Why the Granger presidency is already keeping us up at night
Dear Editor, This country has just released itself from a fifteen year long cave of psychological oppression which only now that the people are free can they begin to comprehend how dark and dangerous it was. The Jagdeo years will go down in this country’s history as a quasi-tyranny under which outspoken critics were slandered and victimised while the rest remained in fearful silence. And that is why it is essential in the formative days of this Granger presidency that we call him out for every small thing he and his ministers do so they all hear it loud and clear that politicians can never again in this nation benefit from that silence, and that climate of scared acquiescence, that allowed vagabonds to rule with such impunity. So here are a couple of things that are bugging us. First, the naming of the Guyana International Conference Centre. We have no problem with Granger naming it after President Arthur Chung. It’s just the way he decided and announced it. It’s like he woke up this morning and had a brain storm. Quite frankly, it comes across as whimsical and authoritarian, and is no way to go about such a decision. At the least, it should have been one for his new Cabinet, and ideally one resolved in the Parliament. What better way to honour the late President? And before that, it should have been debated in the letters pages, and on social media, and been the subject of television panels. Maybe someone else’s name could have been proposed…In other words, the proposal needed to be thrown out to the people, chewed over for a while, and for a collective decision to be made. Secondly, the naming and swearing in of the partial Cabinet today was just piss poor. (We will excuse the running out of parchment paper. Blame that on Ramotar who never thought he would have to do all this swearing-in rigmarole and that life would return to normal). Again what is disturbing is not the renaming of the ministries, but the complete lack of any explanation of the reasoning behind the numerous decisions. Tell us what is the purpose of the Ministry of Social Cohesion, except to keep Amna Ally happy, even though she is not the most unifying member of the APNU? Why is it now called the Ministry of Social Protection instead of the old name Social Security and Human Services? Why is it the Ministry of Communities? Tell us why did we hear only later that Youth, Sports and Culture is to be absorbed under Education and what is the rationale behind that? Tell us the reason why we hear the Ministry of Natural Resources is to be controlled by the Office of the President, despite having huge authority over the country’s economic activity? To us, this seems like a dangerous centralisation of power. Tell us why the Ministry of Tourism is now only tourism? Is it because it is an AFC position? Just throwing out the name of a new ministry and attaching a minister to it emphasises personalities over purpose, faces over functions. And tell us why are there no complete bios on any of the new ministers? Tell us who is Simona Broomes. What are her qualifications for her position? Tell us why was Basil Williams picked as the new AG, when many in the legal community are shaking their heads? TELL US. This is no way to start. Governments are duty bound to be transparent, inclusive and answerable to the people and this smacks of high handedness and secrecy. The country has had quite enough of that and we urge all people to speak up and never give this new administration a moment of rest. It is not through cheerleading but through criticism that we will get the government we deserve. Taken from www.gtmosquito.com
What do you think.