Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Jagdeo to Jordan: Apologise for misleading public

Amaila Falls Hydropower Project

– threatens nationwide campaign to expose Govt’s lies – says Project would have saved GPL billions of US dollars

In continuing to represent and underscore the merit and deservedness of the Amaila Falls Hydropower Project, the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) Opposition is once again urging the A Partnership for National Unity/Alliance for Change (APNU/AFC) administration to put politics aside, accept that the initiative would indeed significantly benefit the entire Guyanese populace, and to now act fast to capitalise on the prevailingly low oil prices on the international market to pursue the development of this project.

If government continues to remain steadfast to its stance that the project is too expensive to embark upon, the PPP/C Opposition is challenging the administration to a face to face discussion about Amaila Falls where each party will present its contentions, based on reason and globally credible analysis.

Finance Minister Winston Jordan had asserted it would be “criminal” to pursue the Amaila Falls Hydropower Project as it would be too costly a venture for the government to embark upon. The Minister stated that Amaila Falls will cost GPL US$2.6 billion over 20 years (US$130 million per year) and that this was too unreasonable.

On the other hand, the PPP/C maintains the Minister is absolutely inaccurate in his calculations.

In exposing the facts and offering clarification, the PPP/C pointed out that in actuality GPL will be saving billions of dollars: First of all, GPL would have been required to pay US$100 million and not US$130 million per year. Secondly, that money would have bought about 50 per cent more power than GPL’s entire generation in 2012. Therefore, to generate that amount of power without Amaila Falls would have cost GPL far more money, almost US$200 million using 2012 costs.

So rather than Amaila costing GPL US$130 million per year, it would be saving GPL US$100 million per year – or put in another way, Amaila Falls will generate 50 per cent more electricity than was generated in 2012 for almost half the cost.

“In short: Instead of Amaila Falls costing GPL US$2.6 billion over 20 years, GPL would actually be saving almost US$2 billion, or G$400 billion, at 2012 prices,” the PPP/C highlighted.

If government confirms its willingness to participate in the conversational forum on Amaila, the PPP/C said it will explain in detail how these savings can enable the costs of electricity to be dramatically reduced for Guyanese, and we will explain how after 20 years, the Amaila Falls Hydropower facility will be wholly owned by the citizens of Guyana without any debt being incurred.

The PPP/C explained that this discussion on Amaila Falls would truly help Guyanese to understand the project for themselves and form their own conclusions of the nature of the initiative.

The PPP/C is also offering the government assistance in improving their understanding of the project.

If, on the other hand, government refuses to join with the PPP/C in this forum, the Party will take its discussion on electricity prices, the cost of living, and the benefits of Amaila Falls to the people of Guyana, village by village.

Set the record straight Meanwhile, the PPP/C insisted that the Finance Minister should come clean and set the record straight by apologising for his erroneous remarks on the cost of Amaila on GPL (whether or not it was a genuine or deliberate error).

The Party is calling on the government to publicly state the net gains to GPL over the first 20 years of its operations and to accept his claim that Amaila Falls would cost GPL US$2.6 billion was wrong.

Additionally, the Finance Minister had disclosed that government’s plan to not proceed with Amaila Falls was “strongly supported by the experts at the Inter-American Development Bank, who had considered the project to be too risky to attract the Bank’s financing.”

The Opposition is contending that this is also incorrect and is calling on Cabinet to confirm that they did not in fact receive any communications from the IDB confirming that the project was not feasible.

The PPP/C made it clear that it will not stand idly by while lies are being spread about the best chance Guyanese will have for generations to come to access affordable, clean and reliable electricity.

“It is not the Amaila Falls Project which is the “criminal deception”. It is the Government’s willingness to mislead the public in pursuit of dubious political ends. This deception will condemn Guyanese to many more years of expensive electricity prices, and is already damaging the competiveness of our private sector and our overall economy. It must be viewed against the backdrop of APNU and AFC Government Ministers awarding themselves a 50 per cent pay rise while also receiving free electricity,” PPP/C stated.

Amaila The Amaila Falls Hydropower Project is the flagship of Guyana’s Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS). The project was expected to deliver electricity to Guyana’s capital, Georgetown, and its second largest town, Linden, by an electric transmission line.

Guyana currently relies on imported fuel oil and diesel for its electricity generation, which is both expensive and carbon-intensive. The Amaila Hydropower plant was expected to shift Guyana’s reliance on thermal generation to renewable energy, eliminate over 90 per cent of the country’s energy-related greenhouse gas emissions, provide energy production for approximately 90 per cent of Guyana’s population.

In addition, it would improve Guyana’s balance of payments by significantly reducing the importation of fuel, significantly reduce end-user costs for electricity, and improve reliability of energy supply and generation of clean energy, which would help to encourage economic growth and development by improving regional competitiveness, private sector investment, and foreign direct investment.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The ball is in no bodys court. The project is shelved. Jagdeo has his time to deliver a feasibility study and offer up a financial rationale for the project and everywhere he failed. From inception he went his own way with fip motilal...giving him complete right to build in the area which he sold to sith for some 15 million and which they hold on to even now and possibly value it at a 200 million stake in the heart of any who would build cheaper. Jageo further give fip another 15 million to build a road. He never built a dam. He failed in that also and the 15 million project escalated to 35 million.

 

Jagdeo, the uber crook failed us not anyone else.

FM
In continuing to represent and underscore the merit and If, on the other hand, government refuses to join with the PPP/C in this forum, the Party will take its discussion on electricity prices, the cost of living, and the benefits of Amaila Falls to the people of Guyana, village by village.

 

Set the record straight Meanwhile, the PPP/C insisted that the Finance Minister should come clean and set the record straight by apologising for his erroneous remarks on the cost of Amaila on GPL (whether or not it was a genuine or deliberate error).

 

Jagdeo to Jordan: Apologise for misleading public, November 6, 2015  By , Amaila Falls Hydropower Project, – threatens nationwide campaign to expose Govt’s lies – says Project would have saved GPL billions of US dollars

PNC politicians appears to continue with deliberate misinformation.

 

Either Guyana pursue the development of hydroelectric power project(s) or, in time and most likely, Brazil will develop project(s) and Guyana will be a consumer; with a few benefits because the project is in the country.

FM
So rather than Amaila costing GPL US$130 million per year, it would be saving GPL US$100 million per year – or put in another way, Amaila Falls will generate 50 per cent more electricity than was generated in 2012 for almost half the cost.

“In short: Instead of Amaila Falls costing GPL US$2.6 billion over 20 years, GPL would actually be saving almost US$2 billion, or G$400 billion, at 2012 prices,” the PPP/C highlighted.

Jagdeo to Jordan: Apologise for misleading public, November 6, 2015  By , Amaila Falls Hydropower Project, – threatens nationwide campaign to expose Govt’s lies – says Project would have saved GPL billions of US dollars.

Of note.

FM

Who is the great economist

and Leader that

left the Sugar Industry

in 82 Billion Dollars Debt?

Department of Public Information's photo.
Department of Public Information<button class="_42ft _4jy0 PageLikeButton _4jy3 _517h _51sy" data-ft="{"type":28,"tn":"c"}" data-ownerid="u_0_r" data-profileid="448225275358717" id="u_0_t" type="submit" value="1">Like Page</button>

Friday, November 6, 2015

Partnership needed to save sugar industry - Govt appeals to sugar workers

The Government of Guyana urges all sugar workers and their unions to help in rescuing the industry, which for the first time in years, has reached and surpassed weekly targets.

The Government encourages sugar workers to remain committed to their jobs and, with the holiday season approaching, to earn as much as they can before the current crop comes to an end.

The Government finds as most disturbing the agitation, mainly by GAWU, for workers to engage in strike action. Such action could cripple operations and close down the sugar industry. This is especially alarming and regrettable now that efforts are being made to breathe life into the industry.

Government has been looking at all options to revive the industry, which was placed in a state of bankruptcy and almost total ruin by the former government.

PERTINENT FACTS It is critical that sugar workers know the following pertinent facts:

• Production slumped from 327,000 metric tonnes in the 1960s to an average of below 250,000 tonnes between 2008 and 2014

• Under the former regime, the sugar industry never came close to realizing the promised 500,000 tonnes target

• Between 2009 and 2015 GuySuCo not only failed to make a profit but suffered estimated total losses of $67.8 BILLION

• When the last administration left office, GuySuCo’s debt burden stood at $82 BILLION

It is therefore irrefutable that under that administration, GuySuCo had lost its way.

It is for this reason that the Coalition Government supported a Commission of Inquiry into the sugar industry. The interim report has confirmed the poor and declining state of GuySuCo as a result of political interference, poor management and squandermania.

TEN YEAR ROAD MAP AND ACTION PLAN After a mere five months in office, the Coalition Government is seeking to put a Ten Year Road Map and Action Plan in place, aimed at returning the industry to viability. It would therefore be ill advised and indeed premature to commence wages talks before this plan is considered. Unions that seek to drag the sugar corporation to the table to do so are obviously pursuing a political agenda which unfortunately is not in the interest of sugar workers.

The Government has, for the first time, allowed management to run GuySuCo independently and to make into a top priority a lasting solution to secure employment and also to make the industry profitable.

$82 BILLION DEBT LOAD Due to its virtual insolvent status under the former regime, taxpayers were forced to dole out $28 BILLION in the last five years alone (2011 - 2015) to keep the sugar industry afloat. With its debt load of $82 BILLION and an expected $5 BILLION needed for capital investment together with anticipated further bailout in 2016, any strike action in the industry would bring sugar finally to its knees.Government appeals for the understanding and the full cooperation of all sugar workers at this time of great peril to ensure that production targets continue to be met.

BAILOUT FOR 2015 MAXED OUT The Coalition Government did not create the problems affecting the sugar industry. The blame ought to be placed elsewhere. It is government’s view that any industrial action at this time will place the industry into further jeopardy. Government is regrettably unable to increase the bailout package above the $12 BILLION for 2015 and strike action will not change this reality.

COI FINDINGS BEING ANALYSED In the meantime Government is analysing the interim findings and recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry. GAWU as an integral part of the COI ought to know that industrial agitation is not an option at this time. Government once again implores all sugar workers to steadfastly remain committed to the industry and to partner with management for its recovery.

 

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Just before Elections in May.....

Who told the Sugar Workers ...."Aya just continue  Voting Race...Everything Bright & Beautiful  in the Sugar Industry".......

ANSWER : Jagdeo, Ramotar & PPP

 

 

 

 

Who threaten to De-unionize Sugar Workers and Kill GAWU???

ANSWER : Jagdeo, Ramotar & PPP

 

 

 

Light a candle for Guyana sugar workers –

Moses Nagamootoo lives

 

LIGHT A CANDLE FOR SUGAR WORKERS

Statement by Moses Nagamootoo

The threat by the state-owned Guyana Sugar Corporation (Guysuco) to de-recognise the Guyana Agricultural and General Workers’ Union (GAWU) is intemperate and reckless.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
 

The media report that Guysuco has notified GAWU that it is considering to end the 1976 Recognition and the Avoidance and Settlement of Disputes Agreement with the union, is an extreme provocation.

 

This year sugar workers were given not a cent either as wage increase or annual bonus as Guysuco did not achieve its set target. The workers were literally expected to “produce or perish”.

 

I am shocked that the Government could condone this attack on GAWU and the sugar workers; and that leaders of my party, the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), would expect to be in silent conspiracy with this outrage against the vanguard of the working class movement in Guyana.

I can no longer remain silent.

This is a grave national matter,

and one of conscience.

 

I dissociate myself from what seems to be a state-party alliance in sledge-hammering GAWU,

judging from the leading role of Dr. N.K. Gopaul, Permanent Secretary in the Office of the President and former acting Head of the Presidential Secretariat, as Chairman of Guysuco,

and Mr. Donald Ramotar, General Secretary of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP), who is a prominent member of the Board.

 

The sugar workers have been the bedrock of the anti-colonial struggles for independence from Great Britain.

For 28 years (1948-1976) they fought for industrial democracy and won union recognition.

For 28 years (1964-1992) they were in the front trenches for restoration of democratic rule in Guyana.

Their struggles gave birth to the PPP, and were exemplified in the commitment of Cheddi Jagan, the sacrifices of the Enmore Martyrs, Kowsilia, and many others.

 

No one denies that the sugar industry is in crisis due to a combination of exogenous and internal management factors. Low worker turn-out, work stoppages and inclement weather compounded the problem. But the sugar workers cannot be the only scapegoats for failure.

 

For many years, I have been associated with the cause of Guyana’s sugar workers and, invariably, marched under their banner in their epic fight for union recognition. As a young teacher I founded a school to help mainly sugar workers’ children to get an education. Later, as a journalist, I captured in many feature articles the consistent and unwavering struggles in the sugar belt.

 

And I can attest that their union has never allowed itself to be intimidated or blackmailed in the past. I expect no more from GAWU which should, with dignity and responsibility, prosecute all reasonable options to end the stalemate in the industry. Strikes must be the last resort.

 

I also expect Guysuco to re-think its options, and to eschew its intention to de-recognise GAWU.

 

The de-recognition threat ought to be withdrawn immediately and unconditionally before irreparable damage is done.

 

The Government would do well also to explore all possibilities to give the sugar workers even a nominal wage increase. Zero is an insult, not an option.

 

I’d like to borrow the poignant words of Ricky Singh, a former colleague of mine, when he wrote several years ago in another context, that we should, as we observe Christmas, “Light a Candle” for our sugar workers.

 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×