ASS WIPE WILL BE ASS WIPE.  I DONT EXPECT BETTER FROM A HIGH SCHOOL DROP OUT EDITOR!!!!!!!!!!!

The editors/reporters seem to be confused with the basic concepts for hydroelectric projects with the following features:

1. run-of-the-river flow conditions; and,

2. storage reservoirs to regulate/manage flows.

The above supplied no information to substantiate its claim .The true cost of the plant would have followed statistically real life examples and would have exceeded it budget by a third to a half its stated value. That they would have been the first to do it within budget is majical thinking. It has already increased over 30% since its first planning.

Also, there is no hard data supplied to us as to the volume of the reservoir and the rate at which it replenishes itself based on usage. The idea that they can come up with cost per Khr needs to be taken in lieu of projections for the Berbice river bridge. That toll is over 500$ of its initial estimate.

Calling people asswipe is easy when you do not use your latent gifts to express intelligently why you came to a specific conclusion. But that has and will always be your habit. It is mainly due to the air in your head. You have to let some out least you lift off

Then tell us where and how they are confused. You are the one with the wealth of data so you can express them in cogent terms if you are up to t he task. But like nehru above, you find it easier to snipe that write good sense.

Read and understand carefully my statement before you babble your usual idiotic views.

What more cogent terms you need than what I provided in the comments?

HEHEHE DG Fish up the IDIOT.

Your statement is its usual dessicated sniping. It is absent information. You are an engineer, speak in as an engineer delivering a message as why a thing is of benefit.

The cogent information that is lacking here is the volume of water necessary for sustained consumption by the plant and the ability for nature to keep it coming. Those information is absent. It is hinted at but never supplied. You can be the first to put it into public domain.

You are as shallow as you present yourself to be.

Continued babbling relative to my statement on the gist of the issues.

The volume of water, the ability to maintain the flows during operation plus other information are in the reports.

Read them carefully to understand the issues before blaring your nonsense.

DEn you at the bottom of the Pacific.

It is understood the mind of a fool he is a wise man. The learned know the difference since they would have had some information to work with. You are absent that

those fictive reports again.

And, you are the sole authority.  

Deh presser Foot like to think he knows everything. I cant stand FOOLS like him!!!!!!!!!

Before you can claim to reflect on something that affirms your authority that thing has to be in the public domain. It must not be state secret. I am telling you the necessary information to draw the requisite conclusion as to the viability of the project is not in the public domain.

Do you think if you make these braying sounds you will not be considered an ass? What are you talking about. You are begging the question on non existent information. Now that is the hall mark of idiocy.

BLA BLA BLA   NANANANANANANANAN

Danyael's continued braying.