Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
 

Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo makes his 2017 budget presentation

Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo has put the David Granger administration on notice that once his party resumes office, presumably in 2020, they will not only undo some of the 2017 budget measures, but also come against any foreign company operating in Guyana through a non-transparent process.

“[Once] we determine that the assets of GuySuCo or any other company were given away in that manner,” Jagdeo told the National Assembly during his budget 2017 presentation, “we will use whatever means including the tax means when we get back in office to deal with that.”

Jagdeo, in his address, said his party has already set 22 measures which does not as yet include countermeasures to budget 2017.

Jagdeo said his party will reduce the Tributors tax for the mining sector, which was increased in budget 2017, from 20% to 10%. “We will remove the VAT on electricity and water, and put back the Education Grant,” Jagdeo added referring to the $10,000 education grant under the last PPP government.

Turning his attention to proposed amendments to have the Guyana Revenue Authority directly garnish monies owned in VAT from from people’s bank accounts, Jagdeo said: ” we will remove the offensive provisions that are being made in our laws that will capriciously seek to go into people’s bank accounts or restrain them from travelling.”

Further measures proposed by the Opposition Leader include a reduction of the environmental levy, and a restoration of the water and electricity subsidy for pensioners.

The Opposition Leader believes the Government “must be judged on the basis of what they told the people of this country.” He said the government while in opposition “had no intention to fulfill their promises.”

Jagdeo did however commit to support the David Granger administration’s measures which “enhance growth and development in Guyana.” “Anything that will ensure more disposable income for people or that there is greater access to education and health benefits,” Jagdeo added.

“We cannot do otherwise because majority of the things reflected in their programmes are things we left and it would be hypocritical of us not to support our own plans,” the Opposition Leader clarified.

Turning his attention to budget 2017, Jagdeo predicts the budget would create a deficit in the consolidated fund of -$123B compared to -$60B in 2015. “In this budget, he [Finance Minister Winston Jordan] has indicated as though they intend to borrow more to spend more,” Jagdeo continued.

Jagdeo believes the government is outstripping private sector from borrowing from our banking sector. “This is very very dangerous because government is taking bigger shares of savings in the country to finance its deficit.”

On foreign investment, the Opposition Leader could not comprehend how the government could say there is foreign investment in the country when financing of investments in 2017 from domestic savings reflect 91.5%, while foreign direct investment accounts for 8.5%.

Jagdeo observed that in 2014, financing investment using domestic savings was 23%; 57% in 2014; 88.8% in 2015; and 90.2% in 2016. He highlighted the sharp increase from 2015, the year when the David Granger administration took office.

The Opposition Leader criticised the government for downplaying how much money the state would earn in VAT even in face of the reduction from 16% to 14% for the 2017 budget. Jagdeo projects money earned from VAT in 2017 will be some $44B compared to $35B in 2016.

Jagdeo’s high-point in the debate was challenge government’s claim of not having the “fiscal space” to avoid the tax-heavy budget. “You are spending twice as much on a [Sussex Street drug] bond to store some condoms than the entire Region 4 health estimates,” Jagdeo objected.

He noted the $170M yearly to rent the controversial Sussex Street bond, which was the subject of debate last evening in the House, is more than the public works budget for Region 6 with more than 100,000 people, greater than the education budget for region 10, and almost as large as the capital budget for Region 8.

Further challenging government’s claim of no fiscal space, Jagdeo said the administration’s tax settlement with Demerara Distillers Limited (DDL) could cost the Treasury $80B.

In closing his presentation, Jagdeo urged the Government to move away from blaming his party and accept responsibility that it is now in government, calling for the David Granger administration to “move on.”

The last two speakers for budget debate 2017 are Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo and Finance Minister Winston Jordan.

The PPP benches are empty in the National Assembly in protesting of a break in custom to the speakers’ list where the Opposition Leader was the second to last speaker in the debate, followed by the Finance Minister, who closed the debate since it was his budget being debated.

http://demerarawaves.com/2016/...017-budget-measures/

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Trying to rule over Africans who have had 500 years of fighting to be ruled by their own people is not just a waste of time and resources But it also endangers the safety and human rights of East Indian Brothers and Sisters. The only solution is for the East Indian people of Guyana Douglas who embrace their Indian heritage and allies of the East Indian people of Guyana must have their own independent sovereign country.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prince posted:

Better yet, we should ask DG to make a prediction into 2020 elections.   

Who, David Granger?  He will predict PNC win, by hook or crook.  If you mean GNI DG, when he seh walk, pick-up and run rass!

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Danyael posted:

This lot is more concerned with winning than with good government. This fellow does not represent good government and does not have the remotest chance of winning.

Well, without winning we cannot talk good government.  Just like with Trump!

FM

In order for the PPP to win in 2020, they will have to win over 80% of the Amerindians and 10% of the black votes.  They will also have win back all of the AFC Indo votes or they will suffer another loss.   

R

For the PPP to win, Guyanese deserve a FREE and FAIR election.

Reminder: The last elections was rigged.

Fact: PNC Ko Ko Beah's are afraid of a recount.

Anyway, the economy is spinning out of control as the AFC/PNC clowns cannot even run a cakeshop, how can these clowns run a country ? Old people were right about these clowns.

FM

PPP supporters want youthful leadership

 

Dear Editor,
In my travels throughout Guyana in October to conduct an opinion survey, supporters of the PPP related that they would like to have a “youthful leadership” (Central Committee, Executive Committee, etc) arising out of the party’s Congress that will be held next weekend in Anna Regina, Essequibo. In earlier NACTA surveys, conducted last March, July, and last year, PPP supporters complained about the ineptitude, incompetence, slothfulness, lack of capacity, lackadaisical attitude or “coorheeness” among some, as well as arrogance, desire for personal wealth, and allegations of corruption among some in the leadership that cost the party the Government in May 2015.

The supporters yearn for change towards a younger enlightened leadership who can bring modernity and rapid development to Guyana. They want a leadership team that can build a strong attractive civic alliance.

As found in the surveys, some in PPP leadership are most despised for their lack of human relations skills. Some of them do not know how to speak with people – an essential requirement of a person desiring to be a leader. People complain they don’t see PPP MPs or leaders in their communities. Many don’t even bother to go among the supporters, preferring instead to be in “town” for nice time rather than grounding with people in their time of difficulties. At any rate, people simply don’t want to see or hear some of them – as they turn away support from the PPP, and in fact some of these characters cost the PPP the Government.

Supporters note that some in the leadership are very archaic in their thinking. They are relics of the past who only speak of the greatness of socialism and communism (that collapsed thirty years ago) and advocate for Palestine, Iran, defunct Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea, etc, that has no relevance to our conditions in Guyana. They don’t understand geo-politics that define which party will govern Guyana because they lack political intellect like those of us who study and are experts in international politics.
Voters complain that some have been paraded before the nation for too long; people are weary of seeing them. They must now excuse themselves from a public presence — especially those who were given opportunities and failed the people in leadership and in government positions. How many chances these characters want, supporters ask.

Party supporters want a new generation of leadership that have time for them and with whom they can interact. They want to see new, charming, attractive faces they can relate to. They want more females and will love to see a female head the party. They want smart, modern thinking people in the leadership in whom they see a bright future and hope for the country. In looking around, they don’t see many in the current leadership offering hope for party supporters or the country. As one person rhetorically asked, which employer will give some of them in the PPP leadership a second look for a job? Outside of politics, most may not find work. But in fairness to them, many gave their entire life fighting the dictatorship for the country’s freedom. They neglected their education and families. They had no or little time to pursue formal tertiary education like others as they worked to better the lives of others. So, they must be recognised and credited for their decades of commitment and dedication in serving the nation.
People have pointed out that a large majority of the party supporters were not around when the PNC outlawed the consumption of roti, alou, dhal, channa, etc. So they cannot relate to arguments made by these old timers on banned foods and the various “isms”. But the old timers should not be altogether dumped. They can play an advisory role to the younger generation of would-be leaders.

The party supporters are fulsome in their praise for Bharrat Jagdeo as President. They note he did a lot of improvement for Guyana during his tenure. But he may not be able to contest as President again because of term limits he consented to when he was President. So the party will have to find an effective leader who is likeable. There are not many choices – Irfaan Ali, Anil Nandlall, Frank Anthony, etc. And in the polls, the ratings were in that order for a successor. But it is a tall order to fill the shoes of Jagdeo as none is universally acceptable like him to win a majority in the next election.

The delegates at the Congress should select the Central Committee wisely and listen to the voice of the supporters – give the younger potential leaders a chance.

Yours truly,
Vishnu Bisram

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×