Skip to main content

FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:

Greta Van Susteren Urges Obama and Black Leaders To Speak Out Against "Knock Out" Attacks By Black Teens

 

 

 

Read more:

 

The media is finally reporting on the wave of “knock-out” attacks sweeping the nation.

 

Black youth mobs have been targeting innocent passersby in “knock-out” attacks for over a year now. The youths pick a target and beat him until he’s bloody and unconscious – sometimes dead.

 

How uncivilized can these people be ? And yet the dirty PNC Indians want them to run Guyana ?

 

Rev

 

 

You are an imbecile. 

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Mars:
Because they love the Big Big Bamboo.


* What has their so-called  "Big bamboo" gotten them in life ?

 

* They remain at the bottom of the totem pole---financially, economically, socially

 

* They are lazy and crave handouts.

 

* They bring children into this world and shirk responsibility

 

So what nonsense are you peddling about Big Bamboo ?

 

Rev

 

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member
They want the Big Big Bamboo Bamboo Oh aye aye aye aye aye. The Dirty PPP Dalits suffering so much from smallcox disease that they take big toys into the bedroom to make up for their deficiencies. The women want the real thing though, that's why they're deserting those Dalits for the Big Big Bamboo Bamboo oh aye aye aye aye aye.
Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Mars:
Because they love the Big Big Bamboo. Why you think those Dirty PPP Dalits on this forum hate the black man so much. Cause their women worshipping the BBC and I don't mean the British media company.

I don't understand parables. My question was specific.

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member
Cobra, when in doubt use Google. Go to www.urbandictionary.com and search for BBC. Or those Dirty PPP Dalits can explain to you why their women are deserting them for the Big Big Bamboo and leaving them hating the black man. Sometimes their womenfolk are forced to commit suicide to preserve the family honor. This behavior is not prevalent in everyone but just limited to Dirty PPP Dalits like the ones who post here.
Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Cobra:

Can someone give an account why Indian women chose to contaminate themselves with Black man sperm and Douglarised Guyana with the seventh race of people? This is also a serious issue needs to be addressed. 

 

How they contaminate themselves? Did you tell that to Obama's mother also? When love or lust happen is not for you to pass judgement. But on another note, Blacks will tend to treat the Indian woman better, the Indian husband will tend to drink his rum and come home to beat the woman while the Black will treat her like a princess, even if he does not have a pot to piss in. 

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Because they love the Big Big Bamboo.


* What has their so-called  "Big bamboo" gotten them in life ?

 

* They remain at the bottom of the totem pole---financially, economically, socially

 

* They are lazy and crave handouts.

 

* They bring children into this world and shirk responsibility

 

So what nonsense are you peddling about Big Bamboo ?

 

Rev

 

 

Here are some stats for Mars. Let us have a civilized debate on this matter:

 

72 Percent Of Black Kids Raised By Single Parent, 25% Overall In U.S.

Comments: 53  | Leave A Comment
Apr 27, 2011
 
By 

One in four children in the United States is being raised by a single parent — a percentage that has been on the rise and is higher than other developed countries, according to a report released Wednesday.

Of the 27 industrialized countries studied by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the U.S. had 25.8 percent of children being raised by a single parent, compared with an average of 14.9 percent across the other countries.

In the African American community, 72 percent of Black children are raised in a single parent household.

Here are some stats on the city to city breakdown of single parent families in the Black community from 2009.

Ireland was second (24.3 percent), followed by New Zealand (23.7 percent). Greece, Spain, Italy and Luxemborg had among the lowest percentages of children in single-parent homes.

Experts point to a variety of factors to explain the high U.S. figure, including a cultural shift toward greater acceptance of single-parent child rearing. The U.S. also lacks policies to help support families, including childcare at work and national paid maternity leave, which are commonplace in other countries.

“When our parents married, there was a sense that you were marrying for life,” said Edward Zigler, founder and director of Yale’s Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy. “That sense is not as prevalent.”

Single parents in the U.S. were more likely to be employed — 35.8 percent compared to a 21.3 percent average — but they also had higher rates of poverty, the report found.

“The in-work poverty is higher in the U.S. than other OECD countries, because at the bottom end of the labor market, earnings are very low,” said Willem Adema, a senior economist in the group’s social policy division. “For parents, the risk is higher because they have to make expenditures on childcare costs.”

The Paris-based organization looked at a broad sector of indicators that affected families and children, including childhood poverty, early education and amount of time spent on parental care.

Across the nations examined, preschool enrollment has grown from 30 to 50 percent between 1998 and 2007. The average enrollment was 58.2 percent, while in the U.S. it was lower.

The report noted that public spending on child welfare and education is higher in the U.S. than in other countries — $160,000 per child compared to $149,000. However, the authors say most of that money is spent after the crucial early childhood years.

“This means early investment — including childcare and support for families around the time of birth — could be strengthened,” the authors wrote in a separate paper examining the United States.

The study pointed out that the U.S. is the only OECD country that does not have a national paid parental leave policy. Some states have started to adopt such policies, but most parents are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave. This is particularly difficult for unwed mothers, who may not be able to afford to take time off, Zigler said.

“We have not built in the kind of national support systems for families and children that other countries have,” he said.

Childhood poverty rates in the U.S. are also expected to climb — 23.5 percent from 20 percent. Adema said the rise is a direct result of the financial crisis and higher unemployment rates.

“The financial strain causes all sorts of other strain, so ultimately it might contribute to family dissolution,” Adema said. “At the same time, it might bring some families together. I suspect that the response differs across families.”

RELATED STORIES

 

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Because they love the Big Big Bamboo.


* What has their so-called  "Big bamboo" gotten them in life ?

 

* They remain at the bottom of the totem pole---financially, economically, socially

 

* They are lazy and crave handouts.

 

* They bring children into this world and shirk responsibility

 

So what nonsense are you peddling about Big Bamboo ?

 

Rev

 

 

Here are some stats for Mars. Let us have a civilized debate on this matter:

 

72 Percent Of Black Kids Raised By Single Parent, 25% Overall In U.S.

Comments: 53  | Leave A Comment
Apr 27, 2011
 
By 

One in four children in the United States is being raised by a single parent — a percentage that has been on the rise and is higher than other developed countries, according to a report released Wednesday.

Of the 27 industrialized countries studied by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the U.S. had 25.8 percent of children being raised by a single parent, compared with an average of 14.9 percent across the other countries.

In the African American community, 72 percent of Black children are raised in a single parent household.

Here are some stats on the city to city breakdown of single parent families in the Black community from 2009.

Ireland was second (24.3 percent), followed by New Zealand (23.7 percent). Greece, Spain, Italy and Luxemborg had among the lowest percentages of children in single-parent homes.

Experts point to a variety of factors to explain the high U.S. figure, including a cultural shift toward greater acceptance of single-parent child rearing. The U.S. also lacks policies to help support families, including childcare at work and national paid maternity leave, which are commonplace in other countries.

“When our parents married, there was a sense that you were marrying for life,” said Edward Zigler, founder and director of Yale’s Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy. “That sense is not as prevalent.”

Single parents in the U.S. were more likely to be employed — 35.8 percent compared to a 21.3 percent average — but they also had higher rates of poverty, the report found.

“The in-work poverty is higher in the U.S. than other OECD countries, because at the bottom end of the labor market, earnings are very low,” said Willem Adema, a senior economist in the group’s social policy division. “For parents, the risk is higher because they have to make expenditures on childcare costs.”

The Paris-based organization looked at a broad sector of indicators that affected families and children, including childhood poverty, early education and amount of time spent on parental care.

Across the nations examined, preschool enrollment has grown from 30 to 50 percent between 1998 and 2007. The average enrollment was 58.2 percent, while in the U.S. it was lower.

The report noted that public spending on child welfare and education is higher in the U.S. than in other countries — $160,000 per child compared to $149,000. However, the authors say most of that money is spent after the crucial early childhood years.

“This means early investment — including childcare and support for families around the time of birth — could be strengthened,” the authors wrote in a separate paper examining the United States.

The study pointed out that the U.S. is the only OECD country that does not have a national paid parental leave policy. Some states have started to adopt such policies, but most parents are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave. This is particularly difficult for unwed mothers, who may not be able to afford to take time off, Zigler said.

“We have not built in the kind of national support systems for families and children that other countries have,” he said.

Childhood poverty rates in the U.S. are also expected to climb — 23.5 percent from 20 percent. Adema said the rise is a direct result of the financial crisis and higher unemployment rates.

“The financial strain causes all sorts of other strain, so ultimately it might contribute to family dissolution,” Adema said. “At the same time, it might bring some families together. I suspect that the response differs across families.”

RELATED STORIES

 

Why don't you and your handler have a civilized debate about your 500 million Dalit brothers who shit on the streets every day, have their women living in fear of rape every night and kill millions of innocent little baby girls.

Mars
Last edited by Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Because they love the Big Big Bamboo.


* What has their so-called  "Big bamboo" gotten them in life ?

 

* They remain at the bottom of the totem pole---financially, economically, socially

 

* They are lazy and crave handouts.

 

* They bring children into this world and shirk responsibility

 

So what nonsense are you peddling about Big Bamboo ?

 

Rev

 

 

Here are some stats for Mars. Let us have a civilized debate on this matter:

 

72 Percent Of Black Kids Raised By Single Parent, 25% Overall In U.S.

Comments: 53  | Leave A Comment
Apr 27, 2011
 
By 

One in four children in the United States is being raised by a single parent — a percentage that has been on the rise and is higher than other developed countries, according to a report released Wednesday.

Of the 27 industrialized countries studied by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the U.S. had 25.8 percent of children being raised by a single parent, compared with an average of 14.9 percent across the other countries.

In the African American community, 72 percent of Black children are raised in a single parent household.

Here are some stats on the city to city breakdown of single parent families in the Black community from 2009.

Ireland was second (24.3 percent), followed by New Zealand (23.7 percent). Greece, Spain, Italy and Luxemborg had among the lowest percentages of children in single-parent homes.

Experts point to a variety of factors to explain the high U.S. figure, including a cultural shift toward greater acceptance of single-parent child rearing. The U.S. also lacks policies to help support families, including childcare at work and national paid maternity leave, which are commonplace in other countries.

“When our parents married, there was a sense that you were marrying for life,” said Edward Zigler, founder and director of Yale’s Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy. “That sense is not as prevalent.”

Single parents in the U.S. were more likely to be employed — 35.8 percent compared to a 21.3 percent average — but they also had higher rates of poverty, the report found.

“The in-work poverty is higher in the U.S. than other OECD countries, because at the bottom end of the labor market, earnings are very low,” said Willem Adema, a senior economist in the group’s social policy division. “For parents, the risk is higher because they have to make expenditures on childcare costs.”

The Paris-based organization looked at a broad sector of indicators that affected families and children, including childhood poverty, early education and amount of time spent on parental care.

Across the nations examined, preschool enrollment has grown from 30 to 50 percent between 1998 and 2007. The average enrollment was 58.2 percent, while in the U.S. it was lower.

The report noted that public spending on child welfare and education is higher in the U.S. than in other countries — $160,000 per child compared to $149,000. However, the authors say most of that money is spent after the crucial early childhood years.

“This means early investment — including childcare and support for families around the time of birth — could be strengthened,” the authors wrote in a separate paper examining the United States.

The study pointed out that the U.S. is the only OECD country that does not have a national paid parental leave policy. Some states have started to adopt such policies, but most parents are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave. This is particularly difficult for unwed mothers, who may not be able to afford to take time off, Zigler said.

“We have not built in the kind of national support systems for families and children that other countries have,” he said.

Childhood poverty rates in the U.S. are also expected to climb — 23.5 percent from 20 percent. Adema said the rise is a direct result of the financial crisis and higher unemployment rates.

“The financial strain causes all sorts of other strain, so ultimately it might contribute to family dissolution,” Adema said. “At the same time, it might bring some families together. I suspect that the response differs across families.”

RELATED STORIES

 

Why don't you and your handler have a civilized debate about your 500 million Dalit brothers who shit on the streets every day, have their women living in fear of rape every night and kill millions of innocent little baby girls every year.

 

Face the facts Mars.

 

500 million Dalits ? Post your source and yes, it must be reliable. Before you do so, address the matter and crisis at hand in the article above. Unless you are willing to address this problem, it will continue to escalate. 

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Because they love the Big Big Bamboo.


* What has their so-called  "Big bamboo" gotten them in life ?

 

* They remain at the bottom of the totem pole---financially, economically, socially

 

* They are lazy and crave handouts.

 

* They bring children into this world and shirk responsibility

 

So what nonsense are you peddling about Big Bamboo ?

 

Rev

 

 

Here are some stats for Mars. Let us have a civilized debate on this matter:

 

72 Percent Of Black Kids Raised By Single Parent, 25% Overall In U.S.

Comments: 53  | Leave A Comment
Apr 27, 2011
 
By 

One in four children in the United States is being raised by a single parent — a percentage that has been on the rise and is higher than other developed countries, according to a report released Wednesday.

Of the 27 industrialized countries studied by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the U.S. had 25.8 percent of children being raised by a single parent, compared with an average of 14.9 percent across the other countries.

In the African American community, 72 percent of Black children are raised in a single parent household.

Here are some stats on the city to city breakdown of single parent families in the Black community from 2009.

Ireland was second (24.3 percent), followed by New Zealand (23.7 percent). Greece, Spain, Italy and Luxemborg had among the lowest percentages of children in single-parent homes.

Experts point to a variety of factors to explain the high U.S. figure, including a cultural shift toward greater acceptance of single-parent child rearing. The U.S. also lacks policies to help support families, including childcare at work and national paid maternity leave, which are commonplace in other countries.

“When our parents married, there was a sense that you were marrying for life,” said Edward Zigler, founder and director of Yale’s Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy. “That sense is not as prevalent.”

Single parents in the U.S. were more likely to be employed — 35.8 percent compared to a 21.3 percent average — but they also had higher rates of poverty, the report found.

“The in-work poverty is higher in the U.S. than other OECD countries, because at the bottom end of the labor market, earnings are very low,” said Willem Adema, a senior economist in the group’s social policy division. “For parents, the risk is higher because they have to make expenditures on childcare costs.”

The Paris-based organization looked at a broad sector of indicators that affected families and children, including childhood poverty, early education and amount of time spent on parental care.

Across the nations examined, preschool enrollment has grown from 30 to 50 percent between 1998 and 2007. The average enrollment was 58.2 percent, while in the U.S. it was lower.

The report noted that public spending on child welfare and education is higher in the U.S. than in other countries — $160,000 per child compared to $149,000. However, the authors say most of that money is spent after the crucial early childhood years.

“This means early investment — including childcare and support for families around the time of birth — could be strengthened,” the authors wrote in a separate paper examining the United States.

The study pointed out that the U.S. is the only OECD country that does not have a national paid parental leave policy. Some states have started to adopt such policies, but most parents are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave. This is particularly difficult for unwed mothers, who may not be able to afford to take time off, Zigler said.

“We have not built in the kind of national support systems for families and children that other countries have,” he said.

Childhood poverty rates in the U.S. are also expected to climb — 23.5 percent from 20 percent. Adema said the rise is a direct result of the financial crisis and higher unemployment rates.

“The financial strain causes all sorts of other strain, so ultimately it might contribute to family dissolution,” Adema said. “At the same time, it might bring some families together. I suspect that the response differs across families.”

RELATED STORIES

 

Why don't you and your handler have a civilized debate about your 500 million Dalit brothers who shit on the streets every day, have their women living in fear of rape every night and kill millions of innocent little baby girls every year.

 

Face the facts Mars.

 

500 million Dalits ? Post your source and yes, it must be reliable. Before you do so, address the matter and crisis at hand in the article above. Unless you are willing to address this problem, it will continue to escalate. 

You can't face the facts when confronted with them, you racist little git.

 

This time you're correct, it's not 500 million but closer to 665 million of your cousins shitting in the streets every day. I guess you don't see 100,000 tons of shit on the streets every day as a problem considering that you live in filth. You and that other racist jackass who calls himself the Rev can go and debate this. 

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aErNiP_V4RLc

 

India has the greatest proportion of people in Asia behind Nepal without access to improved sanitation, according to Unicef. Some 665 million Indians practice open defecation, more than half the global total. In China, the world’s most populous country, 37 million people defecate in the open, according to Unicef. 

Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Because they love the Big Big Bamboo.


* What has their so-called  "Big bamboo" gotten them in life ?

 

* They remain at the bottom of the totem pole---financially, economically, socially

 

* They are lazy and crave handouts.

 

* They bring children into this world and shirk responsibility

 

So what nonsense are you peddling about Big Bamboo ?

 

Rev

 

 

Here are some stats for Mars. Let us have a civilized debate on this matter:

 

72 Percent Of Black Kids Raised By Single Parent, 25% Overall In U.S.

Comments: 53  | Leave A Comment
Apr 27, 2011
 
By 

One in four children in the United States is being raised by a single parent — a percentage that has been on the rise and is higher than other developed countries, according to a report released Wednesday.

Of the 27 industrialized countries studied by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the U.S. had 25.8 percent of children being raised by a single parent, compared with an average of 14.9 percent across the other countries.

In the African American community, 72 percent of Black children are raised in a single parent household.

Here are some stats on the city to city breakdown of single parent families in the Black community from 2009.

Ireland was second (24.3 percent), followed by New Zealand (23.7 percent). Greece, Spain, Italy and Luxemborg had among the lowest percentages of children in single-parent homes.

Experts point to a variety of factors to explain the high U.S. figure, including a cultural shift toward greater acceptance of single-parent child rearing. The U.S. also lacks policies to help support families, including childcare at work and national paid maternity leave, which are commonplace in other countries.

“When our parents married, there was a sense that you were marrying for life,” said Edward Zigler, founder and director of Yale’s Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy. “That sense is not as prevalent.”

Single parents in the U.S. were more likely to be employed — 35.8 percent compared to a 21.3 percent average — but they also had higher rates of poverty, the report found.

“The in-work poverty is higher in the U.S. than other OECD countries, because at the bottom end of the labor market, earnings are very low,” said Willem Adema, a senior economist in the group’s social policy division. “For parents, the risk is higher because they have to make expenditures on childcare costs.”

The Paris-based organization looked at a broad sector of indicators that affected families and children, including childhood poverty, early education and amount of time spent on parental care.

Across the nations examined, preschool enrollment has grown from 30 to 50 percent between 1998 and 2007. The average enrollment was 58.2 percent, while in the U.S. it was lower.

The report noted that public spending on child welfare and education is higher in the U.S. than in other countries — $160,000 per child compared to $149,000. However, the authors say most of that money is spent after the crucial early childhood years.

“This means early investment — including childcare and support for families around the time of birth — could be strengthened,” the authors wrote in a separate paper examining the United States.

The study pointed out that the U.S. is the only OECD country that does not have a national paid parental leave policy. Some states have started to adopt such policies, but most parents are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave. This is particularly difficult for unwed mothers, who may not be able to afford to take time off, Zigler said.

“We have not built in the kind of national support systems for families and children that other countries have,” he said.

Childhood poverty rates in the U.S. are also expected to climb — 23.5 percent from 20 percent. Adema said the rise is a direct result of the financial crisis and higher unemployment rates.

“The financial strain causes all sorts of other strain, so ultimately it might contribute to family dissolution,” Adema said. “At the same time, it might bring some families together. I suspect that the response differs across families.”

RELATED STORIES

 

Why don't you and your handler have a civilized debate about your 500 million Dalit brothers who shit on the streets every day, have their women living in fear of rape every night and kill millions of innocent little baby girls every year.

 

Face the facts Mars.

 

500 million Dalits ? Post your source and yes, it must be reliable. Before you do so, address the matter and crisis at hand in the article above. Unless you are willing to address this problem, it will continue to escalate. 

You can't face the facts when confronted with them, you racist little git.

 

This time you're correct, it's not 500 million but closer to 665 million of your cousins shitting in the streets every day. I guess you don't see 100,000 tons of shit on the streets every day as a problem considering that you live in filth. You and that other racist jackass who calls himself the Rev can go and debate this. 

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aErNiP_V4RLc

 

India has the greatest proportion of people in Asia behind Nepal without access to improved sanitation, according to Unicef. Some 665 million Indians practice open defecation, more than half the global total. In China, the world’s most populous country, 37 million people defecate in the open, according to Unicef. 

 

Post the UNICEF report. Post the report of your claims. This is not Toilet Paper KN. Post the reports now or go to bed.

 

Stop Posting Lies.

 

 

images

images

images-2

Attachments

Hide
Images (2)
  • images
  • images-2
FM
Last edited by Former Member
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member

hahaha, now this Duncified Dalit is trying to deny that his Dalit cousins are shitting all over the streets of his homeland. 

 

There are hundreds of articles documenting the defecation on the streets by your Dalit cousins. You would be one of them today if the British didn't rescue your Dalit forefathers and send them to BG. This is Bloomberg News, not that Chronicle that people wrap fish with at Bourda Market. You can't handle the truth. hahaha

 

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aErNiP_V4RLc

 

India has the greatest proportion of people in Asia behind Nepal without access to improved sanitation, according to Unicef. Some 665 million Indians practice open defecation, more than half the global total. In China, the world’s most populous country, 37 million people defecate in the open, according to Unicef.

Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member

Go sue Uncle Bloomberg for lying hahahaha

 

hahaha, now this Duncified Dalit is trying to deny that his Dalit cousins are shitting all over the streets of his homeland. 

 

There are hundreds of articles documenting the defecation on the streets by your Dalit cousins. You would be one of them today if the British didn't rescue your Dalit forefathers and send them to BG. This is Bloomberg News, not that Chronicle that people wrap fish with at Bourda Market. You can't handle the truth. hahaha

 

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aErNiP_V4RLc

 

India has the greatest proportion of people in Asia behind Nepal without access to improved sanitation, according to Unicef. Some 665 million Indians practice open defecation, more than half the global total. In China, the world’s most populous country, 37 million people defecate in the open, according to Unicef.

Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member
 

The polluted Yamuna river runs alongside the Taj Mahal

Indian children defecate in the open air near the Taj Mahal

Children clean themselves after defecating in the open a

Residents of a poor area bathe

 
Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member

You can't handle the truth jackass, even if it jumped up and slapped you in the face.

 

Here is the Unicef report you idiot.

 

http://www.unicef.org/india/wes.html

 

Fast Facts

Hand washing with soap, particularly after contact with excreta, can reduce diarrhoeal diseases by over 40 per cent and respiratory infections by 30 per cent.  Diarrhoea and respiratory infections are the number one cause for child deaths in India.

Hand washing with soap is among the most effective and inexpensive ways to prevent diarrhoeal diseases and pneumonia.

With 638 million people defecating in the open and 44 per cent mothers disposing their children’s faeces in the open, there is a very high risk of microbial contamination (bacteria, viruses, amoeba) of water which causes diarrhoea in children.

 

Children weakened by frequent diarrhoea episodes are more vulnerable to malnutrition and opportunistic infections such as pneumonia. About 48 per cent of children in India are suffering from some degree of malnutrition. Diarrhoea and worm infection are two major health conditions that affect school age children impacting their learning abilities.

Adequate, well-maintained water supply and sanitation facilities in schools encourage children to attend school regularly and help them achieve their educational goals. Inadequate water supply and sanitation in schools are health hazards and affect school attendance, retention and educational performance.

Adolescent girls are especially vulnerable to dropping out, as many are reluctant to continue their schooling because toilet facilities are not private, not safe or simply not available

Women and girls face shame and a loss of personal dignity and safety risk if there is no toilet at home. They have to wait for the night to relieve themselves to avoid being seen by others.

 

 

 

• India is home to 638 million people defecating in the open; over 50 per cent of the population.

Mars
Last edited by Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member

That is NOT a UNICEF report as you continue to lie. This is not KN Toilet Paper Reporting:

 

 

AFC caught Lying Again and trying to peddle anti Indo Guyanese racism

 

 

 

images

images-2

Attachments

Hide
Images (2)
  • images
  • images-2
FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member

 

AFC councillor details widespread corruption within party

WEDNESDAY, 11 SEPTEMBER 2013 15:38 ADMINISTRATOR
PrintPDF

By AFC Region 6 Councillor Haseef Yusuf

AFC Councillor, Haseef Yusuf

Nothing that the Alliance For Change (AFC) does or will do in the future will ever surprise me again. There is a saying that you only know someone when you deal with him. If I had not dealt with certain executive members of the AFC, I would still be singing their praises.I knew from the inception that Nigel Hughes would rescind his resignation because in the end, when you are in the same boat, you will never want to part company with your compadres. The ‘top guns’ in the AFC need each other’s support badly. They complement each other’s corrupt practices, as they try to outsmart their members and supporters.
However, recently there was a desperate attempt to get rid of me by the National Executive Committee of the AFC since I am not part of the corrupt ‘jahaaji’ network. They sent a message with an AFC Region 6 Councillor that if I am not pleased with the current policies and actions of the party then I should resign from the party and as an AFC Councillor. I told that Councillor in no uncertain terms that if the AFC is not pleased with my stance against cronyism and corruption and my promotion of national development, then they should expel me and furthermore, it is the corrupt ones within the AFC who should resign!


Ironically, it was the same Councillor who submitted exhaustive evidence of cronyism and corruption against an AFC MP at an inquiry, who claimed that he spent in excess of $4.5M on ‘bigan’ and ‘curass’. That was a ‘whitewash inquiry’ and even the Chairman of that inquiry, the then General Secretary Mr Sextus Edwards, was not aware of the press release which concluded that the entire episode was one of ‘misunderstanding and miscommunication.’ You cannot go against your own kind!
Subsequently, there was numerous evidence of corruption but I no longer have the resolve to bring it up. It was simply a case of you cannot fight the Devil’s case in Hell!

I will just itemize a few instances:

- Certain top members of the AFC will go abroad (Canada, USA) and members in the diaspora will hold fund- raisers and give monies collected to these members who will not submit the same in its entirety since proper accounting records are not kept. I was utterly shocked when the unaudited financial statement for 2012 showed that in one year the AFC only collected $22,087,500 from its chapters in the UK, Canada, USA, etc. During the 2011 campaign alone; one of the chapters in Canada sent $55,000 Canadian or $11,000,000 (Guyana dollars). I have evidence of this.


- Certain top AFC members will collect donations and not make any recordings in any receipt book or any document whatever.


- Monies are being spent with no proper bills or vouchers;


- positions are given to cronies and those who donate a lot.


- I saw a top AFC member collect monies and issue a receipt but on looking closer I saw that there was no carbon sheet, hence no duplication made. How was the balancing done?


- Everything was donated for a fund-raiser in Berbice and it made a loss!


- On Election Day 2011, food and drinks were diverted to some AFC members’ homes for their private use while some AFC polling agents went hungry;


- During the 2012 AFC convention, a motion was passed for AFC groups to bank all monies collected in a party account, this was never done. In fact, it was I who raised that motion which was unanimously passed. So much for accountability!

- During the 2011 elections there were three factions in Berbice and all were accusing each other about theft, mismanagement and corruption, but no investigation was done. The leaders of the AFC cannot afford to ‘rock the boat.’

- During the AFC 2012 convention, members were specifically instructed not to vote for the former General Secretary but to vote in favour of David Patterson. This also happened in the case of Moses Nagamootoo and Mrs. Punalall.

- Article 15(9) of the AFC Constitution stated that the National Executive Committee shall appoint an auditor annually yet the AFC presented an unaudited and inaccurate financial statement at the AFC 2012 Convention. There is no shortage of accountants and auditors within the AFC, so why no audited accounts?

- The financial statement which ended on February 2012 showed a surplus of $464,643 yet members were told after the 2011 Elections that the AFC owed Mrs Cathy Hughes a sum in excess of $ 7,000,000 and that the AFC MPs will have to make contributions towards offsetting that liability. How can there be a surplus when monies are owed? In other words, there were no bills to support the spending of $ 7 million! The financial statement did not speak of any liability! Here is a party that is preaching accountability but is utterly devoid of that concept in its internal dealings.

Is this the party that wants to run this country? It seems as if the worst from the PNC and PPP formed the AFC; not the best as I had believed! Mr Ramjattan himself told me that if the AFC had won the elections, there would have been ‘murderation’ among members for positions. But it would have also been ‘murderation’ to fill their pockets! Imagine all the political blackmail that is going on now with the intention to fill some of the AFC’s ‘fat cats’ pockets! Come on Ramjattan, make the ‘right turn’ or resign! You cannot allow your ‘boys’ to continue their corrupt tendencies! But then can you afford “to rock the boat”?
Is it wrong for me to speak out about the very things the AFC is preaching in public about? Should I keep my mouth shut, turn a blind eye and pretend that all is well within my party?
I believe in what the Great Mahatma preached- do not be afraid to speak out against corruption even if you are alone. History will judge and absolve me for speaking out against cronyism and corruption within my party. I will have to clean my house before I clean my neighbour’s. Let us remove the ‘beam’ from our own eyes then we can see to remove the ‘speck’ from our brother’s.

 

 

 

images-1

 
 
Attachments
 
Photos (1)
images-1
 
FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
MarsMarsSenior Member
Originally Posted by yuji22:

That is NOT a UNICEF report as you continue to lie. This is not KN Toilet Paper Reporting:

 

 

AFC caught Lying Again and trying to peddle anti Indo Guyanese racism

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is the Unicef Report, Dumbo. I excuse you since you're illiterate and didn't make it past Form 1 at Skeldon Line Path.

 

 

 

http://www.unicef.org/india/wes.html

 

Fast Facts

Hand washing with soap, particularly after contact with excreta, can reduce diarrhoeal diseases by over 40 per cent and respiratory infections by 30 per cent.  Diarrhoea and respiratory infections are the number one cause for child deaths in India.

Hand washing with soap is among the most effective and inexpensive ways to prevent diarrhoeal diseases and pneumonia.

With 638 million people defecating in the open and 44 per cent mothers disposing their children’s faeces in the open, there is a very high risk of microbial contamination (bacteria, viruses, amoeba) of water which causes diarrhoea in children.

 

Children weakened by frequent diarrhoea episodes are more vulnerable to malnutrition and opportunistic infections such as pneumonia. About 48 per cent of children in India are suffering from some degree of malnutrition. Diarrhoea and worm infection are two major health conditions that affect school age children impacting their learning abilities.

Adequate, well-maintained water supply and sanitation facilities in schools encourage children to attend school regularly and help them achieve their educational goals. Inadequate water supply and sanitation in schools are health hazards and affect school attendance, retention and educational performance.

Adolescent girls are especially vulnerable to dropping out, as many are reluctant to continue their schooling because toilet facilities are not private, not safe or simply not available

Women and girls face shame and a loss of personal dignity and safety risk if there is no toilet at home. They have to wait for the night to relieve themselves to avoid being seen by others.

 

 

 

• India is home to 638 million people defecating in the open; over 50 per cent of the population.

 

 

Mars
Last edited by Mars
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
.

Don't be foolish man, check out who has the real power in Barbados, the Whites and foreigners.  The Blacks are just along for the ride, they are rewarded with a middle class living for being "yes massa" to their white masters who own the major industries. 

A bank manager don't own the bank, Goddard was being patronizing when he joked about a black bank manager being powerful, the black gets to make decisions about who gets a loan but don't own the loan nor get the profit. It is the white massa who is the owner.

 

 

I guess you say "no massa" to your white bosses then.  Regardless as to whether you are a w-2 or a 1099 they are still your bosses.

 


And who has the real power in Trinidad.  Neithert blacks nor Indians. 

 

In Guyana a tiny cabal of Indian elites have the power.

 

To claim that Indians as a whole have power in Guyana is a laugh.

 

Look at the Heist of Guyana.  Yes all Indians, but a group which exploits and abuses Indians as readily as Burnham did.  Too bad for people like you that Indians seem to ba waking up to the fact that this tiny group has been using them by screaming "bad blackman", and then using this same group to ensure their continued dominance.

 

The notion that your average IndoGuyanese, many reduced to being servants of middle class black Bajans, has power in Guyana is a joke.

 

Guyana has become like India where a tiny group abuses the majority of blacks, and yes Indians also.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
 

the PPP in its present incarnation is the most corrupt regime ever in our land.  To deny that is the lie.


Listen Danyael!

 

No one with a single functioning brain cell will deny that the PPP is corrupt. But the fact is Guyana and Guyanese have made more progress under the corrupt PPP than they did under the black PNC.

 

ANOTHER THING:

 

This thread asks the question how can Indians be blamed for keeping blacks down when blacks have not progressed when led by blacks ?

 

You and carib have chosen to side step that question.

 

Rev

 Who gives a shit what the thread asks? It is a straw man's argument. No one that matters makes that argument. The argument is crony capitalism in the hands of a corrupt criminal inclined party facilitates its Friends and family Inc and the majority of the population ( Indians and blacks) remain on the borders between debilitating poverty and barely getting by. That the Friends and Family inc is mainly Indian is incidental to the thesis.


Yes it is a real pity that fascists like druggie and rev think that because most of the crony capitalists are Indians that means that IndoGuyanese have power.  They are as exploited by this group as Burnham and his cabal of brutes exploited blacks in the 70s.

 

Rev and druggie if Indians in Guyana were all that successful why do so many flee to become servants and semi slaves, often to blacks, in the Caribbean?

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Danyael:
 

 I do not know what people you are taking about since the reality is that most Indians do not have a pot to piss in either. The average earning of RH is on the poverty line ie 25K for a family of four. You can check that out if you care since they do not remotely  rank close to the pools and patios nomenclature of the Credit company.

 

I do not have to explain to you why blacks, women Hispanics etc are disadvantage. I care little to explain that since it would be as pouring water on a stone. In any event I do not know on what metric you are using to measure since you are no different from the average black person in the society. 


I have already told druggie that Guyanese in NYC have approximately the same household earnings as do Jamaicans.  This despite the fact that Jamaicans have higher incidences of single parent families.

 

Druggie has never proven that AfroGuyanese in NYC are worse off than other AfroCaribbean people.  So if Guyanese have earnings consistent with other West Indians then clearly it means that there is little difference between Indo and Afro Guyanese in NYC.

 

I will further add that Jamaicans have HIGHER self employment than do Guyanese.  Both groups have self employment rates way below that of the average NYer. 

 

Druggie both Afro and Indo Guyanese are wage earners, concentrated mainly in working and lower middle class occupations.  Both groups have been hoodwinked by unscrupulous mortgage brokers and are now struggling to keep their homes.  Your tired notion that one is better off than the other because blacks are lazy just reflex your own racist brain.

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Cobra:

Can someone give an account why Indian women chose to contaminate themselves with Black man sperm and Douglarised Guyana with the seventh race of people? This is also a serious issue needs to be addressed. 

 

How they contaminate themselves? Did you tell that to Obama's mother also? When love or lust happen is not for you to pass judgement. But on another note, Blacks will tend to treat the Indian woman better, the Indian husband will tend to drink his rum and come home to beat the woman while the Black will treat her like a princess, even if he does not have a pot to piss in. 

 

 

Druggie had I made those comments about black husbands vs Indians you would call me a racist.  And in that case you would be right. 

 

FACt is that spousal abuse is a big problem throughout the Caribbean.  ALL RACES engage in this, even Chinese husbands.

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
 

 

Of course I have long said that the Burnham dictatorship was the worst thing that happened to blacks in Guyana, and I have said the same thing about the PNMwith reference to Tdad...indeed Eric, a Trini who used to post here, used to have a mental break down every time I said this. 

 

Blacks in the Caribbean, with thelr legacy of slavery, which bred a culture of dependence, did NOT need a small elite of Africans and mixed people to promote incompetence, and further dependency.  Indeed it is easy to show that in 2013 black in Tdad and Guyana are the WORST off in the English speaking Caribbean.  Rendered even more unable to fend off the racism which has impacted them in both nations, by the culture of dependency that BOTH Burnham and the PNM fostered, and fostered for cynical reasons.

 

I will leave it to Chief and baseman to argue that the Best thing that happened to blacks was Burnham. 

To Rev and druggie who insist that I have not answered I did LONG ago.

 

Exploitation of blacks by the PNC and the PNM does not give non blacks the right to attempt to exclude those blacks who deserve to be included however.  Trinidad still has its skin color issues (white/syrian/red vs black and sometimes Indian).  In Guyana a tiny elite is engaging in ethnic exclusion of blacks.  Buit it also abuses grass roots Indians as well.

 

Neither the PNM nor the PNC prepared blacks to have the tools to defend themselves against these attacks.  Indeed in Tdad blacks stopped educating themselves because they could get welfare jobs from the PNM.  Thankfully in Guyana the PNC ran out of patronage dollars in the late 70s so blacks had to learn to survive on their own.

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
 

Druggie had I made those comments about black husbands vs Indians you would call me a racist.  And in that case you would be right. 

 

FACt is that spousal abuse is a big problem throughout the Caribbean.  ALL RACES engage in this, even Chinese husbands.

You don't need to make any such statement to be labelled a racist since you have already earned this distinction over the years.

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:
 

* Blacks have made more progress under the Indian PPP than under the black PNC.

 

 

Rev


Show proof that this isnt due to high gold prices, remittances and to Hoyte who reduced govt domination of the economy thereby preventing Janet Jagan from installing a complete communist system Fidel Castro style.  People are better off DESPITE what the govt does. Yes the money that their relatives send from Antigua, St L and Bdos helps them out too.

 

Its clear that blacks play almost no role in how the country is run, or how resources are allocated.  Even Roger Luncheon screamed that blacks are abunch of incompetent people, which is why he cannot cite evidence that the PPP doesnt exclude them from effective leadership positions.  You then wonder why most blacks in Guyana say that he hates black people.

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by caribny:
 

Druggie had I made those comments about black husbands vs Indians you would call me a racist.  And in that case you would be right. 

 

FACt is that spousal abuse is a big problem throughout the Caribbean.  ALL RACES engage in this, even Chinese husbands.

You don't need to make any such statement to be labelled a racist since you have already earned this distinction over the years.

YEs people who scream that blacks are lazy and are criminals and have made no positive contribution to Guyana wail that I am a racist because I refuse to let them get away with making these claims in order to justify the PPP/Indo ELITES attempts to exclude blacks.

 

Look at Rev and cobra's rants and ask yourself why you include yourself in the company of these PPP racists.

FM
Add Reaction
💯❤️😂🎉🙏🤔😀😹👍👎☝️👏😻👀👿😢🤪🤣✅🙄🤷🔥🏆📈🤯
Previous

Add Reply

Views: 2,569

Membership Required

We're sorry. You must be signed in to continue. Sign In or Register
×
Are you sure you want to remove from your Block List?
×
Loading...
×
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .
×
Welcome to the Original Guyanese Discussion Forums, first established in 1996. Here you can discuss, ask questions or generally debate anything related to politics, movies, music, health or just gyaff away your day/night here. A note of warning, the Political forum is not for the faint of heart.  We do have some rules, so please adhere to them .
 
Privacy Statement - Rules

 
 

 

×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×

Access to this requires a premium membership.

GNI VIP Member

Welcome to the Original Guyanese Discussion Forums, first established in 1996. Here you can discuss, ask questions or generally debate anything related to politics, movies, music, health or just gyaff away your day/night here.

Please note while you do have free access to our Forums, the Political Forum will now be a Paid Membership Forum. What does this mean? To write in the Political Forum you must be a paying member. The fee is $25.00 US per year and is non refundable. Payment can be done through PayPal.
Membership is not automatically renewed and you can cancel anytime
We do have some rules, so please adhere to them.
$25.00 per 12 Months (plus tax if applicable)
×