Bill passed to allow Local Gov’t Elections by August
THE National Assembly, after rigorous debate over the importance of local government elections to the democracy, last evening passed the Local Authorities (Elections) (Amendment) Bill 2013, which states that elections must be held on or before August 1, 2014.
The Bill’s passage was pushed by the Opposition, which used its one-seat majority to its advantage, even as government MPs argued in a favour of the date being on or before December 1, 2014.
The August date was made via an amendment to the Bill, proposed by A Partnership for National Unity, while the House was in Committee.
USURPED AUTHORITY
Minister of Local Government and Regional Development, Norman Whittaker, who opened the debate, stressed that the authority to call local government election is reposed with the subject minister and the amendment reflects a move to usurp this authority.
He stressed the need for the December date, particularly since much preparatory works are still to be completed.
He added that there has been much progress in the efforts to ensure readiness to host the elections.
According to the minister, there has been capacity building at the level of the local government organs across the country, improving revenue collection, expenditure controls, as well as improved delivery of services.
“We view these as vital organs of local democratic power,” he said.
Whittaker pointed out that local government reform is not only related to legislative advances, but advances in improving governance – a process that has seen “tremendous strides” to date.
He stated too that legislative reform must be viewed as a continuous process.
“The PPP/C has not been dormant, we have been active…the government, through the ministry has been taking a menu of measures,” the minister said.
He also made clear the government’s intention to have local government elections called.
“The PPP/C has nothing to gain by delaying local government elections,” Whittaker said.
Additionally, the minister highlighted the fact that the preparatory process must be allowed to be completed to allow for free and fair elections.
He pointed out that all the variables involved in the ensuring the hosting of local government elections are not in the control of the government.
BAPTISM BY FIRE
Ronald Bulkan, who as of last night became an APNU front-bencher, was subjected to a ‘baptism by fire’ of sorts as he made his contribution to the Bill, which was subject to much heckling.
Whittaker contended that it would be a “bad investment” to have elections without the completion of the preparatory works, which include public awareness to ensure there is participation in the process.
“The Opposition says we are ready, but this is not about the readiness of the Opposition …the function of so many variables must be taken into account,” the minister said.
Whittaker also charged that the Opposition’s position on the matter at hand impedes progress, a point Bulkan stressed his disagreement with.
The APNU MP questioned the reasons for the delay, a statement that attracted a heckle from the government side, “your paranoia showing comrade.”
He added that five months have passed since the House passed four bills to facilitate the hosting of local government elections, three of which were assented to by the President.
Whittaker shot this down and made it clear that the one bill that was not assented to does not prevent the hosting of local government elections.
The three local government bills assented to on November 6 are the Fiscal Transfers Bill 2012, Municipal and District Councils (Amendment) Bill and the Local Government Commission Bill.
The fourth piece of legislation, the Local Government (Amendment) Bill, seeks to vest control of local authorities in the Local Government Commission.
Attorney General (AG), Anil Nandlall, in his contribution maintained that the Bill is a simple one.
He noted that the government does not dispute the importance of democracy and democratic processes.
To this end, he stressed the need for free and fair elections, given the facts that mar Guyana’s history as it relates to elections results being held in question.
“If we are to debate here we must accept the facts, not have newcomers to mislead record of the House,” Nandlall said.
Written By Vanessa Narine