Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I still predict a PPP majority.

 

The biggest mistake for the PNC was to not offer an apology for it's past sins. This will cost them the election.

 

It is all about trust and right now the PNC is still not trusted due to it's past dictatorship era. The current leadership might be genuine in it's promises but they will have a tough job selling it.

 

It is quite difficult for the AFC to deliver 12 percent since their Berbice base has been dismantled.

 

Regardless of the outcome of the upcoming election in Guyana, the political landscape has been transformed.

FM
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Chief:

The opposition in Guyana should learn from what happened in Israel two days ago.Do not let your guard down.

What Lessons are there to learn??

yuh rass fulla questions

dEM DOES CALL ME THE QUESTION MAN.  i DOES EVEN ASK DEM gALS WHA COLOR pANTIES DEM GAT ON.

Nehru
Originally Posted by yuji22:

The biggest mistake for the PNC was to not offer an apology for it's past sins. This will cost them the election.

 

It is all about trust and right now the PNC is still not trusted due to it's past dictatorship era. The current leadership might be genuine in it's promises but they will have a tough job selling it.

 

I've been talking about a branding remaking of the PNC in the APNU as a sound political marketing strategy. This got caught up in some equivalency with PPP's behavior in the past.

 

Shaitaan had an interesting observation that post-elections violence is owned by the PNC. When the main Indian party, the PPP, was shut out for 28 years (first through duplicitous election rules) and later outright rigging aided by the armed forces), the party supporters emigrated or went into the illicit trading business making money.

 

the PNC base's responses were different following the 92, 07 and 01 elections. The post-2002 violence changed the perception of mo fiah slo fiah as not workable ( a sort of Guyana 2nd amendment solution in the TEA party lexicon).

 

Re-image, re-brand..........vital ingredients of trust.

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

The biggest mistake for the PNC was to not offer an apology for it's past sins. This will cost them the election.

 

It is all about trust and right now the PNC is still not trusted due to it's past dictatorship era. The current leadership might be genuine in it's promises but they will have a tough job selling it.

 

I've been talking about a branding remaking of the PNC in the APNU as a sound political marketing strategy. This got caught up in some equivalency with PPP's behavior in the past.

 

Shaitaan had an interesting observation that post-elections violence is owned by the PNC. When the main Indian party, the PPP, was shut out for 28 years (first through duplicitous election rules) and later outright rigging aided by the armed forces), the party supporters emigrated or went into the illicit trading business making money.

 

the PNC base's responses were different following the 92, 07 and 01 elections. The post-2002 violence changed the perception of mo fiah slo fiah as not workable ( a sort of Guyana 2nd amendment solution in the TEA party lexicon).

 

Re-image, re-brand..........vital ingredients of trust.

other than a celebration of "sacred Indian victim" vs "violent African oppressor" redeemed [unsaid] by Jagdeo and the criminalized state . . . not sure what the point here is

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×