Is Ramkarran defending an illegality?
Dear Editor,
In his weekly column, published in the Stabroek News, Mr Ralph Ramkarran, this week, chose to write in defence of and indeed, advocates for, the Specialty Hospital project to be awarded to Fedders Lloyd without going through any procurement process. “There is absolutely no reason why a new bidding process must be undertaken when the contract is ready to be awarded… There is no rule or principle which dictates that for a new contract, a new bidding process has to be undertaken…” boldly writes Ramkarran.
The following cannot be disputed:
that a public procurement exercise was undertaken in respect of this project in accordance with the Procurement Act Cap 73:05, Laws of Guyana;
that the process, manned by the National Tender Procurement Administration Board (NTPAB) and it’s team of technical evaluators, disqualified Fedders Lloyd from this procurement process on certain technical grounds;
that this same process produced Surendra Engineering Ltd as the successful bidder;
that this company’s bid, qualifications and competence for the project did not only meet the satisfaction of the evaluators but would have enjoyed the imprimatur of the Indian Exim Bank, and presumably, the Indian Government;
that the contract was awarded to Surendra Engineering Ltd;
that the award of the contract to Surendra Engineering, brought that procurement process to an end;
that Fedders Lloyd ‘s bid was never evaluated because they were disqualified at a preliminary stage.