Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I wished this could be done, but in law this will be a battle since you cannot withdraw a benefit without just cause.

 

Remember the majority of the 9th Parliament approved this legally.

 

APNUAFC Government cannot unilateral changes this contract with Jags

If employers just tell employees they’re changing the employment contract, without employees express or implied consent, then there will be a:

  • Breach of contract;
  • Possibly, a  repudiatory breach.

Jagdeo has options:

 

Bring a claim for breach of contract or unlawful benefit deductions. This is sometimes known as “standing and suing”.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Jungle Girl:

Stop Jagdeo's 'pension'!!

 

* 5 years from now Granger will be looking forward to receiving a "massive" pension like Jagdeo's.

 

* So you can bet the house and farm Jagdeo's pension will not be touched.

 

Rev

As I have always said about politicians - self first and nation after. They are the same, no different.

FM

the AFC promised not to join the PNC.

They promised to stop Jagdeo's pension and put him behind bars.

They Promised to change Burnham's 1980 constitution.

They promised to raise the Salaries of the armed forces.

They promised to stop crimes  but will allow domestic violence.

What more do you want from a bunch of coolies who cried wolf when they didn't a piece of the pie.

R
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:
Originally Posted by Jungle Girl:

Stop Jagdeo's 'pension'!!

The court already ruled on Jagdeo's pension.

courts can rule on the law. The assembly can create a law. Presidents sigh those. There is no constitutional requirement to set the President pension as a specific scale. It is arbitrary and the reason it is as onerous as it is necessitating change.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:
Originally Posted by Jungle Girl:

Stop Jagdeo's 'pension'!!

The court already ruled on Jagdeo's pension.

courts can rule on the law. The assembly can create a law. Presidents sigh those. There is no constitutional requirement to set the President pension as a specific scale. It is arbitrary and the reason it is as onerous as it is necessitating change.

two thirds majority is needed and they will not get it.

 

However, I want to see the constitution changed.

The President's pension package revised as they cannot change former president's package. 

R
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:

the AFC promised not to join the PNC.

They promised to stop Jagdeo's pension and put him behind bars.

They Promised to change Burnham's 1980 constitution.

They promised to raise the Salaries of the armed forces.

They promised to stop crimes  but will allow domestic violence.

What more do you want from a bunch of coolies who cried wolf when they didn't a piece of the pie.

Why are you all crying? Didnt you say that the AFc was a dead duck party which wouldnt attract any votes?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×