That is what you take away from all of that? Well, I can not be responsible for the fact that the majority of individuals populating our world is steeped in mediocrity and you happen to be in that crowd.

I should expect if you are a bigot lying would also come easy to you.

And since he is not a bigot he is telling the truth.

logic is not your forte. Rely on common sense  in the absence of a formal introduction into the subject

But you have just committed a fallacy.

all logical fallacies have names. Please identify the one  I used and the argument in which it occurs. You are simply digging a deeper hole for yourself. 

It's called a fallacy of composition. You are not that smart. 

That would be the case if indeed I were to deduce some conclusion that involves me speaking of components of a thing and inferring the nature of the thing. The above does not remotely accrue to a fallacy of composition.

The man is a racist. He lied.  These are two instances of truths arising independent of each other. My suggestion that they are a family of behavior has little to do with their existence as representing verifiable facts.

He is a racist on his own account because he did what racist do. He said   that black people do not measure up and went into long excursions of thought detailing why. I did not invent that. His posts to that effect are probably still on the site.

Secondly, he told a brazen lie. I never believed the PPP when they said they did not constitute an extrajudicial phantom force. I saw the buxton uprising as a confederation of thieves seeking opportunistically  to prey on their neighbors. My posts here were mainly around the moral authority of the PPP to quell the uprising. That is verifiable independent of me by others here since I do not believe all are characteristic liars as he is. Plus, I have some of the posts.

Those are the known facts.  I related the two to a mental state on account that bigots are given to conclusions with no grounding in facts. That is why they are termed prejudicial. It is therefore  not uncharacteristic for him to say I did something I did not. It is simply a manner in which he is habitually loose with facts.

And yes you are a dunce.

ahmmmm . . . who again are the interlocutors in this 'raging debate' on the relative "effective[ness]" of PPP/PNC bottom house appeals?

. . . shadow boxing or punch drunk?

Like you been out drinking last night or wah? Go chill out lil bit and then figure it out yourself.

What year was this and where were you? Let's assume that your lies are correct, then why did the people of Linden consistently voted for the PNC and Forbes Burnham. Are they stupid or are you stupid? Did you or Lindeners write to the UN about it? Did you or Lindeners call for a Commission of Inquiry? Did you or Lindeners block off access to the interior? Did you not think that Burnham owned Lindeners, and that is why he named Linden after his first name?

Well at least you know now that I am not a racist. Amen!

I'd appreciate it if you'd mek up yuh mind . . . is da wan or dis wan:

"Like you been out drinking last night or wah? Go chill out lil bit and then figure it out yourself"

I am the teacher you are the student. You committed a fallacy of composition. It is for you to figure it out. I am not here to indulge you in silly nonsense. You do not have a reputation of being an honest poster here.  

That year was 1981 or there abouts.

If you really think that every one who Burnham said voted actually voted I feel sorry for you.  Objective observers noted that turnout in G/twn was around 10-15% in the election in 1973 and referendum in 1978.  I feel confident that Linden it was no better, especially after Burnham shot them and tried to starve them by getting soldiers to block food shipments to Linden.

So when you pretend that the Burnham had enthusiastic support from blacks after 1973 you lie.  Why did Burnham have to force civil servants to go to the National Park and take attendance to ascertain who wasnt there if he was liked?  You do know that AfroGuyanese like a show so if he had to do that to guarantee a crowd it must have been really bad.

This post from a man who claims objectivity. No evidence has been furnished that the crowds were pekting the police.  Only GINA made this claim.  Yet he swallows that lie. 

The videos all showed that the police told the crowds to disperse.  They refused to so thye police shot them....killed 3 and injured several more.

Reminds me of Syria and Egypt under Mubarack.