Skip to main content

Jagdeo’s palatial home… Former President accountable to Guyanese for his actions – AFC

 

September 6, 2012 | By | Filed Under News 
 

 “It is a fact that no other former president other than Jagdeo demitted office with an increase in his asset base of in excess of 1000%. None. Presidents Desmond Hoyte, Cheddi Jagan and Janet Jagan left office with the same assets with which they assumed the office.”

 

The circumstances under which former President Bharrat Jagdeo acquired his two-acre plot of land at Sparendaam, East Coast Demerara, is an issue of accountability and not security, the Alliance For Change (AFC) insisted yesterday.
According to the Parliamentary opposition party, the fact that Jagdeo has demitted office does not prevent him for being accountable for his “acts” and “omissions” when he was President of Guyana.

 

 

Over the weekend, the party got into a bruising public battle with the ruling People’s Progressive Party/Civic during a segment of the corruption debates on NCN’s Channel 11.

During the live debate, AFC’s Chairman, Nigel Hughes argued that it is evident that Jagdeo garnered more wealth than any other president in Guyana.

Government on Tuesday came out heavily in defence of the right of Jagdeo to his sprawling home, and blasted an aerial shot of the seaside compound, equipped with pool and all, which was published by Kaieteur News. According to the government, quoting an unknown, unnamed senior police officer, the publication was a breach of security.

The government statement even contemplated “legal proceedings” over the publication.


Yesterday, the AFC hit back, citing the case of former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair who was made the subject of and compelled to testify at the inquiry into his involvement in taking Britain into the Iraq war after he left office.


“There must be no immunity of persons after they demit office,” said AFC. The party has seven seats in the National Assembly.


Lawyers and police officials yesterday noted that there is no law that they are aware of that prevents members of the public from taking photos of the homes of anyone, be it public officials or otherwise.


“The era of ‘Google Earth’ has long removed the concept of privileged locations immune from public scrutiny. Even the royal family (England) has suffered more invasive intrusions into their personal life.”


In addition to this, there are thousands of photos on the net of the homes of public officials, including present and former Presidents.


Jagdeo’s sale of a house in Goedverwagting, East Coast Demerara, while he was in office, for a whopping US$600,000 ($120M) had raised eyebrows.


There were criticisms when an entire area off north Sparendaam was cleared and plots of lands were sold to several government officials in somewhat secret circumstances. An antenna belonging to the NCN had to be moved at enormous expense across the river to La Parfaite Harmonie, West Bank Demerara, to facilitate a posh new housing area catering to a chosen few.

Together with a controversial pension package for former Presidents that was passed under the tenure of Jagdeo, the opposition had been highly critical.

AFC said yesterday that there should be clear explanations about matters that concern the taxpayers of Guyana.

“The Alliance For Change maintains that there must be no ambiguities in the law and the benefits that are given to Jagdeo or any former president must be clearly identified both in description and in quantity so as to avoid the abuse of power which was not unknown to the Jagdeo regime.”


AFC said that Jagdeo is accountable for his actions.


“The fact that President Jagdeo has demitted office does not prevent him from being accountable for his acts and omissions while he acted as President. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair was made the subject of and compelled to testify at the inquiry into his involvement in taking Britain into  the Iraq war after he left office. There must be no immunity of persons after they demit office.”


According to the party, for government to “defend Jagdeo and attempt to spin the newspaper’s coverage into some kind of security breach is totally ludicrous”.


AFC also said yesterday that it has taken note, with amusement, of the attempts by “the usual suspects” to shift focus off the evidence of corruption highlighted by its Chairman, attorney-at-law, Nigel Hughes, during the “NCN so-called debate”.

“What Hughes did was to highlight the fact that former President Bharrat Jagdeo left office a considerably more wealthy person than when he first took office… a feat not achieved by any of his predecessors. It is a fact that no other former president other than Jagdeo demitted office with an increase in his asset base of in excess of 1000%. None. Presidents Desmond Hoyte, Cheddi Jagan and Janet Jagan left office with the same assets with which they assumed the office.”

The party also slammed statements by Minister of Labour, Dr. Nanda Gopaul, which “suggested that somehow once one is afforded the privilege of being elected to the High Office of President of this Republic, the person must “fix” himself up”.


“This is repugnant and must be rejected by all right thinking citizens,” the AFC said.

“The privilege of being president is about service to the country and not about enriching oneself.

It is a matter of considerable significance that despite being afforded several opportunities to indicate where citizens of Guyana can purchase an acre of ocean front property for $5M, the goodly doctor and the Attorney General were unable to provide the citizenry with any answer.”

 

 
Latest News Headlines


Replies sorted oldest to newest

Jagdeo is no longer president so what is the obsession with him and his alleged wealth through insidious means? If the AFC/PNC have a gripe they can always bring charges through the legal system rather than rabble rousing through the media. 

FM

It is a serious shame when the President of a poor third world country acquires astonishing wealth in office

 

September 5, 2012 | By | Filed Under Letters 
 

Dear Editor,


The idiocies PPP acolytes utter are truly disgusting.


Minister of Labour Nanda Gopaul reportedly said during the recent corruption debates “What is wrong with a former president or a president seeking to ensure that he lives a comfortable life after his presidency? Especially because we have term limits, knowing full well that you are going to demit office, you must ensure that you look for your future. We must not go from a president to rags.”


Political office is not a bank or a gravy train. It is not there for anyone to get rich. If you don’t like the pay and the pension package as president do not run and better still, get out of politics.

Nanda Gopaul typifies the nonsensicality of the PPP. A president serves two terms maximum. That is eight years. Then he gets a pension for life. Why should a man who has destroyed a country earn an outlandish pension package after eight years of service?

In eight years, the president earns $96 million tax free. That is US $480,000 tax-free over eight years. However, Jagdeo was in power from August 11, 1999 to December 3, 2011, a period of 12 years 3 months. At $1 million per month, Jagdeo would have earned $147 million or US$735,000 tax-free during his tenure.

How could a man who likely earned this stupendous kind of income, tax-free, still want to suck this country dry? Even if this was not Jagdeo’s doing but that of his party, he never said no to this insanity. He never once uttered a single word deeming this pension package as an abomination in a country of extreme poverty that is just above calamitous Haiti in the Western Hemisphere.

Nanda Gopaul has some shamelessness to defend this absurd pension package given to a man who, if he earned $1 million per month, would have earned some $147 million of taxpayers’ money tax-free in salary as president for 12 years and 3 months.


Guyana has a GDP per capita of US $2869 at US $239.08 per month. It would take a Guyanese earning the per capita GDP of Guyana some 256 years to earn what Jagdeo would have earned in 12 years 3 months as president at $1 million per month.


This is not absurd and sickening enough for Nanda Gopaul and the PPP followers who attempt to defend the even more brazen assault on taxpayers of this nation with the Jagdeo pension package. By any measure, Jagdeo has gotten very rich sitting as president. He did not pay any taxes on his massive salary for 12 years. The PPP soup drinkers want to enrich him even more by giving him a preposterous pension package.


Bharrat Jagdeo essentially rose to riches just by sitting in the presidency and earning a tax-free salary from the people of Guyana. At 48 years, why is Jagdeo entitled to that ridiculous $3 million per month pension package? Why should the poor people of this country support a young man in the prime of his working life with contacts all over the world and good qualifications that enable him to earn a good living?


What kind of mentality is at play within the PPP to see it fit to pillage this country in this fashion with a pension package of this nature? Is it a perspective that sees Guyanese people as pliable and easily bullied? Or is it an outrageous sense of entitlement? Is it pure greed or plain disregard and disrespect to the sufferings of the majority of this nation? This pension package is no better than a leech sucking the blood of an innocent prey.


 

If Jagdeo is getting a pension of $3 million per month, he is getting US$180,000 per year compared to Barack Obama who will get $127,129 per year. Obama will pay taxes on his pension. Jagdeo will not. There is providing a pension for a president, and then there is this rape and pillage of the Guyanese people and nation. By no measure is Jagdeo entitled to this pension. Not in a country where old age pensioners receive an insulting $10,000 per month.


 

It is greed, plain and simple for any president of a backwater third world country that happens to be the second poorest in the western hemisphere to be rewarded in this rapacious fashion. Jagdeo will not go from president to rags, not with what he has earned, the pension he will receive and his lucrative job opportunities. It is the people of Guyana who will go from rags to even more rags with this kind of highway robbery in the presidential pension package passed by the PPP.

 

Jagdeo will go from President to Sultan with this package.The US president does not get such a pension package and he is the president of the most powerful nation on the planet. The arrogance of this package is a reflection of the mentality of those who passed it. This is all about bullyism, insolence, intimidation and entitlement

 

M. Maxwell

 
Latest Letters Headlines


Mitwah

There is the parliament and courts to deal with this matter. The AFC is trying the issue of the pension plan of Jagdeo via the press, instead these folks should be doing their jobs by trying it in a court of law.

FM

Nehru bhai, thanks for your kind remarks. Look at how the Father of the nation livedcompared to Jagdeo.

 

In eight years, the Bharat earns $96 million tax free. That is US $480,000 tax-free over eight years.

 

 However, Jagdeo was in power from August 11, 1999 to December 3, 2011, a period of 12 years 3 months. At $1 million per month, Jagdeo would have earned $147 million or US$735,000 tax-free during his tenure.

 

How could a man who likely earned this stupendous kind of income, tax-free, still want to suck this country dry?

 

Even if this was not Jagdeo’s doing but that of his party, he never said no to this insanity.

 

 

 

Mitwah

The claim of wealth accumulated by Jagdeo centers on his property. In fact he paid the going rate of land at the time and was instrumental in raising the said value of the land via his economic policies that led Guyana to greater prosperity. If Cheddi did a good job with the economy the way Jagdeo did then his land too would have increased in value. Instead he could not phantomize and let the mo fiah slow fiah crew drive away business and plunged the economy into stagnation. 

FM

It's shamelessness to defend this absurd pension package given to a man who, if he earned $1 million per month, would have earned some $147 million of taxpayers’ money tax-free in salary as president for 12 years and 3 months.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:

It's shamelessness to defend this absurd pension package given to a man who, if he earned $1 million per month, would have earned some $147 million of taxpayers’ money tax-free in salary as president for 12 years and 3 months.

I don't support this package, indeed these payments are absurd for a 3rd world nation. However the method to undo these changes lies in legislation and parliament, not the court of public opinion. The joint opposition needs to push legislation to formulate a pension package comparable to what the country can afford. But I doubt that they will enact such legislation since it will also affect their pension and benefits.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×