Neil Adams
Replies sorted oldest to newest
So, let’s for discussion purposes say that The CCJ buys into that asinine reason that Charandass was an illegal occupant on December 21st hence his vote was null and void, then here is the real case scenario; then, the government has to go back and change all bills and decisions where charandass’ vote merited passage through the house. It means that all decisions in the house involving Charandass has to be revoked, thats the law. Seeing Courts cannot make retroactive rulings, hence the original high court ruling stands.
The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) has refused Attorney General (AG) Basil Williams’ request to introduce what he says is new evidence in the appeal dealing with the controversial passage of the December 21st no-confidence motion against government.
In an order issued to the attorneys involved in the case, by the Trinidad-based court of last resort for Guyana, it made it clear that the AG’s request had been refused. Though the court had completed hearing arguments almost a month prior, Williams last Thursday sought leave to have what he described as new evidence added.
He had been hoping to have introduced a purported admission by government defector Charrandass Persaud, who voted in favour of the opposition-sponsored motion, that he was aware that he was not eligible to be a Member of Parliament (MP) because of his dual citizenship…..
The CCJ should penalize the party that Charandas represented during the time that he was a Member of Parliament.
Dave posted:So, let’s for discussion purposes say that The CCJ buys into that asinine reason that Charandass was an illegal occupant on December 21st hence his vote was null and void, then here is the real case scenario; then, the government has to go back and change all bills and decisions where charandass’ vote merited passage through the house. It means that all decisions in the house involving Charandass has to be revoked, thats the law. Seeing Courts cannot make retroactive rulings, hence the original high court ruling stands.
trivial nonsense . . . there is no need to “rule” a “go back and change” for previous bills the ‘illegals’ voted on
the VERY GOOD reason being that Guyana has a List system where rogue MPs can LEGALLY be removed/replaced by the sponsoring Party . . . Charrandas’ ejection from Parliament by the AFC is THE case in point
naturally, the possibility for different results re previous votes are therefore exactly ZERO!
the governing principle
any Court worth the name would know that, and ignore stupidness from poor intellects like yours and the SIMPLETON letter writer in its deliberations
i have dealt with this elsewhere
try to keep up
Williams is a proven idiot.
Dave posted:So, let’s for discussion purposes say that The CCJ buys into that asinine reason that Charandass was an illegal occupant on December 21st hence his vote was null and void, then here is the real case scenario; then, the government has to go back and change all bills and decisions where charandass’ vote merited passage through the house. It means that all decisions in the house involving Charandass has to be revoked, thats the law. Seeing Courts cannot make retroactive rulings, hence the original high court ruling stands.
[addressing pitiful derail attempt by Ksazma . . . smh]
trivial nonsense . . . there is no need to “rule” a “go back and change” for previous bills the ‘illegals’ voted on
the VERY GOOD reason being that Guyana has a List system where rogue MPs can LEGALLY be removed/replaced by the sponsoring Party . . . Charrandas’ ejection from Parliament by the AFC is THE case in point
naturally, the possibility for different results re previous votes are therefore exactly ZERO!
the governing principle
any Court worth the name would know that, and ignore stupidness from poor intellects like yours and the SIMPLETON letter writer in its deliberations
i have dealt with this elsewhere
try to keep up
Dave posted:Letter: The purported Charandass’ confession
Here is where the doctrine of clean hands come into play, you cannot now feign ignorance of the law when Charandass was a legal entity all along what suddenly makes him illegal on December 21st? For over three plus years he voted for bills and other major matters, which were legally passed in the house by his one vote then why is is his vote shunned and disregarded now?Neil Adams
If Charandass vote on December 21, 2018 in not acceptable; the votes cast by all of the other MPs with dual citizenship are also not valid.
Demerara_Guy posted:If Charandass vote on December 21, 2018 in not acceptable; the votes cast by all of the other MPs with dual citizenship are also not valid.
[re]read my previous post slowly, pause lil and let it sink in
if you still having difficulty, then this matter is obviously above your pay grade
call a friend
ronan posted:Demerara_Guy posted:If Charandass vote on December 21, 2018 in not acceptable; the votes cast by all of the other MPs with dual citizenship are also not valid.
[re]read my previous post slowly, pause lil and let it sink in
if you still having difficulty, then this matter is obviously above your pay grade
call a friend
Profoundly expressing your lack of comprehend on issues and relevance.
Demerara_Guy posted:ronan posted:Demerara_Guy posted:If Charandass vote on December 21, 2018 in not acceptable; the votes cast by all of the other MPs with dual citizenship are also not valid.
[re]read my previous post slowly, pause lil and let it sink in
if you still having difficulty, then this matter is obviously above your pay grade
call a friend
Profoundly expressing your lack of comprehend on issues and relevance.
ahmmmm, sir ‘scholar’. . . ok
smh
Access to this requires a premium membership.