Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Local Government (Amendment) Bill unconstitutional – President Ramotar

Vanessa Narine, Tuesday, 12 November 2013, Source

 

QUESTIONS over why President Donald Ramotar assented to only three of the four local government bills passed in the National Assembly on August 7 were put to rest on Friday last, when the Head of State, at a press briefing at Office of the President, maintained that the fourth bill is “unconstitutional”, as it seeks to remove ministerial control over local authorities.

 

President Donald Ramotar

President Donald Ramotar

 

The three local government bills assented to on November 6 are the Fiscal Transfers Bill 2012, Municipal and District Councils (Amendment) Bill, and the Local Government Commission Bill.


The fourth piece of legislation, the Local Government (Amendment) Bill, seeks to vest control of local authorities in the Local Government Commission.


President Ramotar added that the Local Government (Amendment) Bill contains changes that were contrary to agreements made with his Administration by the main Opposition during a series of meetings. He said: “Before this Parliament (the 10th Parliament) came into existence, we had an agreement with the PNC; we had a full agreement with the Opposition, the PNC then.


“In this Parliament, they have decided to change it (agreement). Not only have they changed it, which in my view is unprincipled, but they have also made it unconstitutional. They have tried to take the authority of the minister and invest it into a commission. That goes against the Constitution, that’s why I didn’t assent to it.”


Local government elections have not been held in Guyana since 1994. Prior to that, local government elections were last held in 1970. Subsequent to 1994, the elections could not be conducted because they had coincided with the general and regional elections of 1997.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Local government elections have not been held in Guyana since 1994.

 

Prior to that, local government elections were last held in 1970.

Of note.

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:

They took three months to realize that the bill is unconstitutional? 

Shows the complacency of the PPP cabal in their debate in Parliament. They supported and voted for it.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Local Government (Amendment) Bill unconstitutional – President Ramotar

Vanessa Narine, Tuesday, 12 November 2013, Source

 

QUESTIONS over why President Donald Ramotar assented to only three of the four local government bills passed in the National Assembly on August 7 were put to rest on Friday last, when the Head of State, at a press briefing at Office of the President, maintained that the fourth bill is “unconstitutional”, as it seeks to remove ministerial control over local authorities.

 

President Donald Ramotar

President Donald Ramotar

 

The three local government bills assented to on November 6 are the Fiscal Transfers Bill 2012, Municipal and District Councils (Amendment) Bill, and the Local Government Commission Bill.


The fourth piece of legislation, the Local Government (Amendment) Bill, seeks to vest control of local authorities in the Local Government Commission.


President Ramotar added that the Local Government (Amendment) Bill contains changes that were contrary to agreements made with his Administration by the main Opposition during a series of meetings. He said: “Before this Parliament (the 10th Parliament) came into existence, we had an agreement with the PNC; we had a full agreement with the Opposition, the PNC then.


“In this Parliament, they have decided to change it (agreement). Not only have they changed it, which in my view is unprincipled, but they have also made it unconstitutional. They have tried to take the authority of the minister and invest it into a commission. That goes against the Constitution, that’s why I didn’t assent to it.”


Local government elections have not been held in Guyana since 1994. Prior to that, local government elections were last held in 1970. Subsequent to 1994, the elections could not be conducted because they had coincided with the general and regional elections of 1997.

Once again the PPP hides behind the dictatorial constitution. Devolution strengthens democracy not stifle it.

FM
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Once again the PPP hides behind the dictatorial constitution.

Again, it requires, at least sixty-six percent of the elected members of parliament to make the needed changes to the constitution.

 

For practical purposes, the PPP/C has fifty percent.

 

When has the PNC cum AFC shown any tangible proposals to amend the constitution?

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Once again the PPP hides behind the dictatorial constitution.

Again, it requires, at least sixty-six percent of the elected members of parliament to make the needed changes to the constitution.

 

For practical purposes, the PPP/C has fifty percent.

 

When has the PNC cum AFC shown any tangible proposals to amend the constitution?

 

Tell it to the dunce D2/Storm/Dan_whatever. He has no brains. Multiple personality anyone ?

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Once again the PPP hides behind the dictatorial constitution.

Again, it requires, at least sixty-six percent of the elected members of parliament to make the needed changes to the constitution.

 

For practical purposes, the PPP/C has fifty percent.

 

When has the PNC cum AFC shown any tangible proposals to amend the constitution?

 

Tell it to the dunce D2/Storm/Dan_whatever. He has no brains. Multiple personality anyone ?

Go suck a rotten egg.

FM
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Once again the PPP hides behind the dictatorial constitution.

Again, it requires, at least sixty-six percent of the elected members of parliament to make the needed changes to the constitution.

 

For practical purposes, the PPP/C has fifty percent.

 

When has the PNC cum AFC shown any tangible proposals to amend the constitution?

 

Tell it to the dunce D2/Storm/Dan_whatever. He has no brains. Multiple personality anyone ?

Go suck a rotten egg.

JB, that Jack Ass, Yugli22, marched on Parliament Hill in the middle of winter against the very Burnham dictatorial Constitution which the PPP now espouse and hide behind.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Once again the PPP hides behind the dictatorial constitution.

Again, it requires, at least sixty-six percent of the elected members of parliament to make the needed changes to the constitution.

 

For practical purposes, the PPP/C has fifty percent.

 

When has the PNC cum AFC shown any tangible proposals to amend the constitution?

 

Tell it to the dunce D2/Storm/Dan_whatever. He has no brains. Multiple personality anyone ?

Go suck a rotten egg.

JB, that Jack Ass, Yugli22, marched on Parliament Hill in the middle of winter against the very Burnham dictatorial Constitution which the PPP now espouse and hide behind.

I support APNU because they want want the 4th bill that give local authority autonomy over the Minsiter. APNU has a good position here. 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×