Skip to main content

FM
Former Member


Integrity Commission’s call for declaration of assets should be ignored – Former Auditor General

 

August 22, 2014 | By | Filed Under News 
 

“The returns will be filed away only to gather dust”

 

In light of the recent call by the Integrity Commission for all public officials to submit their 2014 declaration forms,

Former Auditor General, Anand Goolsarran

Former Auditor General, Anand Goolsarran

 

Former Auditor General Anand Goolsarran says that for many reasons, public officials should not even give the request a “second look.”
In a published advertisement in this newspaper yesterday, the Integrity Commission called on all public officers to submit their 2014 declaration forms to the Office of the Integrity Commission. It sought to remind that the closing date for submission is today. It reminded too that all default public officials are to submit their outstanding declaration forms from1997 to 2013 to the Commission.
It said too that failure to file declarations with the Commission is an offence according to the Commission’s Act and is subject to Section 22 of the said Act.
The Commission said that declarants are also advised to attach supporting documents for the information provided in their forms.
Goolsarran gave some background to the Integrity Commission with reference to its Act which was passed in 1997.
Though the Act was passed then, the Former Auditor General said that it was not until 1999, that the first Commissioners were appointed, exclusively from the religious community.
Goolsarran, who has been highly critical of Government’s lack of transparency and questionable accounting policies, pointed out that arguably, the Commissioners would have lacked the relevant skills to properly evaluate the declarations made to the Commission and therefore, it would have been necessary to engage the services of professional persons skilled in investigative work. However, there was no evidence that this was done.
He explained that the Commissioners were re-appointed after their tenure expired, without consultation with the Opposition Leader as required by the Act. This prompted the Opposition Leader to take legal action in May 2005 to nullify the appointments. To date, there has been no hearing.
The anti-corruption advocate said that in April 2006, the Chairman of the Commission resigned, and since then he has not been replaced. In addition, since the Chairman’s resignation, there has been no sitting of the Commission for want of a quorum.
In 2009, three Commissioners were appointed, but again without consultation with the Opposition Leader. Again also, no Chairman was appointed.
While it is a requirement of the law for Ministers of the Government, Members of Parliament and senior public servants, among others, to make annual declarations of income, assets and liabilities, Goolsarran emphasized that it is also a requirement of the law to have a duly constituted and fully functioning Commission in place.
In the circumstances, he said that it makes no sense for such declarations to be made, as such an exercise becomes a mere academic one.
The former Auditor General believes that the returns will be filed away only to gather dust, which is not the intention of the law. He also made the point that it is also not publicly known whether the Commission has ever “investigated anyone based on their declarations and whether any prosecutions have been initiated.”
Goolsarran also stressed that Guyana is a signatory to both the Inter-American Convention against Corruption and the United Nations Convention against Corruption. A key requirement in both conventions is for there to be in place an effective and functioning system for annual declarations of income, assets and liabilities in respect of the above-mentioned persons.
“Few will deny that perceptions of corruption have reached an unprecedented level, indeed, its highest point in the history of the country, with many senior public officials flaunting unexplained wealth with impunity. Yet we have a dysfunctional system in place, perhaps deliberately so.”
Goolsarran opined that corruption invariably benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor and disadvantaged women, children and youths, since funds are diverted away from programmes that can lift them out of poverty.
“If we are serious about fighting corruption, our politicians need to get their act together and appoint members of the Integrity Commission who are professionally competent and independent of the political directorate.”
The Commission should also be provided with adequate resources to enable it to discharge its responsibilities, including initiating investigations and prosecuting those for whom there is evidence of the acquisition of unexplained wealth.”
“We continue to boast about successive years of economic growth, but how much of that growth is accounted for through illicit gains and how much of it cascades down to the poor and vulnerable, disadvantaged and the unemployed? What we are experiencing is growth without development.
No wonder the latest United Nations Human Development Report places us as the second lowest in this part of the world, the lowest being Haiti. No wonder also that on the Corruption Perceptions Index, we occupy a similar place. How proud are we when we consider the results of these assessments?”Goolsarran concluded.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Quote "While it is a requirement of the law for Ministers of the Government, Members of Parliament and senior public servants, among others, to make annual declarations of income, assets and liabilities, Goolsarran emphasized that it is also a requirement of the law to have a duly constituted and fully functioning Commission in place." unquote

FM

Why would anyone in their right minds give their personal information to a crime syndicate that has Bynoe, Joe Hamilton, Shawn Hinds and other thugs as part of their hierarchy?

 

Who in their right minds will do this?

FM
Originally Posted by asj:

“The returns will be filed away only to gather dust”


And so the Corrupt PPP/C allows lawbreakers to go scott free and so the corruptions continues on a daily basis.........compliments of the PPP/C

FM

If we were to prioritize is this more important or implementing the software to track assets and drive financial accountability?

 

Which is more important?

 

Transparency about the finances at NICIL or this charade? Which pandit or imam will analyze the filings?

FM

It is not a matter of doing nothing, the PPP needs to establish and construct a properly staffed and run integrity commission not this poppy cock nonsense that has not been functioning for years and has no Chairman and you are telling people to file documents to who? 

 

If that is the case let the parliamentarians send in blank pieces of paper that would be adequate. Why go through the motion just so the government can keep up false appearances? will the conflicts of interest with Robert persaud, Jagdeo and all these crooks come to the surface with this integrity commission?

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:

ok, SO WE DO NOTHING. EVERYONE HAPPY.  GOD BLESS GUYANA.  END OF STORY.

Not so quick. Remember Clico?

 

Five years later… CLICO’s collapse impacting NIS

April 2, 2014 | By | Filed Under News 

- details still shrouded in secrecy

The negative effects of Guyana’s handling of the collapse of the Colonial Life Insurance Company (CLICO) and its subsequent impact on the National Insurance Scheme (NIS) are continuing to be felt some five years later.

Ram and McRae’s Managing Partner, Christopher Ram

Ram and McRae’s Managing Partner, Christopher Ram

In its take of the National Budget 2014, chartered accountants, Ram and McRae, made it clear that the collapse remains very relevant to Guyanese. One of the biggest impacts for Guyana is the fact that the National Insurance Scheme (NIS) had almost $6B (US$30M) invested in CLICO Bahamas, a sister company of the insurance group. With CLICO Bahamas in winding-up proceedings, it is still unclear whether Guyana will ever get back that money. Government has remained largely silent on this investment with criticism still lingering over the manner in which the money was invested in the first place. This year, Government has plugged $226M into NIS to help fund studies that will help in charting its future, more than the $100M-plus allocated last year. The Opposition, too, is concerned and has reportedly has intentions to even ask for more funding to ensure the scheme remains viable. NIS is worrying Government, with falling contributions resulting in 2013 being the first year in its history that expenditure was in excess of its revenue. Government has said that NIS has about $30B invested in, among other places, the Berbice River Bridge.

Mitwah

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×