they trying to accomplish. 

After the declaration, there needs to begin immediately on constitutional reform and a restructuring of Guyana so no one feels left out. 

National Unity is not a product but a derivative of national justice and ethnic security. 

FM

What is needed after the declaration, is simply a renumeration of the voter's list, eighteen years and above? In that way, there would be no dead people on the list and no migrants either. In 1953, 1957, 1961, 1964, and 1968, a renumeration was done 3 months before the election date. 

R

Trotz, De Souza and rigging: The imprisoned Freudian mind

Two WPA personalities, who may or may not hold membership card to what was once Walter Rodney’s glorious organization, the WPA – Dr. Alissa Trotz and Karen de Souza, penned a long letter on what should happen after GECOM makes a declaration. They want a referendum on unity in Guyana.

The letter is a goldmine for those who plan to study the vulturine mind the five-month old election rigging process has created in Guyana. The researcher must find Trotz and de Souza two amusing ladies. The missive by these two so-called democratic activists lays bare the Freudian mind of those who were once part of the WPA or were associated with the WPA. To get a glimpse of this Freudian prison, let’s quote from the commentary of these WPAites.
On what is taking place with the rigged election theatre right now, they wrote: “And depending on what ‘side’ one is on, yesterday’s demon is today’s heroine, and vice versa. Strange bedfellows are self-righteously being made, with no regard for principles and with scant regard for truth.”

What Trotz and de Souza left out was deliberate. And an analysis of that willful omission shows the deep Freudian prison these two women’s minds are imprisoned in. But however deeply buried those minds are in their Freudian jail, they are dangerous and deceiving. Let’s do some Freudian analysis. We start with Trotz.

She and Dr. Arif Bulkan penned a long commentary on the role of the PNC and PPP in perpetuating party and ethnic dominance against the background of the election impasse on June 30 in the column, “In the Diaspora”. You read this thing and you would not believe that in Guyana at the moment, the very existence of the society is threatened by one of the worst manifestations of electoral fraud in the post-World War II era and up to the present moment. If you were from another planet and you read Trotz and Bulkan’s writing, you would not believe Guyana is in the throes of imminent devastating instabilities. Both Trotz and Bulkan could not and would not use the words “fraud” or “rigging” to describe what Guyana is in at the moment.

Trotz (this lady is barefaced) is at it again. This time her pal is de Souza. Yet another long commentary on the current problem but not a word on “rigging” or “fraud”. Trotz and De Souza cannot bring themselves to use those words because they are trapped in their Freudian cocoon where the mind cannot bring up to the surface what is hidden beneath – that the preference is for the PNC because their party, the WPA, is part of the power structure.

Perhaps the most graphic evidence of the Freudian coffin of these two ladies are the words quoted above from their letter. They wrote that “yesterday’s demons are today’s heroines” The choice of words was deliberate. It should have read this way; “yesterday’s heroes are today’s demons.” And the list of demons would include Eusi Kwayana, Tacuma Ogunseye, Rupert Roopnaraine, etc, a group that de Souza has an enduring camaraderie with.

We come now to de Souza. This woman who is mortally afraid to use the words “rigged elections” fought alongside Walter Rodney against rigged elections in the seventies and beyond. In that struggle she was arrested and charged by the Burnham government.

The era of denying Guyanese people their right to vote has returned and de Souza because of some psychic contortion cannot muster mental courage and psychological integrity to describe what is currently taking place. And what is taking place? A game of bestial politics where the return to Burnhamism is on the horizon. And who should be aware of the tentacles of Burnhamism? No less an activist like de Souza.

Let’s return to the quote above and recite the last part of it; “Strange bedfellows are self-righteously being made, with no regard for principles and with scant regard for truth. This is where we are today.” But Trotz and de Souza lift themselves out of that description, when in fact they are an essential part of the syndrome of the strange bedfellow syndrome denying facts and truths. From fighting against rigged elections in the seventies by the same PNC entity, de Souza refuses to recognize rigged elections in Guyana in 2020 and joins her WPA colleague, Desmond Trotman who invokes the memory and legacy of Walter Rodney when in a sick, carnivorous way, says Rodney would support and endorse the positions he has taken since the March 2 elections. I end with an imploration. Please assist Trotz and de Souza out of their Freudian dungeon if they are willing to climb out.

(The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this newspaper.)

FM
@Ramakant-P posted:

What is needed after the declaration, is simply a renumeration of the voter's list, eighteen years and above? In that way, there would be no dead people on the list and no migrants either. In 1953, 1957, 1961, 1964, and 1968, a renumeration was done 3 months before the election date. 

Banna, talk sense. People die everyday so the list will always have deceased.  Migrants are still eligible voters so you just cannot remove them. 

The controls has to be at the polling stations.

FM
@Former Member posted:

Banna, talk sense. People die everyday so the list will always have deceased.  Migrants are still eligible voters so you just cannot remove them. 

The controls has to be at the polling stations.

In fact, the controls were very rigid at the polling stations on elections day. At least representatives from both major political parties were at every polling place watching every elector as they picked up their ballot. They were accompanied by some representatives from all the other parties as well as local and international observers. A lot of local and international observers. At the end of elections day many if not all local and international observers along with party representatives including the Coalition proclaimed that the elections went very smooth and was free and fair. Even GECOM and President Granger made those same proclamations. What is going on now is not a defect in the elections but the Coalition's refusal to respect the will of the electorate. Their fake news about fraudulent and invalid votes are falling on deaf ears because everyone who is paying attention now was also paying attention in March when they witnessed first hand the blatant and clumsy attempt by Mingo to rig the elections. That is the only fraud of the March 2, 2020 elections. 

FM
@Former Member posted:

In fact, the controls were very rigid at the polling stations on elections day. At least representatives from both major political parties were at every polling place watching every elector as they picked up their ballot. They were accompanied by some representatives from all the other parties as well as local and international observers. A lot of local and international observers. At the end of elections day many if not all local and international observers along with party representatives including the Coalition proclaimed that the elections went very smooth and was free and fair. Even GECOM and President Granger made those same proclamations. What is going on now is not a defect in the elections but the Coalition's refusal to respect the will of the electorate. Their fake news about fraudulent and invalid votes are falling on deaf ears because everyone who is paying attention now was also paying attention in March when they witnessed first hand the blatant and clumsy attempt by Mingo to rig the elections. That is the only fraud of the March 2, 2020 elections. 

I know. Even the observers thought it was rigid.  Only the PNC and their gangster brigade invented flaws. 

FM
@Former Member posted:

I know. Even the observers thought it was rigid.  Only the PNC and their gangster brigade invented flaws. 

Funny that Williams said just before the recount began that the Coalition has their statements of polls and they prove ex facie that the Coalition won the elections (got the most votes). Proves that either the Coalition are terrible at arithmetic or they are common liars/riggers.

FM
@Former Member posted:

Banna, talk sense. People die everyday so the list will always have deceased.  Migrants are still eligible voters so you just cannot remove them. 

The controls has to be at the polling stations.

When people die, their names would be taken off the list on a daily basis. GECOM would be an independent organization with no political interference. If you migrate your name would also be taken off the electoral list. There is no room for error.  If you want to go home and vote, then you would have to be re-registered again. Gecom should be a permanent organization just like Election USA and Election Canada.

The Chairman of GECOM should be a no-nonsense person and doesn't give a rat's ass which organization you belong to. Somebody like Django.

R

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×