Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

THE VOICE OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS

JANUARY 21, 2016 | BY | FILED UNDER NEWS 

Are we committed to restructuring Guysuco?
 
By:  Sase Singh

 Introduction
After authoring a sugar series in the Guyana Chronicle in 2015, the plan was always to do such a series in the Kaieteur News, which is read by a different spectrum of the Guyanese population.  There could be no better time to commence this series, after the completion of the much-delayed Commission of Inquiry (CoI) Report into the sugar sector.

Sase Singh

Sase Singh

The unhealthy financial state in which Guysuco finds itself has the potential to cause long-term distress which can result in the closure of the sugar industry of Guyana; let us not fool ourselves.  But even more important is that we must know that privatization will only accelerate closure of this industry.
Thus, it is vital for all Guyanese who want to preserve and grow the economic strength of this nation, to reject this CoI Report and its primary recommendation – privatization and divestment of these State Owned Assets.
It’s the Cash Flow Stupid
There are clear reasons for corporate failure at Guysuco; it has nothing to do with the Guyanese people not having the ability and, more importantly, the workers being able to rise to the challenge. It has everything to do with very poor management under the PPP and much political interference under the PPP.
Former President Ramotar is not an innocent bystander in the destruction of Guysuco; he sat on the Board when the political decision was enforced that Guyana must go with the Chinese vs. the Indian to build the Skeldon Sugar Factory and did nothing as Guysuco drained its working capital on a capital expenditure.
He then presided over the ensuing mess as President; when he could have done something- like firing that “sugar numbskull” that paraded then as CEO.  Guysuco was allowed to deteriorate since 2004 because of the PPP and no one else – let us get that fact absolutely clear.  But, that is no reason to make any determined and pre-meditated attempt at making an even worst decision for the industry – privatization.
This APNU+AFC Coalition in a short 18 months period will be pumping some $24 billion of taxpayers’ money into the industry and that is a lot of money. But there are no alternatives considering the macroeconomic and socioeconomic impact of the sugar industry.
Even our flood control plan is heavily dependent on Guysuco, like so many other core infrastructure needs in rural Guyana that goes unnoticed.  The strategy has to be weeding out the non-value added elements of Guysuco and preserving those that can survive successfully by taking them up the value chain.
This Report is strategically deficient in many areas but most disappointedly in the Economic/ Finance area.  I have a ton of respect for the academic work of Professor Clive Thomas and I value his journals and writing.
I even consider him as someone who is much deserving of the Order of Excellence as one of Guyana’s premier economists who has published so many fine pieces of academic work in the field of economics.  But what clearly was highlighted by this report is that most of the players especially those who constructed the Economic/Finance Sub-Committee Report do not have a clue on  what it takes to run a real business in distress in the real world.
THE TERMS OF REFERENCE of the Commission were absolutely clear – “Prepare a Road Map for the way ahead for 2016-2030, structured in five-year intervals, with stated goals and modalities of implementation”.  This was not even attempted to be done!
Actually, the Cabinet was given a basket to fetch water by this Commission even after they spent over G$70 million on themselves and their operations.  Would we call that executive swindle?
How has the CoI Report helped?
We have to be grateful to the Commission for identifying the key challenges in the industry which every single Tamesh, Dick and Beharry on the estates grew-up knowing. Thus, although not much new knowledge was added to the industry on the field and factory operations, at least, all of that information is now in a formal document. We also have to be grateful for a set of updated high-level financial information.
But the financial analysis was sub-optimal and the financial modeling was missing in action.  Even in the Bachelor’s of Business Administration, the first year college students are aware that you cannot draw a financial road map without a financial model.  But I suspect Guyana is in a different time zone and on a different planet.
Guysuco was nationalized by the PNC Government to transfer political power from the European to the new local ruling class and thus because Guysuco has always been a political question – that is why the industry has always been mashed up since 1976.
But the minute you remove the politics from the industry, Guysuco shines.  Privatization of Guysuco is a guaranteed poison pill that will exterminate the sugar industry.  Guysuco will never survive in private hands that are totally focused on profits over people; it will die within five years of privatization and thousands will economically and socially die along with it.
Please share your feedback with me at sasesin1@yahoo.com.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

THE VOICE OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS

JANUARY 27, 2016 | BY | FILED UNDER NEWS 

The privatization recommendation of the Parvatan Commission must be rejected
 
By Sase Singh
 
INTRODUCTION
Part 1 of this Sugar Series was an important column since from the inception, there were no “smoke and mirror”


Sase Singh

impressions; the reader was absolutely clear where I stand on the recommendations from the Commission of Inquiry (CoI) into GuySuCo. The recommendation of privatization by the Parvatan Commission must be rejected emphatically as a result of an incomplete financial review.
But let us rewind to the Terms of Reference (ToR) for this Commission.  Reading the ToR, one felt assured that this Parvatan Commission was going to develop a “plan to bring the industry back to profitability and assure its economic survival” in the medium term. Actually, item 3 of the ToR stated clearly that it plans to “examine avenues/opportunities to make the industry viable in the near future.  In the event it is not realizable, then all other options, including diversification and divestment, will be considered.”
But after spending over $70 million and investing more than 3½ months of collective executive time on this Report, we are no better off.
Have all the opportunities been examined to take GuySuCo out of distress? Certainly not!  After reading that Report twice, since I could not believe my eyes the first time around, I am convinced that this Parvatan Commission did a grave injustice to the people in the sugar industry.
They clearly did not deliver on the expectations of the ToR.  What they failed to do was “prepare a Road Map for the way ahead for 2016-2030, structured in five-year intervals with stated goals and modalities of implementation” as was asked for by the ToR.
When one reads this CoI Report, one can quickly see it was not constructed to help stabilize the business at least for the period 2016-2030, while at the same time significantly reducing the size of the financial call on the Treasury.
There was no clear plan in this CoI Report on how the financial footing of the company will be strengthened and how we are going to use good corporate governance with less political interference to deliver greater value for money to the stakeholders in the industry.  The Parvatan Commission did not provide advisory support, they were on a mission to gather evidence in support of a pre-meditated position – privatization.
IT’S THE CASH FLOW STUPID!
There was no short-term cash flow forecasting or any recommendations on how to manage the available working capital to free-up cash for the critical capital works needed in the fields and factories.  Before we even move forward, there is very little clarity around the cash inflows and outflows, and this must be established.
There are just too many inconsistencies in this Report around cash outflows from GuySuCo – estate by estate.   If these basic elements in the cash flow are not clearly understood, we can recommend the moon; it matters not.
That PPP-sponsored Raj Singh Business Plan was a “hocus-pocus” Road Map, with pie in the sky numbers and shifty key performance indicators (KPI), of which very few were achievable.  The Commission quite rightly rejected the Raj Singh/PPP Business Plan; it was a document conceived in deception to cover criminality.
But the Parvatan Commission has replaced the PPP financial numbers with an even less germane set of financial information.  So GuySuCo right now is living day-to-day; paycheck-to-paycheck, like a corporate bum with no plan, no vision, no direction.  At a minimum, this CoI Report should have been the basis to inform the creation of a new Business Plan for GuySuCo. In its current form it cannot.
After wasting some $70 million on this CoI Report, we should banish the financial section of this document since it is not fit for professional consumption.  If the financial assumptions are incorrect, then we are clearly basing our financial recommendations on an incomplete process.
THE REALITY – ACUTE FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES
GuySuCo is currently facing acute financial difficulties, caused mainly by the repairs to the Skeldon Factory, poor prices and an extremely high cost of production.  Two of them are difficult to change situations in the short-term and therefore, we have limited control.  Sugar prices and the repairs to the Skeldon Factory are a given, which has to be absorbed into all future plans for GuySuCo.
The reality is that a fair chunk of the taxpayers’ G$12 billion is going towards fixing the Skeldon Factory.  Therefore let us bury that myth that it is going into the pockets of the sugar workers; it is not.  Let us also clarify that this cash-guzzler called Skeldon Factory was imposed on this nation by the Jagdeo/Ramotar cabal.
But when you analyze the numbers presented in Appendix 3 of the CoI Report – which appears to be a printout from the GuySuCo Finance Department – you quickly conclude that both Albion and Blairmont actually can compete internationally.
This situation will improve even further if the politicians take their hands off the industry and allow the industry to return to those time-honoured set of best practices such as flood fallowing and progressively mapping the sugarcane fields to identify deficient canes and taking appropriate agronomical actions.
But all of this will go to waste if we cannot enhance the management of the harvesting and post-harvesting system in a sort of JUST-IN-TIME (JIT) framework to minimize the sucrose losses. Further, we must move away incrementally from human harvesting of sugar cane to more mechanized harvesting techniques.  That process cost lots of money, but it will provide value to the nation worth its weight in gold.
CONCLUSION
If all of these basics are being implemented and continue to be implemented between 2016 and 2019, then a merged Albion/Rose Hall estate and a separate Blairmont estate can survive without any massive injection of funds from the Treasury.  The tough question remains – what will we do with the Demerara Estates and Skeldon?

We shall continue next week.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×