Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

SOURCE STABROEK NEWS

 

APNU moots ‘Social Contract’ for national unity

Posted By Staff Writer On January 4, 2014 @ 5:21 am In Local News | No Comments

A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) yesterday proposed a new ‘social contract’ in order to promote national unity and foster economic development.

In a statement, APNU said that the People’s Progressive Party/Civic administration has shown that it is incapable of solving the country’s current woes on its own.  It called on the PPP/C to seriously re-examine the prospects for the future relationship between citizens and the state as a means of  tackling the country’s pressing political, economic and social problems.

A social contract, a broad agreement between societal stakeholders on matters such as wages, crime and economic development, has been discussed here for many years but without success. Social contracts have been hammered out in several Caribbean countries.

APNU argued yesterday that the “economic crisis” has lowered the standard of living. It added that protests by two of the country’s largest trade unions – the Guyana Public Service Union and the Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union – have underlined how relations between the state and its workers have deteriorated. The number  of unemployed young people is growing and poverty is rampant, APNU charged.

It adverted to the  World Bank’s 2014 World Development Report, which rated Guyana as the second poorest country in CARICOM. The Report highlighted Guyana’s Gross National Income (GNI) of US$3,410 per capita compared to The Bahamas at US$21,280 per capita and Suriname at US$8,480 per capita. Only Haiti in Caricom was lower than Guyana.

The opposition coalition argued that the “security crisis” has disproportionately hit  the poor and that Guyanese have been pained by the rise in serious crimes in  2013. The party pointed out that there were 1,038 reports of robbery under arms at the end of November 2013. This represented a seven per cent rise over the same period in 2012. There was also a jump in the number of armed robberies involving the use of firearms by 16 per cent. Other serious crimes were also up.

APNU said it was  therefore proposing  a new ‘social contract’ through which the major sections of society – including the government;  opposition; trade unions; private sector and civil society – can seek agreement  on a broad national programme to move the country forward.

APNU contended that the ‘social contract’ could be the main means of harnessing the talents of a broader constituency and of fostering the conditions for social cooperation and economic development.

APNU called on the PPP/C administration to honour its obligations to:

*         undertake and continue tripartite talks with workers’ and employers’ organisations in order to promote heightened production and productivity;

*         establish, in accordance with CARICOM’s Charter of Civil Society for the Caribbean Community, “… a framework for genuine consultation among the social partners…”

*         buttress the mechanisms for tripartite consultation in accordance with ILO Convention No. 150 on Labour administration, 1978.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

YOU ALL REMEMBER THIS????

 

 

 

Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat
 
 
 
Press release 55/1998
(3 July 1998 )

THE ST. LUCIA STATEMENT ISSUED IN RELATION TO RESOLVING GUYANA'S POLITICAL IMPASSE

 
 

 1. In signing the `Herdmanston Accord' on 17 January 1998, the Leaders of Guyana's two main political Parties stated that they are doing so `specially mindful of the willingness of (their) CARICOM colleagues to remain engaged with Guyana in this endeavour'. It is in this spirit that as colleagues we have taken the opportunity of our St. Lucia Summit, on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of CARICOM, to initiate a dialogue with them on the current situation in Guyana - conscious of our own full participation as signatories to the `Herdmanston Accord'.

2. We are also fully resolved that it is pre-eminently our task - to be in the front line of all efforts to assist Guyana as part of our own family.

3. Our conversations with President Jagan and Mr. Hoyte have convinced us all of the necessity to return Guyana to the agreed path of the `Herdmanston Accord' - within the time-frame agreed in the Accord. Convinced that there is no time to lose in securing this, we have resolved together to place our collective commitment behind the undertakings, arrangements and measures in paragraphs (a) to (j) below to which President Jagan and Mr. Hoyte, representing the PPP/Civic and the PNC respectively, have agreed between themselves and with CARICOM, namely -

  • All parties to the `Herdmanston Accord' reaffirm their commitment to the Accord, and to the implementation of its provisions as initially contemplated.

  •  
  • Both stages of the Electoral Audit as provided for in paragraph 1 of the `Herdmanston Accord' have been presented to the political Parties in Guyana. All the parties to the Accord have agreed to accept the findings of the first stage of the Audit - as set out in paragraph 1(i) (a) of the Accord - as binding upon them; but it is recognised that this does not preclude the pursuit of electoral petitions which have been filed in the courts by both parties.

  •  
  • The next substantive step to which the parties are committed under the Accord is that of Constitutional Reform on the basis and within the framework provided for in paragraph 4 of the Accord. We recall that provision specifically and reaffirm our determination to pursue it in spirit and letter.

  •  
  • Mindful that among the matters to be addressed by the Constitutional Reform Commission will be
`Measures and arrangements for the improvement of race relations in Guyana, including the contribution which equal opportunities legislation and concepts drawn from the CARICOM Charter of Civil Society can contribute to the cause of justice, equity and progress in Guyana' -

It is accepted that the parties will take steps for the early implementation of specific measures to achieve these objectives in advance of constitutional reform itself. 
 

  • We are all agreed that it is feasible to complete the work of the Constitution Reform Commission and to have the Report submitted to the National Assembly by 16 July 1999 as originally contemplated, thereby maintaining the timetable in paragraph 4 (ii) of the Accord, and we commit ourselves to achieving it.
  • To enable this timetable to be met, the parties have agreed that they will settle as soon as possible, by law in the manner required by the `Herdmanston Accord', the terms of reference and the naming of the Constitution Reform Commission mindful that CARICOM is resolved to assist them in every way required, but more specifically by arranging for the provision of constitutional experts and facilitators.
  • The parties have also agreed that the necessary enabling legislation should be enacted in time to allow the Opposition to take their seats in the National Assembly by 15 July 1998. Mr. Hoyte has indicated his intention that, without prejudice to the outcome of the election petition referred to above, the PNC will assume their seats in the National Assembly by that date, and President Jagan has indicated her agreement to secure the enactment of the necessary enabling legislation.
  • Mrs Jagan has also agreed to make all normal parliamentary arrangements to facilitate the due functioning of parliament as established in a number of parliamentary democracies.
  • Building on this historic process of the meeting of Guyana's political leaders with CARICOM Leaders in St. Lucia and the demonstration that through dialogue lies the path to the resolution of Guyana's problems, the parties have agreed to redouble their efforts for dialogue as provided in paragraphs 3 and 6 of the `Herdmanston Accord'. Further, the two leaders have given CARICOM Heads of Government their assurance that they will themselves meet on a periodic basis to facilitate the achievement of all the processes to which they committed their Parties by the `Herdmanston Accord'.
  • The two leaders have recognised the value of high level Facilitator acceptable to them whose functions will be developed in conjunction with them. Therefore, they have accepted the offer of CARICOM to provide such a Facilitator who will be appointed as a matter of urgency to further assist in the due implementation of these several agreements.
In the context of the conversations in St. Lucia CARICOM leaders are satisfied that there will be an end to illegal protest on the streets of Guyana as dialogue and parliamentary processes take their rightful and more prominent place in Guyana's governance. We are strengthened in this by the assurance that the rule of law will be upheld and that as a consequence violence in the political life of the country will cease. None of us wish to stifle dissent in any of our countries; but none of us will accept disorder and threats to life and property as a way of political life.

4. CARICOM remains committed to the peaceful settlement of differences and disputes within our Region and States. These goals are fully supported by both President Jagan and Mr. Hoyte. We are therefore heartened by their assurance that this is the path along which they will work to achieve national unity and cohesiveness for the betterment of Guyana and all its peoples. We are certain that all Guyanese will lend their tangible support to this.

5. We express our genuine appreciation of the statesmanship shown by our colleagues in Guyana in making this historic Agreement possible and once again pledge the commitment of the Caribbean Community to remaining engaged with Guyana in the implementation of the `Herdmanston Accord' and this Agreement and to be at the disposal of the Parties for this purpose. 
 

MADE THIS 2nd DAY OF JULY 1998, AND ACCEPTED BY: 
  
KENNY ANTHONY 
THE CARIBBEAN COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN 
  
JANET JAGAN 
PEOPLE'S PROGRESSIVE PARTY/CIVIC

DESMOND HOYTE 
PEOPLE'S NATIONAL CONGRESS 
 

FM

I doubt that Granger will do anything stupid. All he has to do is sit back and let the AFC do the dirty work of cannibalizing voters from the PNC and criticize their policies. The PNC could very well win the next elections if the people are so stupid to vote for the AFC. 

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

I doubt that Granger will do anything stupid. All he has to do is sit back and let the AFC do the dirty work of cannibalizing voters from the PNC and criticize their policies. The PNC could very well win the next elections if the people are so stupid to vote for the AFC. 

what you mean by stupid you big goadee man you mean when indian people finally wise up

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×