Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

Shortly after the Labour Relations Bill was introduced in March 1963, the PNC and the UF mounted a series of demonstrations in Georgetown, mainly around the Public Buildings when the House of Assembly was meeting. In his addresses during these demonstrations, Burnham incited the crowd with language that encouraged violence and hatred.

 

On March 17, a joint march by the PNC and TUC against unemployment occurred, and included in that demonstration were hooligans who attacked PPP and PYO members who had a counter demonstration outside the Governor’s residence demanding independence for Guyana. Burnham, speaking at a PNC rally during the afternoon, congratulated his supporters for their violent attacks on the pro-independence supporters.

 

Then on March 24, Burnham again incited his supporters by telling them that the PPP was planning violence and that they the PNC supporters must be ready to “apply the remedy”. This led to PNC and UF demonstrations around the Public Buildings on 27-28 March. The crowd broke through the police cordons and physically attacked PPP legislators.

 

The situation worsened on Friday 5 April when PNC demonstrations led to violent attacks on workers at the Rice Marketing Board and the looting of 10 stores in Georgetown. One looter was shot dead by the police.

 

On 17 April, the Civil Service Association (CSA), led by Dr. Balwant Singh, announced that it would join the TUC-organised strike due to begin the following day. Dr. Jagan met with Dr. Singh and pointed out to him that the CSA had no grievances and that there was no need for that union to strike.

Singh responded that the CSA was joining to express solidarity with the TUC.

 

When the strike began, many civil servants who refused to go on strike were threatened and in some cases were physically attacked by those on strike.

 

From the beginning of the strike, the political motives were clearly shown. Owners of big business places, generally supporters of he UF, openly supported the strike and locked up their offices and factories to prevent access to those who wanted to work. The sugar workers refused to strike, but the sugar companies refused to operate the sugar factories in the effort to keep sugar workers off their jobs. The bauxite companies also urged their workers to stay away from work while the Shipping Association refused to allow ships already in the harbour to be unloaded. This led to shortages of consumer food products, which resulted in hoarding and black-marketing. However, the shortage was temporary as locally produced items from mainly the rural areas were supplied to the population.

 

Clearly, the action of big business was aimed at overthrowing the Government since it was unusual for such entities to encourage their employees not to work!

 

International travel was seriously affected because airlines ceased operations. The Trinidad-owned British West Indian Airways was prepared to break this air blockade but the Trinidad Cabinet ordered that the flights must be cancelled. Dr. Jagan sent his private secretary, Jack Kelshall, a Trinidadian, to Port of Spain urge the Premier, Dr. Eric Williams, to re-consider this issue, but Dr. Williams refused to meet with him.

Oil supplies were also cut off from Trinidad and, as a result, fuel for rice farmers was very limited resulting in the loss of nearly one-third of the expected rice crop. Oil companies willing to ship oil were threatened with sabotage, and this forced Dr. Jagan to ask the Governor to seek the assistance of the British navy to protect oil shipments. When the Governor refused to comply with this request for naval assistance, Dr. Jagan appealed to the Cuban Government for help. The Cuban government immediately sent shipments of oil which greatly alleviated the situation. The American oil companies operating in Guyana refused the Government’s request to use their empty storage tanks on the East Bank Demerara, but Shell and the Electricity Corporation provided their facilities for this purpose.

 

The local newspapers, which openly supported the opposition, shamelessly incited violence and racial hatred and almost daily called for the overthrow of the Government. The Government was accused of being “communist” and the media carried stories that children would be taken away from their parents to be indoctrinated to work in factories built by the communists!

 

The opposition political parties also distributed handbills urging people to use violence against PPP supporters and instigating a violent coup d’etat. And after a series of violent attacks on peaceful citizens and bombing of some business places, the police in early May raided Congress Place, the headquarters of the PNC where a large cache of arms and ammunition, chemicals for bomb-making, and documents detailing assassination plans were found. One of the documents gave details of a PNC terrorist organisation working under a plan called “X-13″ aimed at causing violence and overthrowing the Government. The document stated that the head of the terrorist organisation was “Comrade Van Gendrine” who was “responsible directly to the leader Comrade L.F.S. Burnham for project, plans, etc., of this organisation.” The police shortly after prepared a research paper on the PNC terrorist organisation and listed the names of the 50 members, including one American “trade unionist”, Gerald O’Keefe, who was advising the TUC during the strike. This “unionist” was subsequently identified as a CIA agent.

 

The research paper on the PNC terrorist organisation, prepared by the police for the Governor, Sir Ralph Grey, proved to be very embarrassing to the political opponents of the PPP, including the British and American Governments which were giving covert assistance to them. As a result the Governor prevented the release of the report to the general public and did not even make it available to the Premier. (It was not until early 1964 information of the existence of this report was exposed after Janet Jagan, the Minister of Home Affairs, managed to obtain a clandestine copy. But after the PPP printed copies of it for public circulation, the Governor immediately declared it illegal for anyone to have possession of a copy of the document).

 

Even opposition supporters were shocked when the information of the discovery at Congress Place was announced by the police. This caused a temporary lull in the violence and the TUC tried to disassociate itself from the PNC plot by claiming that its campaign during the strike was based on “passive resistance”.

 

But towards the end of May, opposition instigated violence erupted again. It began after Burnham addressed a large crowd of his supporters on 24 May in Georgetown and telling them that agitation must move away from the legislature to “places where they grow rice.” This was clearly a reference to PPP areas of support and, soon after, violent attacks were made on people on the East Coast Demerara, an area of PPP strength.

With the arrival of oil from Cuba, the TUC’s stranglehold on the Government was loosened and more and more workers were breaking the strike. The PNC then openly took over the leadership of the TUC and there followed increased attacks on individuals – mainly Indians – homes and Government buildings. Even a mosque in East Demerara was destroyed by a bomb blast.

 

On 30 May a serious outbreak of violence occurred at the funeral of Claude Christian, the Minister of Home Affairs, who died suddenly of a heart attack. The funeral service at the Brickdam Cathedral was interrupted constantly by a hostile noisy crowd of anti-Government supporters outside on the street. At the graveside at the La Repentir cemetery the hostile mob stoned the mourners who included members of the Government. This mob then rampaged through the streets of Georgetown beating Indians and damaging stores and other business places. People of other races who tried to stop this assault were also subjected to beatings. The violence continued throughout the night, and became a daily pattern in Georgetown when Indians were beaten and robbed often in full view of the police. Some PPP legislators were also physically attacked on leaving the House of Assembly.

 

As expected, these acts of violence led to retaliation in some rural areas where Africans were attacked by Indians. The onslaught led by the PNC caused distress even among supporters of the opposition, and it caused Dr. D.J. Taitt, a founder-member of the PNC to accuse Burnham of leading his followers “into a blind alley of improvised tribalism,” and appealed to him to “change his course and lead in the right direction.”

But this appeal went unheeded, and on June 10, the PNC began a campaign of using women and children supporters to squat in front and inside Government buildings and utilising gangs of young men on foot or on bicycles to attack Indians on the streets of Georgetown. The situation worsened on the following day and when Dr. Jagan told the Commissioner of Police that the mobs were breaching the emergency proclamation, he disagreed and refused to act. Looting broke out shortly at the Stabroek Market and several Indians were again beaten on the street in the full view of the police.

 

Dr. Jagan then asked the Governor to call a meeting to include the Commissioner of Police and the Commander of the British troops stationed in Guyana. At the meeting Dr. Jagan asked the Governor to order the use of British troops to help stem the disorder since the police seemed incapable of doing so. A further meeting took place the following morning and the Commander of the troops declared that he would not deploy the army, even though the Commissioner of Police supported Dr. Jagan’s request. Dr. Jagan again appealed to the Governor to make an official request for the troops, but the Governor refused.

 

That morning the mobs on the street became even more violent. They laid siege to the Public Buildings which also housed the Premier’s office. Dr. Jagan made efforts to get the Governor and the Police Commissioner to visit the scene but they refused to budge. It was as if they had received other instructions to allow the mob to cause as much violence as possible and to overthrow the Government. In the meantime, the Minister of Education, Cedric Nunes, was beaten and stoned in the presence of the police as he tried to reach his office just across the street from the Public Buildings.

 

At around mid-afternoon, Dr. Jagan, accompanied by two body guards and Superintendent Carl Austin, was leaving the Public Buildings when his car was stoned and then surrounded by a hostile crowd armed with bottles, iron bars, stones and pieces of wood. The car windows were smashed, but as some in the mob tried to get at Dr. Jagan, Superintendent Austin and the two bodyguards fired their pistols and the driver managed to manoeuvre the car away from the scene. This action of the mob was clearly an attempt to assassinate Dr. Jagan.

 

This incident was followed by a greater spate of violence. Mobs invaded the Law Courts and the office of the United Nations. Some government buildings were dynamited and an attempt was made to destroy the Rice Marketing Board Wharf where workers were loading rice on a Cuban ship. A large quantity of dynamite planted by saboteurs was found attached to the woodwork under the wharf.

 

Violence continued throughout the month until early June when, through the intervention of the British TUC, the strike came to an end. By that time, 9 persons were murdered, 2 others were killed by police gunfire, 40 persons were injured and 3 women raped. In addition, 19 buildings in Georgetown and 5, including a mosque, in the countryside were bombed. There were also 53 cases of arson and attempted arson.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by VVP:
 This action of the mob was clearly an attempt to assassinate Dr. Jagan.

 

What a bloody shame they didn't kill Jagan and his wife. Guyana of all groups would have been better for it.

 

FM

It's funny when PPP folks start scrambling to recollect past history, but with selective memory. They never mention for one moment that before the PPP came to power in 1992, Guyana was a relatively peaceful place. Gun murders were hardly ever heard of during a year, and hard drugs were things people read or heard about in the news, and it was always foreign news.

But once the PPP came to power, they encouraged gun crimes and investments in hard drugs. They even imported several hard core criminals from the US to murder hundreds of Guyanese in the early part of this century.

So when the PPP stooges look back at the history of Guyana before 1992, they should bemoan the peaceful period that was so brutally cut down by the incoming PPP government.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

It's funny when PPP folks start scrambling to recollect past history, but with selective memory. They never mention for one moment that before the PPP came to power in 1992, Guyana was a relatively peaceful place. Gun murders were hardly ever heard of during a year, and hard drugs were things people read or heard about in the news, and it was always foreign news.

But once the PPP came to power, they encouraged gun crimes and investments in hard drugs. They even imported several hard core criminals from the US to murder hundreds of Guyanese in the early part of this century.

So when the PPP stooges look back at the history of Guyana before 1992, they should bemoan the peaceful period that was so brutally cut down by the incoming PPP government.

I am not PPP bai; not under this current PPP regime!!  But what you said here happended under the Jagans and Hinds? Lie. And where were you living in Burnham days when kick-down-the-door banditry was the norm and Indians were the main victims.  Forbes told them "you know who gat the money go tek it."

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by VVP:

I am not PPP bai; not under this current PPP regime!!  But what you said here happended under the Jagans and Hinds? Lie. And where were you living in Burnham days when kick-down-the-door banditry was the norm and Indians were the main victims.  Forbes told them "you know who gat the money go tek it."

I was right in the middle of all the troubles in Wismar when Burnham became PM.

Whatever Burnham said in the 60's pale into insignificance when compared to what Jagdeo has been saying, and what has caused him to have to attend court. Jagdeo proclaimed Apan Jaat, which means ethnic cleansing of the country.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Mr.T:
Originally Posted by VVP:

I am not PPP bai; not under this current PPP regime!!  But what you said here happended under the Jagans and Hinds? Lie. And where were you living in Burnham days when kick-down-the-door banditry was the norm and Indians were the main victims.  Forbes told them "you know who gat the money go tek it."

I was right in the middle of all the troubles in Wismar when Burnham became PM.

Whatever Burnham said in the 60's pale into insignificance when compared to what Jagdeo has been saying, and what has caused him to have to attend court. Jagdeo proclaimed Apan Jaat, which means ethnic cleansing of the country.

When Jagdeo die there will be war in hell between him and Burnham to determine who is the king devil.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

Well the purpose of the post is to improve our understanding so there will not be another Burnham in Guyana again.  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

Well the purpose of the post is to improve our understanding so there will not be another Burnham in Guyana again.  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

where is the evidence that the world could plunge into a Cold War style dualism of the ideological kind that spawned Burnham and Burnhamism more than a half-century ago?

 

you are so full of tendentious tribal shit!

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by VVP:
  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

Unfortunate, myopic and insensitive statement. What is unfortunate about Afro Guyanese seeing the former President Burnham as a "god". What is wrong with them seeing one of their own as a protector of their rights in a country full of racial insecurity? What is so unforgivable about what Burnham did?

 

Indos cannot treat Cheddi Jagan as a god and expect Blacks to treat Forbes Burnham as a pariah when they both sought to protect the respective peoples at specific times in Guyanese history. 

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

While one would have and state their indifference with politicians regardless of how they attained power; one should also recognize their position.

give this man some sort of prize for the most illiterate post of the day

FM
Originally Posted by politikalamity:
Originally Posted by VVP:
  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

Unfortunate, myopic and insensitive statement. What is unfortunate about Afro Guyanese seeing the former President Burnham as a "god". What is wrong with them seeing one of their own as a protector of their rights in a country full of racial insecurity? What is so unforgivable about what Burnham did?

 

Indos cannot treat Cheddi Jagan as a god and expect Blacks to treat Forbes Burnham as a pariah when they both sought to protect the respective peoples at specific times in Guyanese history. 

 

 

Did you read the initial post above?  You do not see a problem with what Burnham did?  

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

Well the purpose of the post is to improve our understanding so there will not be another Burnham in Guyana again.  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

where is the evidence that the world could plunge into a Cold War style dualism of the ideological kind that spawned Burnham and Burnhamism more than a half-century ago?

 

you are so full of tendentious tribal shit!

My friend a cold war is not different from a race war.  What happened was a lust for power because Burnham was a socialist who only conveniently turned pro US to gain power.

 

The lesson to be learned is that if they are power hungry people like Burnham and Jagdeo the country as a who suffers so these people could achieve their ends.

FM
Originally Posted by Freaky:
big bad Burnham a still haunt GNI coolies

 

Run and hide inside your pit latrines and under your money stuffed mattresses, Burnham and his legion of Black people zombies is out to get you.

 

Lest we farget, we have Professa of Coolie History VVP here to remind us

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

Well the purpose of the post is to improve our understanding so there will not be another Burnham in Guyana again.  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

where is the evidence that the world could plunge into a Cold War style dualism of the ideological kind that spawned Burnham and Burnhamism more than a half-century ago?

 

you are so full of tendentious tribal shit!

My friend a cold war is not different from a race war.  What happened was a lust for power because Burnham was a socialist who only conveniently turned pro US to gain power.

 

The lesson to be learned is that if they are power hungry people like Burnham and Jagdeo the country as a who suffers so these people could achieve their ends.

nearly all politicians are egotistical and "power hungry" . . . Cheddi Jagan was no exception

 

that does not necessarily make them bad

 

the Cold War set the unique conditions (in this hemisphere) for Burnham to gain and sustain himself in power through rigged elections

 

what's so freakin hard for u to understand about that?

 

btw, i refuse to dignify the inapposite stupidness u babbling about "cold war" vs "race war"

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Funny that many Indians here speak up against the PPP but how many Africans have anything bad to say about the PNC?  No wonder Guyana suffered until Burnham croaked....and Africans got the brunt of the suffering.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

Well the purpose of the post is to improve our understanding so there will not be another Burnham in Guyana again.  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

where is the evidence that the world could plunge into a Cold War style dualism of the ideological kind that spawned Burnham and Burnhamism more than a half-century ago?

 

you are so full of tendentious tribal shit!

My friend a cold war is not different from a race war.  What happened was a lust for power because Burnham was a socialist who only conveniently turned pro US to gain power.

 

The lesson to be learned is that if they are power hungry people like Burnham and Jagdeo the country as a who suffers so these people could achieve their ends.

nearly all politicians are egotistical and "power hungry" . . . Cheddi Jagan was no exception

 

that does not make necessarily make them bad

 

the Cold War set the unique conditions for Burnham to gain and sustain himself in power through rigged elections

 

what's so freakin hard for u to understand about that?

 

Hey hey. Careful. Yuh talkin to wan MPA dere.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
 

 

the Cold War set the unique conditions for Burnham to gain and sustain himself in power through rigged elections

 

what's so freakin hard for u to understand about that?

Any war would have set the condition for Burnham, if not the cold war it would be the race war!

 

Have you ever read "Beware of my Brother Forbes"???

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

Well the purpose of the post is to improve our understanding so there will not be another Burnham in Guyana again.  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

where is the evidence that the world could plunge into a Cold War style dualism of the ideological kind that spawned Burnham and Burnhamism more than a half-century ago?

 

you are so full of tendentious tribal shit!

My friend a cold war is not different from a race war.  What happened was a lust for power because Burnham was a socialist who only conveniently turned pro US to gain power.

 

The lesson to be learned is that if they are power hungry people like Burnham and Jagdeo the country as a who suffers so these people could achieve their ends.

nearly all politicians are egotistical and "power hungry" . . . Cheddi Jagan was no exception

 

that does not make necessarily make them bad

 

the Cold War set the unique conditions for Burnham to gain and sustain himself in power through rigged elections

 

what's so freakin hard for u to understand about that?

 

Hey hey. Careful. Yuh talkin to wan MPA dere.

Remember bai don't do me injustice:

BE - Bachelor of Engineering - Electrical Engineering

ME- Master  of Engineering - Electrical Engineering

MPA - Master of Public Administration - Concentration Economics and Public Finance

PE - Licensed Professional Engineer- NYS

 

VVP, BE, ME, MPA, PE

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Freaky:
There are two blacks here versus 28 coolies

Now you forget how to count 

 

Freak here is no high falutin electrical engineer

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

 

the Cold War set the unique conditions for Burnham to gain and sustain himself in power through rigged elections

 

what's so freakin hard for u to understand about that?

Any war would have set the condition for Burnham, if not the cold war it would be the race war!

 

Have you ever read "Beware of my Brother Forbes"???

dude, incoherent bleating is not argument

 

and, which part of Jessie Burnham's tract u need to hold up to the light for me to read, eh?

 

smfh

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:

History lesson for today before ahyuh start partying for the weekend.  From Odeen's History of Guyana.

 

ANTI-GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE IN 1963

the definition of an ignoble endeavor . . . what's your point?

 

this is one side of a contentious half Century-old, Cold War-era history in which Dr. Jagan was victimized

 

the main players are, for the most part, dead now

 

the USA antagonist is now our protector and refuge . . . former PPP communists have moved on and gotten American passports

 

the only traction alyuh can scrounge up now is de ole fail safe . . . demon blackman

 

smh

Well the purpose of the post is to improve our understanding so there will not be another Burnham in Guyana again.  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

where is the evidence that the world could plunge into a Cold War style dualism of the ideological kind that spawned Burnham and Burnhamism more than a half-century ago?

 

you are so full of tendentious tribal shit!

My friend a cold war is not different from a race war.  What happened was a lust for power because Burnham was a socialist who only conveniently turned pro US to gain power.

 

The lesson to be learned is that if they are power hungry people like Burnham and Jagdeo the country as a who suffers so these people could achieve their ends.

nearly all politicians are egotistical and "power hungry" . . . Cheddi Jagan was no exception

 

that does not make necessarily make them bad

 

the Cold War set the unique conditions for Burnham to gain and sustain himself in power through rigged elections

 

what's so freakin hard for u to understand about that?

 

Hey hey. Careful. Yuh talkin to wan MPA dere.

Remember bai don't do me injustice:

BE - Bachelor of Engineering - Electrical Engineering

ME- Master  of Engineering - Electrical Engineering

MPA - Master of Public Administration - Concentration Economics and Public Finance

PE - Licensed Professional Engineer- NYS

 

VVP, BE, ME, MPA, PE

 

UG?

 

Tell us about your Ivy League alma mater dere

 

Never before have I been in the presence of wan high powered electrical engineer bai.

UG Bachelor of Engineering degree is high quality bai.  But then again you wouldn't understand.  I could afford Ivy league bai but I do have a PE and you could do some research on what a PE is about,

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
 

 

and, which part of Jessie Burnham's tract u need to hold up to the light for me to read, eh?

 

smfh

Well read the whole thing nah...here it is:

 

I remember vividly one Sunday while Forbes and I were studying and the rest of
the family were either resting or relaxing; a religious programme “Bringing Christ to the
Nation” was on the radio. The preacher was so enthusiastic that he shouted himself
breathless. It was indeed disturbing to anyone studying. Forbes told me to switch off the
radio.
I complied.
2
Mother, a few minutes later queried about the sudden halt in the programme.
Forbes replied quickly, “Jessie turned off the radio.” Forthwith, I had to defend myself
and state my case. The same attitude is still there. “I plan, others implement.”
Mother was a religious woman with strict ideas on moral and proper conduct. She
used to speak often about the importance of honesty and the worth of good character.
Often, especially as he grew older, I would catch mother watching Forbes with a worried
eye. I knew she was concerned about him, about his apparent change generally. When he
left for studies in England, her fears about the kind of man he was becoming deepened.
I couldn’t see it at the time. Forbes and I were very close. As brother and sister,
we shared many, many good times and confidences. I was not old enough to understand
or appreciate what was happening in his life and character.
A young Forbes Burnham.
But I know now.
I have watched this brilliant brother use his brain to scheme, to plot, to put friend
against friend, neighbor against neighbor, and relative against relative. I have watched
him use this one and that one, and then quickly discard then when they have served their
purpose. I have watched him with his clever wit and charms manipulate people like
puppets on a string.
All this I have seen. But up to now, I must repeat, I HAVE BEEN SILENT. After
all, I told myself, he is my brother.
But I can be silent no longer.
3
For today, I fear for my country and my people should my brother become
PREMIER or PRIME MINISTER. It is from this fear, this concern that I speak.
BEWARE, I say, of “MY BROTHER FORBES.” His motto is, the personal ends
of power justify ANY means use do achieve them. His Bible is The Prince by
Machiavelli. And we the should he come to power will be only pawns in his endless
game of self-advancement.
Make no mistake about it, the attraction of political life for Forbes is the
attainment of power and glory. The number of times he had ignored the offer of a
coalition supports this. And I know from personal experience what I am talking about.
Jessie Burnham, the only sister of Forbes Burnham
It was not always so.
Forbes and I grew up in the family house at 4 Pike Street, Kitty. Our father was
the head-teacher at the Kitty Methodist School for 37 years as well as a member of the
Village Council and lay reader in the Methodist Church for about 51 years.
Our home life centered around my mother, whom Forbes adored. It was
frequently said, by old family members, that Forbes began to change when mother passed
away. But as I look back now, the signs of his selfishness and boastfulness now so
familiar a part of his personality, were evident long before.
He was small for his age. His schoolmates Central High School were so jealous of
his ability that they took to giving him daily whippings. Mother became concerned about
his health and he changed to Queen’s College (QC).
4
I vividly remembered one Sunday afternoon, when Forbes was shaving my father,
I heard them both talking about what he would be when he grew up. He told daddy he
had six goals:
1. To win the Percival Exhibition (at QC)
2. To win the Guiana Scholarship
3. To be Mayor of Georgetown
4. To become Chief Justice of British Guiana
5. To become the first Prime Minister of the West Indies Federation
6. To be the first Prime Minister of the West Indies
“Boy, you’re mad or what?” asked my father. “Be sensible. Start as a magistrate
and work up your way up to be Chief Justice.”
“Magistrate?” retorted Forbes scornfully. “There’re always exceptions and why
can’t I be one?”
This burning ambition, if channeled properly, could have made him one of our
country’s great Statesmen-leaders. It would have, had he coupled this ambition with a
genuine concern for the welfare and needs of the people, given him all he sought, in life.
But along with ambition, he developed certain slickness, a sly glibness. He began even as
a boy, to depend more and more on his skills with words to achieve his goals.
Today, he runs his Party like the way King Christopher once ran Haiti. While
terror is no stranger to our country, it has never been used to suppress FREEDOM, the
liberty of speech, worship and the press. Would these freedoms continue under my
brother? It is my concern in this area…personal individual freedom…that causes me to
say to my people, to Guyana, “BEWARE, MY BROTHER, FORBES. Watch carefully to
whom you hand your Government.”
Forbes Burnham and Dr. Cheddi Jagan
5
By the time he left this country to pursue his legal studies, my father had retired.
He had a pension of $22.00 per month, and so it was necessary, since Forbes was going
abroad, for me, the youngest, to become the breadwinner.
I became a teacher at the Plaisance Methodist School, and later at the Bedford
Methodist School. My salary was $20.00 a month to start. Eventually, I earned $120.00 a
month, but this was much later. Each month, I would give all my earnings to mother,
keeping out $10.00 for personal needs.
Every other month, the family would send $120.00 dollars to Forbes in England.
“Help out now,” mother told me, “and when Forbes comes home, he’ll make it up to
you.” It is perhaps, a basic indifference to others that my brother has never found
occasion to “help out” or, for that matter to even express his thanks for the sacrifices all if
us made to help him get his start. I don’t regret assisting him. I’d do it again. He is, after
all, my brother.
He was never very keen on my entering political life. When asked to assist me to
come to a decision his answer was in half-anger, “You have to make that decision
yourself.” But I wanted a part in helping my country receive its independence, so I
ignored his opposition.
On the Monday the week before the 1953 Elections, when my canvassers and I
were planning strategy, he walked into the sitting room.
“Are you all fooling Jessie?” he asked my associates. You know she can never
win the seat.”
Election year in 1964; troops in the city just outside the courts and parliament buildings.
6
When I won my seat, he came over and shook my hand in an elaborate mockgesture
of congratulations. When I visited his counting centre in Kitty, he actually kissed
me.
The issue of Party leadership came to the fore immediately after the election. It
has always been interesting to me that Forbes, alone among our key PPP leaders, did not
go to jail following the Suspension of the Constitution. Could it be I’ve frequently asked
myself, that when Governor Savage remarked that “certain Ministers have come to me,”
he might possibly have had in mind my brother? Could it have been his hope to shatter
the Party, bring down the Government in disgrace, and then perhaps, be around to pick up
the pieces? It is, one must admit, an intriguing question.
After the formal split in 1955, Forbes began visiting other countries on a fairly
regular schedule. What could have been the motive? Would he, the supposed nationalist,
become the victim of his pet phrase, “I will not sell my country for a mess of pottage?”
Forbes made his formal bid for power at the meeting of the Party’s General
Council immediately after the 1953 elections. Up to that point, he carefully masked any
ambitions to be leader. Then, to the astonishment of his colleagues, he demanded the post
of Legislative Leader as the price if his continued support.
“It’s Leader or nothing!” he angrily shouted.
When I heard him, I smiled. It was so typical of my brother. This was indeed the
moment of truth: leader or nothing. It was, perhaps then, for the first time, I became fully
aware of his “winner take all” attitude, his unending zest for the trappings of power, the
frightening egotisms of the man.
Eventually, in a move mediated by Aston Chase, Forbes Burnham backed down
and accepted the Ministry of Education. But things were never again quite the same.
That his love for personal power is so great he will trade anything to achieve it.
That nothing is safe, no person, no liberty…that stands in his way.
That is why I say, in all sincerity, “BEWARE, MY BROTHER FORBES.”
Behind that jest, that charm, that easy oratory is a certain dark strain of cruelty
which only surfaces when one if his vital interest sin threatened. There are two
Burnhams; the charming and the cruel. I saw BEWARE of both.
I do not want to see my country become a police state, where power-hungry man
can sacrifice our liberty for his personal gain. Many men are selfish. Many men are cruel.
Many men love power. The world can tolerate such men as individuals. But our beloved
country cannot tolerate such men as LEADERS.
I have said enough. I end with the hope that it is not too late for me, for my
friends, and most of all, for my GUYANA.
7
By speaking as I have, I risk much, even perhaps life itself. For we live in lawless
and dangerous times. But if what I have said can save our “world” from chaos, then any
risk is worth taking.
On December 7, when you mark your ballot box, remember carefully what I have
said and “BEWARE.”

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

dude, incoherent bleating is not argument

 

and, which part of Jessie Burnham's tract u need to hold up to the light for me to read, eh?

 

smfh

Well read the whole thing nah...here it is: . . .

i read it as a 2nd Former at QC when i was 12 years old . . . which part yuh waan me read again?

FM
Originally Posted by Mr.T:
Originally Posted by VVP:

I am not PPP bai; not under this current PPP regime!!  But what you said here happended under the Jagans and Hinds? Lie. And where were you living in Burnham days when kick-down-the-door banditry was the norm and Indians were the main victims.  Forbes told them "you know who gat the money go tek it."

I was right in the middle of all the troubles in Wismar when Burnham became PM.

Whatever Burnham said in the 60's pale into insignificance when compared to what Jagdeo has been saying, and what has caused him to have to attend court. Jagdeo proclaimed Apan Jaat, which means ethnic cleansing of the country.

"I was right in the middle of all the troubles in Wismar when Burnham became PM."

 

T, does this mean you were part of the cabal that were engaged in raping and burning Indians out of the area????

V
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

dude, incoherent bleating is not argument

 

and, which part of Jessie Burnham's tract u need to hold up to the light for me to read, eh?

 

smfh

Well read the whole thing nah...here it is: . . .

i read it as a 2nd Former at QC when i was 12 years old . . . which part yuh waan me read again?

De hole ting.

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

dude, incoherent bleating is not argument

 

and, which part of Jessie Burnham's tract u need to hold up to the light for me to read, eh?

 

smfh

Well read the whole thing nah...here it is: . . .

i read it as a 2nd Former at QC when i was 12 years old . . . which part yuh waan me read again?

De hole ting.

why?

 

i've read this inconsequential shyte bout a man dead 30 years more times than good sense required

 

better than half a century old, it seems to excite alyuh PPP antiman today more dan homan

 

smh

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by politikalamity:
Originally Posted by VVP:
  Unfortunately many Africans still see Burnham as god.

Unfortunate, myopic and insensitive statement. What is unfortunate about Afro Guyanese seeing the former President Burnham as a "god". What is wrong with them seeing one of their own as a protector of their rights in a country full of racial insecurity? What is so unforgivable about what Burnham did?

 

Indos cannot treat Cheddi Jagan as a god and expect Blacks to treat Forbes Burnham as a pariah when they both sought to protect the respective peoples at specific times in Guyanese history. 

 

 

My sentiments. And I hope Maduro is successful in the annexation, The major races WILL NEVER co-exist. With Essequibo gone, immigration is possible. Being aliens in the land of the Venoes. That leaves Demerara-always an Afro enclave, and Berbice, home to the Indoes.  

S

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×