Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

By Indo Asian News Service

 

Wed 1 Feb, 2012

 

 

 

Washington, Feb 1 (IANS) The Indian military is strengthening its forces in preparation to "fight a limited conflict" with China, said a top US intelligence official who added that "a major Sino-Indian conflict is not imminent".

"India is increasingly concerned about China's posture along their disputed border and Beijing's perceived aggressive posture in the Indian Ocean and Asia-Pacific region," US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the Senate Intelligence Committee.

"The Indian Army believes a major Sino-Indian conflict is not imminent, but the Indian military is strengthening its forces in preparation to fight a limited conflict along the disputed border, and is working to balance Chinese power projection in the Indian Ocean," he added.

The official also said that India has expressed support for a strong US military posture in East Asia and US engagement in Asia.

On Iran, Clapper said that Tehran is still undecided on whether to make a nuclear bomb though it has the ability.

"There is dissension and debate in the political hierarchy of Iran (over whether to build a nuclear weapon)," Clapper told the hearing.

While weighing the pros and cons of making a nuclear weapon, Iranian politicians have not yet reached "unanimity" on the issue, he said, adding that though Iran is capable of producing a nuclear weapon, the Islamic Republic is not building one right now, reported Xinhua.

Clapper also said Iran is more likely to respond with an attack on the US.

The new US sanctions would have a great impact on Iran, but they were not likely to result in the fall of its regime, he said.

CIA Director David Petraeus, who testified at the same hearing, said new sanctions on Iran "have been biting much, much more in recent weeks", but it remained to be seen whether this could force Iran to change its behaviour and policy on its nuclear programme.

On Dec 31, US President Barack Obama signed a bill with provisions asking for new sanctions on Iran, targeting foreign financial institutions that do business with Iran's central bank, the main conduit for its oil revenues.

The move, aimed at choking off Iran's critical oil income, prompted furious reactions from the Islamic Republic, which has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most critical oil routes.

US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Washington would "not tolerate" the blocking of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's production of a nuclear weapon. He stressed that they were two "red lines", and the US would respond if Iran crossed them

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Nehru:

hENRY, pREZ oBAMA IS A CARING, SIMCERE and brillant Leader. However, the POWER of the Special Interest Groups are MORE Powerful than  The Office of the President. MONEY SPEAKS. That is DEMOCRACY for you.

Obama is an Uncle Tommy.  A danger to the interests of people of color world wide.  The only good thing about Obama is that he broke the color barrier and he tried to reform Health care insurance.

FM
Originally Posted by Wally:

Obama is an Uncle Tommy.  A danger to the interests of people of color world wide.  The only good thing about Obama is that he broke the color barrier and he tried to reform Health care insurance.

Actually, he is a danger to people of all colors, and his so-called reform of health insurance was nothing more than an extension of the Wall Street bail-out. It requires people to buy private insurance, while creating a framework for the insurance companies to avoid paying for your health care on the basis of "cost-cutting."

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:

 

As we speak, India, China, Brazil, South Africa AND Russia are meeting, planning and deciding their FUTURE as a GROUP. Think about it Bhai.

Right. And if the US had sane leadership, we would be joining with them, instead of following after the British like a sad, bedraggled little puppy.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×